Trains.com

Good bye, conductors?

21778 views
193 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Good bye, conductors?
Posted by jeffhergert on Friday, July 18, 2014 1:32 PM

http://www.railwayage.com/index.php/blogs/frank-n-wilner/bnsf-smart-seek-historic-crew-consist-revision.html

I was hoping to be retired, or close to it, before they went to one person crews.  Now I'm not so sure.  At least working on lines equipped with PTC.

Jeff

 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 2:16 PM
The article states that conductors will still be required albeit not on board trains. Rather, such "master conductors" will supervise their trains remotely using various devices, including drones. Sounds like an interesting development!
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, July 18, 2014 2:44 PM

Drones fixing a broken knuckle or stuck brakes - interesting concept!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Friday, July 18, 2014 2:58 PM

If they can have a roving conductor, they can have a roving knuckle man.  Some have said that PTC is a road that ultimately leads to unmanned drone trains.   

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, July 18, 2014 3:02 PM

BaltACD

Drones fixing a broken knuckle or stuck brakes - interesting concept!

Drones certainly are versatile, aren't they?

Johnny

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Friday, July 18, 2014 3:25 PM

Deggesty

BaltACD

Drones fixing a broken knuckle or stuck brakes - interesting concept!

Drones certainly are versatile, aren't they?

Just equip the drone with an on-board repair robot.  Hey, if they can rig a small tracked vehicle with an arm to de-fuse IEDs, it should be able to swap out knuckles.

Alternatively, the repair robot could be carried on the train, along with a full spectrum of minor repair parts...

Chuck

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 3:35 PM
I'm guessing here.. but if the engineer is the only one left on the train the task of fixing a broken knuckle would fall to him/her. That would seem reasonable to me... its probably not something that happens every 20 minutes or even everyday.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, July 18, 2014 3:44 PM

Ulrich
I'm guessing here.. but if the engineer is the only one left on the train the task of fixing a broken knuckle would fall to him/her. That would seem reasonable to me... its probably not something that happens every 20 minutes or even everyday.

Good way to keep the mainline blocked a few hours.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 3:47 PM
Why.. are engineers slower moving than conductors? Either way someone has to hoof it to fix the problem... both are on two legs. What does the engineer normally do when the conductor is fixing the problem?
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, July 18, 2014 3:49 PM

Ulrich
Why.. are engineers slower moving than conductors? Either way someone has to hoof it to fix the problem... both are on two legs. What does the engineer normally do when the conductor is fixing the problem?

First there's the issue of train securement.  Then with an engineer, you can bring the knuckle to you, and not have to take it a walk for a mile.

PS.  Before we start with the roving utility concept, remember there are many places that are not accessible by road.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Friday, July 18, 2014 3:56 PM

I see lots of new business opportunities ahead as railroads fundamentally transform themselves.

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:00 PM

Smart alec answer….Run the locomotive.Embarrassed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:03 PM
To where? Knuckle broken..
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:15 PM

Ok,

Not trying to be a smart alec this time,…

Think about what has happened and what needs to be done to “fix” the problem.

The train has a broken knuckle half way back, has come apart and gone into emergency.

Both types of knuckles and spare knuckle pins are stored on the locomotive, along with a spare air hose and wrench.

Knuckles weigh between 90 and 110 lbs, each.

Now, go from there…

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:21 PM

"No evidence has surfaced that a second person in the locomotive cab contributes to a more-safe operation, while evidence exists that the second person in the cab can cause a safety hazard."

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:22 PM
OK, the train is now immobile. You're saying it takes two people to carry the replacement knuckle back... if they weigh that much then I can appreciate that. So engineer and conductor BOTH go back with the replacement knuckle.. is that how its generally done?
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:22 PM

schlimm

"No evidence has surfaced that a second person in the locomotive cab contributes to a more-safe operation, while evidence exists that the second person in the cab can cause a safety hazard."

Who said that?  They are full of crap. 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:24 PM

The article said that.  Take your issue up with the magazine of you believe that to be false..

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:25 PM
Whoever wrote the article said it.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:26 PM

Ulrich
Whoever wrote the article said it.

They're still full of crap. 

And the piece doesn't specify who made that statement.  I hope it wasn't some 'official' with the Office of Management and Budget.  They probably know as much about railroading as my cat does.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:26 PM
Possibly...probably..maybe..
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:37 PM

Let's let the non-railroaders figure all the moves required to fix a broken knuckle?

No professional help please - and don't hurt yourselves laughing!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:38 PM

schlimm

"No evidence has surfaced that a second person in the locomotive cab contributes to a more-safe operation, while evidence exists that the second person in the cab can cause a safety hazard."

Think you'd want to fly in an airliner that has only one pilot? The first officer is there for a safety factor as well as to share the load. Engineer has a heart attack. No one in the cab to initiate emergency braking; what's gonna happen next?

Norm


  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:42 PM
BaltACD

Let's let the non-railroaders figure all the moves required to fix a broken knuckle?

No professional help please - and don't hurt yourselves laughing!

That doesn't really help. One person by him/herself would find it difficult to change a knuckle... is that correct?
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:44 PM

Ulrich
BaltACD

Let's let the non-railroaders figure all the moves required to fix a broken knuckle?

No professional help please - and don't hurt yourselves laughing!

That doesn't really help. One person by him/herself would find it difficult to change a knuckle... is that correct?

Map out the game plan - 1 man or 2.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:46 PM
Norm48327

schlimm

"No evidence has surfaced that a second person in the locomotive cab contributes to a more-safe operation, while evidence exists that the second person in the cab can cause a safety hazard."

Think you'd want to fly in an airliner that has only one pilot? The first officer is there for a safety factor as well as to share the load. Engineer has a heart attack. No one in the cab to initiate emergency braking; what's gonna happen next?

Brakes applied from a remote location.
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:46 PM

We have had many versions of this conversation before, and each time, it seems like the entire march of progress stops when it gets to those pesky knuckles. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:46 PM

zugmann

Ulrich
Whoever wrote the article said it.

They're still full of crap. 

And the piece doesn't specify who made that statement.  I hope it wasn't some 'official' with the Office of Management and Budget.  They probably know as much about railroading as my cat does.

It is the underlying assumption of the agreement one of the rail unions is signing with BNSF.   Maybe you should address them with your concerns and anger.   It's not the non-railroaders who are saying and doing this.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:47 PM

BaltACD

Map out the game plan - 1 man or 2.

I have a feeling this is going to get interesting. Big Smile

Norm


  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 4:47 PM
BaltACD

Ulrich
BaltACD

Let's let the non-railroaders figure all the moves required to fix a broken knuckle?

No professional help please - and don't hurt yourselves laughing!

That doesn't really help. One person by him/herself would find it difficult to change a knuckle... is that correct?

Map out the game plan - 1 man or 2.

I can't change a knuckle. You can't run a business. Let's move on.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy