Texas Zepher wrote: Beowulf wrote:I find single axle bobber cabooses very annoying during an operating session! I've never seen one of those I think they would have a big problem teeter-totering all over place.
Beowulf wrote:I find single axle bobber cabooses very annoying during an operating session!
Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running BearSpace Mouse for president!15 year veteran fire fighterCollector of Apple //e'sRunning Bear EnterprisesHistory Channel Club life member.beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam
hardcoalcase wrote:I really could do without the ones that derail!
I like boxcars, lots and lots of box cars :)
cutting wrote:Anything military - guns and tanks etc are only manufactured for the purpose of killing and maiming people; so they are therefore inherintly evil. I will not have them in my house, let alone on the layout!
If we lived in a perfect world where everyone would allow everyone else to live in peace, it sure would be nice. Unfortunately, when we have a world with people like Adolf Hitler, Josip Stalin, Usamu binLaden and (fill in your favorite would-be world conqueror here,) the choice is, defend yourself or bow down and be fitted with shackles (or a coffin.)
When I see drivel like this, I wonder why I spent the best years of my life protecting and defending this country (and the rest of the Free World,) "From all enemies, without and within." Then I think of my own kids and grandkids. Yes, I did it for them. You got to come along for the ride, and didn't even have to pay US taxes to support my efforts. Aren't you lucky!
Chuck [MSgt(ret) USAF]
METRO wrote:Autoracks do absolutely nothing for me, and I don't really know why.
MisterBeasley wrote:Glow-in-the-dark rolling stock? Pickle Cars? Why not combine them? This one's a dilly... It was a yard-sale gift from my sister, so I have to be able to run it when she shows up. The rest of the time it's in a dark cardboard box under the layout, along with the orange Toys 'R' Us car.
Glow-in-the-dark rolling stock? Pickle Cars? Why not combine them? This one's a dilly...
It was a yard-sale gift from my sister, so I have to be able to run it when she shows up. The rest of the time it's in a dark cardboard box under the layout, along with the orange Toys 'R' Us car.
It could have been worse...
Autoracks do absolutely nothing for me, and I don't really know why.
Baldwin switchers after the first two phases of the VO-series look like bricks with cabs.
Unit coal trains are more fun in real life than in model form, nothing beats the sound of one of those going by at speed.
Cheers!
~METRO
TONY
"If we never take the time, how can we ever have the time." - Merovingian (Matrix Reloaded)
I live within a block of some track. So anything leaky or explodable can go directly to the nearest RIP track (do not pass GO do not collect $200), and be made fixed again.
Oddly, though, my fondest memory of rolling stock was some not-rolling stock - a line of rusty old NYC 'cigar' logo PS-1 boxcars (I think) that probably did not budge an inch during the entire lifetime of the Penn Central railroad. If I could see those, we were going to visit Dad at work. <g>
On my layout I am doing 1900 so I really do not need anything AAR, USRA, or more modern than that.
I do like watching a mixed-merchandise train more than I like watching a unit train of anything - RoadRailers, coal, autoracks, 89' hi-cube, piggyback, containers.
Steamers sure do not look right pulling a string of Boxes with no roof walks...
I am anti anything longer than 72 Ft.
My Zephyr is all 72 Footers and so are my DRG&W pass. cars.
Do not particularly like the short high cubes either.
Keep smiling, It looks good on you.
Long lives the "Wobbly"
James:1 Verse:5
from Saskatchewan, in the Great White North..
We have met the enemy, and he is us............ (Pogo)
Seriously, I love old roof-walk cars, and now that I'm planning to dual-era my 60's layout back to the 30's, I think I'll pick up a couple with the top-mounted, horizontally-rotating brake wheel. Walthers has some stock cars on sale in the latest catalog.
It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse.
I don't like intermodal. The wells and flats are boring. I don't care for passenger trains. I model 1978 so you can imagine the options I have. I like the 50' Airslide covered hoppers. They are the most unusual looking I have seen.
I cant stand the O-scale diesels with the "swinging pilots"..
where the pilot is seperate from the body and swings out with the trucks on curves..ugh.
probably my least-favorite thing in the entire universe of model railroading.
I also cant stand 3-rail track, and "tinplate" style layouts in general..you can tell my first layout as a kid was HO scale and not Lionel! ;)
Scot
twhite wrote:In the era that I model (WWII) I like 'em all. Even those silly-looking Heinz pickle cars!Tom
In the era that I model (WWII) I like 'em all. Even those silly-looking Heinz pickle cars!
Tom
I love pickle cars.
Enjoy
Paul
ACK!
I was just thrown back to the AHM 99 cent sale days in the 70's
Putrid at best!
Brian
Remember those cheap HO F7's with thick, shiney chrome paint? You can include that on your list.
Or how about those rocket launcher cars? Or glow in the dark rolling stock?
Enough of that.
GARRY
HEARTLAND DIVISION, CB&Q RR
EVERYWHERE LOST; WE HUSTLE OUR CABOOSE FOR YOU
jecorbett wrote: stokesda wrote:I don't know what they're called, but I've never been a fan of those "self-propelled" passenger cars - half Pullman, half subway engine. Yuck!Are you referring to doodlebugs or RDCs. I would agree with you on RDCs. They don't have a lot of character. But doodlebugs are another matter. They will be serving my branchline if and when I ever get it built. RMC even has a story about converting the Bachmann doodlebug to two way operation. Doodlebugs can serve as single car passenger trains on lightly traveled branclines and can even haul a coach or two and or freight cars. Typically they had a combine configuration with passenger seats in the rear, the baggage section up front. The would handle mail and express shipments as well. I think they are one of the most interesting pieces of equipment we can run and a great choice for small layouts.
stokesda wrote:I don't know what they're called, but I've never been a fan of those "self-propelled" passenger cars - half Pullman, half subway engine. Yuck!
Are you referring to doodlebugs or RDCs. I would agree with you on RDCs. They don't have a lot of character. But doodlebugs are another matter. They will be serving my branchline if and when I ever get it built. RMC even has a story about converting the Bachmann doodlebug to two way operation. Doodlebugs can serve as single car passenger trains on lightly traveled branclines and can even haul a coach or two and or freight cars. Typically they had a combine configuration with passenger seats in the rear, the baggage section up front. The would handle mail and express shipments as well. I think they are one of the most interesting pieces of equipment we can run and a great choice for small layouts.
From an operating standpoint, a locomotive has nothing on them anyday! RDC's have more character than regular passenger cars if you ask me.
Mechanical Department "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."
The Missabe Road: Safety First
For some reason, the tiny ore cars look fake to me just as the 34' cars and small tank cars.
At the other end of the spectrum - those 86' flat cars and high cube box cars do not "flip my switch"
Have fun with your trains
Tracklayer wrote: bb4884 wrote:I have no idea why, but I hate tankers. Rolling Molotov cocktails if you ask meAwww bb4884. Come on man... Tankers are among my favorites.Tracklayer
bb4884 wrote:I have no idea why, but I hate tankers. Rolling Molotov cocktails if you ask me
Awww bb4884. Come on man... Tankers are among my favorites.
Tracklayer
I love tank cars , Not enough of the type I like are available though.
Jerry SP FOREVER http://photobucket.com/albums/f317/GAPPLEG/
Kurt_Laughlin wrote: jasperofzeal wrote: However, that doesn't mean I don't quesition the purpose of some of them. For example, ore cars, with their small size, I don't see the purpose if a larger car can have more capacity than the smaller car. I guess it has something to do with weight limitation along the lines they serve on, but still, not that I don't like them, they're just my least favorite.The problem is really with the people, not the cars or track. Ore is usually much denser than the lading larger hoppers are designed around: coal. If coal hoppers were used for ore (and this has been tried) in short order the operators start filling the hoppers to the maximum volume rather than the rated load capacity, resulting in damage to the cars and track.KL
jasperofzeal wrote: However, that doesn't mean I don't quesition the purpose of some of them. For example, ore cars, with their small size, I don't see the purpose if a larger car can have more capacity than the smaller car. I guess it has something to do with weight limitation along the lines they serve on, but still, not that I don't like them, they're just my least favorite.
However, that doesn't mean I don't quesition the purpose of some of them. For example, ore cars, with their small size, I don't see the purpose if a larger car can have more capacity than the smaller car. I guess it has something to do with weight limitation along the lines they serve on, but still, not that I don't like them, they're just my least favorite.
The problem is really with the people, not the cars or track. Ore is usually much denser than the lading larger hoppers are designed around: coal. If coal hoppers were used for ore (and this has been tried) in short order the operators start filling the hoppers to the maximum volume rather than the rated load capacity, resulting in damage to the cars and track.
KL
Thank you for clarifying, makes sense and now I can see the purpose for the car in a whole new light. They're still my least favorite, I think that they are too small compared to most other equipment, toy-like.