jeffhergert wrote: BNSFrailfan wrote:Who takes the blame when a Train stalls on a hill and is blocking crossings? That situation is a bit different. The situations I meant were ones where you know your going to be stopped for whatever reason. If you're stopped because of trouble and can't move that's a bit different. The laws allow for crossings to be blocked longer than 10 minutes (or whatever the local time limit is). If you're stalled it depends what the circumstances are. If you are going to wait for someone to help you over the hill and it will be quite a while before help arrives, if safe, you could possibly back down off the crossing, or at least back enough of the train that the engines could pull some cars up to cut it. If you're going to double the hill, and the portion you're leaving is on the crossing, there isn't much anyone can do, unless you can back the train down, at least to where the cut is made. If it isn't safe to do that, then blocking the crossing is no one's fault. If I stalled on Blair hill, I would probably say it's safer to leave it blocked until someone pushes you over it. It's a judgement call and if I can't get a law officer or company officer to agree, I'd have to take the blame. Jeff
BNSFrailfan wrote:Who takes the blame when a Train stalls on a hill and is blocking crossings?
That situation is a bit different. The situations I meant were ones where you know your going to be stopped for whatever reason.
If you're stopped because of trouble and can't move that's a bit different. The laws allow for crossings to be blocked longer than 10 minutes (or whatever the local time limit is).
If you're stalled it depends what the circumstances are. If you are going to wait for someone to help you over the hill and it will be quite a while before help arrives, if safe, you could possibly back down off the crossing, or at least back enough of the train that the engines could pull some cars up to cut it. If you're going to double the hill, and the portion you're leaving is on the crossing, there isn't much anyone can do, unless you can back the train down, at least to where the cut is made. If it isn't safe to do that, then blocking the crossing is no one's fault.
If I stalled on Blair hill, I would probably say it's safer to leave it blocked until someone pushes you over it. It's a judgement call and if I can't get a law officer or company officer to agree, I'd have to take the blame.
Jeff
Lord Atmo wrote:enr2099, read the text next time. it says "great job with those remotes". REMOTES! REMOTE CONTROLLED LOCOMOTIVE! there was NOBODY INSIDE!
There is still a crew running the remote. 2 conductors, I know because we use the same system at CN!
Murphy Siding wrote: If you have an engineer in the cab, why would you need the remote control?
If you have an engineer in the cab, why would you need the remote control?
No engineer, 2 conductors. One person protects the point and one does the switching. Some RCO operations have designated pull backs where both men can be on the ground switching.
n012944 wrote: CopCarSS wrote:Well written, Jeff. One other point I'll bring out again is that I still don't understand how any railfan can hate the only railroad that maintains it's own (mammoth) steam locomotives, and spends quite a bit of time running them all over their system. It just boggles my mind. I agree. While I do think the copyright charges on the models suck, overall it a very good railroad that I like to watch. The UP bashing, saying the same thing over and over, gets very old very quick. Bert
CopCarSS wrote:Well written, Jeff. One other point I'll bring out again is that I still don't understand how any railfan can hate the only railroad that maintains it's own (mammoth) steam locomotives, and spends quite a bit of time running them all over their system. It just boggles my mind.
I agree. While I do think the copyright charges on the models suck, overall it a very good railroad that I like to watch. The UP bashing, saying the same thing over and over, gets very old very quick.
Bert
James, Brisbane Australia
Modelling AT&SF in the 90s
In addition to the steam program, UP Yellow and the winged herald date back to the start of the diesel age, so they are really part of UP's heritage as well for fans of the UP. As far as the old C&NW, I remember riding the old C&NW North commuter line when there were so many vertical dips in the track over the viaducts, one almost needed a seatbelt to avoid hitting the ceiling. From what I can see on the west line, the pink ballast is still there, the left-hand running is still there, but the track and ballast are in great shape, there's plenty of modern power, and no shortage of traffic. I'd guess there's at least a few former C&NW employees who don't miss the tight budgets of the past. Sure I miss the old semaphores, but Class I railroads are becoming more and more alike.
james saunders wrote:I don't get it... They don't like UP because it bought another railroad? thats called business. they have to much yellow in their paint scheme? thats heritage. (IMO, its an attractive scheme, especially the flag units) I guess if CN bought BNSF, CN would be hated for buying BNSF who has (probably) more railroads in it's heritage than UP ever will.
Well, there is a little more to it then that. I supose there is always a degree of resentment when a RR buys (or merges with) the RR you grew up with and or admired. But with the UP it's not just loosing the old paint scheme but usually a change in culture. A change many didn't like. With the SP the culture was like the 'good old boy' system (as probably was the CNW too) and the railroad was a very friendly place, which made the whole railroad very accessable for railfans. The UP culture is more like the military. And they run there railroad in a militant fashion. So when UP took controll of the SP and tried to run the SPs good old boys with UPs militant style it not only ruffled a lot of feathers but it ground the system into a meltdown. The two cultures clashed. The UP in there arrogance (another reason some don't like the UP) thought they could make changes and have the SP boys do it there way. They wouldn't listen to the SP boys that knew certain things didn't work that way. To a large degree the SP boys quit talking to a def ear and let the UP boys 'crash there car' so to speak. The worst part of the whole thing is they didn't learn there lesson from the CNW merger/meltdown just a couple years before and they let history repeat itself. Between that and there habbit of comming along with a wrecking ball in one hand and a paint brush in the other hand when they take over a railroad didn't exactly win over the hearts of the masses. Especially here in California were traditionaly UP had very little presence and now there vast network is almost entirely on railroads they took over (Before the 80s there only line in California was the Salt Lake-San Piedro route, and almost half of that was on AT&SF track rights).
Of course those arn't the only reason some don't like UP. Some just simply don't like the paint. Some are just angry that UP is trying to protect there copyrights. Pretty shallow reasons to hate a railroad if you ask me. I find it hard to understand how someone can be a railfan and hate a railroad.
I have always been a SP fan. I miss the SP but I don't spend my time whineing about it. I am a UP fan by default now. Change is constant (although rather slow) with railroads and you just have to go with it. They are not in the bussiness of pleasing railfans, but you got to give the UP credit for the bones they throw us. How many other railroads have a steam program? How many others have a heritage unit program?
They don't like UP because it bought another railroad? thats called business.
I've noticed that most of you who don't think anybody should hate UP hasn't had their towns rail service DIE because of UP. They haven't had the excellent locomoitve shops in your area closed by UP. Classic buildings that COULD'VE stayed up were tore down by UP.Apparantly, those that haven't been hurt by UP don't think anybody else could be.
How many other railroads have a steam program?
dingoix wrote: They don't like UP because it bought another railroad? thats called business. That's fine. But did UP assimilate YOUR favorite railroad? I've noticed that most of you who don't think anybody should hate UP hasn't had their towns rail service DIE because of UP. They haven't had the excellent locomoitve shops in your area closed by UP. Classic buildings that COULD'VE stayed up were tore down by UP.Apparantly, those that haven't been hurt by UP don't think anybody else could be. How many other railroads have a steam program? NS had one until 1994. They had the N&W Class J 4-8-4 #611, N&W Class A 2-6-6-4 #1218, and the SOU 2-8-2 #4501
Well my Modoc line was abandoned and scrapped and that didn't make me hate the UP. Perhaps you should be thankfull the UP didn't abandon your line(s) all together.
And yes, we al know about the NS steam program, but it's gone, UPs is still around.
To me seeing a train, no matter what railroad, is better than seeing no train at all. Again I don't like the copyright thing, but I do understand why they are doing it. I think people are just so into "their" thing, that they hate anything that replaces it. Think about all the great pictures that were lost in the 40's/50's because many people would not take pictures of anything but steam. They hated diesels because they replaced their beloved steam. I think the hate towards the UP is along those same lines.
An "expensive model collector"
Here's my thoughts, take 'em or leave 'em.
I grew up next to the CNW mainline. I missed them when the FRVR, WC, and eventually the CN took over. UP bought CNW. I know it's not going to come back. It would make me so happy to see, in person, even one running CNW engine in original paint on a train. Do I hate the UP? No. Would I railfan them? No, probably not. Is it because they bought CNW? No. Does that make me a bad person because I'm not a huge fan of the UP and occasionally express a wish to see one engine in CNW livery? I think it's almost a double standard to say anyone who hates the UP isn't a railfan, or shouldn't express that opinon. That's just what people are saying: opinoins! You don't have to agree with them, or read them (some obvious ones anyway) for that matter. Some may go overboard but telling them they can't have or express their opinion is, IMHO, as 'wrong' as telling them they're 'wrong' to have their opions. Finally, taking constructive criticism is part of life. Learn how to do that without getting upset and life gets a little easier. Again, you can choose to accept it or ignore it.
Dan
Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.
dingoix wrote:They don't like UP because it bought another railroad? thats called business. That's fine. But did UP assimilate YOUR favorite railroad?
No, they merged (SP), but I don't hate them for that. if UP hadn't bought them, who knows what would have happened.
dingoix wrote:Maybe I didn't make this clear but, I don't hate UP. Sure I'm mad for many of the things they have done, but they are trains. OTOH, I would never go out of my way to see a UP train (unless its the 844 or 3985) That's just how I feel about them. And, I like any railroads that have GP38-2s, so I'm obligated to somewhat like UP for that fact.
I have got to be one of the biggest GP38-2 fans, yet I model 1968. That's not to say a few aren't gonna sneak on the layout GP35s can almost substitute for 38-2s considering the year I model. But they're not the same.
dingoix wrote:I have got to be one of the biggest GP38-2 fans, yet I model 1968. That's not to say a few aren't gonna sneak on the layout GP35s can almost substitute for 38-2s considering the year I model. But they're not the same.
riprap wrote: Because, as the biggest Class I, and the only one (as far as I know) that makes TV commercials,
Because, as the biggest Class I, and the only one (as far as I know) that makes TV commercials,
Norfolk Southern runs commercials all the time around here. Heck, living in DC you see and hear commercials aimed at Congress for all kinds of stuff (the ones for defense contractors are always interesting!).
Hardly inspires anyone to launch a tirade against them.
Norfolk Southern also dropped the ball the day of the Conrail split. They were also described as having a more military style of management than Conrail's (and CSX's for that matter) laid back style. Still don't hear tirades against them. NS also managed to work out the problems and is considered by some to be the best class one running this year. UP seems to be working out the problems too. No plan survives contact with the enemy. No merger plan is perfect.
I still haven't gotten over the Lake Erie & Western taking over the Fort Wayne, Muncie & Louisville Road (1890).
We, the Northwestern, were trying to get out of Oelwien in the late 1970s. We were disapointed it took so long.
james saunders wrote:I don't get it... If you don't like UP fine, But don't bring your dribble here.
WP 3020 wrote:Anyone who has posted that someone "hates UP" and are thinking of me, they're flat out wrong. I have a problem with that ( I don't want to be missquoted and rather not be missunderstood ) and would want the chance correct a fault. Sure, there are some things I don't like (and have stated them elsewhere) about them, but I never said I hate them.
It's funny that you don't hate the UP, given the poor taste of your third quote in your signature...
-ChrisWest Chicago, ILChristopher May Fine Art Photography"In wisdom gathered over time I have found that every experience is a form of exploration." ~Ansel Adams
Well, let me see. Since I am a train photographer, I really don't have any problems, with any railroads. Why? because all I am doing is shooting pictures. Yes, I have heard plenty about the UP, and how alot of people don't like them. I grew up about 1 mile south of the C&NW's Proviso Yard, and my brother and I would make occasional trips up there to watch the goings on. We never stayed long, because the CNW cops, or special agents, would eventually make there way to where we were (on the platform of the commuter station that was there) and shoo us out, just a couple of kids watching trains, and either are railroad employee, or a Special Agent would tell us to "get lost"... Since the UP has taken it over, they don't mind much, if I am there with my kids, and watching what goes on in the yard, and shooting pictures of trains that come through on Rockwell I and II. In fact, one day, while watching trains, a helpful crew member came over, just to say hi to my small kids, and ask me how the shooting was going. He then proceeded to tell me that if I waited about 15 minutes, there was going to be several trains both east and west bound on Rockwell I and II. His train wasn't going to be moving until they cleared up the congestion, and lo and behold, about 12 minutes after our conversation, the first of 5 freight trains came through, all in the space of about 45 minutes or so.
Is UP a giant? Yes, they are... do I wish I could still see some CNW livery... of course, I loved the green and yellow... but, time goes on and things change. Do I think UP is the embodiment of evil? Heck no.. they are a business doing what they do, that's all it is about. I will only hate the UP when they stop running trains.....
CopCarSS wrote: WP 3020 wrote:Anyone who has posted that someone "hates UP" and are thinking of me, they're flat out wrong. I have a problem with that ( I don't want to be missquoted and rather not be missunderstood ) and would want the chance correct a fault. Sure, there are some things I don't like (and have stated them elsewhere) about them, but I never said I hate them. It's funny that you don't hate the UP, given the poor taste of your third quote in your signature...
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.