Trains.com

America's railroads: The "poster boy" for graffiti vandalism.

47022 views
539 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, July 10, 2014 7:50 AM

Ulrich

Maybe the best way to approach it is to increase the fines and to control the sale of spray paint somehow or to put a hefty tax on it that is then used to pay for clean up. 

I have serious doubts that the paint used in tagging has been bought.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Thursday, July 10, 2014 8:01 AM

I don't know... maybe its all stolen... but that's alot of stolen paint.  My guess (and it is only a guess) is that alot of it comes from the big box stores. 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, July 10, 2014 8:33 AM

Here it says that taggers lose points if they buy the paint instead of stealing it.

http://www.sellwoodwestmoreland.com/docs/online/Understanding%20graffiti%20and%20taggers.pdf

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:16 AM
I believe Europe and other countries dealt with this issue years ago. I know here at home the NYC MTA subways did. It is just catching on in the US now? Yeah, we are falling far behind the rest of the world in so many things anymore. And I don't believe that spray paint artists have to or actually do steal it...maybe it's chic in some circles, but some of the artists are sincere in their art just not sensible about their canvass.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:21 AM

And a very nice compliment in there for older women too. I know a few who in their youth got  saddled with useless lugs who don't work but seem to have time for all kinds of destructive behavior. Tax the paint and cut out welfare to adult able bodied males. 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:38 AM

henry6
... but some of the artists are sincere in their art just not sensible about their canvass.

Maybe so, but a big part of the “art” is the resentment of others having property.  There is a big “stick-in-the-eye” component in graffiti. 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:13 AM

A few years ago, I found what looked like a gang's mark for its territory on my garbage can. I covered it with spray paint (I tried to match the color of the can itself, but did not quite get a true match), and the villain did not re-mark the can.

I do not remember all of the details, but I believe that it is extremely difficult for a minor to buy spray paint in Salt Lake County. Of course, not all of these overly-proud "artists" are minors.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:42 AM

.

 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:49 AM

.

 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Thursday, July 10, 2014 11:12 AM

Murphy Siding

Ulrich

From me. If I return equipment that has been marked up or damaged or vandalized then I get to pay for it. They don't care how it happened... it was under my care and control. 

   How would that scenario change, if the trailer in question was hauled by several trucking firms right after another, and spent various amounts of time at shippers' and receivers' docks and parking areas, truck stops, shoulders of little traveled highways, and parked on the street in some shady rough parts of many cities and towns?

Wouldn't change at all. If I signed the lease agreement then I'm responsible for the equipment regardless. Personally I wouldn't give up care and control of any vehicle unless I too had an agreement with the other party to pay for damages. I generally stay away from leases and rentals.. I've paid for too many scuff boards, dents, and scratches over the years.  I guess rail cars are treated differently.. maybe the rail lease companies accept vandalism... the truck lease places sure don't.  

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Thursday, July 10, 2014 11:39 AM

Ulrich

I don't know... maybe its all stolen... but that's alot of stolen paint.  My guess (and it is only a guess) is that alot of it comes from the big box stores. 

The selling of spray paint to minors is illegal in the US, not because of the tagging concern, but the “huffing” concern.

Under 18 years of age, you can’t buy it.

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Thursday, July 10, 2014 12:36 PM

edblysard

Ulrich

I don't know... maybe its all stolen... but that's alot of stolen paint.  My guess (and it is only a guess) is that alot of it comes from the big box stores. 

The selling of spray paint to minors is illegal in the US, not because of the tagging concern, but the “huffing” concern.

Under 18 years of age, you can’t buy it.

edblysard

Ulrich

I don't know... maybe its all stolen... but that's alot of stolen paint.  My guess (and it is only a guess) is that alot of it comes from the big box stores. 

The selling of spray paint to minors is illegal in the US, not because of the tagging concern, but the “huffing” concern.

Under 18 years of age, you can’t buy it.

Well, that's certainly a good thing.. I didn't know that. Maybe they need to further curtail the sale of spray paint somehow by selling only to licensed contractors via a tightly controlled supply chain network. Making the stuff hard to get would at least reduce the vandalism. 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, July 10, 2014 12:47 PM

I have no access to numbers, but I have the impression that there are far more legitimate users of spray paint than there are taggers. To limit sales to licensed contractors could cause a great outcry on the part of legitimate users.

Johnny

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, July 10, 2014 2:43 PM

henry6
And I don't believe that spray paint artists have to or actually do steal it...maybe it's chic in some circles, but some of the artists are sincere in their art just not sensible about their canvass.

You don' think someone who will go out and do $10,000 worth of defacement property damage would steal a can of paint?

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, July 10, 2014 3:07 PM

.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Thursday, July 10, 2014 3:25 PM
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Thursday, July 10, 2014 3:35 PM

Too bad....he had talent. 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, July 10, 2014 4:33 PM

.

 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, July 10, 2014 4:39 PM

henry6
I believe Europe and other countries dealt with this issue years ago. I know here at home the NYC MTA subways did. It is just catching on in the US now? Yeah, we are falling far behind the rest of the world in so many things anymore.

I have seen a lot of graffiti on rail cars and RoWs as well as some buildings in Europe.  If anything, it may be worse than it was 10-20 years ago.  

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    February 2014
  • From: Nescopeck and Topton, Penna.
  • 81 posts
Posted by Eddie Sand on Thursday, July 10, 2014 5:05 PM

It's ironic, because at the height of the railroads' financial miseries back in the mid-70;s, boxcars never looked better thanks to all the leasing and short-line (pseudo-)ownership.

19 and copy from 'NP' at Nescopeck, Penna.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Huntsville, Alabama
  • 207 posts
Posted by jimnorton on Friday, July 18, 2014 1:22 AM

With the railroads emerging in both tonnage and the public's eye one would think there would be some pride associated with that.  But the message is lost. 

Recently, I served on a local municipal board.  When the topic of the town's railroad came up, inevitably, graffiti was mentioned.  More recently, I shared some nicely detailed railroad models with non-rail friends.  Both times I was told, "you outta put some graffiti on there."  

What we can gather from this is that the vandals are getting their message out far and away better than the railroads.  Imagine that.

Jim Norton

Huntsville, AL

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Huntsville, Alabama
  • 207 posts
Posted by jimnorton on Friday, July 18, 2014 1:34 AM

One of the best run and proud railroads in the country is Pennsylvania's Reading and Northern.  Recently, a "war on graffiti" was announced by Andy Mueller the line''s president.   That's the only instance of an effort mounted by a railroad nationwide to discourage graffiti from their freight equipment.  RBMN wants to look in good order and impressive in the public's eye.  Maybe it will catch on.

Jim Norton

Huntsville, AL

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 7:13 AM
I sure wish them success with that. They should get together with their peers and turn this into an industry wide initiative, maybe through the AAR. Another industry class act, RJ Corman, famously stated that "you can't be any good if you don't look good". Certainly, from a marketing perspective that's true; appearance and presentation are as important as substance.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, July 18, 2014 8:34 AM

.

 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Friday, July 18, 2014 8:57 AM

Murphy Siding
In an average year, how many cars do you think are rejected by shippers and receivers because they have graffiti on the side?

Graffiti is not a good thing, but in the grand scheme of running something as big as a railroad, isn't it more of a fairly small mole hill, compared to a lot of big mountains?

A corporate brand and image works in big ways that go far beyond simple business logistics.  How many shipments do you think U.P. would lose if they just ran their equipment in red oxide paint with no name or logos?  Yet they will spend lots of money taking anybody to court who tampers with those intangible symbols.  Why? 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, July 18, 2014 9:22 AM

.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 9:32 AM
On the whole graffiti has probably hurt the industry... but we will never know to what extent because no one keeps track of phone calls NOT made or business deals not consummated. I can tell you from first hand experience that customers do notice appearances. They correlate appearance with capability.. they figure if your equipment looks ratty and marked up then your service must be ratty too. That may not be fair or true, but that's how its perceived. Maybe things are different on the rail side as shippers generally don't have that much choice.
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Friday, July 18, 2014 9:34 AM

Murphy Siding

     How many shipments would they lose?  Zero.  What color were the grain cars that hauled the corn that made your cornflakes this morning?

Yes, I agree, but that is my point.  They would not lose any shipments, so why do they care about paint schemes, logos, brand, and image?  There must be a reason.  These things cost a lot of money.  If destroying them with graffiti did not matter, why would they spend the money on them in the first place?

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Friday, July 18, 2014 9:37 AM

Euclid

How many shipments do you think U.P. would lose if they just ran their equipment in red oxide paint with no name or logos? 

Since the UP's paint scheme for boxcars IS oxide red with only required lettering and a very small UP shield, and their carloadings are going up, I would have to say that it would make no difference whatsoever. 

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, July 18, 2014 9:46 AM
Generally the folks who have done well in business (like RJ Corman) will tell you that image matters a lot.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy