Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

New QSI upgrade chip - 6/30 update

6130 views
100 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Gainesville area
  • 1,396 posts
Posted by scubaterry on Thursday, June 29, 2006 9:59 PM
Dang this is going down hill fast. I am waiting on my GP-9 and lite Mike chip myself. Pondini if I understand correctly as long as you stay out of RTC all is well? My Hudson chip seems to be working fine. I must have got one of the good ones.
Terry
Terry Eatin FH&R in Sunny Florida
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 7 posts
Posted by idahoan2004 on Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:38 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Pondini

BUT when I change 56.4 to 2 for Regulated Throttle control, both engines go absolutely nuts!

Same behavior on both chips, forward and reverse, even after reset. (And like some of you, the little dude says "Reset", but no whistle sounds.)

The 3.0 manual says.....


Not all of the information in the 3.0 manual is applicable to the Q1a upgrade chips. You should be using the Q1A DCC Reference Manual v4, preliminary extracts of which are available on the QSIsolutions web site in the Tech Info section.

The Q1a CV 56.4 settings are changed from earlier versions of the firmware. Regulated Throttle Control is enabled with CV 56.4 set to 1, not 2. A setting of 2 places it in Load Compensated BEMF Speed Control mode, which is not yet available due to threatened litigation from Mike's Train House (as is mode 3, Calibrated Speed Control). I am surprised it does anything with CV 56.4 set to to 2. Use 0 (Standard Throttle Control), or 1 (Regulated Throttle Control).

Another change appears to be the reset confirmation. Now we get the "dude" saying RESET when a reset is performed, instead of three whistle hoots.
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,240 posts
Posted by tstage on Friday, June 30, 2006 12:19 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Pondini

Hi, guys. I almost hate to add to this thread, but . . .

Among other BLIs (none upgraded), I have 2 Mikes, one light, one heavy. Both were working properly. Got one of each upgrade chip (the -0 and the -1 variant) from Tony's on Wednesday.

I didn't have a lot of trouble setting CV 2 (although like other posts here, it came set to 22, not 8). I ended up just experimenting, as my NCE Powerhouse won't change CVs while the engine is at any speed step except zero, whether it's actually moving or not. The light is at 14, the heavy at 22. At those settings, with CV 56.4 set to 1 ("Speed Control"), both crawl very nicely at step 1 (of 128), and accelerate and decelerate slowly, as I prefer, with CVs 3 and 4 set to 50.

I did note something some of you might want to try: In "Speed Control" mode, with the default speed curve, and v-high set to any value over 1, I'd see the creeping without acceleration noted in some previous posts. Change CV 5 to 1, and it's fine!?

BUT when I change 56.4 to 2 for Regulated Throttle control, both engines go absolutely nuts! Won't start to move below speed step 22, then moves for about one second, then abruptly stops. Raise throttle to, say, 40 and it'll move again, for about another second or two, then freeze. Increase by one speed step, it'll move just enough for 1 chuff! (Sound is still on, headlight is still bright.) If I press Option for speed step zero, it jumps to speed, then gradually slows down to a stop! Ditto after changing chuff rate in 56.12.

Same behavior on both chips, forward and reverse, even after reset. (And like some of you, the little dude says "Reset", but no whistle sounds.)

Ditto with various settings of v-high (CV 5).

The 3.0 manual says RTC uses v-start and v-high, with no reference to v-mid (page 34). Other than saying it's not supported, there's no mention of v-mid anywhere in the document. I tried setting CV 6, and got no confirmation. When I put 6 in CV 64, the guy just says "CV 6" with no mention of it's value. On the program track, I get "Cannot read CV" for CV 6 (only). Seems pretty clear it just ain't there.

Tony had me remove and reinstall the chips, but there was no change. He's sending 2 replacements . . . should be here Saturday or Monday. (Tony sure is a class act, isn't he?) He said they'd test them before shipping, and I haven't heard from him since, so I assume they're on the way and tested ok there. Hope so.

Since it's both chips, it sure doesn't seem like an installation problem (yes, I was very careful about grounding), or something funky about both engines, but I guess we'll see how the new ones work.

Jim,

Since you have the NCE Powerhouse and I have the Power Cab and we both have seen some of the same issues, I'm still wondering if this is really an NCE issue with the QSI upgrade chip. Granted, the replacement upgrade fixed my sMHP problem. But the fact that you still had troubles with programming CV2 sends up a red flag.


Jon,

Here's what I received from American Hobby Distributors, the folks who distribute QSI:

QUOTE: Tom,
I reviewed the info, thanks.
CV 6 is not supported by QSI.
I am not sure of the issue you are having with CV2?
We have a PowerCab here and all is normal.
It seems you were succesfull on the programming track and not on the main?

Thanks
American Hobby Distributors

I'm also supposed to call Tony @ TTE but have yet to do that. I'll let you know what I find out.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 30, 2006 6:09 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by idahoan2004

QUOTE: Originally posted by Pondini

BUT when I change 56.4 to 2 for Regulated Throttle control, both engines go absolutely nuts!

Same behavior on both chips, forward and reverse, even after reset. (And like some of you, the little dude says "Reset", but no whistle sounds.)

The 3.0 manual says.....


Not all of the information in the 3.0 manual is applicable to the Q1a upgrade chips. You should be using the Q1A DCC Reference Manual v4, preliminary extracts of which are available on the QSIsolutions web site in the Tech Info section.

The Q1a CV 56.4 settings are changed from earlier versions of the firmware. Regulated Throttle Control is enabled with CV 56.4 set to 1, not 2. A setting of 2 places it in Load Compensated BEMF Speed Control mode, which is not yet available due to threatened litigation from Mike's Train House (as is mode 3, Calibrated Speed Control). I am surprised it does anything with CV 56.4 set to to 2. Use 0 (Standard Throttle Control), or 1 (Regulated Throttle Control).

Another change appears to be the reset confirmation. Now we get the "dude" saying RESET when a reset is performed, instead of three whistle hoots.


Well, silly me! I actually believed the instructions that came with my chips!

They say that the operations manual for the new chip is at: http://www.qsisolutions.com/pdf/q1a-steam-p-man.pdf. That has NO reference to CV 56.4 or how to select throttle control in DCC.

Now that I investigate, their web site option for "Q1a Steam Manual v4.1 for Upgrade Chips" gets http://www.qsisolutions.com/pdf/q1a-steam-v4-man.pdf, which has the correct info.

The instructions also specify "the complete user manuals are here: DCC: http://www.qsisolutions.com/pdf/q-dccman30.pdf". That, of course, is the "original" V 3.0 manual, dated 2/16/05, and showing 0, 1, and 2 for Standard, Speed Control, and Regulated Throttle Control for 56.4.

Of course, you're right about the "extract" at http://www.qsisolutions.com/pdf/q-dccman4-prelim_extract.pdf, which is only slightly confusing: on page 1 showing changes, it says "CV 56.5 Regulated Throttle Control ..."

Later on, naturally, it correctly refers to CV 56.4, not 56.5, with the values you mentioned.

And the upgrade instructions do correctly say to reset 56.4 to 1 for RTC. Then again, it also says the CV 2 default is 8.

I'll call Tony's tomorrow -- he's probably already sent the chips, but at least I can get him to correct the instructions!

Thanks for steering me in the right direction!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 30, 2006 6:18 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tstage

Jim,

Since you have the NCE Powerhouse and I have the Power Cab and we both have seen some of the same issues, I'm still wondering if this is really an NCE issue with the QSI upgrade chip. Granted, the replacement upgrade fixed my sMHP problem. But the fact that you still had troubles with programming CV2 sends up a red flag.



Actually, the only "problem" I had with CV 2 was not being able to change it while the engine was not at speed step zero. But that seems true of all the QSI engines I've got. Doesn't seem at all like the mess you've had.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 7 posts
Posted by idahoan2004 on Friday, June 30, 2006 9:39 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tstage

I also discovered another interesting phenomenon last night. I wanted to hear what the speed feedback sounded like. On my NCE Power Cab, you have to press SHIFT and PROG simultaneously to get F10.

The audible voice for the speed feedback was just barely audible. But the weird thing was, after I depressed the two buttons, none of the speed buttons responded after that. In other words, the locomotive maintained a constant speed - no matter what I did with the speed buttons.

The only way to stop the locomotive was to press the EMERGENCY STOP button. When I pressed the acceleration button to get the locomotive moving again, the speed step would visually change on the LCD display but the actual speed of the locomotive was constantly at speed step 001 and wouldn't budge any higher - whether the screen said 001 or 126. Weird.


There is a possible explanation to the behavior you are observing after an F10 speed report. The non-response to speed changes could be due to activation of the "Heavy Load" feature. When activated, what it does is allow you to control the chuff loudness via the cab throttle position, but the model speed will not be changed. When deactivated, model speed control is restored. By default, the Heavy Load feature is controlled by F9.

Now, DCC functions F9-F12 are sent to the model in a single control packet (a Function Group Two instruction). When you press F10 to request a speed report, the controller will send a Group Two packet, containing the current value (on or off) of functions F9-F12. This is where a problem can occur. If, at the time you press F10 (changing the function from off-to-on or on-to-off), the controller F9 value is different than the model F9 value, the model will also respond to the change in value of F9, and enter Heavy Load mode. Page 10 of the Version 3.0 QSI DCC Reference Manual explains this phenomenon somewhat.

If this is what is happening, you should be able to restore throttle speed control response after an F10 speed report by pressing F9 to deactivate Heavy Load.

I have observed a similar behavior at random times with headlight control, as well as other functions. The controller view of the function will be sent to the model when any of the functions within a function group is changed (groups are F0-F4, F5-F8, and F9-F12).
If the controller view of a function is out of sync with the model's view of a function, neither knows of this. The model simply responds to the function values in the function group being received.

How do controller and model views of function values get out of sync? It could happen at system power-on time. I don't think the BLI models retain function settings between power-on sessions. I think the NCE Power Pro does. So, turn a function on, power off the system, power it back on, and now the controller and model will have different views of the function. As far as I know, there are no facilities in the NMRA DCC standards for synchronizing the controller and model views of any or all functions. All the controller can do is send the current value of each function setting. The function values are sent in one of the three groups. The model will (and must) respond to each of the function values in a group when they are received.

That's my theory, anyway....
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: US
  • 625 posts
Posted by jondrd on Saturday, July 1, 2006 8:10 AM
Everyone on this thread or those following it:

What an inducement to upgrade one's QSI chip!
JMHO but it seems like QSI Solutions didn't work hard enough on their upgrade solution. Yes, test the chip/software but also test the documentation for same.
Tony's Train Exchange seems to be going the EXTRA mile on making good for QSI's questionable execution. [tup] [tup] [tup] Would love to see some of the messages between TTE and QSI. [;)]
Not a thread to win converts to DCC. [:(]
Sometimes being first on the block with the latest means you become manufacturer's guinea pig. [:(]

I'm behind the technology implementation curve so DCC decoder-wise I'm working with stuff that's been proven by consumers. I'd love to upgrade my BLI locos to latest capability but don't need more challenges to having a smooth running layout. I hope that all who have been encountering upgrade problems overcome them soon so that they can get back to running trains!! [tup] [:D]

Jon
"We have met the enemy and he is us" Pogo via the art of Walt Kelly
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 3, 2006 12:11 AM
I bought a BLI GG1 just the other day and am thinking about getting the Quantum engineer. It only works with QARC locomotives so I don't know if I should get the upgrade or not. any pointers?
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Gainesville area
  • 1,396 posts
Posted by scubaterry on Monday, July 3, 2006 12:06 PM
I have had the Hudson Upgrade chip installed for about a month now and have experienced no problems at all. (knock on wood). I have my Lite Mike and GP-9 chips on order. It will be interesting to see how they work. I am really beginning to think at least part of this series of problems are more of a DCC system compatability problem more than anything else. I have a Super Chief and have had no problems to date. I will be able to talk more confidently when I get the next two upgrade chips installed. I would really like to put Tom's replaced chip in my Lite Mike with my DIgitrax system just to see if it continues to present problems. Did you ever get a response from TTE on that Tom?
Terry
Terry Eatin FH&R in Sunny Florida
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,240 posts
Posted by tstage on Monday, July 3, 2006 2:39 PM
Terry,

No, I haven't called Tony yet. [*^_^*] Gotta do that soon...

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Gainesville area
  • 1,396 posts
Posted by scubaterry on Monday, July 3, 2006 8:18 PM
Tom - I think it would be an interesting experiment.
Terry
Terry Eatin FH&R in Sunny Florida

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!