Trains.com

Lake Placid railroad tracks to be ripped up

10333 views
93 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Lake Placid railroad tracks to be ripped up
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 11, 2015 4:49 PM

Sad news:

An historic rail line from Utica through the Adirondacks to Lake Placid will be partially converted to a bike path/snowmobile trail as part of a plan by the state Departments of Transportation and Environmental Conservation today. Rails used by a tourist train would remain in place to Tupper Lake, where a mega-resort is being planned, but be removed from Tupper Lake to Lake Placid, so the rail bed could be turned into the new multi-use path. This would end the use of the tourist train from Lake Placid to Saranac Lake.

http://blog.timesunion.com/business/state-announces-plans-for-adirondack-rail-line-conversion-to-bikesnowmobile-path/66847/

 

 

 

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Thursday, June 11, 2015 5:59 PM

One day they'll be sorry.

And then they'll spend who knows how many millions to put it back.

Your tax dollars at work.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:25 PM

Murray

Sad news:

An historic rail line from Utica through the Adirondacks to Lake Placid will be partially converted to a bike path/snowmobile trail as part of a plan by the state Departments of Transportation and Environmental Conservation today. Rails used by a tourist train would remain in place to Tupper Lake, where a mega-resort is being planned, but be removed from Tupper Lake to Lake Placid, so the rail bed could be turned into the new multi-use path. This would end the use of the tourist train from Lake Placid to Saranac Lake.

http://blog.timesunion.com/business/state-announces-plans-for-adirondack-rail-line-conversion-to-bikesnowmobile-path/66847/

 

 

 

 

AS an outsider, but somewhat interested party; I would guess that the DEC is in the process of whistlingh past the graveyard....   To my suspicions that the DEC is simply "pandering': FTA:"... Rails used by a tourist train would remain in place to Tupper Lake, where a mega-resort is being planned, but be removed from Tupper Lake to Lake Placid, so the rail bed could be turned into the new multi-use path. This would end the use of the tourist train from Lake Placid to Saranac Lake..." 

       Sort of sounds to me that the State Deptments(of NY) involved have written off the older resorts of Lake Placid, and Saranac Lake in favor of a promise to build a new mega resort.  This will assure that those older resort areas will be 'choaked off' by this new, better, super-duper mega venture. 

    In previous Threads on this topic, there was mention made of the lack of updated infrastructure in this area. The current road net will require major investments to bring it to a condition that will not endanger motor traffic traveling into this area...Traffic that has helped support the Adairondack Scenic RR, and brought in tourists and their dollars to an area that benefited from those monies.

  As Firelock 76 mentioned : Someday, they will regret this decision to do away with a major tourist destination, in favor of what is only a seasonal snowmobile activity.

   I am also anxious to hear what tree68 has got to add to this discussion...

 

 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:42 PM

The loss of Lake Placid as a destination will, in my estimation, be huge.  Lake Placid has name recognition world-wide that Tupper Lake (still a very nice community, by the way) does not.  It's not much different than if the Grand Canyon RR didn't go all the way to the Grand Canyon - who'd ride?

It's been my personal opinion that the "trail advocates" really don't want a trail - they want everyone out of their woods.  When it comes time to look for funding for the trail, they'll be really hard to find.

It's not quite over yet - I think there's one more "hearing."  I'm afraid, however, that their mind is made up.  A huge loss for Adirondack tourism.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Thursday, June 11, 2015 7:16 PM

Firelock76

One day they'll be sorry.

And then they'll spend who knows how many millions to put it back.

Your tax dollars at work.

 

 

The environmental lobby is only gaining power. Even today, it's difficult to envision rails being laid on an idle corridor, a difficult proposition anywhere, within the confines of the Adirondack Park. Once these are gone, they're sadly gone for good.

Sad day, but hardly a surprise in this country. Particularly when it's New York State and Albany is involved. 

I wonder what the next step after the rails are lifted will be. There's no way that those that have been behind this scheme will rest. The snowmobilers better watch their backs, since they'll be next up and stand to lose what they already had anyways with the railroad there. 

I'm not very familiar with this "mega resort", but such a loss if that comes to pass for both Lake Placid and Saranac Lake, that this asset will be destroyed that could've linked these two communities to it by a tourist railroad. 

I'd love to think that one day they'll be sorry, but they'll likely be too busy with their next scheme for more than a handful of them to ever look back and lament about this decision that they played a role in allowing to happen.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Thursday, June 11, 2015 7:24 PM

Larry (tree68)  found the following linked article@

 http://www.uticaod.com/article/20150611/NEWS/150619866/1994/NEWS?rssfeed=true

"State announces plan for Adirondack Scenic Railway Corridor"

by Elizabeth Cooper Posted Jun. 11, 2015 at 5:17 PM
Updated at 7:19 PM

THe following was, I thought, an intersting statement: [snipped]"...Bethan Maher, executive director of the Adirondack Railway Preservation Society, which operates the Adirondack Scenic Railway trains from Utica to Big Moose, said her organization will fight to ensure that the rails go all the way to Lake Placid.

“Our mission has been and will continue to be to restoring rail service to Lake Placid and connecting the high peaks with Central New York and the Mohawk Valley,” she said.
If rail service goes only to Tupper Lake, which has less name recognition than Lake Placid, it would be “a significant blow to the potential ridership and the economic impact” of the railway, she said.
The group Adirondack Recreational Trail Advocates, however, applauded the trail plans, but was displeased with the plans to extend the track to Tupper Lake..."[snip]

 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Thursday, June 11, 2015 9:00 PM

The environmental commissioner said “The proposal will reinvigorate the economies of neighboring communities by implementing a comprehensive approach to recreational use of the Corridor including establishing a multi-use recreation trail from Tupper Lake to Lake Placid for hiking, biking, cross-country skiing, snowmobiling and other compatible uses and a renewed commitment to rail from Remsen to Tupper Lake,” 

In what universe is cross-country skiing and sowmobiling a compatible use?  What is renewed commitment to the remaining rail corridor?  Have they contributed anything to the rail rehab?  Will they compensate Adirondack Scenic for the rehab work they have done between Lake Placid and Saranac?

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, June 11, 2015 9:02 PM

MidlandMike
The environmental commissioner said “The proposal will reinvigorate the economies of neighboring communities by implementing a comprehensive approach to recreational use of the Corridor including establishing a multi-use recreation trail from Tupper Lake to Lake Placid for hiking, biking, cross-country skiing, snowmobiling and other compatible uses and a renewed commitment to rail from Remsen to Tupper Lake,”

 

If that was true - thre wouldn't be a single town, county, or state in debt in this country. 

 

Is anyone else getting a wet leg?  Must be raining.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 9 posts
Posted by K SCOTT GUDGEON on Friday, June 12, 2015 4:24 AM
 

 I just received a statement from the rail operator which suggests the issue is not closed yet.  This sounds like a good topic for TRAINS' editors to look at.  NY State is the owner of the rails to Lake Placid, which has no regular air or Fpassenger rail links to the outside despite its staus as two time Winter Olympics venue and major center for Adirondack tourism and winter sports.  Why a dual use of the corridor will not work here as it has elsewhere is hard to understand, as is renouncing any prospect of linking Lake Placid and saranac lake to NY Empire Service some day.  One hopes the fight over this is not finished, it is such an awful outocome.

 

Here is the statement:

 
 
 
Volunteers, Members & Supporters:

The New York State Department of Transportation (DOT) and Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) announced today, June 11, 2015 the State's decision to reopen the Remsen-Lake Placid Travel Corridor's Unit Management Plan with the intention of removing the railroad tracks north of Tupper Lake, running to Lake Placid.   The corridor is part of the 141 miles of track on which the Adirondack Railway Preservation Society (DBA:  Adirondack Scenic Railroad) operates and is working to preserve.  Although the Railroad disagrees with the State's compromise position, the organization looks forward to an expanded operation and bringing train service to Tupper Lake, a town at the precipice of a revitalization and resurgence.

 

The ARPS has believed from the beginning of the review process that the original decision designated by the 1996 UMP was the correct decision.  The selected alternative, option 6, states that the DOT and DEC will "permit rail uses over the entire length of the corridor, encourage compatible recreational trail uses." The process to decide the use of the Remsen - Lake Placid Travel Corridor was lengthy, thorough and led to a sensible future plan for the corridor. While the ARPS is disappointed that the various parties will soon be embarking on what will undoubtedly be another lengthy and costly process to potentially remove the tracks north of Tupper Lake, we look forward to working with the pertinent agencies to answer the question as to the best use and development of this wonderful asset south of Tupper Lake.

 

 

 

Over the past twenty-one years, the Adirondack Scenic Railroad has operated a successful and safe railroad which has been an integral part of heritage tourism in New York State.  The railroad has served in excess of 1.3 million passengers and grosses over $1,200,000 in annual ticket sales, facts which are reported to several federal and state agencies. As a multimodal corridor (rails with trails), rail use also allows for interface between the train, hikers, bikers and canoeists, making New York State a leader and world class example in the concept of multimodal travel through a sensitive ecosystem.  

 

The future of the Adirondack region depends on bringing people and business to the area from outside the Park and we cannot afford to eliminate any infrastructure which serves to attract tourists to the area. The Remsen - Lake Placid corridor is currently managed as a railway in the spring, summer and fall months and as a snowmobile trail in the winter months. The Adirondack Park has thousands of miles of hiking, biking and snowmobile trails, many of which will be accessible via train with a completed rail line. The Adirondack Park has one railroad, a piece of living and functioning utilitarian history, a protected historic landmark, which allows people of all walks of life to experience the beauty and thrill of our unique region.

 

 

 

It is through the hard work and support of our members and volunteers that the organization has come as far as it has. We will continue to work on building a successful tourist rail operation in addition to fighting for the restoration of the Remsen - Lake Placid Travel Corridor. It's clear that the process to reopen the management plan will be a lengthy and elaborate and it is our intention to continue fighting for full corridor operations. 

Warmest regards,

Bill Branson
President

Bethan Maher
Executive Director


Adirondack Railway Preservation Society
421 Broad Street, Suite 7, Utica, NY 13501
AdirondackRR.com
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, June 12, 2015 7:47 AM

New York appears to be learning from its neighbour, Quebec. Quebec has been a leader in rails to trails,  and their "Route Vert" (Green Route) has  pumped millions upon millions  of dollars into the Quebec economy over the past ten years. So much so that Quebec is now recognized throughout the first world as the go to destination for cycling. I can personally attest to it...I spend alot of time cycling on Quebec trails.. the trails are busy and well used and encourage healthy living. And if trains do make a comeback for shorthaul and distribution one day, the trails are there and can be converted easily enough... the roadbed is graded and all that's needed is for someone to put the track back into place.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, June 12, 2015 10:06 AM

MidlandMike
In what universe is cross-country skiing and snowmobiling a compatible use?

I have long contended that the suggestion that the trail would be used by cross country skiers telegraphs one of the "trail advocate's" true agendas - to get rid not only of the railroad, but of the snowmobiles on the corridor.  Portions of the corridor pass through designated wilderness and primitive areas.  I'm sure there is a constituency who feels that snowmobiles shouldn't be there, but due to the current corridor plan, they haven't been able to act on that.  

I'm also convinced that the snowmobile community as a whole stopped listening when they heard that the tracks could come up.  I get that the tracks are an impediment to sledding at the beginning and end of the season, but since they quit listening when they did, they haven't heard the statements from the "trail advocates" that foretell their being banned from the corridor (or enough of it to make it useless as a through trail).

What is renewed commitment to the remaining rail corridor?  Have they contributed anything to the rail rehab?

The state actually has (and does) make some contribution to maintaining the corridor.  Perhaps they'll start kicking in money for rehab - which they used to do in dribs and drabs.

It should also be noted that there is substantial opposition from the "environmental preservationists" to the planned resort in Tupper Lake, although the developer has won all of the court battles.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Toronto, Canada
  • 2,560 posts
Posted by 54light15 on Friday, June 12, 2015 10:11 AM

Interesting how environmentalists include snowmobiles. Aren't they noisy and powered by 2-stroke engines that cause a lot of air pollution? Don't snowmobile drivers often chase down deer for amusement? Don't they go off the trail and cause damage to the undergrowth? Environmentalists. Yeah right, and having new roads to a "mega" resort will sure help the environment as well as all the gas stations and strip plazas that will be built for the people driving to the resort. Glad I left New York 20 years ago.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Friday, June 12, 2015 2:55 PM
I bet the people who want the trail consider it ‘their’ territory, and think of the railroad advocates as enemy invaders.
Excerpt from Adirondack Daily Enterprise
"The rail is favored in communities south of Tupper Lake," Davies said. "The trail is favored in communities north of Tupper Lake. This obviously is not unanimous throughout those communities. There are people who have differing opinions, but the communities seem to break that way."
Excerpt from North Country Public Radio
If the new Unit Management Plan (UMP) formally unveiled today is finalized, state agencies would help restore and upgrade the rail line between Remsen and Tupper Lake and offer a huge boost to the Adirondack Scenic Railroad.
  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Friday, June 12, 2015 6:05 PM

Rail trails are really compatible with bicycle use, with the gentle grades making for easy travel.  The same is less true for the slower pace of cross-country skiing, where it can turn into boring drudgery if going more than a couple of miles.  Skiing is a lot more enjoyable if there are occasional gentle slopes to break the monotony.

If the present plan is put into action, I can see the track north of Tupper Lake being ripped up right away.  Then the moaning will start, "no money in the budget this year to rehabilitate the middle section", and the so-called compromise will turn out to be smoke and mirrors.

John

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, June 12, 2015 8:20 PM

cx500
If the present plan is put into action, I can see the track north of Tupper Lake being ripped up right away.  Then the moaning will start, "no money in the budget this year to rehabilitate the middle section", and the so-called compromise will turn out to be smoke and mirrors.

I'm betting that the money won't be there to build the trail either....

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Saturday, June 13, 2015 9:00 AM

tree68

 

 
cx500
If the present plan is put into action, I can see the track north of Tupper Lake being ripped up right away.  Then the moaning will start, "no money in the budget this year to rehabilitate the middle section", and the so-called compromise will turn out to be smoke and mirrors.

 

I'm betting that the money won't be there to build the trail either....

 

Economic Impact Statement by Camoin Assoc @ http://www.adirondackdailyenterprise.com/pdf/news/553641_2.pdf

Couple of things jumped out at me in the above linked statement: The original study was done in 1996 for "Empire State Development [ESD]. In 2014 the Dept of Environmental Conservation ordered a revision of the 1996 UMP concerning the 119 mile length of the 'rail corridor' the Adirondack Scenic RR is operating in two portions seperated by approx. 39 miles between Tupper Lake, and lake Placid, that portion of which was unable to carry the operational rail traffic. 

Apparently, the 'corridor' between Tupper Lake and Lake Placid, via Big Moose Lake is problematic for a couple of reasons.  The altitude at Big Moose is about 1135 ft (?) . According to the "History of the Corridor" [page 2 of the Economic Study]  it was originally built in some 18 months around 1892 to reach the "Camps' of wealthy property owners and was then operated continuously by the New York Central til 1972, in 1974 the State of New York purchased it(the abandoned railroad). It was operated(leased to) by the Adirondack Railroad Corp which was in bankruptcy in 1977.  The State acquired the rest of the lease in 1991. At that time the State required the 1991 UMP for the corridor from Remsen to Lake Placid.  That UMP was finally approved in 1996.  It was reopened in 2013,by a Public Hearing process...

The 'Comion Study'  was commissiond in 2014 by the NY DEC. [From the lionked document] [snipped] "...Camoin Associates was hired by Empire State Development to provide the State with an economic impact analysis that would consider how each of the three scenarios would in-turn impact total sales,jobs,and earnings in New York State.This impact analysis is one of many factors to be utilized in preparation of the revisions to the UMP..." [snip]

 Like a lot of the 'documentation processes' required these days, The results will 'favor'  the end results required by the party who is paying for the study. {IMHO}

 I am not faniliar with the local political thinking or politics in that part of NY State, but I am somewhat supicious when a government agency is moved to reurect a 'Study' from almost twenty years earlier...The Adirondack Scentic Preservation Trust seemed to have a 'plan' and was building and working towards a goal of re-establishing the full 1149 mile rail corridor between Remsen and lake Placid.     

Call me suspicious, but the "Development" of a 'Mega-Resort' in the Tupper Lake seems to be a catalyst for thses events(?)  The railroad is amajor artery in that area to move people in and out of the area in all weather conditions. When one looks at the road maps of the area, with the exception of the Interstate [ to the East][The road net appears to be non conducive to moving lots of fast moving traffic, safely, in that area.  The existing roads seem to resemble a pictyure of malaria germs as they follow the contours of the terrain in that mountainous area.

As Larry (tree68) had indicated, money for the various aspects of the Corridor re-configuration is going to be a problem...Will the snowmobilers, and bicyclers be willing to pay fopr their recreation rnhancements?

    Is the State of New York going to pony up all the needed funds? THe railroad required some seventeen bridges in the 39 mile gap, used to gain the high point of 1135 feet of altitude?    Or will the State be willing to improve the road network that seems to be required to bring in the numbers of tourists to the area?

     Where do the Land Developers fit into this picture?  How much are they going to contribute to the infrastructure enhancement that will be needed top support their Mega Development ?   There are an awful lot of 'moving parts' in theses scenarios to bring together; It will be the people who live in that area who will eventually bear the burden of their transportation needs, and the health of their tourist based economy, after the railroad has been take out of the picture, and the developers are off to their next 'opportunity'..  My 2 Cents

 

 


 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Saturday, June 13, 2015 12:32 PM

Elevation at "Summit", just west (RR north) of Big Moose station, is 2040 feet, reputedly the highest point on the New York Central.  In fact, the sign stating such (erected by the NYC) will be duplicated at the spot.

Big Moose is 11 rail miles north of Thendara, not between Tupper Lake and Lake Placid.

Big Moose Hill, five miles of 1.1% grade (with minor variations) was the ruling grade on the line.  Purgatory Hill, just south of Otter Lake, is a little steeper, but not as long.

The Adirondack Railroad (Olympic edition) ran from 1979 to August of 1980.  It was shut down for several reasons, including some poor management.  

However, right up to the last trip, the railroad was carrying around 100 passengers each way on each trip.  Had the operation been properly run, I would opine that today's Adirondack Scenic might not exist, as the Adirondack RR might well still be a going concern.

Unless the "trail advocates" are able to push this ahead quickly, I don't foresee any rails being removed for a while.  There are things like historical designations to deal with, among other issues.  

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Saturday, June 13, 2015 7:43 PM

[quote user="tree68"]

"...Elevation at "Summit", just west (RR north) of Big Moose station, is 2040 feet, reputedly the highest point on the New York Central.  In fact, the sign stating such (erected by the NYC) will be duplicated at the spot.

Big Moose is 11 rail miles north of Thendara, not between Tupper Lake and Lake Placid.

Big Moose Hill, five miles of 1.1% grade (with minor variations) was the ruling grade on the line.  Purgatory Hill, just south of Otter Lake, is a little steeper, but not as long.

The Adirondack Railroad (Olympic edition) ran from 1979 to August of 1980.  It was shut down for several reasons, including some poor management.  

However, right up to the last trip, the railroad was carrying around 100 passengers each way on each trip.  Had the operation been properly run, I would opine that today's Adirondack Scenic might not exist, as the Adirondack RR might well still be a going concern.

Unless the "trail advocates" are able to push this ahead quickly, I don't foresee any rails being removed for a while.  There are things like historical designations to deal with, among other issues..." 

 

[/quote]

Larry (tree68): I have no intention of arguing your points as quoted:My information was from the 'Camoin Study'."...Elevation at "Summit", just west (RR north) of Big Moose station, is 2040 feet, reputedly the highest point on the New York Central.  In fact, the sign stating such (erected by the NYC) will be duplicated at the spot..."

Larry (tree68) You help to make my point.  The current study, under discussion is the "Camoin Study" which seems to just revise, and make current the original UMP from 1995/96..The information I quoted was from the "History Section" of their study.  The data they used is just a re-hash of data almost 20 years old(give or take?).

  As I previously had indicated, such a study is more or less an affirmation of the 'Points"  that the study's sponsor's  want to use to reaffirm their positions... Sort of a play on the "Baffle them with B.S. tact". Reshuffle the data, and the uninformed will seem to just accept it; because it is presented by some 'experts'.     Beware, I used to work a long time ago for some pretty smart guys; one of which used to say that to bureaucrats, and politicians, anyone from out of town who arrived with a briefcase was an'expert'. [Just my 2 cents.] Trust,but verify ! Whistling

 

 


 

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 9 posts
Posted by K SCOTT GUDGEON on Friday, November 6, 2015 4:55 AM

Anonymous

Sad news:

An historic rail line from Utica through the Adirondacks to Lake Placid will be partially converted to a bike path/snowmobile trail as part of a plan by the state Departments of Transportation and Environmental Conservation today. Rails used by a tourist train would remain in place to Tupper Lake, where a mega-resort is being planned, but be removed from Tupper Lake to Lake Placid, so the rail bed could be turned into the new multi-use path. This would end the use of the tourist train from Lake Placid to Saranac Lake.

http://blog.timesunion.com/business/state-announces-plans-for-adirondack-rail-line-conversion-to-bikesnowmobile-path/66847/

 

 

 It seems like this saga is nearing its end if not quite over. Am I the only person who thinks the NY State government and Lake PLacid Olympic folks are nuts to tear up rails to Lake Placid when they are thinking of a future Winter Olympics bid for a town that has no real scheduled air service and will soon have no prospect of passenger rail service either?  What are they thinking?  Here is the latest email bulletin from the Adirondack Scenic RR:

 

Anonymous

Sad news:

An historic rail line from Utica through the Adirondacks to Lake Placid will be partially converted to a bike path/snowmobile trail as part of a plan by the state Departments of Transportation and Environmental Conservation today. Rails used by a tourist train would remain in place to Tupper Lake, where a mega-resort is being planned, but be removed from Tupper Lake to Lake Placid, so the rail bed could be turned into the new multi-use path. This would end the use of the tourist train from Lake Placid to Saranac Lake.

http://blog.timesunion.com/business/state-announces-plans-for-adirondack-rail-line-conversion-to-bikesnowmobile-path/66847/

 

 

 

 

Anonymous

Sad news:

An historic rail line from Utica through the Adirondacks to Lake Placid will be partially converted to a bike path/snowmobile trail as part of a plan by the state Departments of Transportation and Environmental Conservation today. Rails used by a tourist train would remain in place to Tupper Lake, where a mega-resort is being planned, but be removed from Tupper Lake to Lake Placid, so the rail bed could be turned into the new multi-use path. This would end the use of the tourist train from Lake Placid to Saranac Lake.

http://blog.timesunion.com/business/state-announces-plans-for-adirondack-rail-line-conversion-to-bikesnowmobile-path/66847/

 

 

 

 

A winter Olympics and no way to get there?

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Friday, November 6, 2015 11:40 AM

Well New York State is pretty silly on how it spends it's money.   Look at the annual stats for the Erie Canal preservation as an example.    I think they spend over $200 million a year on preserving what amounts to a large ditch for a few pleasure craft and their annual revenue take is less than 10% of that amount.     Thats why New Yorkers pay such high taxes.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Friday, November 6, 2015 1:43 PM

CMStPnP

Well New York State is pretty silly on how it spends it's money.   Look at the annual stats for the Erie Canal preservation as an example.    I think they spend over $200 million a year on preserving what amounts to a large ditch for a few pleasure craft and their annual revenue take is less than 10% of that amount.     Thats why New Yorkers pay such high taxes.

 

Seems as if this is the latest chapter in the sory of "...How the Stomach Churns in the Adirondacks..."

It would seem that "The Developers" have finally won this round...seems to be more of the case that money talks, and balogna smells.  Whistling  

Quite the political decision !  My 2 Cents 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, November 6, 2015 8:40 PM

samfp1943
Seems as if this is the latest chapter in the sory of "...How the Stomach Churns in the Adirondacks..." It would seem that "The Developers" have finally won this round...seems to be more of the case that money talks, and balogna smells.     Quite the political decision !   

More a case of the "no development" folks winning.  

There are those among them who want everyone out of the woods, never mind the railroad.  The development of a resort at Tupper Lake, was loudly opposed by those of this mind set.  I've heard that the building of a "big box" department store was stymied when one of them bought the proposed site.

And yes, it is a purely political decision.  The "trail advocates" have been spreading plenty of money around.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Friday, November 6, 2015 9:24 PM

K SCOTT GUDGEON

  

 It seems like this saga is nearing its end if not quite over. Am I the only person who thinks the NY State government and Lake PLacid Olympic folks are nuts to tear up rails to Lake Placid when they are thinking of a future Winter Olympics bid for a town that has no real scheduled air service and will soon have no prospect of passenger rail service either?  What are they thinking?  Here is the latest email bulletin from the Adirondack Scenic RR:

 ...

 

A winter Olympics and no way to get there?

 

 

 

 

 

It's highly unlikely a town as small as Lake Placid would ever get another Olympics.  The Winter Olympics have grown too big and way too expensive.  The Olympic Committee expects that biddding cities will have mass transit.  The 2022 Bejing Winter Olympics will have HSR between Bejing (location of the big ticket items like hockey and figure skating) and the mountain events some distance out of the city.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Saturday, November 7, 2015 6:04 PM

Recent "equipment moves" over out-of-service portions of the line have been mentioned here in another thread by Larry / tree68.  I wonder if that activity/ demonstration of feasibility or intent of possible future service will have any effect on the local political deliberations about the future of the line (sadly, probably not).

However, the environmental benefits and historical aspects of the line can't be ruled out (yet) as possible saviors of it.  If those was enough to save the Grand Central Terminal from demolition and redevelopment as commercial uses, there may be hope yet.

Finally, I wonder if an appeal to the STB will be filed.  That Board has jurisdiction over any rail line abandonments, and would supersede any state action.  Lack of service - even for many years - does not necessarily indicate an intent to abandon the line, but perhaps instead just a suspension of service. 

The possible future restoration of a line is one of the rationales for preserving them as rail-trails.  Although that principle would seem to point to the end of this line, those are extreme cases when the railroad wants to abandon the line. 

Back in the 1960's there were handful of cases (3 ?) where a state sought and the ICC ordered the abandonment of small lines or segments of them, usually for an alleged greater public benfit (typically a highway project).  Michael J. Dunn III wrote an article in Trains about that, and as I recall all 3 were money-losing operations that didn't have long to live anyway. 

Now, with this abandonment being much longer in scope - and if the STB doesn't waive the Environmental Impact Study required by NEPA for 'major' Federal government decisions - it might be a crapshoot how this turns out, and will bear watching.   

- Paul North. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Matthews NC
  • 363 posts
Posted by matthewsaggie on Saturday, November 7, 2015 7:36 PM

The STB may be more deferential to the state since it's the state that owns the track, not a private concern. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, November 7, 2015 8:04 PM

And how many years is it since the line was regularly operated?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Saturday, November 7, 2015 8:27 PM

schlimm

And how many years is it since the line was regularly operated?

Quite a few - but when it was last run end-to-end, it was hosting two round trips per day, with over 100 people on each trip (1980).

The basic issue here has nothing to do with industrial uses - those dried up years ago.  No one disputes that.

The line's history as a passenger carrier for a Class 1 is of no consequence, either.  The only reason scheduled passenger service continued until 1965 was the regulatory process at the time.

The line's value now is as a tourist line - much like the Grand Canyon Railroad.

The summer of 1980 - well after the Olympics - the line carried over 16,000 passengers, strictly on the basis of being a tourist attraction.  Rail advocates feel those numbers can be matched, and even improved upon.

As I've probably said before, it's my opinion that the "trail advocates" simply want everyone out of "their" woods.  Reasons range from the railroad (and snowmobiles) interfering with their placid enjoyment of the woods to folks who would love to see the entire Adirondack Park turned into wilderness - sans trains, cars, and people.

Cutting the Adirondack line back to Tupper is not much different that cutting the Grand Canyon back to Valle.  Tupper Lake is a nice community, but it doesn't have the name recognition of Lake Placid.

 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Saturday, November 7, 2015 9:41 PM

To my way of thinking, "regularly" operated also includes the seasonal tourist operation that currently covers not quite half the distance that is proposed to be torn up.  Some days there are two trains a day, so that some may take the train between the two towns, spend some time in the other town and take the later train back to their origin.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Sunday, November 8, 2015 9:12 AM

Thar's a more compelling rationale.  A good argument could be made that use of part is a use of all, particularly since it's all 1 line - not like multiple branches, of which only 1 is being used. 

I don't have the time or resources to research this thoroughly, but there have been some fairly recent STB decisions blockading attempted abandonments.  mudchicken is familiar with some involving the A&K rail people, who wanted to buy a southern shortline (Louisiana ?  Mississippi ?), and then abandon it, mainly to remove and resell the really good rail it had, and likewise in Colorado.  As I recall, those decisions weren't based on the alleged bad history and evil intent of the A&K entity, but instead on preserving the possibility of future service.  I would not take a bet against the railroad here. 

- Paul North.       

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Sunday, November 8, 2015 10:45 AM

SighUnfortunately, there is a very good chance that STB has absolutely no say in the matter. This is another Peoria Heights case in the making. Go back and look at how NY State wound up with the line and the USRA decisions made in the 1970's.

The state may yet regret its decision.(and nobody will "win", not even the lawyers) Once an attempt is made to remove the track, all of the title issues will come spilling out of the closet. Fibber McGhee will never get that door closed. Ugly.

Be careful what you ask for.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy