Trains.com

CNW Commuter Questions

28524 views
97 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 10:03 AM

B&M and CNJ also had GP7's similarly equipped for their suburban operations.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 10:14 AM

schlimm

The Butler

From the picture links provided by "schlimm," it looks like one of the 60' cars to me.  This photograph was taken in 1961.  I would guess that the 60' car had been converted to HEP.

Harvey, it claims that GP9 #1712 was one of a group of five units (1711-1715) delivered in 1954 with steam generators.  It then goes on to say, "The auxiliary generating equipment for Suburban service was housed in an extra squared-off enclosure on the rear platform.



1. No.  The CNW bought the 2nd order to completely retire all the old 60' and 80' cars in the late 50's.  The old 60's and 80's were never converted to HEP.

2. As Harvey said, the squared off box at the end of the long hood housed a generator (for lighting and AC on gallery cars).

 

I said the generator was in short hood; but it was in fact the long hood (What was I thinking!). The trainline power may have been 64-v, not 32-v; but I have no definitive reference.

Actually, the push-pull HEP galleries from Pullman would have been at least the third order.  The commuter cars may have been conditional on the acceptance of the "400 Bi-Levels."  Two separate purchases for steam-heated galleries were made from St.Louis and Pullman. 

The single level cars were running as late as 1962 while the earlier steam-heated galleries were being converted to HEP.  I rode the 5:06 express to Des Plaines which at the time had 80-footers pulled by an E-7.  Newer geeps had been reassigned to freight service; and passenger units were available from the many discontinuances including the "Twin Cities 400" and "Northwestern Limited."

Speaking of push-pull, I think I posted before witnessing an afternoon turn with single-level cars from Elmhurst, seemingly at track speed, through Maywood in the late 50's.  The lead 80-footer had a window and wiper in the car end; and control was by air signals to the pushing diesel.  An air whistle was attached to the brake hose.  This may have been a practice with steam power as well.

Harvey

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 11:39 AM

HarveyK400
Actually, the push-pull HEP galleries from Pullman would have been at least the third order.

 

Harvey, you are quite correct and the 60's and 80's were running maybe even into 1963.  There was a real hodge podge of motive power for commuter service: the usual GP 7's and 9's, but also some RS 3's and SD 7's or 9's.  And who could forget the one-of-a-kind Baldwin unit with a baggage section that ran out on the Galena division to West Chicago and then out on the original G&CU line to Freeport?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 11:43 AM

HarveyK400
Speaking of push-pull, I think I posted before witnessing an afternoon turn with single-level cars from Elmhurst, seemingly at track speed, through Maywood in the late 50's.  The lead 80-footer had a window and wiper in the car end; and control was by air signals to the pushing diesel.  An air whistle was attached to the brake hose.  This may have been a practice with steam power as well.

 

I think that was a dead-head run from West Chicago.  I have a dim memory of an E class Pacific doing that about 1954.  I was pretty little, but it seemed weird at the time and I wondered why it ran through the Wheaton station!

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 2:22 PM

I don't recall RS-3, or Baldwins in suburban service other than as EMD rebuilds.  You forgot a couple of my favorite Baby TM's used on the Wisconsin Div.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 2:30 PM

Maybe there was a West Chicago turn too; but I saw the Elmhurst turn in the late 50's that continues with little change today, notwithstanding the push-pull galleries and F-40's.

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Southeast Missouri
  • 573 posts
Posted by The Butler on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 8:17 PM

Thanks, folks!  So, am I right in surmising that this photo, taken in 1961, (I wish I could find a link to it!) shows five steam gallery cars because of the 60' car on the rear of the train?

James


  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 9:38 PM

 Yes.  I think I've seen that photo also.  I also wish i could load a pic I have on my computer of that Baldwin passenger 1000hp diesel in Freeport.  Not technically a commuter scoot; actually a branchline train with 2-3 60' cars in tow.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Wednesday, January 6, 2010 12:44 AM

The Butler

Thanks, folks!  So, am I right in surmising that this photo, taken in 1961, (I wish I could find a link to it!) shows five steam gallery cars because of the 60' car on the rear of the train?

 

You're right; but the 60' car was just one clue - the other being the geep.  No C&NW geeps were fitted for HEP and push-pull service.

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Southeast Missouri
  • 573 posts
Posted by The Butler on Wednesday, January 6, 2010 9:54 AM

HarveyK400

The Butler

Thanks, folks!  So, am I right in surmising that this photo, taken in 1961, (I wish I could find a link to it!) shows five steam gallery cars because of the 60' car on the rear of the train?

 

You're right; but the 60' car was just one clue - the other being the geep.  No C&NW geeps were fitted for HEP and push-pull service.

Confused Wait, the blurb said, "The auxiliary generating equipment for Suburban service was housed in an extra squared-off enclosure on the rear platform."  Is this not HEP?  Or do you mean, HEP and push-pull service, one not the other and not both?

James


  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, January 6, 2010 10:18 AM

The auxiliary generator on GP's on B&M, CNJ and C&NW was strictly to provide power for lighting on suburban coaches since the coaches did not have their own generator/battery sets.  A steam generator was still needed to provide heat.  CNJ steam locomotives in the suburban pool also had similar auxiliary generators.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Southeast Missouri
  • 573 posts
Posted by The Butler on Wednesday, January 6, 2010 11:07 AM

Thumbs Up Smile Thanks!

James


  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Wednesday, January 6, 2010 11:41 AM

In the broadest sense, the auxilliary generating equipment is HEP; but it was low-voltage, low-wattage DC only for train lighting.  The push-pull HEP, in the commonly understood sense, was 375kW (F-7) or 500kW (E-8 & F-40), 440-V AC for train lighting, door and now lift operation, HVAC including radiant heat coils in the floor, battery charging, and other electronics.

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Southeast Missouri
  • 573 posts
Posted by The Butler on Wednesday, January 6, 2010 11:54 AM

Thanks, that explains how it fits on the rear platform of the Geep.  What is with the red light above the headlights on said GP9?

James


  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Wednesday, January 6, 2010 12:03 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH

The auxiliary generator on GP's on B&M, CNJ and C&NW was strictly to provide power for lighting on suburban coaches since the coaches did not have their own generator/battery sets.  A steam generator was still needed to provide heat.  CNJ steam locomotives in the suburban pool also had similar auxiliary generators.

 

Steam locomotives in passenger service used steam turbo-generators, often mounted on the fireman's side over the firebox.  In some cases, a separate high-capacity steam generator for train heat would put in a head-end car, such as a dormitory or baggage car to avoid sapping tractive power, and to free up locomotive assignment. 

Early UP Streamliners may have used a diesel generator set in a head-end car, such as a dormitory or baggage car.  Most long-distance passenger equipment had individual gen-sets under the floor such as the propane-fueled Waukesha "Enginator."

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: US
  • 733 posts
Posted by Bob-Fryml on Sunday, January 17, 2010 5:46 PM

For a few winters after the 1968 merger with the Chicago Great Western, the first morning commuter train out of Williams Bay / Lake Geneva, Wisc. ran with an A+B F-unit set coupled to the east end of the train.  The idea here was to have the heavier weight locomotives bust through snowdrifts and impacted road crossing flangeways rather than have a cab car do it.  The B-unit was painted passenger colors, but it retained a "CGW" reporting mark. 

As to whether or not the B-unit had an auxiliary generator to supply the coaches with electric power, that I don't know.  But what I used to call the first section of "The Lake Geneva 400" - that was the only C.& N.W. suburban train of that era that I ever saw which ran with 2-units.

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, January 17, 2010 8:23 PM

The Butler
What is with the red light above the headlights on said GP9?

 

A fairly short-lived emergency signal light the CNW liked.  IIRC, some of the E-type Pacifics sported them also near the end of steam.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Sunday, January 17, 2010 9:48 PM

schlimm

The Butler
What is with the red light above the headlights on said GP9?

 

A fairly short-lived emergency signal light the CNW liked.  IIRC, some of the E-type Pacifics sported them also near the end of steam.

Short-lived?  The red signal light was installed on most early earlier steam, E's, J's & H's, as well as early diesels.  The exception seemed to be diesel passenger units with a white (Mars) signal light.  Correct me if I'm wrong; but it seems that the GP30's were the first freight units that didn't have the red signal light.  That would make it about three decades.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, January 18, 2010 12:52 PM

Harvey:  I stand corrected.  I was just looking through Vols.1 and 2 of the CNW in Color (these are great reference books, BTW).  The passenger E units had a Mars light that was normally white, but flipped around 180 degrees in an emergency stop to display the red part. Steam engines had the red-only unit mounted on top of the smokebox, but not steamers were equipped.  Road switchers were inconsistent also, some have a red-only light on each end, some the light mounted on top of the hood, some without.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Southeast Missouri
  • 573 posts
Posted by The Butler on Monday, January 18, 2010 8:50 PM

Thanks, folks.  So it is a brake light (an emergency brake light), why would it be on the front?  It doesn't seem to have been used in the push/pull service, right?

James


  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 8:31 AM

The C&NW Pullman push-pull gallery cars had a single red light (lens) under the twin beam headlight.  I never saw one in use.  A slide of mine shows the first order of CMStP&P Budd gallery cars with a similar red light trained with a Hiawatha coach and F9A while the subsequent MTD order did not.  My photos also show Metra M-K, Amerail, and N-S cab control cars have third light with a clear lens under the twin beam headlight; but the light seems to "float" in a way that suggests it gyrates and may have a movable red lens.

The reason the red light is on the front of a cab car is that it is at the rear of the train outbound.

The Butler

Thanks, folks.  So it is a brake light (an emergency brake light), why would it be on the front?  It doesn't seem to have been used in the push/pull service, right?

 
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 1:04 PM

The Butler

Thanks, folks.  So it is a brake light (an emergency brake light), why would it be on the front?  It doesn't seem to have been used in the push/pull service, right?

 

Both the reversible white/red Mars lights (named for the owner of the Mars company that made the candy bar of the same name - he allowed the prototype to be machined in the candy plant and financed its manufacture) and the fixed red lights on steam and diesel, preceded push-pull by many years.  It was on the front to signal an emergency braking.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Southeast Missouri
  • 573 posts
Posted by The Butler on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 11:02 PM

HarveyK400

snip...

The reason the red light is on the front of a cab car is that it is at the rear of the train outbound.

...snip

I do not recall seeing the red light lit on the rear of a C&NW commuter train.  I remember the flashing yellow light atop cab cars and engines, though.

James


  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Southeast Missouri
  • 573 posts
Posted by The Butler on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 11:12 PM

schlimm

Both the reversible white/red Mars lights (named for the owner of the Mars company that made the candy bar of the same name - he allowed the prototype to be machined in the candy plant and financed its manufacture) and the fixed red lights on steam and diesel, preceded push-pull by many years.  It was on the front to signal an emergency braking.

I am sorry, I still do not understand, why on the front

James


  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:46 AM

I didn't see the red light lit on push-pulls either; but in the 1950's I saw oscillating red Mars lights on the rear of both suburbans (occasionally) and 400's.  Rules and use must have changed along the way.

The Butler
I do not recall seeing the red light lit on the rear of a C&NW commuter train.  I remember the flashing yellow light atop cab cars and engines, though.

 
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:30 PM

 In days gone by, E (1)614 on an Illini rail Club Special in 1956

 

E2B 2912 rescuing dead diesels in 1952.

 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:07 PM

Very nice photos - both locomotives have the red Mars light.  BTW, the 1st diesel (in bottom photo) looks like an FM Erie-built.  Train could be the Peninsula 400 sb at Racine.

schlimm

 In days gone by, E (1)614 on an Illini rail Club Special in 1956

  

E2B 2912 rescuing dead diesels in 1952.

 

 
  • Member since
    August 2008
  • 73 posts
Posted by clarkfork on Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:19 PM
schlimm:

 

Both the reversible white/red Mars lights (named for the owner of the Mars company that made the candy bar of the same name - he allowed the prototype to be machined in the candy plant and financed its manufacture) and the fixed red lights on steam and diesel, preceded push-pull by many years.  It was on the front to signal an emergency braking.

I am sorry, I still do not understand, why on the front

James
 
This is hard to explain but I will give it a try.  Most major derailments create a mess spread out 30 to 50 feet out from the track.  On single track this does not create any special problems, other than the problems of clearing the wreckage itself.  However on double track this derailment wreckage does create an additional hazard, and that is that another train from the opposite direction could approach at speed and collide with the mess of derailed cars and cause a second derailment, not to mention what amounts to a head on collision for the crew of the second train.  The red "mars" light was meant to give instant warning to the crew of the approaching second train that the first train on the adjacent track had gone into emergency braking, which could have been caused be a derailment blocking both tracks (as well as other things.)  Seeing the red "mars" the crew of the second approaching train would stop as fast as they could to avoid colliding with any derailed cars obstructing their track.  These two train derailments don't happen very often, but when they do, they can be serious.  Some years ago in Selby, UK, a driver of a Land Rover lost control at an overpass and ended up on the East Coast Main Line.  As luck would have it a high speed passenger train collided with the truck and derailed blocking the adjacent track just as a freight train approached and derailed when it collided with what was left of the passenger train. Ten people lost their lives.  Going into emergency on double track is always an emergency and a fast response on the part of the train crew is essential.  This situation is one of few instances where Rule 99 flagging is still required.  The train crew should also send an emergency radio message to warn all approaching trains and ask the dispatcher to block traffic on adjacent tracks. 
  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Southeast Missouri
  • 573 posts
Posted by The Butler on Thursday, January 21, 2010 6:58 PM
"clarkfork," that makes sense to me.  For years, I have wondered why the red lights on the front of locomotives (not just C&NW).  Your answer is the most reasonable explanation I have heard.  Thank you for taking the time.

James


  • Member since
    August 2008
  • 73 posts
Posted by clarkfork on Thursday, January 21, 2010 10:36 PM

You are most welcome.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy