I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.
I don't have a leg to stand on.
Have fun with your trains
QUOTE: Originally posted by Lotus098 QUOTE: Where did I ever say I wanted the US to operate like France? thats out of context. I just said government funding of HSR is a good idea. I can tell you've never been to France...Actually visiting a place before you condemn it is always a good idea, I used to think Italy was a dump, till I spent some time there, now I wont hesitate to take a visit there ...Ah Venice! France is a beautiful place, amazing country sides, terrific wine, food, OH the cheeses! But if you dont like France might I suggest Japan? Perhaps the most awesome national rail system in the world, all funded by the government, and great sushi too! It is apparent you have not been there recently either. Have you looked at the headlines about France; the place is in a near civil war. You always want socialism, and France is run on total socialism, which is just a mild from of communism. People don’t like working to pay for nonsense like that, so they get mad and burn things. France will never compare to America, head out to Idaho, and take a look at the wide-open country on an early morning, no distant smoke from burning vehicles, no stench of the unabated populace. Not to mention, you can’t hunt in France, or even own a gun. Food well, I will take a hamburger any day of the week, and I can’t drink wine, plus if you want cheese got to Wisconsin. If you want real good eats nothing can ever beat a mess of homemade fried chicken, that’s good eatin. Japan would be better, but you idea of awesome, is being built on the backs of laborers being stolen from. If I were to steal rob banks, and mug people to build a HLS, you would call me a criminal. Were I to have congress do it, you would be pleased as punch. I have decided to take you up on you offer, why don’t you get together with you friends and pay for a ticket for me to Europe. If it is as good as you say, I might change my mind. IF THESE PLACES ARE SO GREAT- WHY ARE YOU STILL HERE?
QUOTE: Where did I ever say I wanted the US to operate like France? thats out of context. I just said government funding of HSR is a good idea. I can tell you've never been to France...Actually visiting a place before you condemn it is always a good idea, I used to think Italy was a dump, till I spent some time there, now I wont hesitate to take a visit there ...Ah Venice! France is a beautiful place, amazing country sides, terrific wine, food, OH the cheeses! But if you dont like France might I suggest Japan? Perhaps the most awesome national rail system in the world, all funded by the government, and great sushi too!
QUOTE: Originally posted by Lotus098 Murphy Siding addressed that! Your bringing this back up only helps to drag us farther off topic. Windbag alert. Why in the world did we invade Germany in World War II, it didn't have anything to do with mass murder? Of course what do you expect from someone who calls the truth crap, and doesn't want us to uphold UN sanctions, protect our country, and spread freedom. WHAT WOULD THE FOUNDERS OF OUR GREAT NATION THINK OF THAT? This is my last post on the thread dealing with WMDs; and I am not lying, like vsimth. Blow up a storm; thank you for attempting to derail yet another try to get us back on Trains. I don't want to have Bergie nuke a very informative train thread. I apologize for having gotten us this far into politics, and will try yet again to get us back on trains. railroads son, railroads.
QUOTE: Originally posted by futuremodal QUOTE: Originally posted by Lotus098 So is freight viable on a short corridor run? Can a line really fit in a freeway median, without being elevated (or would that not help), what about passing sidings? Or junctions, would the line lift up and over one lane of traffic, then back down? What about emergency vehicle turn arounds on the freeway would these cross the tracks; nothing worse than waiting for a train while someone is dieing. Thank you, Jiminy Cricket. [:)] The reason today's freight railroads prefer long haul to short haul is simply an outgrowth of the railroads' marriage to the carload/classification yard mentality. Yards eat up profits, having to make up trains eats up profits, so they try to make up for that by going long. That doens't mean short haul railroading can't work, HSR or no HSR. The advent of the unit train actually makes shorter haul corridors more profitable, because once you eliminate the need for yard work, you are left with simply running from point of origin to destination and back, e.g. it's all in the cycle. If you count intermodal as a form of the unit trains concept, you can see how the short haul can work there too. There are several 3PI's in Washington State running short haul intermodal from Eastern Washington to Puget Sound, with runs averaging 100 to 300 miles point to point, and they are making good money doing so. For HSR it can work the same, because the profits are all dependent on the number of cycles per year, not the length of the haul. 10,000 revenue ton miles per year is 10,000 revenue ton miles per year, whether it is in the form of a few hundred 100 mile cycles per year or ten 1000 mile cycles per year. And on the shorther hauls you can usually charge a higher per ton mile rate than on the long hauls because in the short hauls you are siphoning market share from the truckers. Regarding freeway medians, obviously it won't work everywhere, but I have driven thousands of miles worth of our Nation's Interstate Highway System out West here and there are quite a few long stretches where rail access to the median would be unencumbered by anything, e.g. overpasses with no median-situated support pier. The rails would need an entry overpass or underpass to get to and from the medians, that is true. But the cost savings of running down the literal middle of the freeway would go a long way toward making the concept viable. If you are from Southern Idaho, next time you drive I-84 east out of Boise take a notice of the space available in the median. Or if you are from the Great State (of mind) of North Idaho, take in I-90 if you ever travel to Seattle. Plenty of room in that median. So what if the cops can't play speed trap in the median? There are also quite a number of abandoned railroad grades out West where there are long tangents and/or gradual curvatures that could also be converted to HSR at less than prime cost. Much of the Milwaukee ROW west of MIles City MT and along the Clark Fork River in western Montana is ideal. The ex-Milwaukee ROW and SP&S corridors in Eastern Washington are also good expamples.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Lotus098 So is freight viable on a short corridor run? Can a line really fit in a freeway median, without being elevated (or would that not help), what about passing sidings? Or junctions, would the line lift up and over one lane of traffic, then back down? What about emergency vehicle turn arounds on the freeway would these cross the tracks; nothing worse than waiting for a train while someone is dieing. Thank you, Jiminy Cricket. [:)]
QUOTE: Originally posted by futuremodal As for the whole political thing, just a quick anecdote. Teddy (hic) Kennedy was being interviewed by NBC's Tim Russert. Russert read a statement to Kennedy from an ostensible proponent of the Iraq war which went something like this (paraphrasing); " 'Saddam has WMD's, and he will use them against us if we don't take action against him, etc. etc.' " Russert then asked Kennedy for his response to this statement. Kennedy replied to the effect (paraphrasing); "(hic) Well, Tim, whoever (hic)made shuch a statement should be made (hic) accountable for lying to the American people about the reashons for going to war in I(hic)raq." Russert replied (paraphrasing) "Well, Senator, that was YOU who made that statement back in 1998". After that, Kennedy tried to change the subject with some mumbo-jumgo to save face. Yep, the only stench coming from that side of the aisle is the stench of complete and utter dishonesty. And you folks on the left want us to go back to THAT?! No thanks.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Lotus098 Democrats, this is your conscience. WAS IT WRONG TO OVER-THROW A DICATOR WHO MURDERED THOUSANDS OF HIS OWN PEOPLE A YEAR?!!! http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2854019.stm Ahem, ahem. http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/01fs/14906.htm http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/iraq/timeline3.htm The proof is in the pudding, these violations alone, are strong indicators he was hiding something; and reason enough o invade! Why so you suppose he wouldn’t allow inspections. SO THEY WOULDN’T FIND THE WEAPONS. Saddam implied, according to the former Presidential Secretary, that Iraq would resume WMD programs after sanctions in order to restore the “strategic balance” within the region and, particularly, against Israel. Following Husayn Kamil’s defection, Saddam took steps to better manage Iraqi industry, and with the creation of the Iraqi Industrial Committee (IIC) in September 1995, the stage was set for a renewal of Iraq’s chemical industry. The IIC coordinated a range of projects aimed at developing an indigenous chemical production capability for strategically important chemicals that were difficult to import under UN sanctions, according to reporting. Between 1996 and 2003, the IIC coordinated large and important projects for the indigenous production of chemicals. · A written order from Saddam established the National Project for Pharmaceuticals and Pesticides (NPPP). NPPP focused on the synthesis of drugs and pesticides, for which Iraq in the past relied heavily on foreign suppliers. · The IIC examined over 1,000 chemicals for initial R&D to determine the feasibility of scaled-up production. ISG notes that two chemicals on this list were compounds that are consistent with an experimental VX pathway. · The process for vetting the 1,000 chemicals for economic feasibility and large-scale production was intensive and formalized. The IIC leadership built in several layers of review, research, and justification before compounds were selected for scale-up, raising further suspicion about the three compounds, particularly dicyclocarbodiimide (DCC)—a dehydrating agent that can be used as a VX stabilizer · Dr. Ja’far Dhia Ja’far, and IIC member, could not recall which projects were accepted for scale-up but he knew that some compounds were dual-use and declarable to the UN, and that the National Monitoring Directorate (NMD) did not declare all of the chemicals. Reports of an unexplained discovery of VX traces on missile warhead fragments in April 1997 led to further tension between UNSCOM and Iraq. The uneasy relationship escalated with the discovery of the ‘Air Force Document’ (see RSI chapter) in July 1998, which indicated further Iraqi deception and obfuscation over its CW disclosures. Iraq’s anger about these two major issues was a contributing factor to Saddam’s decisions to suspend cooperation with UNSCOM and IAEA. · The lack of inspectors allowed further dual-use infrastructure to be developed. The lack of effective monitoring emboldened Saddam and his illicit procurement activities. Concurrently, Iraq continued to upgrade its indigenous manufacturing capability, pursuing glass-lining technology and manufacturing its own multipurpose controllers. Scientists from the former CW program formulated agent simulants such as concentrated Malathion, a pesticide, and locally manufactured a copy of a system to disperse the simulant in 2001 and 2002. Thionyl chloride, a controlled CW precursor that Iraq had used as a chlorinating agent in its sulfur mustard and nerve agent production processes up until 1990, was part of the program for the indigenous production of chemicals. The IIC tasked the Jaber Bin Hayan State Company between 1996 and 1998 to research the small-scale production of thionyl chloride, according to reporting. According to official reporting, thionyl chloride production was reported to Iraq’s National Monitoring Directorate. Iraq began research on VX in the 1980s but failed to declare any production or attempts to produce VX until August 1995. Excerpts from: http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap5.html#sect0 Why look at what your beloved Al Gore said in 1998. “ "If you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many people is he going to kill with such weapons? He's already demonstrated a willingness to use these weapons. He poison-gassed his own people. He used poison gas and other weapons of mass destruction against his neighbors. This man has no compunction about killing lots and lots of people." Only look here if not convinced the war is and was worth it. http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/images/ch5_img00.jpg QUOTE: Again all your facts are based on pre-invasion intelligence that was openly criticized for being flawed by our allies. A little proof please! Wasn’t it British intelligence information that helped get us started? QUOTE: I've stated my last post of this as the original topic is now irrelevant. Aren’t you proud of yourself for doing that! Well I don’t plan on having this thread derailed. Back to the subject!
QUOTE: Again all your facts are based on pre-invasion intelligence that was openly criticized for being flawed by our allies.
QUOTE: I've stated my last post of this as the original topic is now irrelevant.
I'm back!
Follow the progress:
http://ogrforum.ogaugerr.com/displayForumTopic/content/12129987972340381/page/1
QUOTE: Originally posted by Lotus098 QUOTE: Originally posted by vsmith you post all this hoopla and you have the kahona's to call me a windbag? Sheeee-it! I think we know WHO the windbag is...[;)] [:0]WE KNOW WHO THE LIAR IS! Wouldn't you be the windbag since you said you would shut-up then didn't.[:0]Triple handedly dragging us well of the beaten path and then complaining that we got there.[D)] [:(][xx(] [tdn][tdn]I am glad you have your priorities straight; SCOLISM FIRST, the LIVES OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN LAST![tdn][tdn][xx(][:(] [V]
QUOTE: Originally posted by vsmith you post all this hoopla and you have the kahona's to call me a windbag? Sheeee-it! I think we know WHO the windbag is...[;)]
QUOTE: Originally posted by owlsroost QUOTE: the US has a lot more roads to avoid James, Have you ever been to the UK (or anywhere else in Europe) ? Europe in general is densely populated and has a road network to match (including a modern motorway (interstate) network), most of which existed in some form or other before railways were invented. The safety hazards of grade crossings were an issue here 150 years ago, let alone today. High speed passenger rail (150 - 200 mph) makes sense up to around 500 miles or so between major population centres - much beyond that aircraft have the journey time advantage, but this is offset by modern trains being regarded as nicer, less stressful way to travel, so even if trains take a bit longer overall many people still prefer it to air travel. Eurostar has a dominant market share of London-Paris passenger traffic, and the original Paris-Lyon TGV line pretty much wiped out the air service between those points soon after it opened - they now have to run double-deck trains at close headways to cope with the demand..... Modern high speed trains don't have a problem with 3%-4% gradients, so following motorways/interstates isn't that much of a problem provided the curvature is OK (parts of the Paris-Lyon TGV line in the mountains feel a bit like a roller-coaster ride at 170mph !). Building trans-continental high speed passenger rail lines in the US wouldn't make economic sense - the overall population densities are too low for the most part, but in the right corridors I think it would work. Tony
QUOTE: the US has a lot more roads to avoid
QUOTE: Originally posted by Lotus098 Moving on from the windbags. I am not so sure that it would make sense to move freight on a HSL. This might make since if it ran on regular track, not a Maglev or anything. Most goods have more problems with lack of freight cars not the speed of delivery. You still are going to have freight trains slowing down passenger trains, since freight trains would have to make more stops to pick up and drop of cars. You also might have problems getting both shippers for a commodity the HSL route, or having the right type of freight car loaded. Another issue not brought up is grade crossing safety. People complain freight trains come out of nowhere, a 250mph train would come even faster. Because of the more spread out us suburbs and rural roads, we couldn’t build over passes for every crossing. If any experts are out there, I would love to here from them about the idea of freight on a HSL.
QUOTE: Originally posted by jeaton Futuremodal I understand there is a big job opening with offices in Wahington Union Station. You should apply for the job. You will fit right in.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.