I hate Rust
cudaken wrote:Two days ago I let the XP Pro up date it self, installed the newest Explorer, think it was 7.0. ...
Several people here have noted issues with IE7 - especially the part about posting pictures.
I've re-installed my Windows operating system a few times from the "recovery media" (CD's) that came with the computer. Of course, after that I had to reinstall my other software packages as well.
If you decide to go that route, make sure to get a backup of all your data files, images, etc. before you start - since reinstalling an operating system sometimes involves formatting the hard drive. BTW - you did save all your original software CD's and their license codes in safe place, right?
-Ken in Maryland (B&O modeler, former CSX modeler)
cudaken wrote: If the new Explorer is the problem, how to I go back to the older one?
If the new Explorer is the problem, how to I go back to the older one?
Ken,
Yes, IE7 is the problem, at least as ar as this forum is concerned. It doesn't display right. It's also quite likely that it's causing your camera problems as well, and uninstalling is simple. Go to Control Panel, open Add or Remove Programs and select IE7. I already did that because of those issues and because it has an annoying interface. If that doesn't resolve everything you can roll the computer back with System Restore, but first things first. Give IE7 the boot!
Nelson
Ex-Southern 385 Being Hoisted
Cuda - What version of windows are you upgrading from?
Here is a link directly to HP's website and the download for version 2 of HP photo & imaging software (it is the first on the list). Perhaps version 2 will solve the problem. Actually, all the links on this page are specific for your camera.
Your problem with the small message window could be display resolution. Does everything look smaller than before? If so, right click your mouse on your wallpaper, choose properties, then settings, and use the slide bar to lower the screen resolution.
I must admit I am not familiar with Exporer v. 7.0. In my long experience with computers and software, I have learned the addage that "pioneers are usually the ones with arrows in their backs".
-Dan
Builder of Bowser steam! Railimages Site
Marlon
See pictures of the Clinton-Golden Valley RR
Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running BearSpace Mouse for president!15 year veteran fire fighterCollector of Apple //e'sRunning Bear EnterprisesHistory Channel Club life member.beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam
Medina1128 wrote:If you open your Control Panel, you can restore your system to an earlier date. THIS is exactly why a lot of people turn Microsoft's Auto-update OFF. And we know that some of the 'fixes' from Microsoft, don't. If you need more help in restoring your system, email me directly.
Totally right! Run a System Restore to a point a day or two, or even a week before your computer updated. This should resolve the issue. If Microsoft has some kind of other "system hook" that will not restore to the older version of IE, then you can try the Add and Remove Programs procedure, see the link below:
http://itinfo.mit.edu/article.php?id=8234
Hope this helps!
Cheers,
Ryan
Ryan BoudreauxThe Piedmont Division Modeling The Southern Railway, Norfolk & Western & Norfolk Southern in HO during the merger eraCajun Chef Ryan
Now say it with me.... WE LOVE YOU BILL.... MICROSOFT IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD....
Now in all reality I really dont like microsoft. But I have a lot of respect for the college drop out that runs the company, because it really does show that being a cold callus business person you really can make a lot of money on Screwing people that dont know any better, ah yes thats america at its best.... And for those that dont know Micro soft is also the controling intrest in mac as of about 5 years ago.
Any way back on topic get rid of IE7 it is just a beta version that they used as a manditory update to see where the problems are. Wait a year to get the new version of IE. Just keep in mind it will be a decent program once all the bugs get fixed. Untill then try fire fox it is just as good as Ie 6 but has beter security features. Just my 2 cents,
Curt
jeffrey-wimberly wrote:And people wonder why I still use Windows98 SE w/sp1? Could it be because IE7 is such a screwed up piece of * that I won't give it the time of day? Quite possibly! I will continue to use W98 until I can no longer find drivers for it. At the rate things are going, a lot of people are coming back to W98.
Interesting how people crucify Microsoft because other people's software won't work with the newer MS releases. That is why they do Beta releases, so the other software firms can upgrade their interfaces. Kinda like being mad at Chevy because Goodyear's 14" tires don't fit anymore. But, if one checks low and behold, Goodyear has 15", 16" , 17" ...ad infinitum size tires.
If your support software doesn't work, check their site for upgrades and then call them.
MS is not perfect. But, they are 99.99% responsible for all of us being able to be here, and the web even being here, too.
curtw_944 wrote: Now say it with me.... WE LOVE YOU BILL.... MICROSOFT IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD.... Now in all reality I really dont like microsoft. But I have a lot of respect for the college drop out that runs the company, because it really does show that being a cold callus business person you really can make a lot of money on Screwing people that dont know any better, ah yes thats america at its best.... And for those that dont know Micro soft is also the controling intrest in mac as of about 5 years ago. Any way back on topic get rid of IE7 it is just a beta version that they used as a manditory update to see where the problems are. Wait a year to get the new version of IE. Just keep in mind it will be a decent program once all the bugs get fixed. Untill then try fire fox it is just as good as Ie 6 but has beter security features. Just my 2 cents, Curt
George In Midcoast Maine, 'bout halfway up the Rockland branch
Virginian wrote:Interesting how people crucify Microsoft because other people's software won't work with the newer MS releases. That is why they do Beta releases, so the other software firms can upgrade their interfaces. Kinda like being mad at Chevy because Goodyear's 14" tires don't fit anymore. But, if one checks low and behold, Goodyear has 15", 16" , 17" ...ad infinitum size tires. If your support software doesn't work, check their site for upgrades and then call them. MS is not perfect. But, they are 99.99% responsible for all of us being able to be here, and the web even being here, too.
Virginian wrote: Interesting how people crucify Microsoft because other people's software won't work with the newer MS releases. That is why they do Beta releases, so the other software firms can upgrade their interfaces. Kinda like being mad at Chevy because Goodyear's 14" tires don't fit anymore. But, if one checks low and behold, Goodyear has 15", 16" , 17" ...ad infinitum size tires. If your support software doesn't work, check their site for upgrades and then call them. MS is not perfect. But, they are 99.99% responsible for all of us being able to be here, and the web even being here, too.
I am not crucifying microsoft either, Just displaying my dislike of a more complicated time thanks to them. Bill gates is a marketing genious and knows who to hire to get the job done. Unfortunitly it was not microsoft who is responsible for the internet conturary to popular belief.
We have the government to thank for that. They were using the phone lines as early as the 50's to send information back and forth between base's and other instaltaions. But It wasnt until the mid to late 80's when the technology was declassified that a lovly company called Prodigy, which was devoloped by gamers, Brought full use of what we now know as the internet in to existiance. The internet was originaly a way to share files and play games, not unlike today. But the big difference came to be when Microsoft bought Prodigy in around 94 that microsoft became the leader in internet service. It is true that bill has made the computer and its programs available to the world at affordiable prices.
But I for one mis the simpler times when the computer as well as the phone were used as a tool and were not as big of an impact that they are today.
Virginian wrote:MS is not perfect. But, they are 99.99% responsible for all of us being able to be here, and the web even being here, too.
Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon
jfugate wrote:Windows 98? Well, it depends on what you're using your computer for.In my case I do a lot of graphic intensive DVD video stuff, and the vendors of this software *require* you have XP SP2 and at least a 2.8MHz processor with 1GB of memory.
TheK4Kid wrote: jeffrey-wimberly wrote:And people wonder why I still use Windows98 SE w/sp1? Could it be because IE7 is such a screwed up piece of * that I won't give it the time of day? Quite possibly! I will continue to use W98 until I can no longer find drivers for it. At the rate things are going, a lot of people are coming back to W98.Jeffrey is right.I am using an edition of W98 called W98 Lite Pro.A freind of mine who does all my PC work and is also a PC and IT specialist says stay away from IE 7 and I was going to get a new Dell PC, and he also said don't even think about Windows Vista, it will be at least a year before they get the bugs out of it.This edition of W98 I have gets rid of most of the junk Microsft loads into a machine.It's an old 400 Mhz machine with an AMD K63 processor, and runs at about 800Mhz performance wise.Basically my PC is just over 8 years old, still running fine.Why mess it up?Ed
Ed: The system I'm using is one I built myself. It has a Gigabyte gold board with an AMD 2.2Gig Dual core processor and 8 gigs of RAM. I use 2 WD 80Gig hard drives, 1 for the OS and the other for data storage and backup. I'm using a Marvell Yukon 10/100/1000 Network adapter through a cable modem. I think about a web site, I'm there!
NeO6874 wrote: jfugate wrote:Windows 98? Well, it depends on what you're using your computer for.In my case I do a lot of graphic intensive DVD video stuff, and the vendors of this software *require* you have XP SP2 and at least a 2.8MHz processor with 1GB of memory.windows XP will run on 2.8 MHz Joe!? LOL!i'm pretty sure you meant GHz
jfugate wrote: NeO6874 wrote: jfugate wrote:Windows 98? Well, it depends on what you're using your computer for.In my case I do a lot of graphic intensive DVD video stuff, and the vendors of this software *require* you have XP SP2 and at least a 2.8MHz processor with 1GB of memory.windows XP will run on 2.8 MHz Joe!? LOL!i'm pretty sure you meant GHz Well you know how it goes, the glitch in the system is located between the monitor and the keyboard ... Yes, GHz.
Joe,
Always be grateful for that edit feature!
(Unless, of course, someone else notices it first.)