CNW 6000 wrote:These are bad:http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=31870 This is the worst!http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=42703 These are the best!http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=8391
These are bad:http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=31870
This is the worst!http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=42703
These are the best!http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=8391
not a fan of the star spangled snoot, eh?
i hear ya on the patches
and the C44-9Ws looked better in fresh paint indeed...cept the unit behind it dominates!
Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.
CNW 6000 wrote: These are bad:http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=31870 This is the worst!http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=42703 These are the best!http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=8391
This a dead locomotive!
http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=62500
Dan
chefjavier wrote: nanaimo73 wrote: Lord Atmo, do you like this one-http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=894890 Dale:It's this a SDP40F/F40C I guest they got the idea from this picture.
nanaimo73 wrote: Lord Atmo, do you like this one-http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=894890
Lord Atmo, do you like this one-
http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=894890
Dale:
It's this a SDP40F/F40C I guest they got the idea from this picture.
Those are E9B units that have had a cab hacked on to turn them into A units.
i'd rather see a crandall cab than a crash 9. that's for sure
chefjavier wrote: Let's cast your votes for the ugliest locomotives for 2007..1. http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=139608&skip=-1 Chefjavier 2. http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=149862 Boomer Red 3. http://www.mountainrailway.com/Roster%20Archive/CP%205400/St.L&H%205447.htm4. http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=177591TheDerailedtrain5. http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=53260 Boomer RedII6. http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=157557&nseq=1 Naimano737. http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=580260 Nainamo73 I also forgot to input the photo pictures but they are also are part of the votes.
Let's cast your votes for the ugliest locomotives for 2007..
1. http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=139608&skip=-1 Chefjavier
2. http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=149862 Boomer Red
3. http://www.mountainrailway.com/Roster%20Archive/CP%205400/St.L&H%205447.htm
4. http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=177591TheDerailedtrain
5. http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=53260 Boomer RedII
6. http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=157557&nseq=1 Naimano73
7. http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=580260 Nainamo73
I also forgot to input the photo pictures but they are also are part of the votes.
HEY where are MY submissions?
I'm pretty sure that this is one of the RS3's that Penn Central and later Conrail repowered with a EMD engine. The edges of the hood are too round for an RS1 and thecowl on top of long hood was to clear the taller GM powerplant. Here's one that is pretty ugly too but appears to be a match!
http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=580260
I've read that crews hated these units and as a result most were sold off or scrapped by the early eighties!
chefjavier wrote: TheDerailedtrain wrote: check out this turd!http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=978745It looks like a old Alco RS-1.. not bad at all..
TheDerailedtrain wrote: check out this turd!http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=978745
check out this turd!
http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=978745
It looks like a old Alco RS-1.. not bad at all..
TheDerailedtrain wrote: heck out this turd!http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=978745
heck out this turd!
ArtOfRuin wrote: Lord Atmo wrote: chefjavier wrote:http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=139608&skip=-1 Can anyone beat that ugly boat...i canhttp://lord_atmo.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=467938ewwwww This might be , but Lord Atmo, I remember your old signature saying something to the effect of, "I'm a CNW fan who hates the duo." Would the crash 9 be "the duo," or is it something else?
Lord Atmo wrote: chefjavier wrote:http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=139608&skip=-1 Can anyone beat that ugly boat...i canhttp://lord_atmo.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=467938ewwwww
chefjavier wrote:http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=139608&skip=-1 Can anyone beat that ugly boat...
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=139608&skip=-1
Can anyone beat that ugly boat...
i can
http://lord_atmo.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=467938
ewwwww
This might be , but Lord Atmo, I remember your old signature saying something to the effect of, "I'm a CNW fan who hates the duo." Would the crash 9 be "the duo," or is it something else?
marcimmeker wrote: trolleyboy wrote: Oh I don't know but these two don't win many beauty contests either.Ugliness is in the eye of the beholder!The TEE cars are now in the Netherlands and are slowly being restored. One cab end has been repainted in original TEE colors: red and cream.greetings,Marc Immeker
trolleyboy wrote: Oh I don't know but these two don't win many beauty contests either.
Oh I don't know but these two don't win many beauty contests either.
Ugliness is in the eye of the beholder!
The TEE cars are now in the Netherlands and are slowly being restored. One cab end has been repainted in original TEE colors: red and cream.
greetings,
Marc Immeker
This poor set is still in North Bay Ontario as a waterfront display piece along with a CP caboose and a railroad consolidation.Even through the graphiti and a couple fires, they intend to at least cosmetically restore them. I took this picture when I was up in North Bay this past summer.
Rob
spokyone wrote: Ding Ding Ding! I think we have a winner.http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=157557&nseq=1
Ding Ding Ding! I think we have a winner.http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=157557&nseq=1
I think is on the top 3's. Hopefully, by next week we would get a vote on the pictures.
I remember back in the 80s MR had one of those on the cover in I think Seaboard colors with an article on how to kitbash one.
It begs the question why you would want to kitbash one.
WARNING: WAIT 30 MINUTES AFTER EATING TO VIEW PHOTO.
i did some searching for and here it is: GE's BQ23-7
and CSX paint schemes didn't help it one bit.
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=157557&nseq=1
EMD'S BL2'S
CHUCK
chefjavier wrote: Murphy To tell you the true not even the blue color will give it is place. It's ugly as sin.
Murphy
To tell you the true not even the blue color will give it is place. It's ugly as sin.
Now, FM Erie builts, and ALCO DL109's, those were not as attractive. In my opinion, the early, boxy U-boats had a look only a mother could love.
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
Bucyrus wrote: The worst looking steam locomotives are 4-4-0s that were built with short smokeboxes and later had them extended.
The worst looking steam locomotives are 4-4-0s that were built with short smokeboxes and later had them extended.
Not quite. Painting the frame and wheels of your steam locomotive red (the Germans did/do!), now, that is ugly!
Fresh out of the Borracho RR workshops, looks like new
Have fun with your trains
chefjavier wrote: Murphy Siding wrote: chefjavier wrote: Murphy Siding wrote: cprted wrote:I always found the C-Liners to be ugly ducklings. I thought they looked rather elegant, in the right paint schemes.That's ugly as sin! Not even a color would change the shark looking style.Close your eyes, and picture it in ConRail blue. I could see it Blue....and Conrail Diagram.
Murphy Siding wrote: chefjavier wrote: Murphy Siding wrote: cprted wrote:I always found the C-Liners to be ugly ducklings. I thought they looked rather elegant, in the right paint schemes.That's ugly as sin! Not even a color would change the shark looking style.Close your eyes, and picture it in ConRail blue.
chefjavier wrote: Murphy Siding wrote: cprted wrote:I always found the C-Liners to be ugly ducklings. I thought they looked rather elegant, in the right paint schemes.That's ugly as sin! Not even a color would change the shark looking style.
Murphy Siding wrote: cprted wrote:I always found the C-Liners to be ugly ducklings. I thought they looked rather elegant, in the right paint schemes.
cprted wrote:I always found the C-Liners to be ugly ducklings.
That's ugly as sin! Not even a color would change the shark looking style.
I could see it Blue....and Conrail Diagram.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.