Trains.com

Ok, who hates the new electronic bells!!!!!

18306 views
71 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Tuesday, August 14, 2007 2:31 PM

Of course.  Besides, I know most shortline owners would go nuts before they put an e-dinger on some old alco.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Tuesday, August 14, 2007 2:01 PM
but wouldnt they wait for the older bell to break before they replace it? they arent filthy rich like class 1s and i would think they would milk everything for everything it's worth before replacing it. saves money

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Tuesday, August 14, 2007 1:27 PM
Shortlines can do the preventative maintenance to their bells.  Kind of hard for roads with thousands of engines - it is just easier to put the e-dinger on.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Tuesday, August 14, 2007 1:30 AM

well sure some will have E-bells. but i think they'll take longer to replace the mechanical bells because those smaller roads dont have so much money to fork out. so i bet they'll keep the mech bells up till they break. then they should replace them

and you're right. as far as i know. all mechanical bells are discontinued. but then again, so are GP7s etc and you still see them work on the smaller roads. so dont count the mechanical bells out just yet on shortlines 

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Monday, August 13, 2007 11:03 PM

I'm sure there's plenty of regionals and shortlines with electronic crossing bells. Does anyone even make the mechanial bells anymore?  If they still do - I wouldn't count on it being made much longer.

As far as locomotives - many shortlines don't abuse their power like class-1s.  Therefore, the bells are not as big as a problem.  

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Monday, August 13, 2007 10:47 PM
and i wouldnt bet on the regionals and shortlines replacing the bells on their units or crossings on their lines either. both of those classes seem like take-what-we-can-get classes

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: New Brighton, Minnesota
  • 1,493 posts
Posted by wctransfer on Monday, August 13, 2007 10:13 PM

Ya, I see what you mean about the more metal the less the sound. No need to be sorry Zug, just had a few ideas.

Alec

Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Monday, August 13, 2007 7:46 PM
 wctransfer wrote:

Ya, but I mean just put that design on a normal cast iron bell and there ya go.

Alec

That won't work.  No matter how much you shroud the bell - it will still get gunked and frozen up.  Plus you will cut down on sound if you add more metal around it.  Both EMD and GE are putting electronic bells on their engines.  Sorry, but the good ol' days of the mechanical  bell are fading. 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: New Brighton, Minnesota
  • 1,493 posts
Posted by wctransfer on Monday, August 13, 2007 6:13 PM

Ya, but I mean just put that design on a normal cast iron bell and there ya go.

Alec

Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Monday, August 13, 2007 11:30 AM
oh these are a pain in the *** though. they put them up in quiet zones and they dont sound like train horns at all.  they're  speakers playing a similar, albeit annoying noise nonstop till the train reaches the tracks. the train's actual pneumatic horn sounds great and doesnt bother me or most anyone else i know. but they all hate that nasty crossing horn. especially when it ruined a steam excursion train at the crossing

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,019 posts
Posted by BigJim on Monday, August 13, 2007 7:06 AM

i only dread the day crossings will have those horns built onto them around here as they do nothing but annoy people

Maybe we are onto something here. Could it be that people are just annoyed at the sound of a locomotive's horn blowing and thus, pay no attention to it and just keep driving right into the path of an oncoming train?

I haven't heard of these horns on the crossing thing before. An interesting idea though. Place the horns on the crossings. That way they blow directly at the oncoming traffic and I wouldn't have to listen to it. Alas, it wouldn't work as people would just get annoyed at the sound!

.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Monday, August 13, 2007 3:19 AM
i've heard both kinds of bells on the locomotives. and to be honest, they both sound just fine to me. i only dread the day crossings will have those horns built onto them around here as they do nothing but annoy people

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Sunday, August 12, 2007 11:36 PM
Had a SD60M... had a U-shaped piece of metal surrounding the mechanical bell.  Didn't matter much, the bell was a little on the weak side.  At least it rang, though. 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Burnaby
  • 525 posts
Posted by enr2099 on Sunday, August 12, 2007 3:51 PM
 wctransfer wrote:

Sorry, I didnt specify more clearly Zug. I saw a shot of a fresh CP GP38-2 with a funky looking bell. It was totally covered, except for 4 holes around the bell. Thats the design Im talking about, and maybe put some type of mesh in there and there ya go. No snow,or Ice to clog it up.

Alec

 

That would be the electronic bell Alec. 

Tyler W. CN hog
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: On Track LaGrange IL.
  • 171 posts
Posted by RABEL on Saturday, August 11, 2007 1:51 AM
 magicman710 wrote:
 zugmann wrote:
   

I haven't seen anyone complaining about using LED lights on crossings yet... 

Ok, who hates the new LED lights on crossings!!!!! Wink [;)]

Me! I prefer the character of  Wig/Wags.Whistling [:-^]

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Friday, August 10, 2007 10:39 PM
 zugmann wrote:
   

I haven't seen anyone complaining about using LED lights on crossings yet... 

Ok, who hates the new LED lights on crossings!!!!! Wink [;)]

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, August 10, 2007 2:40 PM

Have to look at it this way:

What happens when that old mechanical bell breaks?  And someone gets hit at the crossing?  Electronics are the present and future.  They can direct sound better - will probably last longer, and pretty soon it will be hard to get parts for mechanical bells.  

I haven't seen anyone complaining about using LED lights on crossings yet... 

 

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Friday, August 10, 2007 1:36 PM
 EJE818 wrote:
I don't mind the electronic bells on the engines at all. I really hate the electroniic bells on the crossings, like the one in this video. The engine also has a electronic bell (and a very nice and loud SD70ACe horn). http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/CNW8575/video/x2lm7x_up-8603_travel
Don't care for the electronic gates either.  It seems to me theres no big deal just throwing a darn bell on the thing!
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, August 10, 2007 12:32 AM
 wctransfer wrote:

Sorry, I didnt specify more clearly Zug. I saw a shot of a fresh CP GP38-2 with a funky looking bell. It was totally covered, except for 4 holes around the bell. Thats the design Im talking about, and maybe put some type of mesh in there and there ya go. No snow,or Ice to clog it up.

Alec

Man, if you're going to do all that (and it will STILL freeze and clog up), might as well just put the electronic dinger on.  

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Joliet, IL
  • 1,646 posts
Posted by EJE818 on Thursday, August 9, 2007 6:29 PM
I don't mind the electronic bells on the engines at all. I really hate the electroniic bells on the crossings, like the one in this video. The engine also has a electronic bell (and a very nice and loud SD70ACe horn). http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/CNW8575/video/x2lm7x_up-8603_travel
Robby Gragg - EJ&E fan Railpictures photos: http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=5292 Flickr photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/24084206@N08/ Youtube videos: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=EJE665 R-V videos: http://www.rail-videos.net/showvideos.php?userid=5292
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: The Beautiful North Georgia Mountians
  • 2,362 posts
Posted by Railfan1 on Thursday, August 9, 2007 4:01 PM

It really doesn't bother me either way.

"It's a great day to be alive" "Of all the words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these, It might have been......"
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Thursday, August 9, 2007 1:03 PM

The only good thing about electronic bells is that they are heard more clearly and louder than traditional bells.

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: New Brighton, Minnesota
  • 1,493 posts
Posted by wctransfer on Thursday, August 9, 2007 12:57 PM

Sorry, I didnt specify more clearly Zug. I saw a shot of a fresh CP GP38-2 with a funky looking bell. It was totally covered, except for 4 holes around the bell. Thats the design Im talking about, and maybe put some type of mesh in there and there ya go. No snow,or Ice to clog it up.

Alec

Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, August 9, 2007 11:49 AM
 wctransfer wrote:

I just see it as the usual "lets mess with something that works" crap that people love to do. If they get frozen, make the bottom like the new electronic bells, covered. That would keep the ice and snow out. Hmm, why didnt they think of that.

Alec

You can't really cover a mechanical bell.  It also has moving parts that feeze or get clogged up.  So, the old way didn't exactly work as well as you would think.  A bell is a very important part of a locomotive.  I would like it to work. 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Mesa, AZ
  • 778 posts
Posted by silicon212 on Thursday, August 9, 2007 10:53 AM

If you heard some of the old SP mechanical gong bells that are in use, those WC Hayes electronic bells don't sound so bad.  There's one crossing here (Dobson) which has one of those WC Hayes electronic bells for the northbound side, and one of the old gong bells for the southbound side.  The southbound starts out strong, within 15-20 seconds you start hearing 'ding-ding-click-ding-click-click-click-ding-click-click' and then silence for the duration of activation.  That's typical of a lot of them out here.

 UP is replacing them but not quick enough.  With those electronic bells, which again, are here to stay.  They don't care about how one thinks of their sound, just that they do their job which is warn traffic.  Pedestrian moreso than vehicular traffic.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Thursday, August 9, 2007 2:00 AM

i dont mind the electronic locomotive bells. they dont sound too different to me.

now those electronic CROSSING bells are another story. especially those damn western cullen hayes bells.

and let's not forget the crossings with virtual horns. those sound HORRIBLE. ugh 

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 195 posts
Posted by NS SD70M-2 on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 11:27 PM

Here is a gound sounding bell! HAHA THIS VIDEO WAS DEDICATED TO ME!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1MMvCntFIE

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: New Brighton, Minnesota
  • 1,493 posts
Posted by wctransfer on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 9:22 PM

I just see it as the usual "lets mess with something that works" crap that people love to do. If they get frozen, make the bottom like the new electronic bells, covered. That would keep the ice and snow out. Hmm, why didnt they think of that.

Alec

Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 8:22 PM
 magicman710 wrote:

Zugmann, that doesnt really sound like a good reenactment of a electronic bell.... Heres a better one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yB0YszgD2FA

 

That was the reenactment of the few mechinical bells I had lately. Now the EMDs with their 30 second cycle is annoying... but at least they work.  The locomotive electronic bells aren't too bad sounding either...  not too much of a difference, really. 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 195 posts
Posted by NS SD70M-2 on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 4:10 PM
I LOVE THE LOCOMOTIVE ELECTRONIC BELL! I HATE THE RR CROSSING ELECTRONIC BELL!

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy