Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Probably been asked before... which was the ugliest diesel (by generation)

17033 views
125 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 7 posts
Posted by jims trains on Thursday, July 12, 2007 6:24 PM

 bush9245 wrote:

I have always considered the VR double ended GM locos ugly. Not when seen by themselves, but when connected to a train because it looks like the cab that should be facing forward is facing the carriages. And then if double heading it looks like they don't know which way they are going.

I always thought the VR RT 'Rail Tractor' was a strange beast. For those who have never heard of it, imagine a short 2 axle flat car, with a tractor engine, and an oversized cab. Then, to make it stand out even more paint it bright yellow! But despite being ugly, 54 of them were built, and many continue to survive where more 'beautiful' deisels have been scrapped or sold to tourist railways.

For a picture, go to http://home.waterfront.net.au/~sem/locos.htm#RT  

For US deisels, the BL has to be top of the list for me. Followed closely by the Baldwin DT6-6-2000 which the EJ&E had, which looks like a GE44 Tonner on steroids. Ulgy, but still very interesting none the less - strangely compelling!

 Go to railpictures.net and select the Baldwin DT6-6-2000 from Locomotive type list to see a photo or two.

 

 James Stanford 

 

Real men play trains!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 12, 2007 6:25 PM
 Renegade1c wrote:

 Zodiac Thriller wrote:
Hello I am new here and I will saythat the ugliest engine in general is the California Zepher

There was never an engine called the California Zephyr. This was the name of several passenger trains (full trains) that ran from San Fransisco to Chicago, via Denver.

I think he is refering to the original articulated streamliner.

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Milwaukee & Toronto
  • 929 posts
Posted by METRO on Thursday, July 12, 2007 6:33 PM
 steemtrayn wrote:

No comment.....

 Did anybody mention the BQ23-7?

 

The Canadian Pacific had some downright wierd looking engines, their RS3Ms were absolute buchery (notice they even cut the multimark in half!) but by no means was this their only oddball:

The FM Trainmaster "Ram Heads"

 

The SD10 (chopped nose hunched back SD7)

 

The M640 (biggest Alco CP owned, check out the weird radiator area)

 

Not all are completely ugly but wierd none the less, gotta love quirky railroads.

 

Cheers!

~METRO 

 

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 21 posts
Posted by riverotter1948 on Thursday, July 12, 2007 7:01 PM

EMD SD-50 gets my vote for least aesthetic -- it's just a long rectangular box with a cab and a nose. B-o-r-i-n-g. Maybe that doesn't qualify as ugly, but it's an utterly mediocre and forgettable design. To me that's worse than ugly.

 P.S. To put that assessment in perspective, I really like the BL-2. I own three of them. (My wife says that from the front they look like a sad puppy dog.)

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Hainesport, NJ
  • 130 posts
Posted by green_elite_cab on Thursday, July 12, 2007 9:33 PM
 myred02 wrote:

The BQ23-7? Ah yes... the Aegis Class Cruiser!

See the similarities?

This would probably get my vote for second... or it would tie with that "RS-3" you have there...

Apparently, once CSX got them they kept them in operation into the late 90's.

-Brandon

 

Nice....  I'll have to remember that one. 

 but yeah, that RS3 has my vote.   Initially, i figured all diesels have their charms, even if they are boxy, rusty, and ancient, but the way they did the windows on that RS3, and how they left the top of the round roof, its just weird.

Modeling Conrail, Amtrak and NJ DOT under the wires in New Jersey, July 1979.  

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • 293 posts
Posted by Newyorkcentralfan on Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:02 PM

The California Zephyr always used conventional equipment.

 

 neil300 wrote:

I think he is refering to the original articulated streamliner.

 

 

 Renegade1c wrote:

 Zodiac Thriller wrote:
Hello I am new here and I will saythat the ugliest engine in general is the California Zepher

There was never an engine called the California Zephyr. This was the name of several passenger trains (full trains) that ran from San Fransisco to Chicago, via Denver.

  • Member since
    May 2007
  • 2 posts
Posted by Grand Trunk Railway on Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:13 PM

RS-1 were ugly. Those Rio Grande /Southern Pacific Krauss-Maffei German locomotives and for 3rd-Gen. hands down-GE AC4400CW and all versions are just horrible.(really anything by GE!).

Ian

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: On the Banks of the Great Choptank
  • 2,916 posts
Posted by wm3798 on Thursday, July 12, 2007 11:01 PM

I think the BL-2 is a thing of timeless beauty!!

Especially since you can still go see one working in revenue service...

BL-2 Video 

My vote goes to those modern Big Boxes that are virtually indistinguishable from each other.  For second generation, I'll vote for anything with a cat painted on it.  Horrible, absolutely horrible.

Lee 

Route of the Alpha Jets  www.wmrywesternlines.net

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: columbia mo
  • 194 posts
Posted by nscaler711 on Friday, July 13, 2007 12:05 AM

I have to agree with some of you but i think the P42 is just to Beautiful to be owned by Amtrak.

Um lets see how bout DD35's all Booster units most GE locomotives

All RS units and all European locos.

Lee i agree with the Cat thing. but i like EMDs locos best especially Modern ones (no SD60M with third window )

Army National Guard E3
MOS 91B

I have multiple scales now
Z, N, HO, O, and G.  

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Wiscasset , Maine
  • 161 posts
Posted by ddgmaker on Friday, July 13, 2007 5:00 AM
Ingalls Shipyard made 1 engine, Gulf Mobile&Ohio ended up with it,,by far the MOST ugly...
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 13, 2007 7:24 AM
I love diesels but the DL-109 gets my vote for it's hideous looks.
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 724 posts
Posted by snagletooth on Friday, July 13, 2007 8:12 AM
 gentlegiant wrote:
I love diesels but the DL-109 gets my vote for it's hideous looks.
It's called the"Centeped"AND GOD is it uly!! It's the only distuging thing called after a nasty bug!! Any questions???? Next thing after that is the Kruasse -Maffet's!!
Snagletooth
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,299 posts
Posted by Dave-the-Train on Friday, July 13, 2007 9:47 AM

 snagletooth wrote:
 gentlegiant wrote:
I love diesels but the DL-109 gets my vote for it's hideous looks.
It's called the"Centeped"AND GOD is it uly!! It's the only distuging thing called after a nasty bug!! Any questions???? Next thing after that is the Kruasse -Maffet's!!

QUESTION:-

Aren't you mixing up the Alco 6 Axle streamline beast (that P1K make a model of) with the Baldwin previously mentioned in this thread? 

Does anyone make a model of the Baldwins?

Cool [8D]

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Redding, California
  • 1,428 posts
Posted by Train 284 on Friday, July 13, 2007 10:22 AM
The GE U boats I hate. But unlike a lot of people here, I really do like the BL-2.   Tongue [:P]
Matt Cool Espee Forever! Modeling the Modoc Northern Railroad in HO scale Brakeman/Conductor/Fireman on the Yreka Western Railroad Member of Rouge Valley Model RR Club
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: CN Seymour Industrial spur
  • 262 posts
Posted by Dayliner on Friday, July 13, 2007 10:32 AM
There's no such thing as an ugly dieselSmile,Wink, & Grin [swg], some just have more, er, "character" than others.  And I'll admit that the CF7 and CP's rebuilt RS3s have "character" to spare.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 594 posts
Posted by Gandy Dancer on Friday, July 13, 2007 10:43 AM

 Newyorkcentralfan wrote:
The California Zephyr always used conventional equipment.
This might be a terminology issue with the word conventional, but the CZ used streamlined stainless steel lightweights of new designs specifically for that train.  As far a I know the only car it ever carried that was not from that design set, was a the pass-through PRR sleeper.

I think Charlie (renegade) is right.  I think that "Zodiac Thriller" means the original articulated  Zephyr (which eventually became the "Pioneer Zephyr") or its east coast mirror copy the "Yankee Flyer".

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Monkey Town, Alabam
  • 91 posts
Posted by leonardbrand on Friday, July 13, 2007 12:35 PM

Back longer than I care to remember the CSX had some diesels (6) I thank that were so ulgy the crews wouldn't even ride in them, and always made them be second engine so they woiuld not have to. I have forgotten who made the real engines nor who made a model. some where stored away I have a model of one and the front looks like a pug nose dog,and that still is the uglist diesel ever made, it even made the Edsel car look good. Maybe someone will  remember it. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 594 posts
Posted by Gandy Dancer on Friday, July 13, 2007 12:54 PM
 leonardbrand wrote:
 it even made the Edsel car look good.
Most of the cars on the road today do that!
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Monkey Town, Alabam
  • 91 posts
Posted by leonardbrand on Friday, July 13, 2007 4:08 PM
Located the one I was refering to. General Defective's  BQ23-7 of which SCL purchased all of.
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Milwaukee, WI
  • 35 posts
Posted by coldguy on Friday, July 13, 2007 7:04 PM

10. GE 70-tonner 

9. Foreign diesels 

8. I just don't like any cowled diesels(F7, PA)

7. F40ph

6. GE U-boats

5. Alco RS-1,RS-2,RS-3

4. Fairbanks-Morse

3. High-nosed GPs and SDs 

2. I'd never seen a BL2 before, but damn its Ugly!

1. Railpower Green Goats

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Kentucky
  • 356 posts
Posted by myred02 on Friday, July 13, 2007 11:43 PM

 leonardbrand wrote:
Located the one I was refering to. General Defective's  BQ23-7 of which SCL purchased all of.

You mean this thing?

Image Copyright Wade H. Massie

You're right, it does remind me of a pug nose dog! [EDIT] In a good way!

-Brandon

Modeling (and railfanning) the CSX mainlines since... ah fudge I forgot! http://myred02.rrpicturearchives.net/ http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=myred02
  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Nashua, NH
  • 430 posts
Posted by Cannoli on Saturday, July 14, 2007 8:05 AM
Your BQ23-7...

Image Copyright Wade H. Massie

My Pug...

I'll stick with the pug. 

Modeling the fictional B&M Dowe, NH branch in the early 50's.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Monkey Town, Alabam
  • 91 posts
Posted by leonardbrand on Saturday, July 14, 2007 8:44 AM
My apology to your pug, he or she is a beautiful dog, can't say that for the BQ23-7 o yes I forgot and left out a thing made for the GM&O by Ingersoll Rand which looked like somekind of insect
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, July 14, 2007 10:11 AM

 

Easy for me: the AMTRAK Genesis.

By the way, does anyone in this stream know how to spell?

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Over There
  • 454 posts
Posted by CPRail modeler on Saturday, July 14, 2007 7:17 PM
 friscofred wrote:

 

Easy for me: the AMTRAK Genesis.

By the way, does anyone in this stream know how to spell?

Sign - Welcome [#welcome],

I have to agree on the Genesis. Before that is the GE U-boats. UGH...(shudders).

BTW Yes we do know how to spell on this forum. We just choose not to. Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: columbia mo
  • 194 posts
Posted by nscaler711 on Tuesday, July 17, 2007 10:49 PM

What is wrong with the P42?

Army National Guard E3
MOS 91B

I have multiple scales now
Z, N, HO, O, and G.  

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Western transplant to the Deep South
  • 4,256 posts
Posted by Cederstrand on Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:27 PM

I noticed BL2 & U50 mentioned a few times. Sold both models of those and almost-sorta-kinda miss them, at least the U50. However, they did help pay for some nice new steam power.

I could see voting that BQ23-7 into the top 5, no problem. Resembles a long box dropped by a Fed-X driver.

How about the "ugliest paint scheme" on an engine? That can make or break one in the looks department. Cowboy [C):-)] Rob

  • Member since
    August 2001
  • From: US
  • 261 posts
Posted by JonathanS on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 6:56 AM
The SD90, SD80 and the new SD70s with the flared radiators and ugly cab.  EMD used to be known for design excellence, now it seems that they just don't care how they look.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bronx, NY
  • 381 posts
Posted by Hudson on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:37 AM
DL 109 is not the "Centipede". The DL-109 was built by ALCO and had a1a - a1a trucks. The "Centipedes" were locomotives built by Baldwin, Pennsy had a few variations: BP-60 and BH-50.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 297 posts
Posted by ngartshore350 on Thursday, July 19, 2007 4:25 AM
The New EMD ACE locomotives are just ugly to me! Just no aesthetics, I'm sure they are very functional?!Confused [%-)]

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!