Trains.com

Canadian Pacific Norfolk Southern Merger

42333 views
557 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Tuesday, November 24, 2015 9:02 PM

dakotafred

My, it was instructive to watch Harrison on Bloomberg today. He hardly looked or sounded enfeebled by age, as one or two on here have suggested (thinking wishfully?) that he is.  

Now that was good for a chuckle.

Typically, when your over the age of 65 and then when a Board of Directors only does yearly extensions of your contract it means they think your old......although it is not politically correct to say so, it is a pretty big hint your in the sunset years as far as that current Company is concerned.    If CP was as enamored with him as you think they should be they would have extended his tenure by 3-5 years and from his comments that is what it seems he wants BUT it was not offered by the Board and it is highly likely they are NOT going to grant year by year extensions as that creates uncertainty in the company and Wall Street would probably not support it.

High Probability that EHH is gone from CP after 2017 and he probably knows it.

 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Tuesday, November 24, 2015 10:39 PM

CMStPnP

High Probability that EHH is gone from CP after 2017 and he probably knows it.

 

 

 ....Unless he is at the center of some big, harry thing like a mrger or something.. Mischief

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:02 PM

Excerpt from the Globe and Mail, Nov. 23

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/no-plans-to-move-cp-rail-headquarters-out-of-canada-ceo-says/article27438287/

Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. expects to generate substantial proceeds by selling surplus land owned by Norfolk Southern Corp. if its proposed $28-billion (U.S.) takeover of the U.S. railroad goes ahead.

“I think we’ll be able, like we did at CP, to take some of their yards that are probably not needed in my view, and convert them to maybe real estate and generate huge cash flow – huge – without having a negative impact on the railroad,” Canadian Pacific CEO Hunter Harrison said in an interview. “It’s gravy. It could be a lot. That’s why I’m excited.”

 

Excerpt from the Globe and Mail, Dec. 7, 2012

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/careers/careers-leadership/cps-hunter-harrison-there-is-a-new-sheriff-in-town/article6122334/

It has been 16 months since Hunter Harrison, the crusty, Memphis-born railway legend hauled himself to a New York museum he can’t remember for a business lunch he’ll never forget.

The locale was the Museum of Modern Art and his dining companion was Bill Ackman, master of the modern art of shareholder activism. Mr. Harrison had only just met Mr. Ackman that morning, in August, 2011. But when the 2 1/2 -hour meal ended, the gruff railroader and the blunt hedge fund mogul shook on a deal that would culminate in a humiliating boardroom coup at Canadian Pacific Railway this May and hand Mr. Harrison the controls at the struggling carrier.

Earlier this week, Mr. Harrison sat down in yet another museum he has never heard of – the Art Gallery of Ontario – to revisit the “godawful” lows of the CP proxy battle along with the early triumphs of his first six months at the Calgary-based railway.

Before that, however, there is the tricky business of food-ordering at Frank, an austere maple-panelled restaurant named after AGO architect Frank Gehry. It’s a proposition that Mr. Harrison, a hard-core red-meat man, now finds taxing because, in addition to fixing CP, Mr. Ackman is trying to make over Mr. Harrison.

“He’s got me on to a trainer and his personal nutritionist,” says Mr. Hunter, shifting his well-upholstered, 68-year-old frame into his chair.

“I lost 12 pounds in the first two weeks.” How? “I have that Greek yogurt stuff with berries, power bars, protein shakes and sugar-free popsicles to fight the munchies.”

As for alcohol, the man with the bourbon-soaked southern drawl says: “I have cut it out completely.” Pausing to offer me a toothy grin, he adds, “Except when I drink.”

And so, as he scans the menu, Mr. Ackman’s newest fitness disciple looks past the beet salad, vegetarian pozole and chestnut soufflé and exclaims: “My eyes are drawn immediately to this.” A beef burrito.

Which is to say that, even though Mr. Harrison is backed by Mr. Ackman (“a real player”), has negotiated the richest salary of his career (“I said, ‘I don’t think you can afford me.’ He said: ‘Don’t kid yourself.’”), and commutes on his private jet (“one of the little things I bought for myself,”), he is still essentially the same hard-nosed railroader who began his career 49 years ago squirting oil at the underbellies of trains.

https://ca.shine.yahoo.com/photos/canada-s-10-highest-paid-ceos-in-2012-slideshow/former-canadian-national-railway-president-photo-181742388.html

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 1:11 AM

Murphy Siding
 
CMStPnP

High Probability that EHH is gone from CP after 2017 and he probably knows it. 

 ....Unless he is at the center of some big, harry thing like a mrger or something.. Mischief

or dead

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 5:41 AM

wanswheel
“I think we’ll be able, like we did at CP, to take some of their yards that are probably not needed in my view, and convert them to maybe real estate and generate huge cash flow – huge – without having a negative impact on the railroad,” Canadian Pacific CEO Hunter Harrison said in an interview. “It’s gravy. It could be a lot. That’s why I’m excited.”

That sounds like a Carl Ichan plan. Rape, rob, leave them destitute. Just get the cash and run.

Norm


  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 7:55 AM

Harrison has a succession plan at CP. Keith Creel, his long time protege, will take over, If a merger does happen, in all likelihood Creel or Squires would get the top job.  

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 8:37 AM

Norm48327

 

 
wanswheel
“I think we’ll be able, like we did at CP, to take some of their yards that are probably not needed in my view, and convert them to maybe real estate and generate huge cash flow – huge – without having a negative impact on the railroad,” Canadian Pacific CEO Hunter Harrison said in an interview. “It’s gravy. It could be a lot. That’s why I’m excited.”

 

That sounds like a Carl Ichan plan. Rape, rob, leave them destitute. Just get the cash and run.

 

Maybe.  Or maybe he knows that there is a lot of dead wood and waste at NS that can be converted to finance the takeover and to make it more efficient.   I do not know.  EHH has a mixed history, for sure, but it strikes me as a bit odd that all the unrestrained, "free market rules!" types on here seem so hostile to him.

 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 8:50 AM

schlimm
 
Norm48327

 

 
wanswheel
“I think we’ll be able, like we did at CP, to take some of their yards that are probably not needed in my view, and convert them to maybe real estate and generate huge cash flow – huge – without having a negative impact on the railroad,” Canadian Pacific CEO Hunter Harrison said in an interview. “It’s gravy. It could be a lot. That’s why I’m excited.”

 

That sounds like a Carl Ichan plan. Rape, rob, leave them destitute. Just get the cash and run.

 

 

 

Maybe.  Or maybe he knows that there is a lot of dead wood and waste at NS that can be converted to finance the takeover and to make it more efficient.   I do not know.  EHH has a mixed history, for sure, but it strikes me as a bit odd that all the unrestrained, "free market rules!" types on here seem so hostile to him.

 

 

As is that it seems that one of EHH's biggest defenders on this thread is one that is usually towards the left on such matters of CEOs and corporations.

Jeff

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 8:51 AM

    Suppose he knows other ways to sqeeze money out of a corporation that other, less timid railroad managers might not be interested in chasing down?  Let's just say for example, that EHH knows that there are some big efficiencies to be made up by running 13,000 foot freight trains through Chicago suburbs.  If that makes the railroad more efficient, surely nobody should voice any concern-right?


     I'd have to believe that the STB would look at all the ramifications of a merger on the transportaion system of our country and the effect on the national economy beore allowing the next mega-merger.  To be approved, a mega-merger  would have to prove better for everyone in general, not just for a hedge fund hoping to make a quick buck.

     Side note:  When I read about hedge funds and such and some of their tactics, it makes me think of the German banker who was playing games with the money policies in his country after World War 1 for his own benefit, triggering hyperinflation and other issues that followed on.
    

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 9:39 AM

jeffhergert

 

 
schlimm
 
Norm48327

 

 
wanswheel
“I think we’ll be able, like we did at CP, to take some of their yards that are probably not needed in my view, and convert them to maybe real estate and generate huge cash flow – huge – without having a negative impact on the railroad,” Canadian Pacific CEO Hunter Harrison said in an interview. “It’s gravy. It could be a lot. That’s why I’m excited.”

 

That sounds like a Carl Ichan plan. Rape, rob, leave them destitute. Just get the cash and run.

 

 

 

Maybe.  Or maybe he knows that there is a lot of dead wood and waste at NS that can be converted to finance the takeover and to make it more efficient.   I do not know.  EHH has a mixed history, for sure, but it strikes me as a bit odd that all the unrestrained, "free market rules!" types on here seem so hostile to him.

 

 

 

 

As is that it seems that one of EHH's biggest defenders on this thread is one that is usually towards the left on such matters of CEOs and corporations.

Jeff

 

I only defend his position as a legitimate one.  Personally and philosopically, I do not think his cost-cutting at IC, CN and CP is good in the larger sense of social responsibility.   But from a pure, "making a profit is our business, our only business" perspective, his attempt to rationalize the inefficiencies in North American railroading should be applauded, especially by all the "free market" "government is bad" folks on here.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 9:48 AM

To borrow a metaphor from the Battle of Jutland, this seems like it is really the cruiser squadrons skirmishing. The big guns of the dreadnoughts have not yet spoken, but they are moving in to position. If Norfolk Southern is going to be owned by a holding company, do we all really think it will be CP? It is an interesting time indeed and will be fascinating to watch play out, for sure.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:13 AM

kgbw49

To borrow a metaphor from the Battle of Jutland, this seems like it is really the cruiser squadrons skirmishing. The big guns of the dreadnoughts have not yet spoken, but they are moving in to position. If Norfolk Southern is going to be owned by a holding company, do we all really think it will be CP? It is an interesting time indeed and will be fascinating to watch play out, for sure.

 

Thumbs Up I applaud your comparison.  Are we expecting a similar outcome after all the smoke and bluster clears?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 11:23 AM

kgbw49

To borrow a metaphor from the Battle of Jutland, this seems like it is really the cruiser squadrons skirmishing. The big guns of the dreadnoughts have not yet spoken, but they are moving in to position. If Norfolk Southern is going to be owned by a holding company, do we all really think it will be CP? It is an interesting time indeed and will be fascinating to watch play out, for sure.

 

What? Did Warren Buffet shoot you an e-mail?

I'm assuming the Holding Company would be a way to navigate the legal pitfalls associated with the merger;when Burlington Northern tried to acquire Canadian National back in the 90's they planned to use a similiar scheme. The holding company in that case was to be called North American Transportation.

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 11:33 AM
Last words said by EHH on Bloomberg TV: “What if I went to Norfolk Southern?”

Excerpt from Wall Street Journal, Nov. 25

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2015/11/25/dealpolitik-canadian-pacific-deal-faces-steep-uphill-grade/

To implement a voting trust requires formal STB approval following public comment. The STB would have to make a finding that the use of the trust is consistent with the public interest.

We don’t know how long the trust approval process would take because it doesn’t appear that there has been a proceeding relating to a major transaction since the current rules were put in place more than a decade ago.

Also, it appears Mr. Harrison is considering putting CP, the railroad he currently runs, into the trust and immediately becoming CEO of Norfolk Southern. That structure would be unusual because generally the target railroad goes into the trust. Mr. Harrison was involved in another transaction in which it was tried, but that deal was not completed. It is hard to figure out how, if Mr. Harrison immediately began running Norfolk Southern and CP went into a trust, the eggs could be unscrambled if the STB did not approve the merger.
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • 1 posts
Posted by Coltrain78 on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:28 PM

Jeff's echoed my thoughts on this perfectly. It's about stock valuation in the face of a lacklustre economic situation in Canada and tepid recovery in America. I'm sceptical there is any material upside, stock prices is what this is about. 

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Sunday, November 29, 2015 4:46 PM

The voting trust is an interim step, to hold the deal in place pending STB approval.  Each railroad retains its own separate identity, but the ownership and management is coordinated more than the previous status.  It's kind of like an engagement before the marriage ceremony takes place.   

A voting trust keeps the eggs from being scrambled in the first place, so the tentative merger is easier to unwind if the deal isn't approved.  I believe the last time one was actually used was the abortive SF+SP merger back in the early 1990's. 

- Paul North. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Sunday, November 29, 2015 4:59 PM

Supposedly E. Hunter Harrison's prime skill is improving railroad's operations.

wanswheel
Excerpt from the Globe and Mail, Nov. 23

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/no-plans-to-move-cp-rail-headquarters-out-of-canada-ceo-says/article27438287/

Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. expects to generate substantial proceeds by selling surplus land owned by Norfolk Southern Corp. if its proposed $28-billion (U.S.) takeover of the U.S. railroad goes ahead.

“I think we’ll be able, like we did at CP, to take some of their yards that are probably not needed in my view, and convert them to maybe real estate and generate huge cash flow – huge – without having a negative impact on the railroad,” Canadian Pacific CEO Hunter Harrison said in an interview. “It’s gravy. It could be a lot. That’s why I’m excited.” . . . [snipped - PDN]

So how does this real estate / asset liquidation aspect utilize that skill ?  And if it doesn't - who needs him to implement these land sales ?  Any real estate broker/ speculator could do that.

But maybe NS is thinking of long-term plans, and doesn't want to foreclose its options by selling adjoining land that might be useful in the future, and which it would be unable to buy back after that land has been sold and converted to other uses.  NS seems to be sophisticated enough about real estate matters, too - it has its own real estate arm:

http://www.nscorp.com/content/nscorp/en/real-estate/about-norfolk-southern-real-estate.html 

plus Pocohontas Land Corp., mostly coal resource land:

http://www.nscorp.com/content/nscorp/en/about-ns/subsidiaries/pocahontas-land-corporation.html  

- Paul North.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    April 2013
  • 24 posts
Posted by noemdfan on Sunday, November 29, 2015 9:04 PM

Murphy Siding

Harrison's Operational Mode is to run trains on a tight schedule.  Container traffic is the commodity that you want to keep on a reliable schedule.  If you can beat the competition (usually trucks), you can win the service.  Now if you're just delivering to Chicago, that's not a problem, until you consider a water-level route like the old Illinois Central from New Orleans into Chicago.  Less fuel would be used (both by container ship and train) from Asia to Chicago by New Orleans than by Montreal.  So there is no market growth there.

If you going through Chicagoland to Kansas City, Milwaukee or Minneapolis, and you can't get a train through Chicago, how in the heck could a schedule be kept?  That's problem #1.

Problem #2 is The Detroit-Windsor Tunnels, which are currently only single stack capable.  Harrison can fix problem #2, but without fixing problem #1, it's a waste of Capital Dollars. 

Technically, CP can run around Lakes Huron and Superior to fix problem #1, bypassing Chicago, but the line generates little on-line traffic.  And it's the long way into Chicago, Milwaukee, Minneapolis or Kansas City, via Thunder Bay, Ontario.  Think of the line around the north side of the Great Lakes as a VERY LONG BRIDGE, getting you from one side of where traffic is generated to the other side, but generating no revenue (kind of like the D&H).  So the traffic producing parts of the railroad have to pay for a line that connects them. 

In the long run, that's no way to be efficient.  EHH, Ackman and CP need a line that generates traffic over every mile and they want to cut anything that doesn't (say goodbye to the D&H).  If they can ever get to scheduling Double-Stack trains from Montreal, through Toronto, Mississauga, Windson, Detroit, Chicago, Milwaukee and Minneapolis or Kansas City, they'll make real money (and dump the North Shore route).

Now with that being said, either CSX or NS allows Harrison to get through Chicagoland on a schedule.  And remember, he said that he'd trade "open access" for any merger.  EHH and Bill Ackman NEED control of the Indiana Harbor Belt to get their trains through.  That means CSX or NS who each own 25.5% of it. 

Also, from a blog post I wrote https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=1158766641710713668#editor/target=post;postID=1000680567962151355;onPublishedMenu=posts;onClosedMenu=posts;postNum=2;src=postname, CP's piece of the intermodal container freight pie is limited as to the markets that they serve.  With the opening of the new PanaMax Lane of the Panama Canal, it will be cheaper to ship containers to the East Coast of the US and have trains to Market Cities (e.g. Atlanta, Cincinnati, Kansas City, Dallas, etc.) docked on an Atlantic Ocean port and shipped to a market in that region than shipping containers transcontinentally by rail.

 
wanswheel

Excerpt from The Globe and Mail, Nov. 9

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/canadian-pacific-said-to-explore-norfolk-southern-takeover/article27176306/

Benoit Poirier, an equities analyst with Desjardins Capital Markets, noted................................ Mr. Harrison has made strides to improve CP’s efficiency and profitability. Building a better rail network and applying his operational model to the underperforming Norfolk Southern.................... 

 

 

 What is Harrison's operational model that is so different from everybody else?

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, November 30, 2015 11:11 AM

zugmann

 

 
oltmannd
I don't think so. NS doesn't need autorouter/movement planner to centralize. Just having UTCS is enough. Any desk can be dispatched from any other desk on the system right now. But, NS's whole operations managment is decentralized to a greater degree than on other roads. Most places, whether to run an extra or annul a train is made by a central office. On NS, these decisions are made at the division level - sometime to the detriment of the network as a whole. That would have to change before you'd see consolidated distpatch offices.

 

 

UTCS without autorouter required people to run the system.  With autorouter enabled, not as much.  I think that will be the key to consolidation (if it ever gets to the point of running the railroad unencumbered).  And you know many of those decisions made at the division level used to be made at the local level.  It's heading in that direction already.  CYO/OSS now handles all customer issues - many of which were at one time local decisions.  Writing's on the wall.

 

I could be wrong, but I would be surprised.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I hope you are wrong, but suspect you have a point.  Looking at UTCS w/autorouter as a vehicle to reduce headcount in the division office should be WAY down on the priority list of things "to do", but....

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Monday, November 30, 2015 1:43 PM
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Posted by Victrola1 on Monday, November 30, 2015 1:58 PM

Talk to the bank. 

If this goes through, it makes one wonder how leveraged the deal will be.  

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Thursday, December 3, 2015 2:04 PM
These are the questions Allison Landry of Credit Suisse asked EHH on the webcast yesterday. 
Question: Thank everybody for coming. Good afternoon. Very excited to have Canadian Pacific here with us today, and CEO, Hunter Harrison. So, we'll just dive right into the Q&A. Hunter, first, I was wondering if you could give us a brief overview of your rationale and thoughts on the proposed transaction or combination with Norfolk.
Question: It's been [close to a] couple of weeks since we've heard from you last. Has there been any discussion with either (inaudible) acquirer or (inaudible) groups? I'm sure you've been talking to shareholders.
Question: Thinking about the CAD1.8 billion that you outlined in terms of synergies, you've publicly spoken about the bulk of that coming from operational improvement. I guess, how do we think about -- what portion of that CAD1.8 billion would ultimately come from revenue synergies from the single haul rail? How do we think about sort of breaking that number down in terms of cost improvement versus driving more business to the rail?
Question: Got it. And thinking about -- going back to one of your earlier comments that -- where some -- one of the places you're hearing opposition from are some of the other rails, if you think about the mergers of the past, and sort of all the trackage rights, and everybody sort of wants something out of supporting the deal, is that factored into the CAD1.8 billion in terms of mitigation costs?
Question: And in terms of what the other rails could oppose, have you heard any feedback or commentary? Would it be, for example, grain that you're moving with BN now to somewhere in the Gulf -- like, that goes CP/NS. And that's just an example; but is that something that you would anticipate the other rail sort of crying foul about?
Question: Do you think that the proposals that CP has suggested -- and I know that it's specific to the CP/NS transaction in terms of the terminal access and removal of bottleneck rates and paper barriers -- is that, in your view, what your competitors will sort of go after, out of fear of not being able to raise price and the –
Question:  On the topic of paper barriers, I think in one of your books you talked about the importance of the short-line industry. And obviously we've seen in the US a lot of consolidation, Genesee & Wyoming having about 25%. Is there any opportunity at any of the sort of terminals, where there would be terminal access granted that you could use a short line instead of Brand X, for example? And would that potentially lower costs for switching?
Question: Thinking about -- and you talk a little bit about head count reduction at Norfolk, and it's not your prerogative to go in there and basically tell them you're cutting jobs, but it would be done through attrition. I wanted to ask two questions within that context. First, what are the sort of union protections that are available to US employees? And then, second, does  NS to your knowledge have sort of a similar base of contracted employees, similar to what you initially found at CP? Were you able to reduce head count from that -- from the non-union perspective? Is there any similarities or parallels we can draw?
Question: Got it. Any questions from the audience?  Unidentified Participant (Inaudible) talked about CP's CapEx going to be slightly lower, the next 3 years (inaudible) million. If I look at CapEx in the Class I rails, it's been tracking to pricing, which is well ahead of inflation. So, it's not tied to miles. It's not tied to inflation. It's tied to their own pricing. You gave the CAD1.8 billion synergy number in operations. Is there a synergy number on CapEx as well? And are the Class I [rails] just generally spending more CapEx than necessary? Is there a savings there? Thank you.
Question: Could we talk a little bit about what you mentioned a couple of weeks ago, in terms of the way that the voting structure would work? And I believe you mentioned the possibility of a holding company. How would that work within sort of the confines of a voting trust? If you, for example, were to lead the holding company, would that be before STB approval, or after? How would that work?
Question: How have shareholders responded to your proposal, and there's certainly a lot of cross-ownership in the industry, and I think that you had mentioned that as being a potential sticking point. Has that come up again from your discussions, the last couple of weeks?
Question: Any questions? Quiet out there. Hunter, one of the things that you mentioned also was the potential for land sales at Norfolk. How should we sort of think about that? Is it sort of similar to what's unfolding at CP currently, in terms of monetizing assets? How do you think about the free cash flow implications of that?
Question: Hunter, can I squeeze in a fundamental question on CP? Just because we've heard from some of the other rails this morning, and obviously volumes have taken a step down. CP's somewhere in the middle of the pack. Do you think you can overcome the volume weakness in the quarter?
Question: The point is, the business is operating very well, and at some point we'll see a pop in the economy, and from there it's –
Question: Any final questions? All right. Hunter, thank you so much for your time.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Posted by Victrola1 on Thursday, December 3, 2015 2:06 PM

CSX Lowers 2015 Earnings Outlook

 
4/15/2015 11:45 PM ET

Railroad operator CSX Corp. (CSX) on Wednesday lowered its earnings forecast for fiscal 2015, noting that coal headwinds have increased for the remainder of the year.

http://www.rttnews.com/2482857/csx-lowers-2015-earnings-outlook.aspx

Next?

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, December 3, 2015 7:37 PM

The stock dropped 1.56%

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Posted by Victrola1 on Friday, December 4, 2015 8:00 AM

Norfolk Southern Corp. has rejected Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd.’s unsolicited acquisition offer, valued at over $28 billion, saying the tie-up undervalues the company and is unlikely to be cleared by regulators.

In a news release, Norfolk Chief Executive James A. Squires said there was a “high probability” that the deal would be rejected by the U.S. rail-industry regulator, the Surface Transportation Board.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/norfolk-southern-rejects-canadian-pacifics-offer-1449232264

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, December 4, 2015 8:31 AM

NSC stock dropped over 6% early Friday on news of rejection of CP bid and shareholder lack of confidence in Squires' probability of cost-cutting in 2016.  

 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, December 4, 2015 8:44 AM

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Friday, December 4, 2015 9:19 AM

Probably moot now, excerpt from Credit Suisse webcast transcript

http://www.cpr.ca/en/investors-site/Documents/CS-Transcript.pdf

ALLISON LANDRY

Since then it was a couple of weeks since we’ve heard from you last. Has there been any discussion with either Squires, or you know, (unclear). I’m sure you’ve been talking to shareholders.

HUNTER HARRISON

Oh yeah, I mean there’s -- I think that our friends at NS have indicated that we’d be receiving a response from them I think soon. So I think we will hear from them…

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Posted by Victrola1 on Friday, December 4, 2015 9:58 AM

 Takeover wars seem to have lost their sizzle. What happened to the battles of corporate goliaths? Where have they gone, those swaggering deal makers? "Harriman vs. Hill" is a corporate dust-up that takes us back to the beginning of the 20th century, when tycoons who traveled by private rail merrily raided each other's empires while the world around them cringed.....

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303496804579369203810705602

Is there any chance of Harrison at CP launching a hostile take over attempt? 

 

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, December 4, 2015 10:05 AM

A hostile takeover might be possible but it would be expensive, think back to the takeover mania of the 1980's.  It might also leave the surviving corporation in poor financial shape.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy