Trains.com

Railroad History Quiz Game (Come on in and play) Locked

101031 views
2075 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Friday, March 7, 2008 9:20 AM
 al-in-chgo wrote:

 So was I also wrong about the soon-to-be famous lawyer?  I had guessed Abraham Lincoln.  -  a. s.

Al, you were right, it was Abraham Lincoln.

Jeff, do you have a new question for us?

Dale
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, March 7, 2008 1:07 PM

     Well, I'm not Jeff, but I *did* sleep at a Holiday Inn last night!Tongue [:P]

     Keeping things rolling:

     What were the top five ALCO/MLW diesels, based on numbers produced? 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Friday, March 7, 2008 2:30 PM

Purely a guess.....

S1

S2

S3

RS2

C630

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Friday, March 7, 2008 2:46 PM

ALCos and MLWs?

S2, S3, RS3, RS18, C424

Dale
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, March 7, 2008 3:54 PM

Let's guess:

S2

S4

RS-1 (had a long production period)

RS-3

C630/M630.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, March 7, 2008 5:17 PM

     Score so far...

Chad:  1 for 5

Dale: 2 for 5

Carl: 4 for 5

 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 724 posts
Posted by snagletooth on Friday, March 7, 2008 10:00 PM

RS-1

S2

RS-3

FA-1/FPA-1

RS-11 

Snagletooth
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, March 7, 2008 10:23 PM

S2

RS1 (including military variant?)

RS3

RS11

and... hmmm

 FA  (do I have to say 1 or 2?)

 

ooops. Didn't see snagletooth's post.  I am always too late!

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, March 7, 2008 10:34 PM

snagletooth: 4 for 5

oltmannd: 4 for 5

 

( I did lump all the FA/FB etc. together as one number)

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: Sandusky, Ohio
  • 537 posts
Posted by NSlover92 on Friday, March 7, 2008 11:29 PM

Oh, been a while but finally one I think I can answer, um, lets see I will list the HO models I have of alcos.

FA's

RS1

RSD1

RS11,

RS3

Well thats my guess, I basically just went off of what PRR models I had, guess they were most popular. Mike

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket Modeling PRR transition era operations in northern Ohio
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, March 8, 2008 6:33 AM
 NSlover92 wrote:

Oh, been a while but finally one I think I can answer, um, lets see I will list the HO models I have of alcos.

FA's

RS1

RSD1

RS11,

RS3

Well thats my guess, I basically just went off of what PRR models I had, guess they were most popular. Mike

3for 5

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, March 8, 2008 6:35 AM
     If you look at the 2 posts by snagletooth and oltmannd, you'll be able to tell which 4 have been figured out.  One to go.Smile [:)]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Saturday, March 8, 2008 7:30 AM

 Murphy Siding wrote:
     If you look at the 2 posts by snagletooth and oltmannd, you'll be able to tell which 4 have been figured out.  One to go.Smile [:)]

I don't think we know if RS11 or FA is wrong.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 724 posts
Posted by snagletooth on Saturday, March 8, 2008 11:31 AM
 Murphy Siding wrote:

snagletooth: 4 for 5

oltmannd: 4 for 5

In fact, they got the same 4 correct.

( I did lump all the FA/FB etc. together as one number)

Pirate [oX)] Where'd I put those horse shoes, I'm going outside. Wink [;)]Laugh [(-D]

S2

RS-3

FA-1/FPA-1

RS-11

C-424 

Snagletooth
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, March 8, 2008 12:25 PM
 snagletooth wrote:
 Murphy Siding wrote:

snagletooth: 4 for 5

oltmannd: 4 for 5

In fact, they got the same 4 correct.

( I did lump all the FA/FB etc. together as one number)

Pirate [oX)] Where'd I put those horse shoes, I'm going outside. Wink [;)]Laugh [(-D]

S2

RS-3

FA-1/FPA-1

RS-11

C-424 <<<<<Not that one.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, March 9, 2008 3:04 PM
 CShaveRR wrote:

Let's guess:

S2

S4

RS-1 (had a long production period)/RSD-1( military version of RS1)

RS-3

C630/M630.

     Time's up.  Fifth one was FA/FB, etc.  I'd give the prize to Carl, for being the first to get 4 out of 5.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Sunday, March 9, 2008 8:18 PM

I think you meant you'd give it to me.

The Ingalls Shipbuilding Company in Pascagoula, Mississippi, is probably famous for building exactly one diesel locomotive.  Did the company ever produce anything else for the railroad industry?  And, if so, what?

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, March 9, 2008 9:21 PM
 CShaveRR wrote:

I think you meant you'd give it to me.

Blush [:I]I'm a baaaad typer.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 10, 2008 10:42 AM
   1968 Penn/Central
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 724 posts
Posted by snagletooth on Monday, March 10, 2008 2:58 PM
I'm not sure if they did anything else, but if they did I'd have to guess that they built some tug boats.Ummm
Snagletooth
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, March 10, 2008 4:21 PM
Not what I had in mind.  Yes, they did supply something to the railroad industry (I have to be careful how I word this!).  I don't know about any railroads ordering new tugs or any other vessels since the 1950s (which is roughly when the locomotive was built).

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Monday, March 10, 2008 4:54 PM

 CShaveRR wrote:
  I don't know about any railroads ordering new tugs or any other vessels since the 1950s (which is roughly when the locomotive was built).

Carl, I'm disappointed in you. 

CP's Carrier Princess and Superior Princess were built during the 1970s. The Superior Princess spent a lot of time on Lake Superior.
http://members.shaw.ca/gcsimpson/cprfleet7.htm 

Dale
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, March 10, 2008 5:23 PM

Sorry, Dale!  That's embarrassing. 

Did Ingalls build them?

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Tuesday, March 11, 2008 2:10 AM

No big deal, I was just having fun. They were built out this way.

If Ingalls only built 1 locomotive, and no railroad boats, then your question must involve freight cars.

Was there anything special about these cars? 

Dale
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Tuesday, March 11, 2008 4:21 AM
A complete SWAG:  Flat cars for shipping propellers.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, March 11, 2008 8:44 AM

Yes, Dale (need more info, though!).  As for the question you asked, nothing particularly special.

No, Don.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:04 AM
Well then, since the Davie shipyard in Quebec built a lot of grain covered hoppers (potash as well?), I'll guess grain cars.
Dale
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:45 AM
No bells to ring here, but you nailed it, Dale.  They built a goodly number (several thousand, I believe) of 4750-cubic-foot covered hoppers for the North American Car Corporation in the early 1980s.  Most of them started out with NAHX reporting marks, but some were lettered for lessees, including 500 that were in the CNW 190000 series.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:59 AM

Ah-ha. Were these were American style flat sided cars, or cylindrical? 

Can anyone name the railroad that served the Badger State and the Razorback State during the 1960s?

Dale
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:24 PM
 nanaimo73 wrote:

Ah-ha. Were these were American style flat sided cars, or cylindrical? 

Can anyone name the railroad that served the Badger State and the Razorback State during the 1960s?

Well.....I think Wisconsin is the Badger state, and Arkansas is the Razorback state.  But, I can't seem to connect the dots.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy