Trains.com

“No Trespassing” Entrapment

7155 views
43 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 20, 2003 1:40 PM
Good question for discution. As far as the law is written for the railroads as far as the right of way here in Illinois it is i think 100 feet from the nearset rail. As for the yards it is an outright dangerous place with trains the biggest share of the time arriving and departing at the same time. I work as a switchman I have to cross the yard tracks doing my job. Ed mentioned the GCOR we have to live by it when we do our work. Please do not teespass on the property. Here in Galesburg Il. we have a bridge that crosses over the yard about 100 yard north of the trimmer bldg and on the north there is a good view of the diesel service tracks. As for other locations around town there is the Amtrak depot, Peck park and also a small town called Cameron each one of these places have good views of the tracks. Rodney
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, January 20, 2003 11:20 AM
j,Excellant point made there!

I do not understand the reason one should be on railroad property anyway..

Look at this also,if you trespass on some industry's property you may be arrested..You trepass on a trucking lines property you you may be arrested.You hunt on some famers land with out WRITTEN PERMISSION you can and will be arrested.Why single out the railroads?

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Monday, January 20, 2003 10:56 AM
Picture this. I like old homes that are remodeled and up to date. just the way the house are built with detail. One day I am walking down the street i spot a house big house, it looks like 8 rooms at least, i walk up the sidewalk and come to the door, I open the door and walk in. it is better than i thought the insides are imaculant the detail and cash spent to referbi***his house in the living room there is a fire place, the furniture the hard wood floors and going on thru the house the den with built in bood case. the nick nacs on shelves on to the kitchen new cabinits all oak nothing cheap here as all things are made of real wood not the cheap stuff. The stairs leading up to the top floor are spiral and are like the rest of the house perfect. the addition of a deck off the back of the house is classy and over looks a water garden that is nicely done. the furniture in the master bedroom is the owners grandparents nicly redone and worth a fortune alone, i move thru the house to the basement and it is now a play room. walls are water profed and while admiring it i stop and have a beer from the fridge, and shoot a game of pool.

then you the owner come home and find me there. i did nothing wrong just looked had a beer and played pool. I didnt touch anything else and i did not know i was not to be there. the door was unlocked and i didnt see any No Treaspassing signs. why are they so mad. why is the cops taking me in.

If it dont belong to you then its best to stay away, Most generally railfans dont do anything either. Walking on the rail (balancing ) see how far you can do it. ( tresspassing) ok i pick up a rock and throw it at a sign ( vandilism) watch a train go by pick up a rock and throw it at the train (more vandilism) found a old spike laying on ground think ill keep it ( theft) Get the picture. It dont matter how small a issue it is it is still breaking the law the same law you exspect for your property to be inforced is the same for the railroad.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 20, 2003 10:53 AM
Ed, you are one of the most sensible posters here, so all I'm gonna do is elaborate on my own experiances.

I respect RR property to the point where I wouldn't vandalize it, any more than I would want them to vandalize mine. Even going back to the days of open auto racks, there was just something very wrong with the thrills kids got trying to bust out windows etc with rocks, and I may have participated once or twice, till the "wrongness" overtook the thrill, and the prospect of shooting out signal lights just looked so wrong to begin with, it never held much any appeal.

I attribute this to having a father who was never to busy to take whatever time necessary to explain right from wrong, no cupped hands nor hickory switches were necessary, he just explained facts in such a way you could put your feet into the shoes of the wouldbe victims.

He died when I was only 7, but his lessons have lasted a lifetime.

And I think it may be a great deal to do with the way I come across when confronted, I don't have a "you guys" mentality When I have confronted RR authority, I just simply explain my business eg "walking up to the county line road lookin at trains" and since I'm a good 20' off the rail, that's usually good enough to get waived on.

I come across as sincere, which is probably no small part of my success.


And the one thime I was harshly escorted to public lands, it was explained to me the RR had experianced a lot of theft from boxcars, which I had no involvement in but could understand where the RR was coming from. And I think the cop pretty much figured out I was a "nice guy" while we walked to the property line, hence no ride downtown.

make any sense?
  • Member since
    December 2014
  • 512 posts
Posted by cabforward on Monday, January 20, 2003 4:38 AM
exactly what sort of doubt do you feel exists in signs warning people to stay off their property? i cant imagine anyone but a troublemaker debating the issue of where public access ends and restricted access begins.. it seems you prefer to view the potential ways in which the signage might be construed so that violators might not be held to account.. and the purpose of this is what? i guess people cannot be prevented from violating the property of others, but they / their survivors ought not to cry foul when the worst case results.. why is it important to create a standard signage for r.rs.? will young people abide the new admonishment? will derelicts avoid the yards? will thieves be struck with fear? who is the signage for? who will take it seriously? i mean, more seriously than the signs are taken now.. what is your point? it seems our forum is once again being led down the garden path as we were just recently, in a contribution of a vastly over-rated topic about grade crossings.. oh no! i aint going there again!!
as asians are given to say, rotsa ruck!

COTTON BELT RUNS A

Blue Streak

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 349 posts
Posted by croteaudd on Monday, January 20, 2003 3:19 AM
Dear Sir / Madam “train”:

No, I am not an attorney, nor do I have much respect for the profession. Occasionally, I sit in a police station and chat with my wife about the very bloody stupidity going on in the community, or what all the fire engines are rushing to. The intention of the original post was to warn others that there IS a potential interpretation problem. It is most accute when a fence with “No Trespassing” signs parallels a well-traveled public highway, and with an abruptly right angle, the fence with “No Trespassing” signs then follows a private road. The same type signs have DIFFERENT implications depending what KIND of road they are facing. Hopefully, others can glean something useful from all this so as to avoid problems. I am also suggesting railroads can reduce misunderstandings by comprehending there IS a consistency problem that invites innocent entanglements. If railroads wickedly desire conflict, they can’t help but get it as things stand, and the well meaning suffer. If they prefer peace, well, the original post suggests how they may have it. I have years under my belt, and I try to anticipate and avoid problems as much as possible. Do you likewise?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 20, 2003 2:10 AM
mmmmm,mmmmm, good! Can't wait to taste those creosote, diesel fumes, and herbicide tainted berries! No, I'm sorry. I just couldn't resist making a joke here though. Railroad humor, you know..............
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 20, 2003 12:26 AM
I like your style train............
  • Member since
    December 2014
  • 512 posts
Posted by cabforward on Monday, January 20, 2003 12:16 AM
dear sir / madam: just a few questions: are you an attorney? are you familiar with the evolution of statutes defining property rights? what is the derivation of "curtilage"?
when someone places a fence between himself and his next-door neighbor, where does the fencepost sit with respect to the property line?

unless you are acquainted with the legal precedents involving the boundaries of private property, and are prepared to argue the fine points of terms such as "trespass", "posted", "violators", etc., i suggest that you would be wise to merely abide the signs' instructions and place yur issues, if you have any, before the r.rs. general counsel.. i'm sure they would be only too thrilled to hash over the various implications of trespass with you..

you sound like someone who would argue the uncertainty of the legal status of the signs, then sue the r.rs. when you are struck by a train, when you weren't violating the r.rs. private property rights..

COTTON BELT RUNS A

Blue Streak

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Sunday, January 19, 2003 11:46 PM
Our yard lies between two neighorhoods, built long after the yard was. We post no trespassing signs everywhere, the public uses them for target pratice, or tears them down. Then we fenced in one side, the side that most of the trespassers came from. They cut the fence, in one place, they used a car and chain to pull it down. Had a father yell at us for making his kids walk another two blocks to get home. Boxcars are consistently broken into, those with bagged flour or rice are emptied within a hour.
I have even caught a guy, with his teenage sons, trying to crank open the bottom of a grain hopper to get whatever was in there. Had one drive right down the center of the yard, on a path used by our carmen with their scooters, he ended up jammed between a pair of trains, claimed to the cops he drove through there all the time, we must have moved our tracks.
As for a right of way standard, I know of none, but that dosnt mean there isnt one. We tried to block access to a dirt road that runs down one side of our yard for maintainence of way to move their equipment. We installed a swinging bar gate made out of rail, locked with a switch lock.
That lived a whole three days, till they pulled it out of the ground with a backhoe, stolen, that they left there. The signs are there to warn those of you who respect what it stands for. Sadly, there are quite a few who could care less, and will trespass regardless. The GCOR has a rule, when in doubt, take the safest route. I would suggest you do the same. If your not sure if its railroad property or not, assume that it is and treat it as such. Yes, most rr cops will chew you out, then ask you to leave, maby with a escort. Thats their job, not to arrest you, but to keep you away from danger. And yes, if the shortest distance between two points is across a 60 track railroad yard, yup, you guessed right...
Stay frosty,
Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 19, 2003 9:59 PM
Good question, but when a right of way bisects other fenced in private property, and represents the shortest distance between two points, gueess what
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 19, 2003 7:34 PM
What does one use a standard in what is and what isn't railroad property, if it isn't clearly marked? How large is the right-of-way on either side of the rails. I know the train yard app. 1/2 mile from my home is fenced in for the most part, by the river on one side and a chain link fence on the other. Furthermore, all the gravel roads that lead to it are marked as which are public access and rail access. Out on the main line, however, there are few signs if any and the only ones that are present are the "NO TRESSPASSING" ones at intersections of paved roads and railroads. I sell organic produce and the like in the warm season (not an advertisement, just a lead in to why I am near the rr to begin with) and the best patch of blackberries is along a rail. There are no signs or fences or barriers natural or otherwise where I enter. I have been picking there for years and they have yet to say anything. The edge of this area is app 3-5 meters from the ties edge and runs about 50 meters parallel to the bed. I have been there on many occasions and spoken to whomever was there, but no one has ever told me to leave so I presume I am not violating any laws. I noticed last year that they had apparently sprayed herbicide (all the small vegetation about 8-10 meters on either side was dad) in the area, but did not spray "my" berries. Is there a standard, as with the highway dept. for rr right-of-way?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 19, 2003 12:48 PM
Why do peaple feel a need to go on railroad property? I do not know the situation you are in but here in the Chicago area you can see just about anything from a general public area. I guess we are fortunate, for I see no need to trespass on railroad property.
TIM A
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 19, 2003 12:11 PM
What are you so worried about? At age 45, I've been "nabbed" by railroad police perhaps half a dozen times, with the worst outcome being an escort off the property.
Last year I got nailed by a maintenance of way superintendant, who "had" to do something, cause his 6 subordinates were looking on, so I just told him the truth, it was a lil journey down memory lane, we had a talk anout "foamers" and how crazy they all were with their radios, train logs etc,...and then he wished me well, told me to be careful, and that was about the end of it.

Bear in mind that if a railroad cop is the one to catch you, there's probably a good chance that's because the RR has experianced high theft or vandalism in the area, and "that" is why the cop is there in the first place, and running away is tantamount to saying "I'm guilty" in their mind.

Instead, walk right towards them like they have something to tell you that is interesting, act like you didn't know it was wrong for you to be where you were, and gladly leave when he tells you to beat it and you should be ok.


Also, display the behavior of staying well away from moving equipment, so that "switcher" crew doesn't have to worry about you getting yerself hurt if they "fail to call you in" and you should be OK, aa far as my own experiances have proven.


I think the railroads have come of the opinion that "bystanders" are a part of the equation they can never totally eliminate, and you can greatly improve your prospects by knowing your place, being a cooperative member of the "team", and just reralize that the RR cop has a job to do to, let him do it, even if that means waliking up to him so he can tell you to get the @R%&$@ out of there.

And realize that if the RR has been experiancing lits of signal lights being vandalized in the area, a pellet pistol in your pocket is gonna do you no good at all. Leave it at home.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 349 posts
“No Trespassing” Entrapment
Posted by croteaudd on Sunday, January 19, 2003 11:39 AM
Railroads may be their own worst enemy regarding “No Trespassing” signs. They seem to use a double standard that makes a sign’s intended meaning not always readily discernable. A fence displaying “No Trespassing” normally means not to go on the OTHER side of the fence. But, in SOME cases, railroads also interpret a “No Trespassing” sign to apply to a parallel roadway in FRONT of a fence. In my opinion, that basically is entrapment, and is misleading. If a vehicular road is the railroad’s property, and they don’t want the public traveling down it, they should post a separate sign at the entrance FACING traffic rather than on the fence facing towards the middle of the roadway. The latter can easily be misinterpreted as only a property line that should not be violated. A general rule of thumb that I personally have used for years to help identify an ‘entrapment roadway’ is: if the entrance is a DRIVEWAY that rises up to a sidewalk, rather than a single level intersection with painted crosswalks, it probably leads to private property, and is an indication to beware. Nevertheless, since most people tend to respect private property notices, railroads could avoid needless trouble for themselves and others if they simply posted “No Trespassing” signs more correctly, and less subject to interpretation.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy