Railway Man wrote: CNW 6000 wrote: YIPE! That's what I get for guessing well, lol. Since my 'handle' on here is derived from a slightly unusual engine...that's the theme I'll go with for my question. I tend to like oddball power...so here we go:Around WWII there were 3 railroads that tried unique steam-electric engines. Name the 3 and delineate which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines before the war and which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines after the war.1938: GE builds a pair of 2500-hp steam turbine/electric transmission demonstrators for Union Pacific, which tries them for a few trips and says thanks but no thanks. GN demo'd them in 1943 and after that GE scrapped them.1947-1948: Baldwin and Westinghouse deliver 3 6,000-hp locomotives to C&O, which were scrapped in 1950.1954: GE and Babcock & Wilcock build Jawn Henry for N&W, which lasts to 1957. Guess if you wanted to have seen these back then, you'd best have been quick on your feet!RWM
CNW 6000 wrote: YIPE! That's what I get for guessing well, lol. Since my 'handle' on here is derived from a slightly unusual engine...that's the theme I'll go with for my question. I tend to like oddball power...so here we go:Around WWII there were 3 railroads that tried unique steam-electric engines. Name the 3 and delineate which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines before the war and which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines after the war.
YIPE! That's what I get for guessing well, lol. Since my 'handle' on here is derived from a slightly unusual engine...that's the theme I'll go with for my question. I tend to like oddball power...so here we go:Around WWII there were 3 railroads that tried unique steam-electric engines. Name the 3 and delineate which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines before the war and which (if any) built, tested, and used their engines after the war.
1938: GE builds a pair of 2500-hp steam turbine/electric transmission demonstrators for Union Pacific, which tries them for a few trips and says thanks but no thanks. GN demo'd them in 1943 and after that GE scrapped them.
1947-1948: Baldwin and Westinghouse deliver 3 6,000-hp locomotives to C&O, which were scrapped in 1950.
1954: GE and Babcock & Wilcock build Jawn Henry for N&W, which lasts to 1957.
Guess if you wanted to have seen these back then, you'd best have been quick on your feet!
RWM
Well that was fast...here I thought I had a toughie for you guys. Great job...you have the next question!
Dan
Name the first U.S. railway to offer regular containerized freight services (and it's not one with a "Pacific" anywhere in its title or history), and when.
Very early on, like the Twenties, wasn't there a barge service from New Orleans to Havana?
And were the "containers" more like Illinois Central boxcars with the wheels removed so that they acted like containers on the barge? I believe the cars would have carried manufactured goods (Chicago seems like a natural origin point) that weren't being manufactured in the Carribean, or even the American Southeast for that matter.
Very labor-intensive but in the Twenties that didn't distend the operations budget as it would today; there were many more RR co. ops. employees then relative to traffic and on the whole labor was a good deal cheaper then than now, even allowing for inflation, because in the era before the Brotherhood and other unions got going, there were no fringe "bennies" to speak of.
If it wasn't the IC then I'll propose Louisville & Nashville. - allen
I think that's enough whiffs at the pinata. The answer is the New Haven, 1847.
There are three "eras" of the container. The modern era begins in 1956 with Malcolm McLean and the Pan Atlantic Steamship Co. (the WP&Y introduced containers the same year but its standards were not adopted beyond its own water-rail-truck system). The 2nd era began in 1921 with the NYC, which put 6x9x7.5 containers into 60-foot gons. PRR copied this in 1929, but both services died at the hands of the ICC in 1931 when it decided this was a violation of the Fourth Section of the ICC Act. The 1st era, which lasted for 50 years, was on the New Haven from 1847 to 1896 on its railway and ship lines between New York and Boston via Stonington, New York and Taunton, and other routes. Containers were of 160 cubic foot capacity and loaded seven to a platform (flat) car.
Chad did guess the NYC so I guess he can stump us next -- if -- he assures us he was thinking of 1921 and not Flexivan (which wasn't a container system) and not just guessing. Though given his obscure photos I am not sure that's a great idea! Otherwise Jim should go next for remembering the WP&Y's pioneering efforts. Not many people know about that one.
Carl
Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)
CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)
Railway Man wrote: Chad did guess the NYC so I guess he can stump us next -- if -- he assures us he was thinking of 1921 and not Flexivan (which wasn't a container system) and not just guessing. Though given his obscure photos I am not sure that's a great idea! Otherwise Jim should go next for remembering the WP&Y's pioneering efforts. Not many people know about that one. RWM
Thanks for the vote of confidance RWM but it was just a guess based on something in the back of my mind telling me NYC.
Chad- I think you missed your que, and someone else took your place:
Chicago, the greatest railroad city in the world, was named after a variation of the word chigagou, which I presume is perhaps an indian word (?) Without looking it up online, what did chicagou mean?
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
I think we studied this in 4th grade History. Unfortunately, there's never a forth-grader around when you need one.
Black (swampy) water?
rrnut282 wrote: I think we studied this in 4th grade History. Unfortunately, there's never a forth-grader around when you need one.Black (swampy) water?
Most linguists translate the word as "stinky onion," but a few hold out for "wild onion." A surprising number of the latter group work for the City in tourism. lol
Murphy Siding wrote: Dang Al, so close that I'd have to give it to you, if it were only a little closer.
And so close you could have given me the win if you'd chosen to do so? I ought to be really [urinated]-off at you, but I have to give you credit in your second post above for calling Chicago "the world's greatest city." I can't tell if you were being sweet or sarcastic, but hey, any publicity is good, as they say.
al-in-chgo wrote: Murphy Siding wrote: Dang Al, so close that I'd have to give it to you, if it were only a little closer.And so close you could have given me the win if you'd chosen to do so? I ought to be really [urinated]-off at you, but I have to give you credit in your second post above for calling Chicago "the world's greatest city." I can't tell if you were being sweet or sarcastic, but hey, any publicity is good, as they say.
Therefore, the judges have reconsidered the facts, and believe Al to be close enough for government work.
Since Al has been rightfully declared the winner, I'll post this:
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Chicago:
"At the beginning of recorded history, the Chicago area was inhabited by a number of Algonquian peoples, including the Mascoutens and Miamis. Trade links and seasonal hunting migrations linked these peoples with their neighbours, the Potawatomis to the east, Fox to the north, and the Illinois to the southwest. The name "Chicago" is the French version of the Miami-Illinois word shikaakwa ("wild leek"/"skunk"), named for the plants common along the Chicago River,[1][2][3] and thus has nothing to do with Chief Chicagou of the Michigamea people.[citation needed]"
Go Al go!
I picked up "the wild garlic place" from Nature's Metropolis,by William Cronon. His notes mentions onions, skunks and garlic. He mentions that "the earliest french authority, Jountil in 1687, attributed the name to " the quantity of garlic growing in the district, in the woods".
But I don't live in Chicago, so I'm just repeating what I've read.
Murphy Siding wrote: Go Al go! I picked up "the wild garlic place" from Nature's Metropolis,by William Cronon. His notes mentions onions, skunks and garlic. He mentions that "the earliest french authority, Jountil in 1687, attributed the name to " the quantity of garlic growing in the district, in the woods". But I don't live in Chicago, so I'm just repeating what I've read.
IIRC it may well have been (and unless bold new strides are made in paleobotany, we may never know for sure) -- a leek. Or an onion. Or wild garlic. Or, considering how stinky it was said to be, perhaps a ramp. They're all botanic cousins under the bulb. Perhaps someone knows if said weed still survives; Illinois is hardly free from slow streams and marshy land. Imagine a weed specialist and a railfan in one person. Impressive, but why make life twice as hard as it already is?
Okay, how about a relatively easy quiz for the night owls. Well, not that easy:
Call it acronym, abbreviation, or just plain alphabet soup, give the full words from the following:
BART
MoPac
PATH
ERA
IRT
FRED
NASA
BNI
LSMFT
KCSdeM
FUBAR
ET&WNC
M.Div.
MOW
LYNX
I'll check back in the (probably late) a.m. and see who has the best and most answers. If you have no idea for a clue, best to skip it, but don't rule out the occasional inspired guess -- and it's quite possible you have an answer that's different from mine but is just as valid. OTOH obviously parodic answers will count against you.
If there's a tie, I have a tie-breaker question.
Good grief--I'm getting to bed before 3:00!
TTFN, al
FRED and FUBAR? On this forum? Bad Al!
Let's say Flashing rear end device, and flashing up beyond all recognition.
As for ERA, is this railroad related, or Equal Rights Amendment/Earned Run Average.
nanaimo73 wrote: FRED and FUBAR? On this forum? Bad Al! There's a perfectly good clean four-letter word begining with "f" that can add -ed, and works just like the unprintable. Let's say Flashing rear end device, and flashing up beyond all recognition. "Flashing" is the way I've heard it, but then again I usually get such information from these boards. As for ERA , is this railroad related, or Equal Rights Amendment/Earned Run Average. Dale, I never said every single term would be a railroad term, or a transit term. Pls re-read my Rules in the post above about the benefit of equally plausible answers. Ca va? - al
FRED and FUBAR? On this forum? Bad Al! There's a perfectly good clean four-letter word begining with "f" that can add -ed, and works just like the unprintable.
Let's say Flashing rear end device, and flashing up beyond all recognition. "Flashing" is the way I've heard it, but then again I usually get such information from these boards.
As for ERA , is this railroad related, or Equal Rights Amendment/Earned Run Average. Dale, I never said every single term would be a railroad term, or a transit term. Pls re-read my Rules in the post above about the benefit of equally plausible answers.
Ca va? - al
The Family-Friendly version of FUBAR is Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition. As for the others, let's see...
BART= Bay Area Rapid Transit
MoPac= Missouri Pacific
PATH= ??
ERA= Equal Rights Amendment
IRT= ??
FRED= Flashing Rear End Device
NASA= National Aeronautics and Space Administration
BNI= ??
LSMFT= Lucky Strike Means Fine Tobacco
KCSdeM= Kansas City Southern of Mexico
ET&WNC= ??
M.Div.= ??
MOW= Maintenance Of Way
LYNX= ??
Brian (IA) http://blhanel.rrpicturearchives.net.
al-in-chgo wrote: nanaimo73 wrote: Let's say Flashing rear end device, and flashing up beyond all recognition."Flashing" is the way I've heard it, but then again I usually get such information from these boards.
nanaimo73 wrote: Let's say Flashing rear end device, and flashing up beyond all recognition.
As for ERA , is this railroad related, or Equal Rights Amendment/Earned Run Average? Dale, I never said every single term would be a railroad term, or a transit term. Pls re-read my Rules in the post above about the benefit of equally plausible answers. Ca va? - al
As for ERA , is this railroad related, or Equal Rights Amendment/Earned Run Average?
PATH would be Port Authority-Trans Hudson?
blhanel wrote: The Family-Friendly version of FUBAR is Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition. As for the others, let's see...BART= Bay Area Rapid TransitMoPac= Missouri PacificPATH= ??ERA= Equal Rights AmendmentIRT= ??FRED= Flashing Rear End Device NASA= National Aeronautics and Space Administration BNI= ??LSMFT= Lucky Strike Means Fine TobaccoKCSdeM= Kansas City Southern of Mexico ET&WNC= ?? M.Div.= ??MOW= Maintenance Of WayLYNX= ??
Everything you answered is correct. For "ERA" I would also have accepted "Earned Run Average." -- Good going!
Now, the people playing this game will notice that not every term has to do with railroading. But five of those as yet unanswered do. - a. s.
nanaimo73 wrote: al-in-chgo wrote: nanaimo73 wrote: Let's say Flashing rear end device, and flashing up beyond all recognition."Flashing" is the way I've heard it, but then again I usually get such information from these boards. You are basically right,as Trains magazine has always used flashing, rather than the employee term.As for ERA , is this railroad related, or Equal Rights Amendment/Earned Run Average? Dale, I never said every single term would be a railroad term, or a transit term. Pls re-read my Rules in the post above about the benefit of equally plausible answers. Ca va? - alFair enough.PATH would be Port Authority-Trans Hudson? ABSOLUTELY! Now, how about "IRT"? - a. s.
PATH would be Port Authority-Trans Hudson? ABSOLUTELY!
Now, how about "IRT"? - a. s.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.