Trains.com

Film crew death

53603 views
495 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Thursday, September 4, 2014 1:15 PM

A Canadian infantry regiment's unofficial motto, or slogan more accurately, is, "Never pass a fault." CSX had little choice but to stop at this one.

I feel it would be irresponsible of CSX to not take an overt legal stance over this intrusion on their corporation.   That is what it was, a lethal and unnecessary intrusion.  While many complain that the Americans, as a population, are overly litigious, this instance is one that brings a loud acclamation IMO. 

In addition to never passing a fault, one in a role of leadership should also set an example for others to emulate. It needn't be punitive in all cases, but I think a law suit could be corrective to a large extent, and also provide a useful example...a 'teaching point'.  If it isn't trespass on controlled crossings, it's trespass on bridges from which there is little escape, except to jump.

Keep on teaching.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 10:05 PM

This is no longer a railroad thing, it's now a legal thing.

The VP-Law of CSX is now calling the shots for them.   And they either have to trust his/her advice or get a different VP-Law.  His/her job is to protect the railroad to the best of his/her ability.

CSX has to fight the parent's legal action.  They can't just roll over.   And they've got to be aggressive in their actions least they get run over in court.

Let's assume, in absence of any evidence to the contrary, that the VP-Law for CSX knows what he/she is doing. 

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:22 PM

schlimm

Though the accident was not the fault of CSX, the optics of the railroad, whose locomotive was the instrument of death of the victim, now suing the film company for lost time, etc. looks really, really bad to outsiders.

Anything CSX does, or doesn’t do, will “look bad in the eyes of outsiders”.

In just about every language on earth, no means no…simple, two letters, one syllable.

They we told no, twice, in writing both times, and went ahead and trespassed any way, causing CSX harm and the death of one of their own employees along with injuries to other of their employees, not to mention physiological injury to a CSX crew.

Their actions forced CSX to expend money not only on inspecting the train, bridge and tracks, (not cheap at all) but delayed delivery of a stack train that most likely had an on time guarentee that was lost, and their actions also forced CSX to incure legal cost in upcoming litigation

CSX has the legal right to recoup their expenses and damages caused by the trespassers, and most likely punitive damages as well.

This will send a clear message to not only film crews, but others that may choose to trespass, that CSX will pursue legal action if the trespassers are caught..

I seem to recall in the graffiti thread you were all for railroads pursuing and prosecuting any trespasser.

Here is the absolute example of the liability issue you backed Jim Norton on fully, so why do you care how outsiders see CSX over this?

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 7:32 PM

Firelock76

Maybe they won't make any money, but they will make the point.

 
  If CSX can bankrupt both film company and individuals that would put the fear of ruin into future productions ?  Also might black list the producers as well ? 
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 6:55 PM

schlimm

Though the accident was not the fault of CSX, the optics of the railroad, whose locomotive was the instrument of death of the victim, now suing the film company for lost time, etc. looks really, really bad to outsiders.

I highly doubt CSX is looking for money. It would be logical to assume they want to make a point to others who would trespass for a similar reason.

Norm


  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 6:52 PM

What good does it do for CSX to sue the film company?  Think of it as a "shot across the box" to anyone considering trespassing on CSX property.  CSX is VERY sensitive and intolerant of trespassing on their lines, and I don't blame them.

Maybe they won't make any money, but they will make the point.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 6:42 PM

The best defense is a strong offense. Go get them CSX!

Mac

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 6:34 PM

Though the accident was not the fault of CSX, the optics of the railroad, whose locomotive was the instrument of death of the victim, now suing the film company for lost time, etc. looks really, really bad to outsiders.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 6:25 PM

I am not a lawyer either, but I wonder if CSX stands a better chance of defending against the suit against them if they push back with a counter suit.  I don't see them having damages worth suing for except for the potential damage if they lose the suit against them. 

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:45 PM

I suspect a better phrasing would be that CSX charged them with trespassing, which of course could carry a fine if convicted.  That is not unusual.  But maybe they are also suing them for the costs of the delayed train, such as recrewing (possibly several trains) and counseling for the crew.  The legal system often seems to reward strategy more than actual justice and it will strengthen CSX's position.  Note - I am not a lawyer!

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: US
  • 591 posts
Posted by petitnj on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:27 PM

What does CSX hope to gain? I doubt the film company, "Film Allman" has any assets and even the OSHA fine will go unpaid. The parent company, "Unclaimed Freight" is most likely a shell with no assets of its own. The film companies are suing to force their insurance companies out in the open, but every dime the insurance company coughs up will go to the victims.

I know that CSX was named in the suits, but they will have to show up at the hearings of  these suits anyway. What does a counter suit produce? 

Would like legal opinion on this if possible. 

 

  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 234 posts
Posted by chad s thomas on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:10 PM

I say GOOD ....Make an example out of them and nail them to the wall !!!! Huh?

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 4:44 PM

BaltACD

 

 As someone who has chased Photographers off CSX tracks I say    --------   GOOD !

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 4:04 PM

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 2:57 PM

http://www.ldnews.com/ci_26459408/csx-film-crew-denied-track-access-before-crash

CSX: Film crew denied track access before crash

"Railroad company CSX Transportation says it twice denied producers of a movie about singer Gregg Allman the permission to shoot on the company's tracks before a freight train slammed into the film's crew in south Georgia, killing one worker and injuring six."



  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 918 posts
Posted by Kyle on Friday, August 22, 2014 4:25 PM

gardendance

Kyle, for what it's worth I feel your wishing death on anyone is in poor taste.

I am not wishing death on anyone.  I am simply stating that if someone has to die, it should be the one who is responsible, instead of an innocent person.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 964 posts
Posted by gardendance on Friday, August 22, 2014 8:14 AM

Kyle, for what it's worth I feel your wishing death on anyone is in poor taste.

Patrick Boylan

Free yacht rides, 27' sailboat, zip code 19114 Delaware River, get great Delair bridge photos from the river. Send me a private message

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 918 posts
Posted by Kyle on Friday, August 22, 2014 4:01 AM

tree68

Kyle
Why couldn't the idiot who decided to film on the live tracks have died.

Really?  Had to go there?

It would have been better than having a poor innocent young women die.  Plus it would save the government money by not having to have a trial to convict the producer.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,023 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:20 AM

Kyle
Why couldn't the idiot who decided to film on the live tracks have died.

Really?  Had to go there?

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 918 posts
Posted by Kyle on Thursday, August 21, 2014 5:46 AM

cacole

There have already been other incidents of people trespassing on railroad bridges and almost being hit by a train.  You just can't fix stupid.

You can't fix stupid, but stupid sometimes fixes itself.  Unfortunately in this accident that didn't happen, and an innocent women died because of the bosses stupidity.  Why couldn't the idiot who decided to film on the live tracks have died.  Somehow, stupid people have good luck and surviveSigh

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: LaGrange GA
  • 55 posts
Posted by ramrod on Wednesday, August 20, 2014 7:59 PM

            I have lived half my life in southern California and have many experiences encountering film crews. In "my experience" most of these people are self centered, self rightious idiots that believe       what they do is so important because it's "for tv, movies, ect" that they have the right to do            whatever they please. I say nail them to the wall !!!! You're entertainment venue is not more        important then life.        

 

Chad: I’ll second your opinion about film crews. I’ve been a technical advisor for a couple of field units and the Hollywood types are insufferable. And scary. A more ignorant bunch I’ve never seen or met. He two things they are apt to ignore in the name of telling a story are safety and accuracy...could give examples but  won’t.- too upsetting to document at this late date. I’ll never get involved again.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, August 20, 2014 7:02 AM

ruderunner

Film Allman?  Oh I can just see the lawsuits against Gregg now...

Nobody said that ambulance chasers were smart.Oops

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 773 posts
Posted by ruderunner on Tuesday, August 19, 2014 7:11 PM

Film Allman?  Oh I can just see the lawsuits against Gregg now...

Modeling the Cleveland and Pittsburgh during the PennCentral era starting on the Cleveland lakefront and ending in Mingo junction

  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 234 posts
Posted by chad s thomas on Saturday, August 16, 2014 6:41 PM

SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) -- In some versions of a story Aug. 14 about a movie production company being cited for workplace safety violations related to a fatal train crash in Georgia, The Associated Press erroneously reported the first name of the singer who is the subject of the film. His name is Gregg Allman, not Greg.

A corrected version of the story is below:

OSHA cites Allman film company in Ga. train crash

OSHA proposes $74,900 fine for safety violations by Allman film company in Ga. train crash

By RUSS BYNUM

Associated Press

SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) - A production company formed to make a biographical film about singer Gregg Allman was cited by federal regulators Thursday for workplace safety violations stemming from a train crash in rural Georgia that killed a camera assistant and injured six others.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration proposed $74,900 in fines against Film Allman LLC, a company incorporated in 2013 to make the movie "Midnight Rider." The company was cited for two safety violations saying it willfully put workers in danger of being struck by a live train and put them at risk of falling off a railroad bridge where they were shooting a scene.

Filming had just begun on "Midnight Rider" when a freight train plowed into the crew Feb. 20 on a railroad trestle spanning the Altamaha River in rural Wayne County southwest of Savannah. The collision killed 27-year-old Sarah Jones. Investigators say fellow crew members were injured either by the train itself or flying shrapnel from a bed that had been placed across the tracks as a movie prop.

"It is unacceptable that Film Allman LLC knowingly exposed their crew to moving trains while filming on a live track and railroad trestle," David Michaels, the assistant labor secretary who heads OSHA, said in a statement.

The citations don't name any individual officers associated with Film Allman LLC. The company's incorporation papers list the same Pasadena, California, address as Unclaimed Freight Productions, which is owned by "Midnight Rider" director Randall Miller and his wife, Jody Savin. Their attorney, Don Samuel, declined to comment.

Film Allman has 15 business days to contest OSHA's findings and proposed penalty.

On July 3, a grand jury indicted Miller, Savin and executive producer Jay Sedrish on charges of involuntary manslaughter and criminal trespassing in connection with the crash. Sheriff's investigators say the filmmakers took their crew onto the railroad bridge despite being denied permission to film there by CSX railroad. All three defendants have pleaded not guilty.

In a statement released through their attorney July 17, Miller and Savin said the crash and Jones' death "will haunt us forever" but they insisted they had committed no crimes.

"We would never knowingly or intentionally put anybody's safety at risk," Miller and Savin's statement said. "This was a horrible tragedy and a horrific accident."

Production on "Midnight Rider" was halted after the crash. Allman filed a civil lawsuit against Miller and Savin seeking to prevent them from restarting the project. They settled out of court without disclosing terms.

  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 234 posts
Posted by chad s thomas on Saturday, August 16, 2014 3:30 PM

I can't believe that after such a long absence from this fine forum my first post is on this thread..Confused..but....

I have lived half my life in southern California and have many experiences encountering film crews. In "my experience" most of these people are self centered, self rightious idiots that believe what they do is so important because it's "for tv, movies, ect" that they have the right to do whatever they please. I say nail them to the wall !!!! You're entertainment venue is not more important then life.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Saturday, August 16, 2014 8:03 AM

There have already been other incidents of people trespassing on railroad bridges and almost being hit by a train.  You just can't fix stupid.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 918 posts
Posted by Kyle on Saturday, August 16, 2014 4:26 AM

Hopefully this accident and death of a young women will have a good end.  Even if this accident only saves a couple of lives in the future.  Let us all pray that this story will teach people that train tracks are dangerous and you should never be on tracks without permission from the RR.  Not to mention don't be on a RR bridge.  Hopefully this accident will save many lives in the future.

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Friday, August 15, 2014 5:14 PM

From an item in Variety, I understand that the production company is suing their insurer because the insurer has decided not to pay certain claims arising out of the cessation of production.  It'll be interesting to see whether these charges are used as a a part of the insurer's defense.

Also, Variety has said director Randall Miller has received medical attention for post traumatic stress disorder.  It'll be interesting to see whether this is relevant to his defense in the criminal and/or civil trials.

Tom 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, August 15, 2014 9:10 AM

      That seems to be absolving the railroad of liability in this matter.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Friday, August 15, 2014 7:45 AM

Production company for "Midnight Rider" film cited by OSHA
for willful and serious safety violations following worker fatality and injuries

https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&p_id=26541

<SNIP>

"Their failure to develop a safety plan to prevent such hazards, including obtaining permission from the rail owner to use the tracks for filming, led to the death of one crew member and injuries to eight other employees," said Kurt Petermeyer, OSHA's Regional Administrator for the Southeast.

<SNIP>

At the time of the incident, the company employed 20 workers on the set and approximately 74 workers nationwide. Proposed penalties total $74,900.

<SNIP>


Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy