CCC&StLRy
"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics
QUOTE: Originally posted by gabe QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear QUOTE: Originally posted by wabash1 QUOTE: Originally posted by CleveUnionTerm What kind of marker did the switch (have/use) to show its alignment at the wreck site? A key to safe railroading is to know your territory and to be alert to all switches therein. Never take switch alignment for granted wherever you run. C.C.C.& St.L. Ry. never take switch alignment for granted. so you are saying that at 55mph i should slow down 1 mile before i get to the switch make sure it is right then go back to notch 8 for 2 miles slow down again until i get to crew change point. ... why dont i just stop and flag all crossing also . FOFLMAO... Wabash, while you're at it how 'bout having cab signals installed and electric locks on all switches off the main?? CC- Have you ever run a train at 40+ mph??? Seeing a switch target at 2:40am from any distance in your headlight/ditchlights is tough enough let alone at that closing speed. The fact that Chris saw the misaligned switch and dumped the train (according to NTSB) is testimony to the fact that he was reasonable alert. Just not enough time to make a difference. LC LC, When you say "dumped the train" do you mean put it in emergency? Do they know how far ahead of the switch the engineer was able to do it? I feel so bad for the crew and town. I read on CNN that the previous crew forgot to realign the switch? Does anyone know if there is any truth to that? Gabe
QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear QUOTE: Originally posted by wabash1 QUOTE: Originally posted by CleveUnionTerm What kind of marker did the switch (have/use) to show its alignment at the wreck site? A key to safe railroading is to know your territory and to be alert to all switches therein. Never take switch alignment for granted wherever you run. C.C.C.& St.L. Ry. never take switch alignment for granted. so you are saying that at 55mph i should slow down 1 mile before i get to the switch make sure it is right then go back to notch 8 for 2 miles slow down again until i get to crew change point. ... why dont i just stop and flag all crossing also . FOFLMAO... Wabash, while you're at it how 'bout having cab signals installed and electric locks on all switches off the main?? CC- Have you ever run a train at 40+ mph??? Seeing a switch target at 2:40am from any distance in your headlight/ditchlights is tough enough let alone at that closing speed. The fact that Chris saw the misaligned switch and dumped the train (according to NTSB) is testimony to the fact that he was reasonable alert. Just not enough time to make a difference. LC
QUOTE: Originally posted by wabash1 QUOTE: Originally posted by CleveUnionTerm What kind of marker did the switch (have/use) to show its alignment at the wreck site? A key to safe railroading is to know your territory and to be alert to all switches therein. Never take switch alignment for granted wherever you run. C.C.C.& St.L. Ry. never take switch alignment for granted. so you are saying that at 55mph i should slow down 1 mile before i get to the switch make sure it is right then go back to notch 8 for 2 miles slow down again until i get to crew change point. ... why dont i just stop and flag all crossing also .
QUOTE: Originally posted by CleveUnionTerm What kind of marker did the switch (have/use) to show its alignment at the wreck site? A key to safe railroading is to know your territory and to be alert to all switches therein. Never take switch alignment for granted wherever you run. C.C.C.& St.L. Ry.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan There wasn't a automatic signal to tell if the signal was thrown was there? Maybe a dwarf or something?
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
QUOTE: Originally posted by Valleyline After reading all of the above it seems to me that we're extremely fortunate that there haven't been more accidents like this. I'll bet the FRA will come up with both technological rules (approach signals for switches off the main line) and/or low speed limits in the area of switches located in dark territory. One thing sure, it will cost a lot of money to provide the needed protection. Until all the investigations are complete we shouldn't speculate about who's at fault.
Originally posted by wabash1 cleveunionterm Use of common sense is not in you stable is it.. I know my territory and if you would understand not every railroad is the same or uses the same switches and or markers. no i dont guess you would. Now in the daytime it would be easier to see a cut of cars rolled out and fouling the main but at nightime you wont see anything. ( until its to late) the next thing is if you think you are going to slow down at every switch or every crossing you will be fired for delaying a train. ( oh yes this is in the trainmasters rules for firing someone) . so at all times you must run at track speed. kinda blows your theory out of the water now dont it. me i am going track speed. regardless. oh and as far as thinking im a hot runner i have and still do the 16 hr day get back out after 8. and do it 75 days straight before a day off .. why do you think you dont see me on here that much. duh. and i know that the first thing out of your mouth is he is fibbing the 12 hr of service law blah blah blah ...... it says i wont preform duty after 12 hrs it says nothing at all about being on duty. and its been as high as 18hrs on duty. with up to 10 hours off before getting called back out. and as far as the big four they are no longer in buisness now are they...... The thing is why are people making a big deal of this because cars crash everyday trucks a little less . but when planes started falling from the sky people ran around thinking the world was ending then things got better then for the most part amtrak was keeping a schedual of putting one in somebodies back yard on a regular basis. then that got better we have a good record but accidents do happen. The tapes will show when the train was put in emergency then how far it traveled from there . at that point they can measure back from the resting point of the engine to see where the emegency applacation was done. as far as signals go there is a signal made for dark territory for switches and is not to exspensive and is used on the old southern railroad its called a non automatic block signal. LC I thought you worked for the ns?? dont give them ideas like that they alread put derails at the top of hills so no car can roll up hill and out on to the main line. Wabash: If you can't SEE at NIGHT you shouldn't be working on the railroad! Quote: "at night time you wont see anything until its to late" Can you see the signals? Sorry, it doesn't work that way...at night time you need your BEST vision and must be alert at all times! "SAFETY IS JOB ONE" You should consider switching to a NON-operating position if you are not already in one. Recomendation: RFE or TRAINMASTER ride with you on a regular basis. You must be a NEW hire? P.S. You wrote "schedual" what does that word mean? Do you mean schedule? "Gotta Love It" REMEMBER .."SAFETY FIRST" Not walking around thinking you know everything!!! Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. The "BIG FOUR" CCC&StLRy Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 12, 2005 7:57 PM Wabash- I don't know what ideas I'd be giving them. The NTSB has already said everything I have said on the front page of the NY Times. I don't think I am telling anyone anything they don't already know... LC Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 12, 2005 8:15 PM No oskar- i don't even remember a coal train derailing here in 1997. Of course i was like 11 or 12 or something. Reply Edit arbfbe Member sinceFebruary 2002 910 posts Posted by arbfbe on Wednesday, January 12, 2005 8:20 PM If the railroads wanted trains to slow down and inspect switches in dark territory they would institute YARD LIMITS in these areas. This requires all trains in these areas to be at a speed at which they can stop short of any switches not properly lined among many other things. Since the railroads don't have such requirements at these places the crews run at authorized track speed. Perhaps the FRA will require yard limits at all locations where switches lined for other than the mainline give a restrictive signal indication. Just noting the restoration of the switch on a form will not give absolute protection unless two or more employees physically inspect the switch to insure that is indeed true. The railroad industry is full of instances where one employee aligns the switch properly and another comes along right behind them and lines it for the incorrect route. It seems incomprehensible but it happens. The rules require employees on the ground to inspect a train at a meeting point to stand on the side of the track on the opposite side of a hand throw switch since there are many, many recorded instances where that employee saw the train coming and lined the switch into the face of their own train at the last moment. Switchmen in yards can and do line switches directly underneath cars moving directly in front of them. Murphys Law applies here, if it can, it will. If anyone can find the solution for this defect in human nature please let us all know, ASAP. In spite of all this the railroads are hell bent on reducing crew sizes even more until there is but one living person on the train. Then there will not even be the safe guard of two minds, four eyes and more years of experience to control the situation. No hearings in Congress, little input from the FRA, just the railroads making those demands in contractual negotiations. It should get to be real fun then. Reply oskar Member sinceAugust 2003 1,092 posts Posted by oskar on Wednesday, January 12, 2005 8:27 PM Mark it was behind Club Car near old evans road kevin Reply oskar Member sinceAugust 2003 1,092 posts Posted by oskar on Friday, January 14, 2005 2:33 PM the units are NS 6593 and NS 6553 I saw the 6553 in Folkston with SOO 6060 back in October Mark are you going to see trains tommow if you are I will be on Taylor Street kevin Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 14, 2005 5:41 PM I wish I was but I have to unload a truck; so much fun. Reply Edit WSOR 3801 Member sinceDecember 2004 From: WSOR Northern Div. 1,559 posts Posted by WSOR 3801 on Friday, January 14, 2005 6:32 PM As to the switch being locked for the siding... Many locks are of the high-security type. On these, you cannot get your key out of the lock unless you lock it back up. Not working for NS, I cannot say whether their locks are of this type. On the WSOR we have high-security locks and brass locks on derails, gates, less-critical applications. The brass locks can be opened and then the key removed. My condolences to the afflicted. Mike WSOR cndr Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com Reply oskar Member sinceAugust 2003 1,092 posts Posted by oskar on Friday, January 14, 2005 10:00 PM mark how's monday every ones off kevin Reply Justicar Member sinceMay 2008 77 posts Posted by Justicar on Friday, January 14, 2005 11:31 PM CleveUnionTerm, the local switch crew reportedly finished their work for the day and left their train more than 7 hours before the collision occurred. Although I can't say that it would be completely surprising for the switch crew to still be working at 2 in the morning since I have no knowledge of typical operations down there, however I can say there's a good chance that the switch crew had gone home before the crew that hit their train even went on duty. To purport that this crew should have been expecting the unexpected and been mindful that someone might be working in Graniteville when they approached this switch and that they should have been completely focused on looking for switch targets and other signs of oddities is at least ill-informed, and perhaps even fantastical. Jeaton, again, I have no clue what operations are like down there aside from what I have read since the accident, but its a good idea to get in the habit of keeping your switch keys with you at all times. Some guys carry extra sets of switch keys or carry different switch keys on different rings, but if your not one of those guys and you lose your keys or someone steals them then the remainder of your tour of duty might be severely limited. The mainline switch in question probably had a high security lock and like someone else said you must lock it in order to remove your keys. This means you have to lock the switch in one position or the other, or close the lock and let it hang on the chain or fall to the ground. If its a switch I'm going to use more than once and I need my keys for a derail or a gate then I tend to unlock the switch, close the lock, remove my keys and leave the lock hanging. These guys at Graniteville, if they in fact were the ones to last handle that switch, may have NOT wanted to do that so that they could trust the switch would be lined and locked for the main in case they needed to take headroom for switching, or they simply didn't want someone to steal the lock. And finally, I predict no major changes in regulations from the FRA, or any other agency for that matter. I also predict no major changes in method of operation from Norfolk Southern or any other railroad. The fact of the matter is rules already exist to prevent the sort of thing that is alleged to have happened. All of the facts are not in by any means but the leading suspected issue is the switch crew's handling of the main line switch. The FRA will simply tighten the screws on the railroads mostly using rules and regulations long in existance. In turn, the railroads will tighten the screws on us, the crews. There will be training, classes, safety blitzes, meetings, bulletins and all sorts of talk about improving operating and safety rule compliance. Will NS install ABS or CTC on that line? No. Will they install any sort of local signal system at Graniteville? Probably not. Will this accident elevate any other railroad's priorities on installing signal systems? Nope. Signal systems are installed on freight lines to increase line capacity and efficiency. Its almost completely a question of money. Thats my two cents....your mileage may vary. CP Rail, St Paul, MN Reply wabash1 Member sinceApril 2001 From: US 2,849 posts Posted by wabash1 on Saturday, January 15, 2005 6:00 AM clevethe union what ever Running low on brains i see when you didnt have anything constructive to say you started in with the spelling .. this out of a guy who spells night nite. then you start the regular maybe i should be a train master or rfe bla bla bla crap and i should be a new hire bla bla bla as you see this dont bother me and you will never bother me. it takes more than that to get to me. now to bring some light to this you started mixing signal territory with dark territory. you cant do this i can see signals miles away dark territory there is no signal .... in other words you are there before you can react. Let me let you in on a something that i can tell you have no idea about engines. when you are standing on the ground looking at these big things you see 3 big lights how far up the tracks do you think these lights let you see.. hint at 20 mph we are already out running our headlights... you dont see as far as you think. problem in dark territory you come around a curve see a target wrong its to late to do anything . even in signal territory ive come up on bad targets but the switch be good. but i can see i have already went over your head with the information here and that you need time to figure out what you can lash out with or against me. feel free to do so. it dont take much intelegence to out do you. you are the average rail buff who i wont allow to get around my engines. and feel lucky .. if i was a trainmaster or a road foreman i would have all railbuffs arrested... just because of people like you make it hard on everyone else. If you want to know about railroading get rid of the 7 year old mentality and listen. seems like we have the m&m thing going again Reply halifaxcn Member sinceDecember 2001 110 posts Posted by halifaxcn on Saturday, January 15, 2005 7:44 AM Local radio news station WBZ radio 1030 had a blurb that lawyers are trying to start a class action lawsuit aganinst NS. Report stated that they were to go before a judge sometime next week for the status. Other lawsuits are pending for wrongful death. failure to maintain swicth and training of the crews. I was half awake driving to work at 6AM when they had it on. I am sure that this was taken off wire service and other media outlets may have it. Frank San Severino CP-198 Amtrak NEC Attleboro, MA Reply oskar Member sinceAugust 2003 1,092 posts Posted by oskar on Saturday, January 15, 2005 7:54 AM yeah that's bad I was pissed off when they were sueing NS I did not see any other lawsuits againts other railroads after they wrecked. kevin Reply Junctionfan Member sinceFebruary 2004 From: St.Catharines, Ontario 3,770 posts Posted by Junctionfan on Saturday, January 15, 2005 2:37 PM I know it's got to be quite expensive to do this but maybe the railroads are going to have to put either a drawf signal at the switches or have some even better, have some kind of a computer display of the switches so the conductor of any active train approaching the area can warn the engineer in advance if the switch is thrown against them. Puting some kind of indicator on the switches to show which way it is thrown and it being displayed on the cab's computer consol, would increase safety as well as moral for the crews who normally must get nervous everytime they are at track speed going through a switch. Andrew Reply oskar Member sinceAugust 2003 1,092 posts Posted by oskar on Saturday, January 15, 2005 2:43 PM well NS is back on track just a little I saw a couple of trains and now where they put the masters train they have a damaged tanker on a flat car. Mark get a picture of it if you get a chance also you missed alot want me to fill you in kevin Reply Justicar Member sinceMay 2008 77 posts Posted by Justicar on Saturday, January 15, 2005 2:50 PM Norfolk Southern SHOULD be sued. What was it, 8 civilians died? Those several thousand town's people were driven outta their homes for days on end? If I was one of those people....do you think I'd sue NS? If UP got some cars on the ground on their mainline which is a block away from my house and I had to go stay in a hotel for a week and would have lost my life if I had been home to breathe the nasty things they spilled ya think I would sue UP? Norfolk Southern, or whichever one of your favorite railroads happens to be operating the train, is responsible and will be compensating those affected. I'd be willing to bet a set of anglebars that in nearly 100% of railways incidents where the public is affected or harmed lawsuits are filed and the railroads pay dearly. NS in Graniteville is not being singled out. Reply oskar Member sinceAugust 2003 1,092 posts Posted by oskar on Saturday, January 15, 2005 9:33 PM I have two things NS 6593 was pulled back in Augusta the other 2 was unknown Ventrue NS should not be sued the crew of the local it's not NS fualt PS [censored][censored] kevin Reply 123456 Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.