Trains.com

Ok, who hates the new electronic bells!!!!!

17671 views
71 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Ok, who hates the new electronic bells!!!!!
Posted by magicman710 on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 12:28 AM
I hate them things!!! I mainly see them on NS, and they drive me crazy!!!! Here is to banning electronic bells on all locos!!!!!

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Mesa, AZ
  • 778 posts
Posted by silicon212 on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 1:57 AM
Love 'em or hate 'em, get used to 'em, 'cause they're here to stay.  They are pretty reliable, and with no moving parts, takes away a lot of chance it could cause an FRA defect.  You will be seeing much more of them in the future.  They don't bother me.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,485 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 6:50 AM

The sound may not be the same as a cast bell, but they don't plug up in the winter.  Considering where most cast bells are mounted these days, that can be a real issue in the parts of the country that have four seasons.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 6:45 PM
The electronic bells are horrible!Shock [:O] Thry sound like fingernails on a blackboard. they should be banned from the railroad scene.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,523 posts
Posted by zugmann on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 7:12 PM

Nothing like the sound of a mechanical bell: 

click..click.......dingdingdingding....click...click..........................................ding..............click

Better learn to love 'em.  They are here.

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 8:20 PM

Zugmann, that doesnt really sound like a good reenactment of a electronic bell.... Heres a better one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yB0YszgD2FA

 

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Over There
  • 454 posts
Posted by CPRail modeler on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 11:39 PM

Lemme just say one word about that bell;

BARF!!!

The traditional bell sounded WAY better than that! The traditional bell also looks good on CPR diesels, mainly the old high hood units.

DEATH TO THE ELECTRONIC BELL,

DEATH TO THE ELECTRONIC BELL,

DEATH TO THE ELECTRONIC BELL, etc.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 19 posts
Posted by kevin hill on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 11:58 PM

I HATE all electronic bells on crossings and on locomotives but mostly on crossings because not only do they sound bad they are way to quiet! with a mechanical bell installed you could still hear them loud and clear in your car with the windows up now(at least with the ones where I am) your lucky if you can hear them at all with your windows up or down so I see electronic bells on crossings as a safety hazard! Just my opinion.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: WSOR Northern Div.
  • 1,559 posts
Posted by WSOR 3801 on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 1:52 AM

WSOR 10C had an electronic bell and a brass bell.  The electronic one is mounted over the conductor's head, and the brass is mounted below the engineer.  Guess which one I use?Big Smile [:D]

You all seem to forget about the gong bell on the nose of CNW units.  Can't hardly hear that one inside the cab.

Sometimes in winter all you get is click, click, click.  Other ones go into turbo mode: CLANGCLANGCLANG 

WSOR 4009 (ex-MILW SD40-2) used to have electronic bell.  Soo and MILW were big on them in the 1970s.  It got replaced with a mechanical bell, mounted on conductor's side, right above and behind the window.  Some guys don't like it..Ashamed [*^_^*]

Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,485 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 6:54 AM

 espeefoamer wrote:
The electronic bells are horrible!Shock [:O] Thry sound like fingernails on a blackboard. they should be banned from the railroad scene.

I would suggest that you get up early one winter morning after four inches of snow fell the day before and help the carmen clean out the bells on the cab cars before the morning rush hour.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,015 posts
Posted by BigJim on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 7:25 AM
What I really hate is EMD's automatic bell (and the idiots that thought it up) that you can't turn off. It keeps ringing for quite a while after the ditch lights quit flashing. After 134 miles of that crap, I am sooooo ready to climb off that engine.

.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 2:24 PM

 BigJim wrote:
What I really hate is EMD's automatic bell (and the idiots that thought it up) that you can't turn off. It keeps ringing for quite a while after the ditch lights quit flashing. After 134 miles of that crap, I am sooooo ready to climb off that engine.

There are ways to turn them off ... I think you need to same key that you need to get 4400hp from an NS dash 9.

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,015 posts
Posted by BigJim on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 3:40 PM
If you mean the timer, not the entire bell, let me know how it's done. Maybe I can talk somebody in the Loco shop into doing just that.

.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 195 posts
Posted by NS SD70M-2 on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 4:10 PM
I LOVE THE LOCOMOTIVE ELECTRONIC BELL! I HATE THE RR CROSSING ELECTRONIC BELL!
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,523 posts
Posted by zugmann on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 8:22 PM
 magicman710 wrote:

Zugmann, that doesnt really sound like a good reenactment of a electronic bell.... Heres a better one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yB0YszgD2FA

 

That was the reenactment of the few mechinical bells I had lately. Now the EMDs with their 30 second cycle is annoying... but at least they work.  The locomotive electronic bells aren't too bad sounding either...  not too much of a difference, really. 

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: New Brighton, Minnesota
  • 1,493 posts
Posted by wctransfer on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 9:22 PM

I just see it as the usual "lets mess with something that works" crap that people love to do. If they get frozen, make the bottom like the new electronic bells, covered. That would keep the ice and snow out. Hmm, why didnt they think of that.

Alec

Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 195 posts
Posted by NS SD70M-2 on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 11:27 PM

Here is a gound sounding bell! HAHA THIS VIDEO WAS DEDICATED TO ME!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1MMvCntFIE

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Thursday, August 9, 2007 2:00 AM

i dont mind the electronic locomotive bells. they dont sound too different to me.

now those electronic CROSSING bells are another story. especially those damn western cullen hayes bells.

and let's not forget the crossings with virtual horns. those sound HORRIBLE. ugh 

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Mesa, AZ
  • 778 posts
Posted by silicon212 on Thursday, August 9, 2007 10:53 AM

If you heard some of the old SP mechanical gong bells that are in use, those WC Hayes electronic bells don't sound so bad.  There's one crossing here (Dobson) which has one of those WC Hayes electronic bells for the northbound side, and one of the old gong bells for the southbound side.  The southbound starts out strong, within 15-20 seconds you start hearing 'ding-ding-click-ding-click-click-click-ding-click-click' and then silence for the duration of activation.  That's typical of a lot of them out here.

 UP is replacing them but not quick enough.  With those electronic bells, which again, are here to stay.  They don't care about how one thinks of their sound, just that they do their job which is warn traffic.  Pedestrian moreso than vehicular traffic.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,523 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, August 9, 2007 11:49 AM
 wctransfer wrote:

I just see it as the usual "lets mess with something that works" crap that people love to do. If they get frozen, make the bottom like the new electronic bells, covered. That would keep the ice and snow out. Hmm, why didnt they think of that.

Alec

You can't really cover a mechanical bell.  It also has moving parts that feeze or get clogged up.  So, the old way didn't exactly work as well as you would think.  A bell is a very important part of a locomotive.  I would like it to work. 

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: New Brighton, Minnesota
  • 1,493 posts
Posted by wctransfer on Thursday, August 9, 2007 12:57 PM

Sorry, I didnt specify more clearly Zug. I saw a shot of a fresh CP GP38-2 with a funky looking bell. It was totally covered, except for 4 holes around the bell. Thats the design Im talking about, and maybe put some type of mesh in there and there ya go. No snow,or Ice to clog it up.

Alec

Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Thursday, August 9, 2007 1:03 PM

The only good thing about electronic bells is that they are heard more clearly and louder than traditional bells.

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: The Beautiful North Georgia Mountians
  • 2,362 posts
Posted by Railfan1 on Thursday, August 9, 2007 4:01 PM

It really doesn't bother me either way.

"It's a great day to be alive" "Of all the words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these, It might have been......"
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Joliet, IL
  • 1,646 posts
Posted by EJE818 on Thursday, August 9, 2007 6:29 PM
I don't mind the electronic bells on the engines at all. I really hate the electroniic bells on the crossings, like the one in this video. The engine also has a electronic bell (and a very nice and loud SD70ACe horn). http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/CNW8575/video/x2lm7x_up-8603_travel
Robby Gragg - EJ&E fan Railpictures photos: http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=5292 Flickr photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/24084206@N08/ Youtube videos: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=EJE665 R-V videos: http://www.rail-videos.net/showvideos.php?userid=5292
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,523 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, August 10, 2007 12:32 AM
 wctransfer wrote:

Sorry, I didnt specify more clearly Zug. I saw a shot of a fresh CP GP38-2 with a funky looking bell. It was totally covered, except for 4 holes around the bell. Thats the design Im talking about, and maybe put some type of mesh in there and there ya go. No snow,or Ice to clog it up.

Alec

Man, if you're going to do all that (and it will STILL freeze and clog up), might as well just put the electronic dinger on.  

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Friday, August 10, 2007 1:36 PM
 EJE818 wrote:
I don't mind the electronic bells on the engines at all. I really hate the electroniic bells on the crossings, like the one in this video. The engine also has a electronic bell (and a very nice and loud SD70ACe horn). http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/CNW8575/video/x2lm7x_up-8603_travel
Don't care for the electronic gates either.  It seems to me theres no big deal just throwing a darn bell on the thing!
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,523 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, August 10, 2007 2:40 PM

Have to look at it this way:

What happens when that old mechanical bell breaks?  And someone gets hit at the crossing?  Electronics are the present and future.  They can direct sound better - will probably last longer, and pretty soon it will be hard to get parts for mechanical bells.  

I haven't seen anyone complaining about using LED lights on crossings yet... 

 

 

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Friday, August 10, 2007 10:39 PM
 zugmann wrote:
   

I haven't seen anyone complaining about using LED lights on crossings yet... 

Ok, who hates the new LED lights on crossings!!!!! Wink [;)]

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: On Track LaGrange IL.
  • 171 posts
Posted by RABEL on Saturday, August 11, 2007 1:51 AM
 magicman710 wrote:
 zugmann wrote:
   

I haven't seen anyone complaining about using LED lights on crossings yet... 

Ok, who hates the new LED lights on crossings!!!!! Wink [;)]

Me! I prefer the character of  Wig/Wags.Whistling [:-^]

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Burnaby
  • 525 posts
Posted by enr2099 on Sunday, August 12, 2007 3:51 PM
 wctransfer wrote:

Sorry, I didnt specify more clearly Zug. I saw a shot of a fresh CP GP38-2 with a funky looking bell. It was totally covered, except for 4 holes around the bell. Thats the design Im talking about, and maybe put some type of mesh in there and there ya go. No snow,or Ice to clog it up.

Alec

 

That would be the electronic bell Alec. 

Tyler W. CN hog

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy