Trains.com

News Wire: NTSB: CSX train had 33 handbrakes applied when it started down grade

4050 views
52 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:49 PM

BigJim
 
oltmannd

Handling a train down that grade has to have all sorts of special instructions in the timetable, no? 

Not really. They brought loaded 150 -170 car coal trains without hand brakes straight down the 1.7% grade out of Bluefield, WVa. for years with very few problems. 

I'll let you guys fight it out for a few days.

Now, I'm off to that one particular harbor. 
Fins up ~~~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~~~

CSX Baltimore Division Timetable - Keystone Sub SI

5559 STEEP GRADE (1% OR MORE) TRAIN HANDLING

Brake Pipe Pressure –

The brake pipe pressure on the rear of eastward loadedtrains must be 75lbs or higher prior to passing over summitat Sand Patch.

A running release of the train brake will not be made oneastward freight trains operating in this territory.

When the total brake pipe reduction exceeds 18lbs on anyeastward freight train operating Sand Patch to Hyndman, thetrain will be stopped. 30% hand brakes will be applied to thehead end of the train to hold it on the grade during the recharge procedure.

If needed, hand brakes may be left on the train to supplement air brakes while descending the rest of the grade. Avoid leaving hand brakes on any empty cars.

Use of pressure maintaining valves –The controlling unit of the lead locomotive consist must be equipped with an operative pressure maintaining feature.

MPH. Then gradually reduce throttle and apply dynamic brake in such a manner to have speed between 25 and 30 MPH, passing BF 208.0. BF 191.1 to 202.0– Approaching BF 202.0, the grade becomes less severe and the speed restriction at BF 202.1 is reduced from 35 MPH to 30 MPH. Therefore, watch deceleration rate very closely, and apply power, if necessary, to keep speed between 25 and 30 MPH between BF 202.0 and BF 198.0. In the vicinity of BF 197.0, grade again increases and train speed will generally begin to increase. If this occurs, it may be necessary to apply dynamic brake or throttle to Hyndman BF 191.0. Then if conditions permit, release train brakes and handle the train in accordance with good train handling procedures.

BF 202.1 to 208.0– In the vicinity of BF 207.0, train speed will gradually increase due to the heavier grade. When this occurs, make additional light brake applications, if necessary, modulating the dynamic brake to hold speed between 32 and 34 MPH, between BF 206.8 and BF 202.1.

Eastward trains exceeding 19,001 tons must descend the grade from Sand Patch, BF 211.0 to Hyndman, BF 190.2 at speeds not exceeding 15 MPH.

Dynamic brake requirements: When possible, eastward trains having to add additional power to the head end of their train in order to comply with dynamic brake axles requirements to descend a grade must do so prior to passing Yoder, BF 218.4. If power cannot be added west of Yoder, the train must be properly secured while air brake test is performed.

Train handling – Stretch braking is permitted for Eastward Trains: Cresting grade at Sand Patch and stopping and starting train Continuous Movement – As train crests grade, continue to use power and make a minimum reduction between 20 to 22

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:44 PM

.

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:40 PM

BigJim
Suffice it say, there was a way to get this train down the said hill in one piece and not derailed. Proper training would have gone a long way!!!

See this video from Southern RR on how to take a coal train down Saluda hill. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IABM8UPplY

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:36 PM

Deggesty

 

 
BaltACD

 

 
Deggesty
A smooth start? Ah, yes, especially when you stalled the car after you started up the hill. 

While I eventually mastered the process - while learning it was much easier when the car had a hand applied and releasable emergency brake.  There weren't enough feet to opeate the foot applied emergency brake.

  Ah, you should have tried it in a '38 Chevy, with the starter on the floor to the right and above the gas pedal--and a non-working hand brake. Have you ever multi-tasked with your feet?

My Dad tought me how to start a manual transmission car on a hill when we had back roads with little traffic. I'm not sure how I would do with todays traffic. But before we knew of this mans bad deeds, I loved this routine.

With apologies for the source, 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOmayx2JBs8

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,019 posts
Posted by BigJim on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:26 PM

oltmannd

Handling a train down that grade has to have all sorts of special instructions in the timetable, no?

Not really. They brought loaded 150 -170 car coal trains without hand brakes straight down the 1.7% grade out of Bluefield, WVa. for years with very few problems. 

 

I'll let you guys fight it out for a few days.
Now, I'm off to that one particular harbor. 
Fins up ~~~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~^~~~~~

.

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,019 posts
Posted by BigJim on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 8:53 PM

Euclid

The problem that has been suggested is that to start, you have to release the automatic brake, so every car goes to full release.  You can't just partially release the brakes until the train starts to roll.  So when the brakes fully release, the train quickly starts to roll.  As it accelerates without any braking, it is heading toward the speed where air braking will not be able to slow it down. 

At that point, it is running away.  So the question is this:  After the brakes release on the stopped train, what is the procedure for quickly getting braking back into effect before the speed rises too far?

This is what has been suggested here to deal with this:  Before releasing the automatic brake, you have enough handbrakes set to hold the train.  Then the engineer releases the automatic brake, and the conductor moves from car to car releasing handbrakes until the train starts to move. 

That way, when the train starts to move, it still has a lot of braking force applied with the handbrakes.  I have never heard of such a procedure until discussions about this wreck on this forum. 

As usual, you have absolutely NO IDEA what the hell you are talking about!!! And, at this point in time I do not have the time to explain it to you.

Suffice it say, there was a way to get this train down the said hill in one piece and not derailed. Proper training would have gone a long way!!!

.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 7:50 PM

BaltACD

 

 
Deggesty
A smooth start? Ah, yes, especially when you stalled the car after you started up the hill.

 

While I eventually mastered the process - while learning it was much easier when the car had a hand applied and releasable emergency brake.  There weren't enough feet to opeate the foot applied emergency brake.

 

Ah, you should have tried it in a '38 Chevy, with the starter on the floor to the right and above the gas pedal--and a non-working hand brake. Have you ever multi-tasked with your feet?

Johnny

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 5:23 PM

The problem that has been suggested is that to start, you have to release the automatic brake, so every car goes to full release.  You can't just partially release the brakes until the train starts to roll.  So when the brakes fully release, the train quickly starts to roll.  As it accelerates without any braking, it is heading toward the speed where air braking will not be able to slow it down. 

At that point, it is running away.  So the question is this:  After the brakes release on the stopped train, what is the procedure for quickly getting braking back into effect before the speed rises too far?

This is what has been suggested here to deal with this:  Before releasing the automatic brake, you have enough handbrakes set to hold the train.  Then the engineer releases the automatic brake, and the conductor moves from car to car releasing handbrakes until the train starts to move. 

That way, when the train starts to move, it still has a lot of braking force applied with the handbrakes.  I have never heard of such a procedure until discussions about this wreck on this forum. 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 4:58 PM

Euclid
It can’t be so uncommon for big trains to stop for some reason while coming down a long steep grade that the crew finds themselves unable to figure out how to re-start.  I would think it is a well-known procedure. 

So what was different about this restart that made the normal procedure unacceptable?  Why didn’t they just restart with the routine process? 

Large block of empties on head end followed by heavy trailing tonnage.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 4:56 PM

It can’t be so uncommon for big trains to stop for some reason while coming down a long steep grade that the crew finds themselves unable to figure out how to re-start.  I would think it is a well-known procedure. 

So what was different about this restart that made the normal procedure unacceptable?  Why didn’t they just restart with the routine process? 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 4:56 PM

Deggesty
A smooth start? Ah, yes, especially when you stalled the car after you started up the hill.

While I eventually mastered the process - while learning it was much easier when the car had a hand applied and releasable emergency brake.  There weren't enough feet to opeate the foot applied emergency brake.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 4:36 PM

A smooth start? Ah, yes, especially when you stalled the car after you started up the hill.

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 4:32 PM

oltmannd
Handling a train down that grade has to have all sorts of special instructions in the timetable, no?

I would liken this to starting an automobile up a steep hill - with a standard transmission.  Even the more experienced drivers will have a less than smooth start.

And today's drivers, with near zero experience with a standard, even, will have significant problems.

I would opine that the crew found themselves in a situation they had no experience with, and did what they thought was right.  If they knew then what they know now, they might still have rolled down the hill with hand brakes still applied, but on different cars...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 3:58 PM

BigJim
I wonder who decided it would be a good idea to move the train with handbrakes applied? That is what "Retainers" are for!

When retainers are not a part of your training - you don't know how to use them.  There are very, very few conductors on any part of CSX that EVER experienced railroading and the use of retainers in their working experience.  That particular lack of training cannot be pinned to EHH.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 3:56 PM

BigJim

I wonder who decided it would be a good idea to move the train with handbrakes applied? That is what "Retainers" are for!

 

Handling a train down that grade has to have all sorts of special instructions in the timetable, no?

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,019 posts
Posted by BigJim on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 3:44 PM

I wonder who decided it would be a good idea to move the train with handbrakes applied? That is what "Retainers" are for!

.

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 8:05 AM

cprtrain

Why wouldn't this be Harrison's fault? He's micro managing CSX.

 

But he's probably doing it by phone so when an order turns out to be wrong the local person is blamed and gets walked out.

  • Member since
    June 2013
  • 115 posts
Posted by cprtrain on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 12:41 AM

Why wouldn't this be Harrison's fault? He's micro managing CSX.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:18 PM

richg1998

Read the NTSB report in Post #1 not the media confused reading of the same report.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Tuesday, August 22, 2017 8:57 PM

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, August 22, 2017 5:59 PM

I suppose that (the CSX crash) was EHH's doing as well?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Tuesday, August 22, 2017 2:54 PM

There's a house in Maple River, IA that sits close to the tracks.  It's a former CNW section house and would be even closer except there used to be a branch line between it and the current main.  The branch line has been turned into a bike trail.  The location is where a decending grade somewhat lightens up going east.  It has been the scene of a few derailments in these people's front yard.

The last one, a few years ago, was a stack train.  The owner now has 3 or 4 "new" storage buildings (both 20' and 40' types) "delivered" by the railroad.  Right to his front door.  Talk about service.Whistling

Jeff 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Tuesday, August 22, 2017 2:29 PM

I guess I'll withdraw my interest in buying a home near a busy railway line. My sister in law and husband just recently bought a beautiful home sandwiched between busy CN and CP mainline tracks.. They'll get a kick out of that picture (or maybe not).. 

Moderator
  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 1,532 posts
Posted by Brian Schmidt on Tuesday, August 22, 2017 1:33 PM

WASHINGTON — Federal investigators say that a CSX Transportation train that derailed in early August had 33 handbrakes applied when it started downgrade before derailing in central Pennsylvania. According to a preliminary report released today...

http://trn.trains.com/news/news-wire/2017/08/22-ntsb-csx-report

Brian Schmidt, Editor, Classic Trains magazine

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy