Trains.com

Train vs. Tornado

15440 views
62 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Monday, July 6, 2009 3:21 PM

Concurning coupler behavior.  Until some time in the 1970's they were plain knuckle couplers.  Then there were a series of accidents in which couplers "by-passed", that is one slid out over the other, and punctured a tank car.  At that point the NTSB/FRA decided that the solution was double shelf couplers on hazmat tank cars.  With the double shelf the adjacent coupler can not bypass or override.  That was the theory and it proved to be mostly true, entirely so in my personal experience.  After a few year's of experience the railroads found that the bottom shelf had the happy side benefit of preventing the extricated drawbar of the adjacent car from falling between the ties which reduced the probablity of derailment.  Many railroads put bottom shelf couplers on their car as an alternate standard.  As I recall Union Pacific was one of the early adopters of bottom shelf couplers for their own equipment.  Bottom shelf couplers may be required on all new cars now but I do not know that for a fact.

Of course there is no free lunch.  Soon after the double shelf changeover kicked in I got called to a derailment in Pennsylvania.  One or two cars had derailed in the usual manner.  The following five tank cars of caustic soda had all derailed the same axle the same way as twisting forces transmitted by the shelf couplers managed to shove the flange over the rail at low speed.

For a couple of years I made it a point to photograph the behavior of shelf couplers in derailments.  I found that in a high speed derailment that stacks the cars in the middle like cordwood, an action seen at the end of this tape, the most likely result was that one or the other coupler shank would break right behind the head with no other obvious effect.

My personal opinion in this case is that the first car to derail was four or five back.  You can hear the air go before you see anything.  The first four cars were all covered hoppers and I suspect one or two of them were empty, that would make it easier for the wind to tip them over.  Note that the most distant two cars ultimately separate from the car behind the engine and the one behind it.  I suspect they either bypassed or broke a shank.  The two cars near the engine appeared to stay together and the one next to the power clearly stayed coupled.  I suspect that the UP covered hopper next to the power had bottom shelf couplers and they held.  I think that in this case the result was to deflect the oncoming tank car from the left, looking back to the right.  That deflection may have saved that tank car from failure in the accident because the tank head was dropped down aimed right at the locomotive's coupler.  If that car was in fact the ethylene oxide tank, two people are in my opinion alive because the cars stayed coupled and a shelf coupler is the most likely reason they did so.

Mac

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 6, 2009 4:36 PM

We have had some discussion here in the past about the pros and cons of track guard rails.  The bridge in this wreck had track guard rails that terminated straight rather than curving inward to join each other at the end, as had been more or less standard practice for a long time. 

 

I can’t see how the lead truck of the tank car reacts to encountering the track guard rails.  The appearance of sparks on the left side of the truck leads me to believe that it was derailed during the approach.  It also appears that the tank is slightly off center to the left of the track when it first becomes recognizable during the approach.  The purpose of track guard rails is to keep a derailed car on the bridge deck as it crosses.  I don’t know if the track guard rails would have accomplished that, since the truck was running true (although likely derailed) during the entire approach sequence, and may have just kept running true even if the bridge had no track guard rails. 

 

Whatever the effect of the track guard rails was, it was not sufficient to prevent the tank from fouling the plate girder alongside of the bridge deck.  You can see a flash of sparks and hear the impact bang as the tank corners the bridge girder.  That collision causes the tank to bounce up and down, which apparently leads to the disintegration of the lead truck.  You can see the axles of the wheelsets drop out at about 1:25.  Apparently some action in the breakup of the lead truck causes more bounce and throws the tank against the side of the deck girder, which guides the tank just before the tank hits the hopper.

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: along the B&O in INDIANA
  • 211 posts
Posted by yellowducky on Monday, July 6, 2009 10:14 PM

My wife wants to know if what the crew heard sounded like a freight train when the tornado hit?

FDM TRAIN up a child in the way he should go...Proverbs22:6 Garrett, home of The Garrett Railroaders, and other crazy people. The 5 basic food groups are: candy, poptarts, chocolate, pie, and filled donuts !
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,010 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, July 7, 2009 7:22 AM

yellowducky

My wife wants to know if what the crew heard sounded like a freight train when the tornado hit?

Help!   I'm laughing so hard I can't breathe!   Laugh

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,277 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, July 7, 2009 3:51 PM

tree68

yellowducky

My wife wants to know if what the crew heard sounded like a freight train when the tornado hit?

Help!   I'm laughing so hard I can't breathe!   Laugh

Another forum I participate in posed the question that if a Tornado sounds like a freight train, then correspondingly a freight train must sound like a tornado...if that is the case then...do the noises cancel each other out?  Pondering that could make you head explode...

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Norfolk Southern Lafayette District
  • 1,642 posts
Posted by bubbajustin on Tuesday, July 7, 2009 7:24 PM

One thing sure is for sure, someone from a higher power was watching over that train that day. If that hopper wasn't in the way, I think the outcome would have been much worse. It seems to me that the couplers would have broken beetween the -8 and that 1st hopper. I wonder why? Also depending on how much train you are pulling, the weight, and track conditions, just because the EOTD said the train was in emergancy doesn't mean it was stopped. Right?

The road to to success is always under construction. _____________________________________________________________________________ When the going gets tough, the tough use duct tape.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, July 7, 2009 8:07 PM

bubbajustin
One thing sure is for sure, someone from a higher power was watching over that train that day.

If 'someone' was truly watching over the train, wouldn't 'they' have caused the tornado to go away, or cause the train be delayed so as to not have been there at all during the tornado, or perhaps had the train going faster so it would pass the area before the tornado, or perhaps .....etc.......

And to answer your railroad question: correct. The EOT will indicate both air pressure as well as motion (or lack thereof).

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Michigan City, In.
  • 781 posts
Posted by spikejones52002 on Tuesday, July 7, 2009 9:20 PM

 You hear the air dump in the engine. The train was not going that fast. Why didn't the brakes on the cars lockup. I seen the sparks under the tank. It looked like debris across the rails from the dropped cars.

As for the camers. The South Shore placed one in every cab on the fireman's side. They video what is ahead and behind.On the old cars that is two cameras per car and married pair of the new cars.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Menasha, Wis.
  • 451 posts
Posted by Soo 6604 on Tuesday, July 7, 2009 9:55 PM

BaltACD

tree68

yellowducky

My wife wants to know if what the crew heard sounded like a freight train when the tornado hit?

Help!   I'm laughing so hard I can't breathe!   Laugh

Another forum I participate in posed the question that if a Tornado sounds like a freight train, then correspondingly a freight train must sound like a tornado...if that is the case then...do the noises cancel each other out?  Pondering that could make you head explode...

I'm confused.....the horn that was heard, was that the train or the tornado sounding its horn for the collision with the train?

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: WSOR Northern Div.
  • 1,559 posts
Posted by WSOR 3801 on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 1:55 AM

spikejones52002
 You hear the air dump in the engine. The train was not going that fast. Why didn't the brakes on the cars lockup.

 

Track speed in that area was 30-40 mph.  Even dumping the air, it will take a half mile or more to stop at that speed.  The engines by themselves stopped quicker, even if the hogger bailed off, as the PCS cuts the power when the air goes.   

 

Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 7:53 AM

WSOR 3801
the PCS cuts the power when the air goes.   

Is that feature still operational these days? Many years ago there were many discussions on the old CNW regarding the desireability of this feature.  It was concluded that having it active is a really bad idea; consequently, the PCS was disabled on our locomotives.
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 1,243 posts
Posted by Sunnyland on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 11:58 AM

That was awesome.  When I took Southwest Chief a few years ago across Kansas, we were on a slow or stop order a good part of the night.  I'd wake up in my sleeper and could tell we were barely moving or had stopped.  The next day, my car attendant said there had been high winds and tornados all around us. When the wind gets above 60 mph, Amtrak has to run very slow or stop.  I don't know if freight railroads are restricted that way or not.  I wouldn't want to be in a Superliner car up high and get blown over.  They sway more than  the old coach cars anyway.  The only time I can remember a lot of swaying was coming back with my parents on NYC from New York and the sleepers had been taken off, so the diner was the last car.  As we ate, the car kept swaying without it's rear anchor, like a mild crack-the-whip.  And I saw a large freight wreck from the windows of the UP City of St. Louis somewhere in Calif, the porter had told us to watch for it and we did.  Cars were smashed and spread out all along the track as we crawled past. 

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 12:28 PM

Here is a little follow up. Turn down the speaker volume first. The music is loud and obnoxious. Scroll down and read the text.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aB08ASei28

 Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 12:33 PM

Here are some other tornado train meets many years ago.

http://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/history/tornadotrains.htm

Rich

 

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 445 posts
Posted by Kootenay Central on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 4:49 PM

Amazing Video, Thank You!

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 5:02 PM
They just showed the last portion of this video on the local news. No explanation except that this is "what happens when a train and a tornado collide." They got the location correct.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Norfolk Southern Lafayette District
  • 1,642 posts
Posted by bubbajustin on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 7:11 PM
zardoz

bubbajustin
One thing sure is for sure, someone from a higher power was watching over that train that day.

If 'someone' was truly watching over the train, wouldn't 'they' have caused the tornado to go away, or cause the train be delayed so as to not have been there at all during the tornado, or perhaps had the train going faster so it would pass the area before the tornado, or perhaps .....etc.......

And to answer your railroad question: correct. The EOT will indicate both air pressure as well as motion (or lack thereof).

Well, some things I just can't answer... Nevertheless of the diffrence of thought, don't you agree that it's a good thing that that hopper was in the way? I mean, it would have just plowed into the locomotive. Sure, the hopper did too, but it was coupled.

The road to to success is always under construction. _____________________________________________________________________________ When the going gets tough, the tough use duct tape.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Champaign, IL
  • 185 posts
Posted by DennisHeld on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 9:49 PM
richg1998

Here is a little follow up.

Here's a YouTube of the actual tornado, but not near the Lawrence train scene. BTW, they just showed the YouTube of the derailment of WGN, Chicago on the news.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YSKv4KZlrA

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 10:13 PM

DennisHeld
richg1998

Here is a little follow up.

Here's a YouTube of the actual tornado, but not near the Lawrence train scene. BTW, they just showed the YouTube of the derailment of WGN, Chicago on the news.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YSKv4KZlrA

 

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: WSOR Northern Div.
  • 1,559 posts
Posted by WSOR 3801 on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 11:56 PM

zardoz

WSOR 3801
the PCS cuts the power when the air goes.   

Is that feature still operational these days? Many years ago there were many discussions on the old CNW regarding the desireability of this feature.  It was concluded that having it active is a really bad idea; consequently, the PCS was disabled on our locomotives.

 

Every engine I've been on has it functional.  Even UP engines on rock trains, and the ones WSOR bought at the UP scrap sales.  One of our customers had a SW1 that seemed to predate the PCS feature.  They would try to drag around empty boxcars that were dumped.  Many other things they would do out there.  Shock

Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Champaign, IL
  • 185 posts
Posted by DennisHeld on Thursday, July 9, 2009 1:14 AM
jeaton

DennisHeld
richg1998

Here is a little follow up.

Here's a YouTube of the actual tornado, but not near the Lawrence train scene. BTW, they just showed the YouTube of the derailment of WGN, Chicago on the news.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YSKv4KZlrA

 

Thanks for activating my link. The Harvard tornado shown was just after passing Lawrence. Harvard is my hometown and i grew up 2 miles north of the tornado's path. My mother lives in a house that was 2 miles south of the tornado. The police cruiser seen by the overturned semi was driven by my nephew, a Harvard policeman. He was pulled from the semi scene to help with the hazmat evacuation at the Lawrence derailment. The storm chasers had the highway wrong. Highway 23 doesn't go north of Harvard. They were actually on highway 14.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:04 AM

bubbajustin
Well, some things I just can't answer...

There are many things mortal man cannot (yet) answer; but it does one's soul good to just contemplate the questions.

bubbajustin
don't you agree that it's a good thing that that hopper was in the way?

Yes, I do agree that it was fortunate that the hopper was in the way of the locomotives.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:09 AM

WSOR 3801

zardoz

WSOR 3801
the PCS cuts the power when the air goes.   

Is that feature still operational these days? Many years ago there were many discussions on the old CNW regarding the desireability of this feature.  It was concluded that having it active is a really bad idea; consequently, the PCS was disabled on our locomotives.

 

Every engine I've been on has it functional.  Even UP engines on rock trains, and the ones WSOR bought at the UP scrap sales.  One of our customers had a SW1 that seemed to predate the PCS feature.  They would try to drag around empty boxcars that were dumped.  Many other things they would do out there.  Shock

Well, it has been many years since I was running; they must have had a change of philosophy.  Back then the thinking was that the risk of the rear of a train running into the front part after a separation was more of a safety risk than whatever safety reason anyone could come up with for having the PCS active.
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,898 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:58 AM

If the emergency is initiated back in the train, many UP engines now have a 20 second delay before losing power when the PCS opens.

Jeff 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 445 posts
Posted by Kootenay Central on Thursday, July 9, 2009 4:02 PM

.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:16 PM

Kootenay Central

The senior Engineers 6 decades ago said that they could put a steam engine on a freight train into emergency from the brake stand for, say, a truck at a crossing, which then cleared, and go back to Release, then Running, and carry on as before with no stop.

You can also do that with 24RL brake valves.  As recently as only 3 decades ago CNW's E8s and F7s had 24RL brakes (before the locomotives were rebuilt for Metra with 26L brake valves).

Some of the 24RL brake valves had a 'full release' feature on the opposite side of the 'emergency' portion.  This feature would put 'straight air' directly into the trainline, causing a much faster release; however there was always a danger of overcharging the trainline by doing this, as main drum pressure (~130psi) was sent through.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, July 9, 2009 9:52 PM

Kootenay Central

Apparently, in the glory days of steam, a train stalled in a long tunnel amidst the sound of the exhaust and the smoke filling the cab.

The Engineer, hunched in his seat with the window closed against the fumes, never shut off, and noticed nothing awry until the Conductor, who had walked up from the Caboose tapped him on the shoulder wondering why they had stopped in the tunnel.

The drivers had cut down to the ties, so they say.

There is also the story of a stalled freight in the first Cascade Tunnel. After some time of running, the headend crew thought that they should have long been out into the open (fixed speed)--and when they stopped and got down, they found that the drivers had ground through the head down into the web.

I have often wondered: just how do you get the engine and train out? Jack sufficient wheels up to give working room, remove the damaged rails, and put new rails in?

Johnny

Johnny

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Thursday, July 9, 2009 10:44 PM

trainfan1221

 I didn't get a clear impression the train was trying to stop, only that it definitely ran into something.  A tornado that close might not be all that visible, also it might have run into it just forming. Either way, the engine seemed to remain intact, at least until the rest of the train came running after it.

I thought the US Weather Service would have giving the warning to the R.R. and able to stop the train. Like everyone say's "January". oh boy!

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Champaign, IL
  • 185 posts
Posted by DennisHeld on Thursday, July 9, 2009 11:45 PM
Awesome!

trainfan1221

 I didn't get a clear impression the train was trying to stop, only that it definitely ran into something.  A tornado that close might not be all that visible, also it might have run into it just forming. Either way, the engine seemed to remain intact, at least until the rest of the train came running after it.

I thought the US Weather Service would have giving the warning to the R.R. and able to stop the train. Like everyone say's "January". oh boy!

<

Even though the tornado was on the ground in Poplar Grove, IL (15 miles to the SW) the sirens didn't sound in Harvard until the tornado had passed. So, residents didn't get a warning. But a January tornado in northern IL is extremely rare.

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • 30 posts
Posted by frankodragon on Friday, July 10, 2009 2:11 AM
How many cars are required to be separated between a tanker car carrying haz material and the locomotive(s) when strung together?  I thought six was the minimum although I seen only maybe 5 cars between the locomotives-it was hard to see or maybe the tanker WAS the 6th car.  Maybe they should up that to 8 after that tanker sliding.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy