Trains.com

An encounter with the BNSF police

19580 views
65 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Thursday, July 2, 2009 9:33 AM

Kiwigerd

Can somebody please tell me why american railroads need so many police?

Here in my country we don't have special rr police at all, security is maintained by normal federal police, like anywhere else. Being a railfan, I am not aware that we are forbidden to make photos from anywere inside or outside a ry station. Of course, you are not allowed to walk on tracks, or immediately nearby, however there is no requirement of staying off 50 feet. Actually there are a lot of public walkways immediately alongside of tracks, perhaps only 15 to 20 ft away. Tracks are sometimes fenced off but not everywhere and there are sometimes inofficial footpath crossings over the track(s). Usually there is a sign "do not cross tracks" in some areas where it is considered very dangerous if people would do that, but I have never seen this being actually inforced. And I sure can't say that we have so many accidents, I think that people who do trespass usually know exactly where to look for and heed.

It might be interesting to see how many railroad police officers there are PER TRACK MILE in the various countries...I will bet you in the U.S. it is very low compared with European nations.
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: THE FAR, FAR REACHES OF THE WILD, WILD WEST!
  • 3,672 posts
Posted by R. T. POTEET on Thursday, July 2, 2009 1:00 AM

BaltACD
In most jurisdictions Railroad Police have the full range of police powers that any other police officer has.  In today's world most Railroad Police have had prior careers with governmental police departments and are well versed in the duties and exercise of police power

This is a relic carried over from those heady days of the 19th Century when railroad was synonymous with power and they demanded and got from the legislatures of the states extraterritorial authority. This authority is badly outdated and in drastic need of repeal.

In Arizona Public Utility Companies--that's Salt River Project and Arizona Public Service--have been granted the same authority and if you think that governmental law enforcement officers are abusive tangle with one of these turkeys sometime; with enough gumption you can fight city hall--it is impossible to fight these guys because the lines of authority are so convoluted that it even comes as a surprise to the legislators that SRP and APS security personnel have law enforcement authority. Unlike government agency police officers who are subject to constitutional restrains these what I call "private property cops" are subject to none of these restraints and there have been cases here in Arizona where they have actually broken down the doors on private property supposedly searching for stolen property and they don't need a search warrant to do it.

 

From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Hewitt,TX.
  • 1,088 posts
Posted by videomaker on Wednesday, July 1, 2009 4:14 PM

Can somebody please tell me why american railroads need so many police?

To answer you question,To an outsider reading this forum,it may seem like there are a lot of RR Police but in actuality there are not ! RR Police are there to protect RR property and freight shipments..They work the yards and slow xings where tresspassers and transits and THEIVES are know to lurk and highjack freight shipments..If you hang around these places your going to be asked what your doing there,  Count on it ! Keep in mind that photographing trains is not what the POLICE are going to believe,unless you are a died in the wool foamer,in possesion of a scanner,camera and wearing your favorite  RRT-shirt and ball cap with all your RR pins on it..,  In the aforementioned situation the RR police have "Probable Cause to stop and detain you for field interviews and if they dont believe you,you will either get arrested or get a ticket or both ! I wish you guys that harp on this would look at it from our point of view ! We're just doing our job ! If Ive said it once Ive said it a 100 times,STAY OUT OF YARDS ! get out in the country to take your photos and you wont be bothered..My 2 cents  I'll get off my SoapBox now...

Danny
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,026 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:05 PM

Kiwigerd

Can somebody please tell me why American railroads need so many police?

I've never encountered a "bull" (to use the old slang term) that I knew of.  Doesn't mean I haven't, but...  I'd suspect that unless you hang around RR facilities a lot, or happen to be in an area where they've had some problems, most people won't encounter them very often.

As was mentioned, they're really more of a loss prevention agent - protecting the assets of the railroad and the goods it carries.

I think the perception of how many RR Police there are is skewed by the quickness of those who have had an encounter (good or bad) to answer up when such a topic is raised on the forum.  Keep in mind, too, that those of us who hang around the tracks are certainly more likely have an encounter than those who don't.

There are also the transit police - whose true function is ensuring that everybody who rides, pays.  Other police actions are secondary.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, June 30, 2009 2:26 PM

Kiwigerd

Can somebody please tell me why american railroads need so many police?

Railroads really have very few police in comparison to the territory that each railroad covers.  One of the primary functions of RR police is to provided security to the cargo's that railroads carry and the schemes necessary to protect these cargo's 'on private property' are not a routine concern of local authorities, just the same as apprehending shop lifters in a Wal-Mart is not the concern of local authorities.  Once the law breakers have been identified and apprehended then the local legal system can take over for prosecution and trial.

Local police authorities have their hands full doing the police function in their own civilian areas, without taking on the function on the railroads private property.

In truth, there are far fewer railroad police today than there were 20/30 years ago.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 371 posts
Posted by ButchKnouse on Tuesday, June 30, 2009 12:46 PM

I assume in Austria trespassing idiots who get hurt can't turn around and sue for 7 figures. From what I understand about Europe, the law recognizes that people are adults.

Unlike this country.

Reality TV is to reality, what Professional Wrestling is to Professional Brain Surgery.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Austria
  • 71 posts
Posted by Kiwigerd on Tuesday, June 30, 2009 12:32 PM

Can somebody please tell me why american railroads need so many police?

Here in my country we don't have special rr police at all, security is maintained by normal federal police, like anywhere else. Being a railfan, I am not aware that we are forbidden to make photos from anywere inside or outside a ry station. Of course, you are not allowed to walk on tracks, or immediately nearby, however there is no requirement of staying off 50 feet. Actually there are a lot of public walkways immediately alongside of tracks, perhaps only 15 to 20 ft away. Tracks are sometimes fenced off but not everywhere and there are sometimes inofficial footpath crossings over the track(s). Usually there is a sign "do not cross tracks" in some areas where it is considered very dangerous if people would do that, but I have never seen this being actually inforced. And I sure can't say that we have so many accidents, I think that people who do trespass usually know exactly where to look for and heed.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, June 30, 2009 7:45 AM

cnwfan51
Kim and I went downtown and while there we watched a couple of eastbound coal loads standing on public property we were also approached by a BNSF Special Agent.    After explaining my reasons for being there showing my Union Pacific ID we were told to have a good day.

THIS is what frost's me.  If these people were on PUBLIC PROPERTY the cops had NO RIGHT to question them!  I don't care what reports the cops had in the past. These people were being presumed guilty until they proved themselves innocent. It would be different if the cops were responding to a current call about trespassers matching their description who were on the tracks in the area where these people were standing.  Additionally, these people had no reason to have to explain their reasons for being where the were.

Of course, we are only getting cnwfan51's account of the episode, and I realize there are usually two sides to every story.  However, if what cnwfan51 reports is accurate, then the cops definitely exceeded their authority.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Monday, June 29, 2009 11:41 PM

Los Angeles Rams Guy

Ironically, I was over at East Dubuque and East Cabin this last Saturday for a bit; even went up to the area where the CN's Iowa Division mainline splits off from the joint trackage and heads for the tunnel but never encountered any BNSF police this last Saturday.  I'm guessing they were likely all congregated in and around Galesburg. 

Actually, not. 

I spent the better part of last Saturday hanging around the Galesburg Amtrak platform and did not see a uniform all day.  It is quite the event for getting up close and personal with freight and passenger trains.  There were at least a half dozen car load trains, a couple of stacks and another half dozen or so coal trains, plus a unit train of ethanol tanks-empty we thought.  There is a 5 foot fence along side the west platform with about 50 feet between there and the station building.  While spectators were not asked to leave the platforms when trains were passing, I choose to stay on the station side of the fence. 

The bus for the yard tour also went over the bridge over the yard.  Normally, no parking or pedestrians are allowed on the bridge, except that the prohibitions are not enforced for Galesburg Railroad Days weekend. 

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    September 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,015 posts
Posted by RudyRockvilleMD on Monday, June 29, 2009 10:27 PM

TrainManTy

I've dealt with railroad cops/station security twice, both on a trip to NYC.

The station security guy saw me taking photos of the restored New Haven Union Station from inside and politely informed me that no photographs were allowed inside for security reasons. I told him that I understood and asked if the platforms were fair game for photography. He said that was fine, and wished me a good day as he walked off.

I wonder if the security guy in the New Haven station knew what he was talking about? I cannot imagine taking pictures inside a waiting room of a railroad station would pose a security threat compared to taking pictures on the station platform.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Brooklyn Center, MN.
  • 702 posts
Posted by Los Angeles Rams Guy on Monday, June 29, 2009 12:44 PM

Ironically, I was over at East Dubuque and East Cabin this last Saturday for a bit; even went up to the area where the CN's Iowa Division mainline splits off from the joint trackage and heads for the tunnel but never encountered any BNSF police this last Saturday.  I'm guessing they were likely all congregated in and around Galesburg. 

"Beating 'SC is not a matter of life or death. It's more important than that." Former UCLA Head Football Coach Red Sanders
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Austria
  • 71 posts
Posted by Kiwigerd on Monday, June 29, 2009 11:54 AM

Thank you. 2003, yes I guess that explains it pretty well.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, June 27, 2009 5:08 PM

Kiwigerd

Now it becomes interesting here. Engineer labs wrote that all BNSF locos are video-equipped. I applaud that, but now comes the big question: when all the locos are fitted with cameras why didn't BNSF produce that material on the issues of the crash were the rr got convicted?

Thank you for answering that one if you know.

Incident that you are referring to occurred in 2003....I don't believe the opportunity to video equip engines became available until approximately 2005.  Video equipping locomotives is not a $200 upgrade so it takes corporate commitment to retrofit 2000-4000 engines....it also takes time to install the equipment.  All the Class I carriers have programs in place to equip their fleets.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Austria
  • 71 posts
Posted by Kiwigerd on Saturday, June 27, 2009 3:38 PM

Now it becomes interesting here. Engineer labs wrote that all BNSF locos are video-equipped. I applaud that, but now comes the big question: when all the locos are fitted with cameras why didn't BNSF produce that material on the issues of the crash were the rr got convicted?

Thank you for answering that one if you know.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Rock Springs Wy.
  • 1,967 posts
Posted by miniwyo on Saturday, June 27, 2009 9:29 AM

I have yet to be stopped by any type of police while railfanning. I have my Citizens for rail safety card that even if it is not a BNSF agent I will present if asked for ID.

 

 

zardoz

Ulrich
what a society we've become when all around us are suspicious and we need to show ID just for being parked somewhere to watch trains

However, we can place much of the blame on the "news" media for the public hysteria.

Thanks to the above-mentioned media, we are now "One nation, under surveillance".

As grafittied on a building in London...


RJ

"Something hidden, Go and find it. Go and look behind the ranges, Something lost behind the ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go." The Explorers - Rudyard Kipling

http://sweetwater-photography.com/

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 573 posts
Posted by pajrr on Saturday, June 27, 2009 3:51 AM
Hi! I live in NJ and have police from CSX, NS, New Jersey Transit and several shortlines. An aquaintance of mine is a railroad police officer and I asked him one day what his authority is when not on railroad property. The answer: He is recognized as a New Jersey State trooper. He is certified by the state, goes through the same training and background checks,can carry a gun on or off duty 24/7, can issue motor vehicle tickets on any road or highway, can make arrests if someone is robbing a store or robbing a bank. Another thing to note is that he has jurisdiction in every state that his particular railroad operates and he has made arrests in states other than NJ. They are not only police officers when on RR property. Next time you guys see a railroad police officer, do yourself a favor and show respect just as you would to any other non-railroad police officer. They are the same thing. The only difference is that a railroad police officers salary is paid by the RR he works for, not the state he is in.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Friday, June 26, 2009 10:44 PM

I find the effort of the BNSF police to keep you at a "safe distance" interesting.  I am going to Galesburg tomorrow for their Railroad Days.  When I was at that event a couple of years ago, several freight trains came from the north passing right along the Amtrak platforms.  A BNSF officer was on site and made sure that people moved back from the edge of the platform, but there was no effort to move people off the platforms and behind the fence, let alone 50 feet back.  Of course, most of the trains were moving maybe 10-15 MPH, but I remember one heading right out on the line toward Burlington was moving at a much faster clip.

I am assuming I will still get closeup views tomorrow.

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Boone Iowa
  • 520 posts
Posted by cnwfan51 on Friday, June 26, 2009 3:18 PM

    While visiting my Dad in Scottsbluff Nebraska I had to get away from the hospital where he was admitted and just do something different. Kim and I went downtown and while there we watched a couple of eastbound coal loads standing on public property we were also approached by a BNSF Special Agent.    After explaining my reasons for being there showing my Union Pacific ID we were told to have a good day.   Seems they have had problems descibed in the above posts of FRNS getting too close to the action  Larry                                                                                                                                        

larry ackerman
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Hewitt,TX.
  • 1,088 posts
Posted by videomaker on Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:31 PM

coborn35

 What exactly does a BNSF officer need with an ID? I highly doubt they can run a search on it...

Coborn, Are you not reading tonight? 

THEY ARE A POLICE AGENCY, ,just like any police dept...Doh ! (as Homer says) 

Danny
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Thursday, June 25, 2009 2:49 PM

Laugh  Laugh 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, June 25, 2009 2:16 PM

Ulrich
what a society we've become when all around us are suspicious and we need to show ID just for being parked somewhere to watch trains

However, we can place much of the blame on the "news" media for the public hysteria.

Thanks to the above-mentioned media, we are now "One nation, under surveillance".

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Thursday, June 25, 2009 2:00 PM

Thumbs Up  Smile,Wink, & Grin  They were 'smart-guy' surveyor-type questions anyway - but I was curious as to why the 5 ft. would matter, and how he could tell. Thanks. -PDN.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Thursday, June 25, 2009 1:37 PM

Evidently this fellow was basing his "measurement" on the position of other BNSF equipment along the tracks which were all in roughly a straight line with the tracks....including the large signal shack there.  My car bumper WAS off the public parking lot concrete by about three to four feet and I guess that is what he was anguishing over.  I did not need a hassle of any sort after a long day of business travel so I simply backed up my vehicle by the offending four feet and was done with it.  Also, I don't want to be at odds with BNSF over such a small and unimportant issue.

Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Brooklyn Center, MN.
  • 702 posts
Posted by Los Angeles Rams Guy on Thursday, June 25, 2009 1:03 PM

I haven't been around East Cabin in a while (drove by it this last November) but when I was living in my hometown in N.E. Iowa I would make frequent trips over to Dubuque/East Dubuque and East Cabin as I knew a couple of the operators there back when ICG controlled the segment between Portage and East Dubuque.  I can't fault BNSF police looking out for their property, though.  I mean, a lot of railfanning involves using RR safety guidelines - and common sense as well. 

"Beating 'SC is not a matter of life or death. It's more important than that." Former UCLA Head Football Coach Red Sanders
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:55 PM
In most jurisdictions Railroad Police have the full range of police powers that any other police officer has.  In today's world most Railroad Police have had prior careers with governmental police departments and are well versed in the duties and exercise of police power.
coborn35

 What exactly does a BNSF officer need with an ID? I highly doubt they can run a search on it...

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 455 posts
Posted by aricat on Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:48 PM

A few years ago No 261 was running a fan trip that was returning to the Twin Cities on the BNSF mainline from St Cloud Minnesota. Of course this will attract many railfans and the BNSF police. Fans want to get up close to the engine and BNSF wants no trespassing on railroad property. The gray area comes when you are on public property near the tracks.Myself and other railfans and citizens were watching from a city street when BNSF special agent told us that we could not park there. Railfans told him that this street was a public street and as long as we remained on the asphalt he had no jurisdiction. He did not press the issue but told us not to go on the tracks. This was near where the new Fridley station is being constructed and this street has now been taken up by this constuction project.

Anyone who is more than a casual fan knows there is a lot of trespassing on railroad property. In another thread I wrote I saw a female jogger and three teenage boys on the BNSF bridge which crosses the Rum river in Anoka Minnesota. They would soon be joined by a BNSF coal train. I don't know if either the railroad or city police were called. I do know that would have happened if that had happened at the Minneapolis/ St Paul International Airport. 

I will pose this question; are railfans easy targets of railroad police because we are so obvious. Railfans are having fun watching trains, trespassers are not.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • 2 posts
Posted by labs on Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:39 PM

as a bnsf engineer i can tell that you that if you are tresspassing on rr property this company takes those violations very serious.at least once week i see people out along the right away taking photos in spots they shouldn't be.bnsf police force is the real deel so make no mistake they do have the authority to ask for a id.problem is that foamers get them selves in places they shouldn't be,then get hurt and end up coming after the rr.that is one of the reasons beyond the security issue that the company  feels important to enforce.hell im a engineer of this company and my own family members haven't even been to some of the places that i see railfans at.we take safety very very seriously here at bnsf.there are plenty of places to take photos,videos etc,[logan topped out] just not along the freakn tracks.it's just not a wise place to be.for everyones info all our power is equipped with video cameras in the cab.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:17 PM

I've dealt with railroad cops/station security twice, both on a trip to NYC.

The station security guy saw me taking photos of the restored New Haven Union Station from inside and politely informed me that no photographs were allowed inside for security reasons. I told him that I understood and asked if the platforms were fair game for photography. He said that was fine, and wished me a good day as he walked off.

The second was the New Jersey Transit police, who got a tip-off about someone (me) taking photos of Amtrak's DOCK lift bridge from a sidewalk in Newark. They were both very polite and said right up front that what I was doing was perfectly legal, and residents only saw the camera and automatically thought "Terrorist! Bomb! Aaaaah!" and called the cops.

I think it's getting much better since the days of Metra's arrests...

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:09 PM

The RRs also have their own databases of people they dealt with.,.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,026 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, June 25, 2009 11:37 AM

coborn35

 What exactly does a BNSF officer need with an ID? I highly doubt they can run a search on it...

You can tell a lot about a person just by how they react to the request.

And I'm sure that a RR police officer can get an NCIC check one way or another.  It might take a phone call to local law enforcement, but it can happen.

I, for one, don't have a problem showing my ID to a badge.  And any reputable law enforcement officer is generally either going to be wearing one, or have one to show.

Horror stories about self-righteous cops notwithstanding, I believe that if you'll play ball with them, they'll play ball with you. 

Last time I dealt with an officer while fanning it was a state trooper, and he happened to know me....

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy