Trains.com

Mechanics Strike on Northwestern and are replaced by scabs....

4220 views
67 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, September 8, 2005 12:30 PM
The Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Alliance (represents mechanics at Northwest and United, among others) has few friends within organized labor for a variety of reasons. The organization has an elitist attitude that says that the mechanics should have their own union apart from other members of the work force. This is primarily aimed at the IAM, which also represents various other ground workers such as baggage handlers, ground crews and others. They also expanded their membership by raiding the various IAM locals, which had previously represented the mechanics at Northwest and United. This may go a long way in explaining why the pilots and flight attendants did not honor the AMFA picket lines at Northwest.

That being said, the AMFA may be striking against Northwest for a lot of the right reasons but definitely the wrong time. If Northwest goes into Chapter 11, the situation for labor will only get worse.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Wednesday, September 7, 2005 9:23 PM
Don, I'm not sure we have to look south of the border to find the replacements. My guess is that most of them are displaced from other airlines, and US citizens.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 7, 2005 7:43 PM
Union members need to become realistic about salaries. When the airline is profitable, wages should reflect good times for everyone. But when the airline is not profitable, wages should reflect the bad times as a group.....

Substitute airline for any company or corporation....

Frankly, I'm not surprised scabs were called in. Considering the immigration coming in from Mexico, whether legal or illegal, scabs is the easy ticket to break any union!

Time magazine had a poll recently asking whether the citizens of Mexico would consider a relocation to the United States. Sixty percent said yes. The next question is would they immigrate to the United States illegally. Eighty percent of the sixty said yes...
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 7, 2005 6:52 PM
I now have a picture of me in my profile, if you still have any doubts, check it out.
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/member-profile.asp?id=240818
I'll bet you never thought I was so handsome.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Wednesday, September 7, 2005 6:13 PM
Northwest and the mechanics will return to the bargaining table tomorrow, the 20th day of the strike. Due to rising fuel prices, it is expected that the company will offer the union even less than their previous offer, made prior to the strike. Reports are that the airline is currently losing 4 million dollars per day. They may begin hiring permanent replacements as early as next Tuesday.

It sounds like the union is up the creek. Not good.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Monday, August 29, 2005 4:06 PM
Do you folk who have responded own a business large enough that would warrent a unionized workforce? I'm not sure how you can relate the struggles of a small business to a large company like that normally makes tons of money.

If some executive screwed up somewhere, it's not the workers' fault and they are still entitled to cover their costs just like the rest. It's not cheap to live in today's society.

It is the businesses fault why the cost of living is so darn high. Think about it. Companies sell at a certain price but if all the companies raise their price and raise it and raise it, folk can't afford it so they need more money so they fight for it come contract negotiations. Now the business go "whoa" and so they want to cover the extra expenses and raise their prices and raise it and raise itwhich of course get filtered and raised/refined somewhere else (ie retail). Now the workers can't afford anything again so they ask for more money........see the cycle.

Now if the businesses refuse to pay, folk won't be able to buy your product because they will either have to save money for the essential or they have gone bankrupt from loosing their job from a belly-up business that decided to close a plant to increase their quarterly report. Now the taxpayer gets the bill if you have welfare because now folk are making some kind of wage off of you instead of the private sector and so the government undertakes the same mentality and raises taxes. Those still with jobs now are in the position they have to find better paying jobs or fight for a better wage or spend less thus decrease sales and effecting the economy.....

So really, the whole capitalism thing doesn't really work that well if that is how you go about doing things-bankrupting yourself and everybody around you for greed. The present day version of capitalism is no longer self-sustaining and is begining to take its toll.

Remember when chocolate bars were a dime, now they are a buck. Buying a really nice house used to be $25,000 but now that same house is worth $450,000. What the heck happened?
Andrew
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Monday, August 29, 2005 2:13 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tharmeni

I know there's a lot of emotion around this topic and understandably so. I heard a report on a radio station that said ATA and United -- in separate actions -- have laid off more mechanics in INDIANA alone than Northwest has on the picket lines and many of those mechanics, with families to feed and finances hurting, are providing services to Northwest.
I think this is just a tragedy for everyone involved, frankly. No one is going to "win" this.



I think you are dead on here. This is the "musical chair factor" I mentioned earlier. Those so called scabs, were once on the receiving end of this kind of treatment from another airline. All they are really doing is what they think is best for their families. The guilt trip is just part of the game.

The 1900 don't have to be miracle workers. They just need to take care of the day to day stuff. The company wants to contract out the big stuff, kind of what the railroads do when they need locomotives rebuilt vs simply repaired.

The largest savings from not having the extra people on the payroll comes from the benefits the company doesn't have to pay, matching social security, health insurance, etc. The reduced wages aren't as large of a savings. It' kind of like, "let the employees be someone else's problem, we just want our planes fixed". That's the beauty of contract work.

I see you guys picked up on the comment about management not making any consessions. That's why they get the big bucks, for making the hard decisions.[sigh]
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Southwestern Florida
  • 501 posts
Posted by Tharmeni on Monday, August 29, 2005 1:26 PM
I know there's a lot of emotion around this topic and understandably so. I heard a report on a radio station that said ATA and United -- in separate actions -- have laid off more mechanics in INDIANA alone than Northwest has on the picket lines and many of those mechanics, with families to feed and finances hurting, are providing services to Northwest.
I think this is just a tragedy for everyone involved, frankly. No one is going to "win" this.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 29, 2005 12:55 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by equinox

From the link provided in the original post:
They are among the 1,900 replacement workers deployed by Northwest to assume the duties of 4,430 mechanics, cleaners and other members of the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association. The union struck the airline on Saturday over the airline's demand for $176 million in pay and benefit cuts. The replacements have spent the last three months training under a $107 million contingency plan that the airline crafted in anticipation of a strike.

1900 workers to replace 4300 workers? Wow, those 1900 must be miracle-workers, to do the job of three men. I wonder why they could not get jobs before becoming scabs?

And the airline that is going broke decides to spend $107 million (plus ongoing costs of housing and security) to train scabs, when that money could have been put forth to the strikers as part of an agreement. Perhaps the airline has its own agenda?

And how much wage and benefit consessions has management made? Any VP's taking a 26% cut? Getting rid of half the management are they?

And gee, THREE whole months to train as an airline mechanic? I have yet to feel like an expert after only three months at any job, much less a job that requires asmuch skill as a airline mechanic.

Perhaps the union could try to make the flying public more aware of just who is "fixing" the planes they are about to board. NO WAY would I fly on an airline with this sort of labor dispute going on. Nor would I cross the picket line.




Some very good thoughts well worth repeating.

If concession are to be made then management should be the FIRST to make concession on their OWN pay.

I wonder if the scabs understand that THEY can be held ACCOUNTABLE for anything that goes wrong with what they have "fixed" ? They probally don't have an A & P license so they are having someone else "sign off" their work. I would not put my licenses and job on the line in this case. NO WAY.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 29, 2005 11:31 AM
From the link provided in the original post:
They are among the 1,900 replacement workers deployed by Northwest to assume the duties of 4,430 mechanics, cleaners and other members of the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association. The union struck the airline on Saturday over the airline's demand for $176 million in pay and benefit cuts. The replacements have spent the last three months training under a $107 million contingency plan that the airline crafted in anticipation of a strike.

1900 workers to replace 4300 workers? Wow, those 1900 must be miracle-workers, to do the job of three men. I wonder why they could not get jobs before becoming scabs?

And the airline that is going broke decides to spend $107 million (plus ongoing costs of housing and security) to train scabs, when that money could have been put forth to the strikers as part of an agreement. Perhaps the airline has its own agenda?

And how much wage and benefit consessions has management made? Any VP's taking a 26% cut? Getting rid of half the management are they?

And gee, THREE whole months to train as an airline mechanic? I have yet to feel like an expert after only three months at any job, much less a job that requires asmuch skill as a airline mechanic.

Perhaps the union could try to make the flying public more aware of just who is "fixing" the planes they are about to board. NO WAY would I fly on an airline with this sort of labor dispute going on. Nor would I cross the picket line.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 29, 2005 7:53 AM
None of you watched the UAW/Caterpillar strike and outcome? Almost 20% crossed the lines to go back to work, the strike lasted years, many guys lost their homes, cars, boats, motorcycles, wives and some even took their lives because the end wasn't in sight. Cat brought in office workers, and they office workers loved it, they made the UAW wages of 18+ an hour and not the partly 10-15 an hour they were used to. I think the UAW here saw the writing on the wall, compromise or lose all union voice at Cat, save what jobs they could, or watch Cat bring in new hires (or scabs as you wish) or watch all the work get outsourced. The union stance here in Peoria, has had a negagtive impact on our securing new companies that would offer a better then Walmart or strip mall pay. Because the union held out so long we haven't seen a major manufacture reappear in years. The last UAW/Cat talks got to the 11th hour of striking, they had office/management out in the shops training right along side the UAW workers. Cat office was hoping for the strike, and I think Cat could have carried on with out the UAW in the shops, since all of Cat is Office heavy. I know a lot of this since my girlfriend is at Cat, they had her on the list to go factory.

While I think that a man should be paid a decent wage, and the company should appriciate the skilled labor they have, when you are looking at times were the best paying job a non-college educated is WalMart, a place like Cat and the offer of working for 2-4 an hour more makes it hard for some not to start being replacement (scab) workers. Put yourself in a younger persons shoes that sees others driving new Pickups, has a decent home while they drive a 10-15 year old car, they live in an apartment and live week to week and tell me you wouldn't place your family first to have it better instead of saying "oh, they are union, and I need to respect the union ethics" yeah right when we see what the upper union management takes home even when there is a strike. I think when the members they represent are on stike and taking home $50.00 a week strike pay, then the uppers at the union should do the same.

If I sound a little pro-company so be it, I have lived both sides of the fence, I have also owned my own company, it's not always easy to pay the "great wages" if you want to be profitable, grow and have your own retirement work. Also the union doesn't own the company or the jobs, the owner or "CEO" is the one.

[end][soapbox][/end]
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Monday, August 29, 2005 6:59 AM
Reports are that at least one mechanic in Minneapolis and one in Milwaukee have crossed the picket line and gone back to work.

The airline is reporting that 96% of all scheduled flights during the first week of the strike went off, with 71% on time. If true, this is not good news for the union, who are counting on more service disruption.

The airline is taking aim at the pilots again, asking for even more consessions. Now a 33% pay cut is being sought, this following a pay cut earlier this year.

Wall Street and Main Street have different views of this strike. Wall Street sees management's actions as a positive, and Northwest's stock price has risen since the strike began.

By the way, oil has reached a new record high per barrel, which only makes the company's financial situation worse. At some point, the employees will not be able to cover this, and ticket prices will have to go up, or at minimum higher fuel surcharges need to be added to each ticket.

So far there has been no mention of pay or job cuts for management. Interesting.[B)][}:)][xx(][:(!][V]
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Gateway to Donner Summit
  • 434 posts
Posted by broncoman on Sunday, August 28, 2005 2:35 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SP9033

Originally posted by Tharmeni



Of course, this is subjective and regional in nature, but having been a truck driver for 35 years, owner operator, non-union employee and union employee I've seen lots. One of the things I've noticed over the years is that whether a shop is union or not, it seems they both have the same percentage of slackers. At the union shop I work at now, there is a certain amount of peer pressure to do a good job - much more than at any non-union shop I've ever worked at over the years.

I have seen and lived through the turmoil of the past 25 years within the trucking industry since deregulation. At most of the companies I witness go under, it had very little to do with labor and much more to do with management that refused to change. They just didn't get it, until it was too late. They thought we were the problem, we were not the problem, we were the solution.

If Northwestern is to survive, they have to change the bureaucratic corporate culture, union busting will not save them. They need lots of change at the top. They have to get rid of the us verses them attitude, and make it a team effort by empowering labor to serve the customer and get the job done.

I'm so grateful that I'm a teamster. June I was diagnosed with cancer and have not worked since then, my treatment has been covered by good insurance covered through the union, paid by my employer. No Cobra here, 12 months of premiums as well as a small weekly short term disability payment. My total out of pocket expense for co-pays was 2,000 bucks, nothing more to pay this year.



Jim
I.B.T. Local 533




I completely agree. Management can make or break a company... especially upper management. IMHO Herb Kelleher was one of the greatest CEOs around. I usually choose to fly southwest at any opportunity, for how energetic and happy their stewards and stewardesses are, as opposed to flying United or American. I know friends who have left other jobs to go to Southwest because it was a good company to work for and are very happy for having made that choice.
I also agree that it is with benefits not always pay that unions are the biggest benefit, and with that I wish you a speedy recovery Jim!

Dave
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Crozet, VA
  • 1,049 posts
Posted by bobwilcox on Sunday, August 28, 2005 2:18 PM
It is interesting to note that the legacy airlines look to Southwest Airlines as their benchmark. Southwest has always had union representation for most of their employees. I think the big hurdle is not the union per se but the problem selling anyone on big give backs from the old days when regulated airlines could pass along the cost to their customers. The give backs may make sense on a spreadsheet but they come right out of someones pocket that needs to pay a stack of bills every month. How many of your could stand a 30% pay cut starting with your next pay check?
Bob
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Sunday, August 28, 2005 9:26 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tharmeni

The talk of "scabs" and the management of Northwest is disturbing. As a businessman, if someone is undercutting me on the cost of my service and taking me to the cleaners, I have two choices: Get my costs down to stay competitive or give up. It's a matter of numbers, not conspriacies.
I went to hear a national union leader speak a few weeks ago and he said two things that I noted: 1) Unions still are, to some extent, seen as a mechanism to do the smallest amount of work for the highest price and 2) if unions do not change, then you'll have to visit the Smithsonian to see a union member.
He said it, fellas, not me.


Well then the man is jack a$$ and shouldn't represent. That is not what the unions are supposed to be doing. They are supposed to be there to represent the workers and make sure that the workers are protected from unfair management policies and ensure that federal and provincial/state laws are being followed among other things. Guys like him are the reason why people distrust and have a negative attitude toward unions.
Andrew
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 28, 2005 8:58 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tharmeni

The talk of "scabs" and the management of Northwest is disturbing. As a businessman, if someone is undercutting me on the cost of my service and taking me to the cleaners, I have two choices: Get my costs down to stay competitive or give up. It's a matter of numbers, not conspriacies.
I went to hear a national union leader speak a few weeks ago and he said two things that I noted: 1) Unions still are, to some extent, seen as a mechanism to do the smallest amount of work for the highest price and 2) if unions do not change, then you'll have to visit the Smithsonian to see a union member.
He said it, fellas, not me.


Who was the union leader speaking, and what craft did he represent?

Of course, this is subjective and regional in nature, but having been a truck driver for 35 years, owner operator, non-union employee and union employee I've seen lots. One of the things I've noticed over the years is that whether a shop is union or not, it seems they both have the same percentage of slackers. At the union shop I work at now, there is a certain amount of peer pressure to do a good job - much more than at any non-union shop I've ever worked at over the years.

I have seen and lived through the turmoil of the past 25 years within the trucking industry since deregulation. At most of the companies I witness go under, it had very little to do with labor and much more to do with management that refused to change. They just didn't get it, until it was too late. They thought we were the problem, we were not the problem, we were the solution.

If Northwestern is to survive, they have to change the bureaucratic corporate culture, union busting will not save them. They need lots of change at the top. They have to get rid of the us verses them attitude, and make it a team effort by empowering labor to serve the customer and get the job done.

I'm so grateful that I'm a teamster. June I was diagnosed with cancer and have not worked since then, my treatment has been covered by good insurance covered through the union, paid by my employer. No Cobra here, 12 months of premiums as well as a small weekly short term disability payment. My total out of pocket expense for co-pays was 2,000 bucks, nothing more to pay this year.

When I get back to work, I'll be a grateful teamster doing a first class job. Most of us in labor, very much understand that we make money for the company. If the company doesn't make money, we have no paycheck!

Jim
I.B.T. Local 533

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Southwestern Florida
  • 501 posts
Posted by Tharmeni on Sunday, August 28, 2005 7:34 AM
The talk of "scabs" and the management of Northwest is disturbing. As a businessman, if someone is undercutting me on the cost of my service and taking me to the cleaners, I have two choices: Get my costs down to stay competitive or give up. It's a matter of numbers, not conspriacies.
I went to hear a national union leader speak a few weeks ago and he said two things that I noted: 1) Unions still are, to some extent, seen as a mechanism to do the smallest amount of work for the highest price and 2) if unions do not change, then you'll have to visit the Smithsonian to see a union member.
He said it, fellas, not me.
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Gateway to Donner Summit
  • 434 posts
Posted by broncoman on Saturday, August 27, 2005 10:15 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan

Unfortunately the workplace got so darn competitive, having all kinds of degrees and certificates doesn't always gets you where you should be. I have heard of folk with trade certificates from the City Guilds of London working at the pizza store because "they don't have experience".

Answer me this employers; how the heck is someone supposed to get experience if you don't hire them?


The only saving grace is that most of the people from the tail end of my generation and up have been told going to college and getting an education is the only way to get a good paying job. I don't know how it is in the mid west, but out here there are tons of trade school or journeyman type jobs that go unfilled, UPs job list for this area is pretty big. Kids were told computers, while the nation is running out of welders, plumbers, mechanics etc. My company pays apprentices a decent wage while they go through their apprenticeship, and we have problems filling jobs. Kids don't want to work, or haven't worked and have a tough time being told to do meanial stuff as part of their job, i.e. you need to spend a couple of hours prepping that pipeline to learn about the prep work before you can learn how to weld it.
Sorry I'm getting off subject.....[oops]
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Saturday, August 27, 2005 9:11 PM
Unfortunately the workplace got so darn competitive, having all kinds of degrees and certificates doesn't always gets you where you should be. I have heard of folk with trade certificates from the City Guilds of London working at the pizza store because "they don't have experience".

Answer me this employers; how the heck is someone supposed to get experience if you don't hire them?
Andrew
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Gateway to Donner Summit
  • 434 posts
Posted by broncoman on Saturday, August 27, 2005 7:34 PM
I agree that its definately not cool to have the rug pulled out. I am 34 and have just completed my 10th year with the union. I had a management job before I hired on so I was used to the ax falling before I came to the union. Its amazing that guys that I work with hired on when they were 18 and are getting ready to retire after putting in 40 somthing years with the same company. There is a completely different culture on that side of the house. I still keep my resume ready and take any classes I can to give me an edge in my field, but I feel for the guys who haven't known different and hope they land on there feet.

Dave
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Saturday, August 27, 2005 2:46 PM
Dave, I really don't know if they are doing any more hiring. I think that phase was done a couple months ago in preparation for the strike. Some of the local news crews broke the story and followed some of the applicants. These training sessions were not held in the Twin Cities, but rather in undisclosed locations around the country. One may have been in Phoenix. There must have been a blind ad in some of the major newspapers around the country. The union probably caught wind of it, and turned the reporters on them.

I'm not sure what the replacement's qualifications are. I think it is reasonable to assume many have an aircraft background, while others came from different diciplines with mechanical skills.

I think what the company is really looking to do, is only employ a small staff to handle minor repairs and quick fixes. The big stuff, scheduled overhauls and such, would be outsourced. Until this strike business is resolved one way or the other, the company may not be able to sign contracts. That would put an interesting twist on things, giving the union a little more leverage. Their goal is to hang tough in hopes of crippling the airline and bring them back to the bargaining table.

The reality is, as long as the planes keep flying, the work will have to be done. The questions are: who, where and for how much? If the company wins, these jobs won't just evaporate, but they will move away. The replacements may become permanent. The moving away part is something the state of Minnesota is NOT very happy about, because a number of years ago, when Northwest was in trouble, the state helped them out, under the condition that the jobs stay here. Now this.

This is more like a game of musical chairs. I'm sure most of these guys will land on their feet, as you noted mechanics are in demand. Of course, nobody likes to have the rug pulled out from under them, and be forced to find a new job and possibly relocate, especially after as many years as some of these guys have with the company.

I wish I could tell you more about the local job market, but I'm not involved in it. I'm just a curious innocent bystander, who's following the story.

Thank you James. In the long run, you'll get more respect around here that way.
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Gateway to Donner Summit
  • 434 posts
Posted by broncoman on Saturday, August 27, 2005 12:30 PM
So guys from the Minneapolis/St. Paul area (namely Big_Boy 4005), do you guys happen to know if they are hiring other mechanic types in the area there and if so do they pay close to the same wages? When there was the last strike and bankruptcy by United, a lot of mechanics went on to other things. I think they made around $38.00 an hour for United at San Francisco. Normal mechanics (truck, car, heavy equipment) around here make around $33.00/hr. Many A & P mechanics had no trouble switching jobs. The company I work for hired around 10 of them I think and thats out of 400 mechanics statewide. With most of the mechanic workforce getting close to retirement there are a lot of job openings, I was curious if this was true in your area also.

Dave
I.B.E.W. 1245
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, August 27, 2005 12:18 PM
well, James. You fired at me and you got fired upon. I will leave this one lay. If you ever become a rail, your opinion of the Union will change. If it werent for the Union we would make 8.00 an hour to pedal these land turds across the rail.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, August 27, 2005 11:46 AM
Please Read at least one last post!
Don't be so quick to judge, ironken, this foamer plans on going to Modoc Rail Academy and joining the ranks of the railroaders, why else would I play train simulator. I just got a big subwoofer, but I can't seem to convince dad that we need the lifesize controls. My profile says schooling, because my job is to be a student. No proof of my age, but I post mostly about model railroading, and other things, so I am not a troll or Bergie would have gotten a bunch of complaints and nuked me. I have a nasty habit of using Teddy Roosevelt diplomacy; I am very blunt and speak my mind, this can be troubling to some. The reason my email is not listed is because of my parents. I have no intention of ruining anyone’s day. Big_Boy_4005, I have been reading your posts, I think I understand the situation, better upon rereading your posts, I agree with you. I sincerely hope that we can talk trains again. I don't want to make any enemies, and I apologize, there was no need to shout or phrase things the way I said. Here are some of my posts, to save you some time:http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43989
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43992
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43744
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43953
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43949
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43727
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43731
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43306
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43852
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43665
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43815http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43915
You can make your judgements, but I hope you won't do like dennis and harrass me everywhere I post.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Saturday, August 27, 2005 9:42 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SP9033

Fellows,

Take it easy on James, he is just a 14 year old kid, still living at home with mom and dad. He still has many lessons of life he hasn't had to live yet.

Jim - Lawton, NV MP 236



Jim, that is my understanding of his identity too, but there is no proof. That is the beauty of the internet, you can be as anonymous as you want, and nobody can prove or disprove who you are.

Over on the MR forum someone accused him of being a troll, and it turned into a 5 page war.

My suggestion is to go to his profile, and read all of his posts. Then decide for yourself if you still believe that he is 14. I'm begining to think Dennis B was right, and he just comes here to see who he can make angry. This is the third time I've crossed paths with him, and I'm getting sick of it.

I don't hide behind my screen name. My photo is in my profile and my email is listed. The same is true of most of the regulars around here.

As far as I'm concerned, from this moment on, I'm done reading his posts. When I see them I will ignore them. My advice is that everyone here do the same, and not let him ruin your day.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, August 27, 2005 2:27 AM
Fellows,

Take it easy on James, he is just a 14 year old kid, still living at home with mom and dad. He still has many lessons of life he hasn't had to live yet.

Jim - Lawton, NV MP 236
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, August 27, 2005 2:04 AM
liberal nonsence....pure opinion......boy James. Everything I say has been disproved? Your profile said that you are a teacher. Typical. You state that you have read about such and such strike. Well pal, I have been on strike and have my job replaced by a scab. You read about it and I have lived it. Just remember, while you are sitting there in your jammies playing your train simulator while your girlfriend sits there looking at you in disgust, I am out there living and doing it and leaving my family to do it. I like it and I like my union and I deserve every penny that I make. Until you have lived it, you have no opinion in my book. Flame away..........When the sun sets, I'm still a rail and you are still a foamer. Heck, instead of going after anything in my life and experiencing it......I shoulda took the safe course and just read about it and become an expert on the subject.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Saturday, August 27, 2005 12:33 AM
James, please take your blinders off, and read my posts. I have pretty well explained the situation. This strike is what leads my local news 4 times a day. It has been on the front page of the paper for weeks.

How would you like to work for a company for 20 years, and wake up one morning and have the company tell you they don't want you anymore? This isn't just about wages, the union probably expects to take a pay cut, but 26%, which is what Northwest offered, isn't realistic. Would you take a 26% pay cut? I think not!!!

In addition to pay cuts they want to cut jobs too. So, now if you don't have 16 years in you are pretty much toast, and get a 100% pay cut. That's life in the real world kid.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 26, 2005 10:56 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SP9033

Originally posted by Lotus098
I meant your blatant liberal nonsense. I am quite interested in the subject. I subscribe to trains for the business information as much as about being a rail fan and taking pictures. What is a foamer?



James,

We all come here from different places and situations in life. And its nice to see a bright, articulate young man as you posting here on this board. But, it is obvious that you have limited your intake of information to one point of view. I would suggest that you broaden your base of knowledge by taking in a boarder buffet of information from multiple sources. Read about both sides of the issues.

Jim



I do try, look at all the facts you can get, and make a logical choice. If the job conditions were terrible, nobody would work there, and if they were illegal, they would get sued. Surely ironken is guilty of the same, or worse. Since much of his statements have been disproved, or are pure opinion.


I just have one question that the article didn't mention.
[?][?] Why are these guys striking?[?][?]
I wonder if the Union isn't trying to force the airline to raise their wages. One other thing that bothers me: What is wrong with these scabs, they are honest men doing an honest job. Part of capitalism, if the job needs done somebody is willing to do it, nothing wrong with that is there? A Great railroad story I read about a strike is out of Short lines A Collection of Classic American Railroad Stories The story The Nerve of Foley, very good story, shows how an engineer who was laid off from another railroad due to a strike comes to the one in the book (I forget the name), he is the hero of the story and in the end rescues one of the strikers sons, he isn't evil and not the scum of the earth. If you read the article, many of the scabs, are former mechanics that were laid off, these people are getting a raise and returning to the job. This would lead me to believe that the job isn't so bad as to strike over. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy