BaltACD Lac Megantic did so well with a single person crew.
Lac Megantic did so well with a single person crew.
How many derailments, collisions, etc. on the Big 6 would have been prevented with a 2-man crew onboard?
C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan
I don’t see how the Lac Megantic wreck proves that a one-person crew is unsafe, unless you are saying that a second person is needed in case the first person intentionally violates a rule. I have never heard that claimed as a justification for larger crews.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
A message from President John Previsich, SMART Transportation Division:
"... the only safe and secure operation of any train includes a minimum of two people on each and every crew."
James
That's why their all "former" UTU union bosses,because they keep selling out the "other" union representing the Engineer's and loosing rank and file dues paying members.They are simply flashing money in front of people to reduce crew numbers .
I can't understand how they as union representatives can justify even going along with this idea.It's unsafe !
There's a whole lot of advanced technology evolved here that as mentioned,is unproven and simply to much to accept in a time frame the carriers are going about it,in my opinion
Collin ,operator of the " Eastern Kentucky & Ohio R.R."
Look,I simply posted the article because it is an important event. I thought it would be important for railroad employees to be informed of the agreement. But apparently not. Here's what another veteran union official said:
“I have had the pleasure of reading the proposed Crew Consist Agreement and Wage and Rule Settlement recently negotiated on a large portion of BNSF Railway. Both of you along with the various Assistant and Associate Chairpersons are to be congratulated on an agreement that goes beyond any protection agreement that I have observed.
“Over the past several years there has been an outpouring from numerous groups, including our Legislative Department, promoting Positive Train Control (PTC). The BNSF has taken the lead in installing this equipment on many of its territories. Instead of waiting and then having to be reactive in trying to salvage any damage that could come from this new technology, each of you has been very proactive and addressed the situation head-on in order to protect the membership you represent. That is true leadership that is hard to find in this day and age.
“I recognize that in addition to supporting PTC, our union is also trying to obtain legislation for a minimum of a two-person crew. This fact in and of itself recognizes that with PTC comes a serious threat to the possibility of losses to SMART-represented jobs. While everyone hopes to see such legislation, the fact remains that with the current Congress and the action of our government in Washington, D.C., nothing is getting addressed, let alone anything that would be of favor to working families.
“Each of you has been successful in negotiating the better of two worlds. Should legislation pass for the requirement of two-person crews, in Article VII, your Agreement provides for a Snap-Back back to your original Agreements. That is covering all bases.
“We all do not like changes, but such will always come about. It wasn't that long ago that each train crew had 5 and sometimes 6 crewmembers along with a caboose. First the railroads went after the firemen's craft, and through legislation the carriers were successful in eliminating all firemen with less than 10 years seniority. I was one of those firemen and realized then that you cannot count on legislation to protect your jobs. Then came the first generation of crew consist [agreements] followed by second, third, and sometime fourth generation of crew consists, all with the intent of the carriers eliminating more crews. This was followed by first eliminating the cabooses, thus placing the rear brakeman and conductor on the head end. Again, the carriers took advantage of this situation to eliminate more positions.
“Don’t think for a minute that the carriers are not looking down the road to take the same advantage of PTC technology. You each have seen the future and rightfully have jumped ahead of the game for the benefit of our membership.
“No doubt there will be those that criticize your efforts, but what are their options? You have eliminated all entry rates, provided protection for all your current ground service employees, obtained a Scope Rule for the future and restored jobs that had been previously lost, and provided a Snap-Back if two-person crews are legislated. You each have not only hit a home run, you have hit a grand slam.
“I am very proud of each of you, for your willingness to do what is right for SMART members, and while there will be changes to some jobs, they will belong to SMART employees with full protection.”
As far as the quote about evidence proving a two man crew is no safer than a one man crew.....prove your quote with facts.
I've worked in the industry for almost 25 years and think that's one of the most unsupported comments I've ever seen about the topic
schlimm "No evidence has surfaced that a second person in the locomotive cab contributes to a more-safe operation, while evidence exists that the second person in the cab can cause a safety hazard."
"No evidence has surfaced that a second person in the locomotive cab contributes to a more-safe operation, while evidence exists that the second person in the cab can cause a safety hazard."
Perhaps the strongest evidence supporting two person crews is the burned out center of Megantic, Quebec and 50 graves......how soon we forget.
BaltACD The systems necessary to support interoperatable PTC will contain millions of lines of code written by hundreds, if not thousands, of programmers that have thousands of decision points - what is the likelyhood that ALL the decisions are correct? Remember - at this point in time - PTC IS NOT a 'fully debugged' production product.
The systems necessary to support interoperatable PTC will contain millions of lines of code written by hundreds, if not thousands, of programmers that have thousands of decision points - what is the likelyhood that ALL the decisions are correct?
Remember - at this point in time - PTC IS NOT a 'fully debugged' production product.
Thing is--superconductors require super-cold temperatures to work.
_____________
"A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner
One thing to remember about ANY computer system - the code is written by individuals that wouldn't know a transportation device if it hit them. While the designers MAY have all the proper qualifications for the system an MAY be able to correctly answer all the decision points that are anticipated - the coding programmer and his code MAY develop additional decision points that the programmer will supply the answers which MAY not be what the designer intended. The systems necessary to support interoperatable PTC will contain millions of lines of code written by hundreds, if not thousands, of programmers that have thousands of decision points - what is the likelyhood that ALL the decisions are correct?
I've ran a train for over 20 years now and can't understand why anyone would think running one man crews with a desk job conductor is the right way to run a railroad ?
Why do airlines,even with all the fancy auto pilots and such,still have a pilot and a co-pilot ? To watch over each other.
I know some will say apples and oranges,but planes carry a few hundred people,I run trains thru towns with thousands of people,and with anything mechanical or electronic,it can break and malfunction .
The FRA has never took a stand towards accepting one man crews as the absolute standard of the industry and in light of everything happening lately the rest of the country won't either .
Everyone please remember,were not talking model trains that on person can run a layout,were talking thousands of tons going thru towns with many lives at hand.
I could almost say that the FRA will never get on board with this one
Paul North:That is a great article. I recall when Railway Man linked us to that.
Where is RM these days? Sure miss his insight and knowledge.
Ed
Or where road accessibility doesn't exist, by Helicopter. So yes, look up, it's a SUPECONDUCTOR!!!
Euclid I think this discussion getting way beyond the scope of the original linked article. It says nothing about using drones to replace knuckles. If anything, it suggests that Super Conductor will replace the knuckles the old fashioned way. All I see in the article is the same old push for crew size reduction all dressed up in a new justification called PTC. The remark about drones is just a throwaway comment to help paint a picture of automation being a panacea. The actual “drone” will be Super Conductor driving a pickup truck.
I think this discussion getting way beyond the scope of the original linked article. It says nothing about using drones to replace knuckles. If anything, it suggests that Super Conductor will replace the knuckles the old fashioned way.
All I see in the article is the same old push for crew size reduction all dressed up in a new justification called PTC. The remark about drones is just a throwaway comment to help paint a picture of automation being a panacea. The actual “drone” will be Super Conductor driving a pickup truck.
She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw
Paul_D_North_Jr Short version: Apparently each plane's navigation system followed the designated air route - though in opposite directions - so well that they guided the planes right into each other ! - Paul North.
Short version: Apparently each plane's navigation system followed the designated air route - though in opposite directions - so well that they guided the planes right into each other !
- Paul North.
erikem Can't resist comparing this to crewing arrangements on airliners, where two has been the minimum since the early 1920's (a few exceptions such as the Ford Tri-motor). Small cargo planes can fly with one pilot, but weight limit for such operations is typically 12,500 lb gross takeoff weight. Having two people in the cockpit doesn't always improve safety (cough) Air France crash over the Atlantic (cough). - Erik
Having two people in the cockpit doesn't always improve safety (cough) Air France crash over the Atlantic (cough).
- Erik
"The Devil at 37,000 Feet" by William Langewiesche, Vanity Fair, January 2009 edition, at:
http://www.vanityfair.com/magazine/2009/01/air_crash200901
Credit Railway Man for tipping us off to this story about 3 -4 years ago.
blue streak 1 Something we need to consider. If no conductor trains are run how much would that reduce track capacity ? 20 - 35 % ?. It certainly will reduce capacity. That would mean CSX & NS would both need to add a track into Chicago ?I Of course they probably already need to add a track ? What is the ROI of adding a track compared to loosing a conductor ?
Something we need to consider. If no conductor trains are run how much would that reduce track capacity ? 20 - 35 % ?. It certainly will reduce capacity. That would mean CSX & NS would both need to add a track into Chicago ?I Of course they probably already need to add a track ? What is the ROI of adding a track compared to loosing a conductor ?
Might increase capacity having more personnel on the ground at key locations....
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
gardendance We're onto the 8th page, I think I've shown incredible fortitude in the face of incredible temptation, but can no longer resist: "Look, up in the sky" "It's a bird" "It's a plane" "No, it's super conductor"
We're onto the 8th page, I think I've shown incredible fortitude in the face of incredible temptation, but can no longer resist:
"Look, up in the sky"
"It's a bird"
"It's a plane"
"No, it's super conductor"
You shouldn't have (held out so long)!
I laughed.
Re: repair drones...would they be able to manuever on ballast?
blue streak 1Something we need to consider. If no conductor trains are run how much would that reduce track capacity ? 20 - 35 % ?. It certainly will reduce capacity.
Why would it reduce track capacity?
Patrick Boylan
Free yacht rides, 27' sailboat, zip code 19114 Delaware River, get great Delair bridge photos from the river. Send me a private message
tomikawaTT Deggesty BaltACD Drones fixing a broken knuckle or stuck brakes - interesting concept! Drones certainly are versatile, aren't they? Just equip the drone with an on-board repair robot. Hey, if they can rig a small tracked vehicle with an arm to de-fuse IEDs, it should be able to swap out knuckles. Alternatively, the repair robot could be carried on the train, along with a full spectrum of minor repair parts... Chuck
Deggesty BaltACD Drones fixing a broken knuckle or stuck brakes - interesting concept! Drones certainly are versatile, aren't they?
BaltACD Drones fixing a broken knuckle or stuck brakes - interesting concept!
Drones fixing a broken knuckle or stuck brakes - interesting concept!
Just equip the drone with an on-board repair robot. Hey, if they can rig a small tracked vehicle with an arm to de-fuse IEDs, it should be able to swap out knuckles.
Alternatively, the repair robot could be carried on the train, along with a full spectrum of minor repair parts...
Chuck
While there might be a robotic system testing in a lab somewhere that is that dexterous the IED disposal robots in the field currently can't defuse devices.
They are used to uncover/excavate suspected bombs and then can destroy the devices either by placing a small explosive charge next to them or shooting them with a shotgun-like device called a disruptor. The old "cut-the -red -wire" stuff still has to be done by humans.
However ,given that robots are being used on a regular basis for micro surgery I'm sure it won't be that long until a knuckle coupler changing robot is practical.
I don't think however, that a autonomous or remotely operated system that can address all the mechanical issues a train can experience in the greatly varying climatic and terrain conditions in modern railroading as quickly and efficiently as a well trained H. Sapien can is going to happen any time soon...
"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock
jeffhergertThe position of conductor will become, in reality, a utility person. Also maybe a van driver? I think the idea of one U-man every 20 miles is overly optimistic. If we're lucky, maybe every 50 miles. I would bet 75 or more would be realistic. No matter, there will be times when one U-man is too many and five aren't enough. Between the busy and slack days, the bean counters will only look at the days nothing much happens and want to cut jobs and lengthen the distance each must cover.
This sounds about right to me.
You point out a problem that gets too little consideration. Nobody really has examined the impact of all the random failures have on network performance. All those things that occur everyday, somewhere, that are take for granted as "normal railroading". Setting out bad orders, broken rails, signal failures...etc. They all take a toll on line capacity, network velocity, and on time performance, but nobody knows the relationship in numeric terms.
If we knew this, the we could figure out how much manpower needs to be where in order to get the best value from the rail network. It probably would vary a great deal from line to line based on the volume and value of the traffic.
But we don't. So we painfully stumble our way forward - and sometime backward.
Paul_D_North_Jr Even anti-labor John Kneiling - who advocated 1-man trains, too - recognized that the labor costs are 'chump change', and that the real money is in the capital equipment costs and additional revenue traffic to be gained, not in the "head-hunting" / cost-saving mode. I still haven't seen or heard of the person with the guts and fortitude to say "I'm going to straighten out interchange and other operations in Chicago and make it run better !"
Yes. Equipment costs, including ownership, best labor costs such that faster = cheaper. (Faster being car velocity moreso than train speed...)
There are lots of people who have the guts to say "Lets make (fill in the blank) work better". There aren't many people who a) really mean it b) have the power to do it c) have an idea of how to do it.
If you want to hear some frustrated folk rant, talk to the guys who have to do the interline service design!
jeffhergert Also, it isn't (at least yet) the end of conductors on trains without PTC. I imagine most main lines will have it, most secondary lines may not. At least not for some time. Jeff
Also, it isn't (at least yet) the end of conductors on trains without PTC. I imagine most main lines will have it, most secondary lines may not. At least not for some time.
Jeff
Yes, there are people that get their rocks off on behaving subhuman.
Norm48327 Erik, Air France 447 and Asiana 214 were both cases of over-dependence on automation and lack of proper training. There always comes the day when human intervention becomes necessary and training is paramount. That begs the question of an engineer who does not fully understand the systems and lets the computer get him into trouble.
Erik,
Air France 447 and Asiana 214 were both cases of over-dependence on automation and lack of proper training. There always comes the day when human intervention becomes necessary and training is paramount. That begs the question of an engineer who does not fully understand the systems and lets the computer get him into trouble.
Norm
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.