Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Plastic v. Brass

8803 views
65 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 31, 2003 2:30 PM
because there are some modelers that won't settle with a plastic model.

As for me, I'll settle with good plastic (P2K & Spectrum), but If I ever get money pouring out of my ears, I'll go 1/3 of the way with brass (the other thirds go to plastic and stratchbuilt streamliners of my own design)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 31, 2003 11:10 AM
I think that the plastic models nowadays are quite realistic so why go to the extra expense of brass.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 31, 2003 9:29 AM
I can't afford brass so model with plastic. Once prototyped and painted it is hard to see the difference.

Manufactures cannot afford to create a mold (plastic) or machine (brass) for every road and every number. Therefore they manufacture products that are generic and resemble as close to the prototype as possible the most popular roads and numbers.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Nova Scotia
  • 825 posts
Posted by BentnoseWillie on Friday, October 31, 2003 8:22 AM
I actually would prefer plastic - mainly because the prototype I model has power that's passed through several hands, and therefore has been modified to teh point where a brass model is unlikely to be correct without modification. Since plastic is the material I know, I'd rather start with a plastic model if I have to bash it to get what I need.

There was, however, a brass release of early CB&CNS power that I'd love to have. We all gotta dream...[:)]
B-Dubya -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inside every GE is an Alco trying to get out...apparently, through the exhaust stack!
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 3,150 posts
Posted by CNJ831 on Friday, October 31, 2003 8:03 AM
Your wording is extremely bias toward a vote for plastic. Why should one be comparing an excellent plastic loco with a so-so brass one?

In fact, my passion is camelback locomotives. These do not come in plastic with any accuracy of detail what so ever. And when it comes to steam locomotives in general, brass is it a no-contest winner, even compared to those new plastic models that are in the $500+ range. Anybody who owns brass examples of such is fully aware of this.

JB
  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 527 posts
Posted by eastcoast on Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:35 PM
Have to say plastic.
More affordable and definately more available.
I am mainly into post 1980 diesel locos and plastic
seems to be what I find more often at the hobby shop.
I also can repaint faster on plastic if I want to do my own road colors.

[}:)]
In curiousity,you called brass so-so,WHY????
There are some AWESOME brass models out there,
especially if you model steam,I do not, but please,
justify YOUR opinion of brass!![:0]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Plastic v. Brass
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:22 PM
Tell us why you chose the option you chose. I spect most would like to answer brass but affordbility is a big issue.[;)]

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!