Trains.com

Are lineside signals largely redundant?

6403 views
46 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,818 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 6:33 AM

That would be news to the aviation industry... instrument flying.. (pilots not looking out the window) can't be all that safe then either.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,274 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 6:30 AM

mudchicken
Ulrich

What so bad about cab signals? Are they hard on the eyes?

When you're preoccupied with watching a screen instead of looking out the wndow/ windshield. I-Zombies gone railroading.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, November 2, 2015 10:35 PM

Ulrich

What so bad about cab signals? Are they hard on the eyes?

 

When you're preoccupied with watching a screen instead of looking out the wndow/ windshield. I-Zombies gone railroading.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,505 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Monday, November 2, 2015 9:27 PM

Having developed the requirements, analyzed systems and written more programs than I wish to count, I can tell you that the more complex the system the more prone it is to errors.  No matter how much testing you do on the software, you cannot think of every situation that PTC will encounter and program it into the system.  In addition their is an old trueism in the computer world "GARBAGE IN, GARBAGE OUT". In other words bad data will result in  bad results.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,818 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Monday, November 2, 2015 8:46 PM

What so bad about cab signals? Are they hard on the eyes?

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 3,590 posts
Posted by csmith9474 on Monday, November 2, 2015 8:38 PM
Just as an FYI, if you see a 40' steel pole with a dipole antenna on top and a small GPS antenna towards the bottom, that would be PTC. Otherwise same poles, possibly with a 20' extension, with a yagi antenna would be for the control points, and possibly for HBDs, WILDs, etc.
Smitty
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Monday, November 2, 2015 8:35 PM

Seems to me that, at present, cab signals are the redundancy.

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, November 2, 2015 8:30 PM

I think Positive Train Control could eliminate the need for intermediate block signals, if the railroads wished to do away with them, but, given the fact that something that may be a PTC antenna has been installed on or by many of them, I don't think that's going to happen.

Control point signals, and perhaps the approach signals thereto, probably will stay no matter what.  

Back when I hired out, the CNW main line was protected by Automatic Train Control, with cab signals.  There were no intermediate block signals at all--just distant signals and home signals for the interlockings.  When UP came in, intermediate signals were installed...ATC and cab signals are still in force as well.  I suspect those will disappear when PTC is operational (UP expects to make the new 2018 deadline). 

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,818 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Monday, November 2, 2015 8:20 PM

DSchmitt
 
Norm48327

 

 
Ulrich
In this day and age of smart technology are lineside signals still really needed?

 

Would self-driving cars obviate the need for stop lights?

 

 

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2015/10/31/study-self-driving-cars-accidents/74946614/

"Even though they haven't been at fault, self-driving test cars are involved in crashes at five times the rate of conventional cars, a new study finds."

 

It's new technology.. give it time. Railroads weren't all that safe either 150 years ago.

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Winnipeg, Mb
  • 628 posts
Posted by traisessive1 on Monday, November 2, 2015 7:50 PM

Cab signals are not used on CN or CP in Canada. Most guys don't even know what they are. So, yes, they are of the utmost importance. 

10000 feet and no dynamics? Today is going to be a good day ... 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Monday, November 2, 2015 6:41 PM

Norm48327

 

 
Ulrich
In this day and age of smart technology are lineside signals still really needed?

 

Would self-driving cars obviate the need for stop lights?

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2015/10/31/study-self-driving-cars-accidents/74946614/

"Even though they haven't been at fault, self-driving test cars are involved in crashes at five times the rate of conventional cars, a new study finds."

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,818 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Monday, November 2, 2015 6:26 PM

BaltACD
 
blue streak 1
mudchicken

Those lineside signals will always be a help....some of us still wish to heck the old motorcar indicators were still around.

(there are plenty of buttonpushing morons out there that should be denied access to GIS and GPS because of the false sense of security created SoapBoxSoapBoxSoapBox

 
MC: Absolutely.  What is worse are the manufacturers who foist these push buttons onto unsuspecting people.  Think of Airbus that has built software that fly aircraft into peril that pilots cannot over ride.

 

And pilots that have forgotten how to fly because all their recent flight hours are where the computer does the flying.

 

And it is still much safer to fly anywhere than it is to venture out in one's car..

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,818 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Monday, November 2, 2015 6:24 PM

Norm48327
 
Ulrich
In this day and age of smart technology are lineside signals still really needed?

 

Would self-driving cars obviate the need for stop lights?

 

 

Probably. Toyota is developing a system whereby cars "communicate" with each other and the roadway.. no conventional signals as we know them today would be required. But that's another story.. we're talking about railroad signals here.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,274 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, November 2, 2015 6:24 PM

blue streak 1
mudchicken

Those lineside signals will always be a help....some of us still wish to heck the old motorcar indicators were still around.

(there are plenty of buttonpushing morons out there that should be denied access to GIS and GPS because of the false sense of security created SoapBoxSoapBoxSoapBox

 
MC: Absolutely.  What is worse are the manufacturers who foist these push buttons onto unsuspecting people.  Think of Airbus that has built software that fly aircraft into peril that pilots cannot over ride.

And pilots that have forgotten how to fly because all their recent flight hours are where the computer does the flying.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, November 2, 2015 6:21 PM

mudchicken

Those lineside signals will always be a help....some of us still wish to heck the old motorcar indicators were still around.

(there are plenty of buttonpushing morons out there that should be denied access to GIS and GPS because of the false sense of security created SoapBoxSoapBoxSoapBox

 
MC: Absolutely.  What is worse are the manufacturers who foist these push buttons onto unsuspecting people.  Think of Airbus that has built software that fly aircraft into peril that pilots cannot over ride.
 
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Monday, November 2, 2015 6:20 PM

Ulrich
In this day and age of smart technology are lineside signals still really needed?

Would self-driving cars obviate the need for stop lights?

Norm


  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, November 2, 2015 5:20 PM

Those lineside signals will always be a help....some of us still wish to heck the old motorcar indicators were still around.

(there are plenty of buttonpushing morons out there that should be denied access to GIS and GPS because of the false sense of security created - many of those are the ones that think PTC implementation is so simple and have not a clue about the reliability issues that come with the beta versions of that black box technology that they have been hornswaggled into blindly believing is the neatest thing since sliced bread.)SoapBoxSoapBoxSoapBox

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,818 posts
Are lineside signals largely redundant?
Posted by Ulrich on Monday, November 2, 2015 5:04 PM

In this day and age of smart technology are lineside signals still really needed? The same information could be sent to crews via much cheaper devices in the cab. Or is that not the case? Buying, installing, and maintaining all those signals must cost a mint.  

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy