QUOTE: Originally posted by Safety Valve QUOTE: Originally posted by bcrailex completely separate...no stops...crew change only in chicago...talk is to allow UP motive pwr to go all the way to S Schenectady....but you are correct QNPSKP goes into Selkirk where it is humped. Those are conventional perishable cars. Also no excess height cars can continue on into Boston, although not sure about Hunt's Point. Hunts Point is truck only. If they get railcars into Hunts I'll eat my steering wheel. I spent some time at Hunts. I dont think Albany is land locked. There is a river that runs to the sea in that area. Surely it can carry navigatible river traffic? I think Albany will be doing alot of Grand Union business in that area, I used to run Eggs out of Maryland into that area and Butter; spices from Baltimore into that part of the NY state. One of the things about the Northeast, they consume everything. It's hard to get anything out of there.
QUOTE: Originally posted by bcrailex completely separate...no stops...crew change only in chicago...talk is to allow UP motive pwr to go all the way to S Schenectady....but you are correct QNPSKP goes into Selkirk where it is humped. Those are conventional perishable cars. Also no excess height cars can continue on into Boston, although not sure about Hunt's Point.
"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)
QUOTE: Originally posted by Safety Valve Well, when that train pulls into Albany with's cornicopia (Spelling) the food is probably going to end up being broken down into alot of different orders as required. With saying 4 trucks to take away one Reefer load and 55 Reefers to unload ye are going to need around 200 trucks ready or more to fill your orders the day you unload that train. Or am I spinning myself out on your operation in Albany?
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrandb QUOTE: Originally posted by Safety Valve There was a comment regarding 4 truck loads in each rail car. Alot of the work is LCL. So a Diner in Jersey might ask for 4 pallets of Apples for the week. (Apple Pies, apple sauce, apple salad etc... mmmmm) 2000 pounds per pallet (Not actual weight but sometimes lighter or heavier) 8,000 pounds will fit in about 8 feet worth of a Reefer Rail Car's or truck deck. You probably have another oh... 40-45 more feet worth of deck to load for any number of Jersey customers. This will be dedicated unit trains from dedicated perishable terminal to terminal. LCL should not be an issue. At 4 truckloads per car times 55 cars we should see many reefer vans available to haul those LCL which are illsuited to rail traffic.[2c]
QUOTE: Originally posted by Safety Valve There was a comment regarding 4 truck loads in each rail car. Alot of the work is LCL. So a Diner in Jersey might ask for 4 pallets of Apples for the week. (Apple Pies, apple sauce, apple salad etc... mmmmm) 2000 pounds per pallet (Not actual weight but sometimes lighter or heavier) 8,000 pounds will fit in about 8 feet worth of a Reefer Rail Car's or truck deck. You probably have another oh... 40-45 more feet worth of deck to load for any number of Jersey customers.
Carl
Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)
CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrandb QUOTE: [i] Greyhounds, Question: Is there anyone out there who thinks that box of cherries is going to get from the orchard to NYC just as fast as the over the road truckers, or at the same cost to the grower/marketer? By that time, the over the road truckers will have handled two cross country trips between existing facilities, probably with backhaul to boot, which totally negates rail's efficiency advantage since the truckers will have hauled just as much freight in that time period as the rail cars. I am a little fuzzy on the math here. How is that two truckers (team drivers) who haul two truckloads in ten days at twice the cost and half the amount of freight (4 truckloads per freight car) are more cost effective and competitive than the railroad. Besides the fact if they are driving a SAT linked tractor there dispatcher could shut them down for either speed or hours violations. To even have a prayer of 2 West Coast turnarounds in ten days you better be able to to drop and pick trailers at both ends. One way will be deadheading. Throw in a back haul and they will back for more cherries in 7-8 days. Unless of course they're back hauling from the same warehouses. NOT This revival of a tried and true method of deliving fresh produce to the east coast by rail will be something to look forward to. [2c] As always ENJOY
QUOTE: [i] Greyhounds, Question: Is there anyone out there who thinks that box of cherries is going to get from the orchard to NYC just as fast as the over the road truckers, or at the same cost to the grower/marketer? By that time, the over the road truckers will have handled two cross country trips between existing facilities, probably with backhaul to boot, which totally negates rail's efficiency advantage since the truckers will have hauled just as much freight in that time period as the rail cars.
In response to the "cherry picker" comments, who is obviously in the trucking industry; let me see if I can give you a different perspective on the "womb to tomb" scenario. If the farmer in Washington State harvests his cherries and puts his 3 month window into his state-of-the-art coolers and then has his salesmen pound the phone for over the road truckers as in the past but most recently to no avail, those cherries just "hand around the coolers with no where to go for up to 7-10 days at times, depending on whether or not the reliable trucking industry feels like working their way up from Cal where the supply is better and less driving. Now 5 days go by and low and behold, here comes a 48 footer with an attitude!! He loads his truck with those beautiful bings, load locks himself in, and off to Boston he goes. He checks his unit and its 90 degrees outside but its a cool 36 degrees in his trailer. He goes down the road and has 5 days till his delivery. More chances than not the driver is getting 5-6 grand for the trip so on the second day he says what the f... and desides to go to his favorite truck-stop and cop some crystal meth!! Any trucker with any brains knows he can make the trip in 4 days so WHY NOT HAVE A LITTLE FUN! Couple of white-trash rest area "hoes" glass pipe and who needs to call in!!!! Meanwhile the cherries inside ain't feeling so good because the unit tripped and now the temperatures a rising faster than the blood pressure of our "California turn-around" driver. We all know the story from here. Driver misses delivery, brings unit back down to temp first, loses the temp recorder, retailer rejects load, and rather than transload through a temp controlled rail center and inspect and deliver cherries through a destination point on the eastern seaboard for "just in time delivery" you are telling me that we should rely on the present "highly efficient" trucking inddustry that takes up 90 percent of the day, looking for these past heroes of the highway. Good for the railroad for showing some steel!!! I'd rather be on a GPS refrig train the first day out of a cooler than a truck attitude the 7th day out of the same cooler, without the glass pipe!!!! ENDQOUTE. First off. Let me say this. ANY driver caught smoking while on duty will be arrested, sent to jail and license is in danger. A typical long haul reefer driver is a company man who expects to make .25 cents a mile not 5-6 thousand dollars. That money probably needs the lading to be signed for delivered and the paper work processed. It can take 2 weeks to get the 5-6 thousand. Staying out of the interstate rest areas and keeping the left door shut and out of the truck stop is the way to protect yourself, your health, the truck and the load. If you cannot do any of this then I dont want you in a class 8 truck resposnisble for a great deal of equiptment, expensive cargo and service contracts. Some of the things I concede to trucking as I have had some wild times, but nothing that will prevent me from sharing with the family. But the perception that truckers are smoking while on duty, seeking out infected (Sexually and probably physically -medically) people who prey on those who dont know any better and other activites designed to prevent safe, fast and accurate transport of cargo is unacceptable to me. Period. That driver will find himself out of a job and probably in so much trouble it will take alot of time, effort and money to clear up. Something hard to come by when you are trying to make a living on the road. Now that I have had my rant in response to this posting I gotta say that I support this train service from Washington. It's very hard to get into the Yakima and out again probably thru the Eastern Oregon especially in the dead of winter which happens to be Chain season during the harvest. You tell me that this methadone smoked driver who is zoned out on his on world filled with pleasures and sickness is going to have the strength and the skills to bring a convoy of 100 trucks over the cabbage safely during a winter storm. YEA RIGHT. Put it on the train, each of those reefers can be tracked via GPS and monitored in real time for any mechanical or temperature problems. I ran reefer for a number of years and they were pretty reliable. I had a unit go down on me at Grand Junction on a chilly 50 degree rainy night at midnight due in Denver at 7 the next morning. I got up and took it straight thru the now 40 degree rain into denver because 1- no repair shops other than Salt Lake or Denver and 2- the value of the load was in excess of 100,000 and I will not be the one that loses it as a company driver. The load was repaired in Denver with some Heroics by Carrier getting out of bed and to work way earlier than usual start time. And the delivery was made. With that in mind, the Railroad is going to need an ability and manpower to respond to any number of reefer problems within 3 hours anywhere on the line. There are mobile repair units ready but I would expect nothing but the newest and the very best reefer cars for this job. Some produce is just too hot time wise to meet the 124 hour service. But Apples and stuff like Potatoes are just fine. Reply Edit Home erfline rr Member sinceAugust 2003 12 posts Posted by Home erfline rr on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 10:26 AM Hello: I have some observations and questions regarding this "NEW" service. During the 1920's there were stories of "Silk" trains that were only a few cars long, and had express routing to bring the silk from the Western USA sea ports to the clothing shops in the East Coast Cities. There are stories and pictures of Pacific Fruit Express Reefer trains running from the Western USA Cities to the Eastern Cities during the 1940's and 1950's. Is the only difference between this latest venture and the above two examples only that these trains will orginate and end in specialized warehouses with climate controlled loading unloading areas? The question I have is the refernce to Coast to Coast. Albany is a land locked city in New York State. How does that translate to Coast to Coast? I do see the benefits of using a dedicated train to bring the produce to the East, but is the Railway going to not take advanctage of higher East to West freight rates and ship other items to the West on the same unit trains? Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 9:20 AM Um...OK in order i guess.. UP only for now Unit train; rolling stock not an issue; Plenty of loads year round; Not just NE, can ease down upper east coast as well. Warehouse/inventory services in Albany. Think of it as an FOB warehouse gents: Your WA product becomes FOB Albany. A shipper can stage product in our facility and ship to many different customers. We start with one train arriving in Albany every 12 days; then go to 2 once proven. Conventional cars will be rec'd in between unit trains as well... Bill (How come no one picked up on the Green Goats doing the yardwork?? THAT"S cool..LOL) Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 9:11 AM I was using the figure for a "team" truck (2 drivers in the same vehicle), which is really the only way to get from WA to BOS/NY in 5 days safely, to compare with our 5 day service, it is a much higher rate than single driver. Also figuring 4th quarter, which is historically higher and tighter due to harvest, and fuel continuing to rise a bit more. I'm sure a slight dollop of exaggeration was is there as well, I stand slightly corrected; But even figuring at say 7G, Railex plans to deliver almost 3X as much product for relatively the same price. So yes, if reliability is there (Obviously my job #1), and we have been assured by UP and CSX that it will be, we hope to do quite well. And yes, other routes are a definite possibility, some of the NS cities that have had long delivery times are being examined, the model could apply to several cities, with hubs in CA and WA. The WA/NY link was the obvious first choice due to demand. HAve a good day guys, Bill Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 8:31 AM 124 hours is a bit slow, but.... if you can load 55 railcars and keep em cool across the USA and have constant service it might put a good face on perisable once again. The Northeast has a insatible appetite for food as does the rest of the USA. How often will Albany recieve such a train? The reason I ask is because you can only generate so many loads, empty rolling stock and facilities to process everything so often. Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 8:17 AM QUOTE: Originally posted by greyhounds Bill C - when I check the USDA site for truck rates I don't see $9,000 from Washington to the east coast. www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/wa_fv190.txt Am I not understanding something? Perhaps those are the one-way rates, with an implicit backhaul. I would think it is more difficult to find a backhaul load for a reefer than a dry van. Regarding Railex, don't forget to add in the local truck rate on both ends, and then compare price and expediency with the over the road guys. There is also some reefer service going TOFC between the PNW and East Coast. Bill C. - Since the Wallula area has access to both UP and BNSF, will this facility end up allowing access by BNSF should they offer service out of the facility, or is this facility in Wallula only accessable to UP? Reply Edit greyhounds Member sinceAugust 2003 From: Antioch, IL 4,371 posts Posted by greyhounds on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 12:57 AM Bill C - when I check the USDA site for truck rates I don't see $9,000 from Washington to the east coast. www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/wa_fv190.txt Am I not understanding something? "By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that. Reply rrandb Member sinceDecember 2001 From: K.C.,MO. 1,063 posts Posted by rrandb on Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:31 PM So bcrailex while we have your ear. Is there any talk of eventually expanding to other markets. Would your model work on shorter hauls? Florida to New York comes to mind with the amount of produce they grow. Tropicana has proved they can get decent transit times? [?] Thanks in advance. Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 6, 2006 10:56 PM Thanks for the kind words gents, Would also like to add in while we're doing the truck math, not to forget that the RR will be getting 2 revenue producing runs per month guaranteed per car in the 55 unit train. Normal turnaround for conventional reefer cars is 28 days avg per revenue trip. Put in an aging 57 foot mech reefer fleet, less yard switching, humping and bad order cars (64 ft cars are brand new and satellite controlled). UP also gets a strong presence in WA state, typically BN country, whose reefer fleet is in even worse shape and whose avg DELIVERY time is 14-22 days on perishables. (UP is 8 from ID, 10 from CA) And yes, Express Lane service was avail, but it was an added cost for what boiled down to 1 day earlier service from the west coast because the UP had basically streamlined their whole operation so well that conventionals would show up the next day or two anyway. (On CSX anyway, NYC, BOS etc...) regards, Bill Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 6, 2006 10:48 PM "Don't forget, there are plenty of storage facilities already in place, so why would the growers want to yank their investments there and commit to a centralized rail distribution center? " The ultimate goal of a logistics planner is to ELIMINATE the warehouse. The fruit growers have to truck out of the orchards, but would just love to perform a truck-to-railcar transfer in Wallula and do the storage on the east end - within overnight reach of the consumers in small-lot shipments Once you get away from the ultra-perishables such as lettuce, the cost of trucking (which is skyrocketing) offsets the value of decreased transit time - the economic "need for speed" quickly disappears. The service will have to be rock-solid RELIABLE to become an option. If they consistently hit that 124-hour target, the rails will have a clear price advantage in offering a competitive service. But - they can't just drop the service the next time APL wants to run a another stack train, or the stock price dips seventeen cents. Reply Edit ericsp Member sinceMay 2015 5,134 posts Posted by ericsp on Tuesday, June 6, 2006 10:01 PM QUOTE: Originally posted by igoldberg For the last couple of years the UP has been running the "Salad Bowl Express" from the Salins and San Juaquin valleys in Caliornia to New York. UP has taken the buisiness away from the trucks with delivery guaranteed jin 94 hours and at competiver pricing. Trains had a great article on it. I will dig it out and post the date of the issue. You are probably thinking about the Express Lane service. While cars from the Coast are probably added at Roseville, no Express Lane train is listed as originating, or running through, there. "No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld) Reply greyhounds Member sinceAugust 2003 From: Antioch, IL 4,371 posts Posted by greyhounds on Tuesday, June 6, 2006 9:53 PM I'd like to congradulate Railex, Bill Collins and all the other people there for getting this off the ground. It is great to see a well thought out effort like this agressively go after the perishable business. It's a HUGE long haul market. A middleman like Railex is just what is needed to make it work. Good Grief! $9,000/truckload from Washington State to the east coast. That's $3.00/mile. At 42K per truck that's over $0.21/pound on apples just for transportation. Can we buy stock in Railex? "By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that. Reply « First«1234567 Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
QUOTE: Originally posted by greyhounds Bill C - when I check the USDA site for truck rates I don't see $9,000 from Washington to the east coast. www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/wa_fv190.txt Am I not understanding something?
QUOTE: Originally posted by igoldberg For the last couple of years the UP has been running the "Salad Bowl Express" from the Salins and San Juaquin valleys in Caliornia to New York. UP has taken the buisiness away from the trucks with delivery guaranteed jin 94 hours and at competiver pricing. Trains had a great article on it. I will dig it out and post the date of the issue.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.