Total New Guy has questions, needs help!

[dknelson]

Cheap HO is as bad as ever actually , but there are nice options now for true beginners, including the Walthers trainset line which I think has pretty decent quality.

Another change: twenty five years ago Bachmann and Life Like were cheap junk now they have some of the finest stuff around.

Maybe the biggest change in HO -- we have finally accepted the knuckle style coupler as a standard even for beginners -- what an irony that beginners for years had the coupler most likely to make them want to give up. You have to be a careful modeler to make hornhooks work right by which time you probably have moved on to Kadees.

Dave Nelson

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by der5997
.. you may be wanting to hang on to your old power pack. If it isn't a transistorised unit, I wouldn't bother..

Fair enough, as far as train control..but if it works, hang on to it for operating building lights or switch machines later.
regards \ Mike

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by der5997
.. you may be wanting to hang on to your old power pack. If it isn't a transistorised unit, I wouldn't bother..

Fair enough, as far as train control..but if it works, hang on to it for operating building lights or switch machines later.
regards \ Mike

[Anonymous]

A maxim I think we all should live by is this: if you have space for O scale, build in HO. Whatever scale you think can work, go one smaller and you'll find that everything fits fo much more comfortably. I work in N-scale, but my track plan could probably be executed as-is in HO scale; this gives me broad curves, long sidings, and the ability to run trains of plausible lengths. If you find or come up with a decent O-scale layout plan, I would say just take that and build it in HO scale, and maybe feel free to add a passing siding or team track here and there to use up some of the leftover space, but fill up most of that extra space with uncompressed scenery.

[Anonymous]

A maxim I think we all should live by is this: if you have space for O scale, build in HO. Whatever scale you think can work, go one smaller and you'll find that everything fits fo much more comfortably. I work in N-scale, but my track plan could probably be executed as-is in HO scale; this gives me broad curves, long sidings, and the ability to run trains of plausible lengths. If you find or come up with a decent O-scale layout plan, I would say just take that and build it in HO scale, and maybe feel free to add a passing siding or team track here and there to use up some of the leftover space, but fill up most of that extra space with uncompressed scenery.

[der5997]

Total New Guy: rail61's suggestions are good and valid, but may be a wee bit advanced for your 4 year old son :-) [ and N scale might be a challenge for tiny hands] File them for future refernce however, because a railroad without a purpose tends to gather dust ,while broken bits don't get fixed quickly. The bit about the books, and some sort of theme I'd use right away. Your boy can understand that you have to take the car to the gas station, and that he gets hungry, so making the trains stop for a purpose, and go on a particuar journey may be a way to relate purpose for the railroad to his experience. This could build his interest further, especially if he gets to help build the reason for the road. Buying equipment and structures then has a specific goal beyond "that looks neat". Not that there's anything wrong with getting something for the layout because it looks great! Enjoy!

[der5997]

Total New Guy: rail61's suggestions are good and valid, but may be a wee bit advanced for your 4 year old son :-) [ and N scale might be a challenge for tiny hands] File them for future refernce however, because a railroad without a purpose tends to gather dust ,while broken bits don't get fixed quickly. The bit about the books, and some sort of theme I'd use right away. Your boy can understand that you have to take the car to the gas station, and that he gets hungry, so making the trains stop for a purpose, and go on a particuar journey may be a way to relate purpose for the railroad to his experience. This could build his interest further, especially if he gets to help build the reason for the road. Buying equipment and structures then has a specific goal beyond "that looks neat". Not that there's anything wrong with getting something for the layout because it looks great! Enjoy!

[Anonymous]

I would go HO or N - the two leaders. Quality is about the same. If you want to appreciate detail on the locomotives, cars, etc, go HO. If you want to look at longer trains, go N. If you want the greatest variety of choices, go HO. N has a good enough selection to get buy without going brass - if you prefer.

My advice is: What about the railroad industry is it that attracts you to it? Slow freights? Fast freights? Passenger? Mountains? Plains? Industry? Modern? Urban? Rural? An era like 1946-59?

Decide what will visually please you, and what kind of operation will please you.

Then decide which scale will offer the best method of achieving what you want to see, feel, and experience as a model railroader.

Myself, I like Ultra-modern, double-track mainline, through the greater industrial Atlanta area, Intermodal-Coal-Merchandise mix, with a major merchandise yard (model the receiving/departure part only - 10 tracks), a few industrial support yards (four tracks) for the industries, and of course, today's bulk-transfer yard (six tracks) and a major intermodal yard (six strip tracks). I plan to add a commuter ovelay to the freight network.

Since industry is the reason the railroad operates, I did not model any structure that was not either a railroad customer or owned by the railroad itself. Some may disagree, but who cares? It's what makes me happy, and that's what counts. My railroad has a theme and a heart which anyone can see right away. It's busy moving freight and the railroad has no other job.

So, think what makes you happy and go for it.

Get some layout, scenery, and bridge/trestle design books, devour them, and start making plans!

Happy modeling!!!

[Anonymous]

I would go HO or N - the two leaders. Quality is about the same. If you want to appreciate detail on the locomotives, cars, etc, go HO. If you want to look at longer trains, go N. If you want the greatest variety of choices, go HO. N has a good enough selection to get buy without going brass - if you prefer.

My advice is: What about the railroad industry is it that attracts you to it? Slow freights? Fast freights? Passenger? Mountains? Plains? Industry? Modern? Urban? Rural? An era like 1946-59?

Decide what will visually please you, and what kind of operation will please you.

Then decide which scale will offer the best method of achieving what you want to see, feel, and experience as a model railroader.

Myself, I like Ultra-modern, double-track mainline, through the greater industrial Atlanta area, Intermodal-Coal-Merchandise mix, with a major merchandise yard (model the receiving/departure part only - 10 tracks), a few industrial support yards (four tracks) for the industries, and of course, today's bulk-transfer yard (six tracks) and a major intermodal yard (six strip tracks). I plan to add a commuter ovelay to the freight network.

Since industry is the reason the railroad operates, I did not model any structure that was not either a railroad customer or owned by the railroad itself. Some may disagree, but who cares? It's what makes me happy, and that's what counts. My railroad has a theme and a heart which anyone can see right away. It's busy moving freight and the railroad has no other job.

So, think what makes you happy and go for it.

Get some layout, scenery, and bridge/trestle design books, devour them, and start making plans!

Happy modeling!!!

[Anonymous]

Have you thought about ON-30. It very space efficient, has lots of nice engines for very reasonable prices, and you can use any O scale building or accessory. Happy Bill

[Anonymous]

Have you thought about ON-30. It very space efficient, has lots of nice engines for very reasonable prices, and you can use any O scale building or accessory. Happy Bill

[der5997]

JD: Reliability has improved remarkably, and so have couplers. I mention these because your bright lad is going to get bored fast with running trains around and around. Switching with some purpose will keep him amused and entertained for hours! Switching is so much better now that even ready to run cars and locos are to be had with realistic knuckle couplers and magnetic uncouplers. Just a thought. (I'm assuming you'll go for HO as a comprimise between tactile and motor skills considerations, and those of overall budget! thinking of which, you may be wanting to hang on to your old power pack. If it isn't a transistorised unit, I wouldn't bother. The smoothness of control and other features of today's packs are so much more satisfactory than those made with just a variable resistor)

[der5997]

JD: Reliability has improved remarkably, and so have couplers. I mention these because your bright lad is going to get bored fast with running trains around and around. Switching with some purpose will keep him amused and entertained for hours! Switching is so much better now that even ready to run cars and locos are to be had with realistic knuckle couplers and magnetic uncouplers. Just a thought. (I'm assuming you'll go for HO as a comprimise between tactile and motor skills considerations, and those of overall budget! thinking of which, you may be wanting to hang on to your old power pack. If it isn't a transistorised unit, I wouldn't bother. The smoothness of control and other features of today's packs are so much more satisfactory than those made with just a variable resistor)

[MRTerry]

Dear JD,
Welcome back! I'm happy to say that it's now simple to find reliable trains in any scale, from Z and N up through G. I'd recommend finding a hobby shop in your area and asking them to let you see a few locomotives in action before you decide. HO is most popular, and that's as small as I would recommend going for a layout that a young person will also be building. It's not suitable for an early grade-school student who is unsupervised, though - but children do grow fast! O remains very popular as well, and it's easiest for small hands to put on the track. As far as your interest in electronics, at this point it's a bit simpler to integrate a PC and other electronics into HO scale than O.
Have fun!
Terry

[MRTerry]

Dear JD,
Welcome back! I'm happy to say that it's now simple to find reliable trains in any scale, from Z and N up through G. I'd recommend finding a hobby shop in your area and asking them to let you see a few locomotives in action before you decide. HO is most popular, and that's as small as I would recommend going for a layout that a young person will also be building. It's not suitable for an early grade-school student who is unsupervised, though - but children do grow fast! O remains very popular as well, and it's easiest for small hands to put on the track. As far as your interest in electronics, at this point it's a bit simpler to integrate a PC and other electronics into HO scale than O.
Have fun!
Terry

[Anonymous]

I left the hobby thirty years ago, and through grandsons, then ages 4 and (twins) 6, became active again.

Re age: When I found the four year old backing an engine into a siding, copling onto a drag, bringing it out on the main and delighting in creeping starts and smooth coupling in HO, I decided to stick with HO.

I've found the power packs and engines (provided you don't go to the "bottom of the line" - $70.00 and under - units) reliable and very smooth at low speeds needed for coupling and uncoupling.
Track options are many, the easiest of which is the "snap" track variety.

I use a 12 x 12 bedroom and have constructed a cab control system with a stub end yard, three cabs, a reversing loop under the upper level, tw 2% grades and two industrial areas, one with three sideings, one with four.

The boys, now 7 and 9 delight in building cuts of cars, servicing industries, pulling power out of either the roundhouse (via the ATLAS turntable) or the steam engine facility coupling to a drag and pulling it out on the main.

Come on in, the waters fine.

George

[Anonymous]

I left the hobby thirty years ago, and through grandsons, then ages 4 and (twins) 6, became active again.

Re age: When I found the four year old backing an engine into a siding, copling onto a drag, bringing it out on the main and delighting in creeping starts and smooth coupling in HO, I decided to stick with HO.

I've found the power packs and engines (provided you don't go to the "bottom of the line" - $70.00 and under - units) reliable and very smooth at low speeds needed for coupling and uncoupling.
Track options are many, the easiest of which is the "snap" track variety.

I use a 12 x 12 bedroom and have constructed a cab control system with a stub end yard, three cabs, a reversing loop under the upper level, tw 2% grades and two industrial areas, one with three sideings, one with four.

The boys, now 7 and 9 delight in building cuts of cars, servicing industries, pulling power out of either the roundhouse (via the ATLAS turntable) or the steam engine facility coupling to a drag and pulling it out on the main.

Come on in, the waters fine.

George

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by jdhermit

Hoping to get some advice here...
Had HO scale as a kid, but haven't done anything in 25 years or so...
Still have my HO, but only a few cars, couple engines, and an old transformer...no tracks or buildings.
I want to get back into railroading...but very unsure as to which way to go.
I do remember the HO's being somewhat unreliable, but have things changed since then? Besides space considerations what are some differences btwn the gauges? I've got pretty good room, so can go with O gauge...
I want to do this with my 4 year old...I know, you'll say go with O b/c of the size...but my son is very advanced for his age, and that really won't be a consideration.
What about price? Seems like O is expensive...compared to what I thought it would cost...how are the other gauges compared?
Just any help would be appreciated for someone knowing NOTHING about the current state of Model Railroading...
Also, I'm interested in doing lots with electronic wiring, interface with a PC, automation, anything like that, if that plays a role in which gauge I should choose...


thanks,

jdhermit

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by jdhermit

Hoping to get some advice here...
Had HO scale as a kid, but haven't done anything in 25 years or so...
Still have my HO, but only a few cars, couple engines, and an old transformer...no tracks or buildings.
I want to get back into railroading...but very unsure as to which way to go.
I do remember the HO's being somewhat unreliable, but have things changed since then? Besides space considerations what are some differences btwn the gauges? I've got pretty good room, so can go with O gauge...
I want to do this with my 4 year old...I know, you'll say go with O b/c of the size...but my son is very advanced for his age, and that really won't be a consideration.
What about price? Seems like O is expensive...compared to what I thought it would cost...how are the other gauges compared?
Just any help would be appreciated for someone knowing NOTHING about the current state of Model Railroading...
Also, I'm interested in doing lots with electronic wiring, interface with a PC, automation, anything like that, if that plays a role in which gauge I should choose...


thanks,

jdhermit

[Anonymous]

Hoping to get some advice here...
Had HO scale as a kid, but haven't done anything in 25 years or so...
Still have my HO, but only a few cars, couple engines, and an old transformer...no tracks or buildings.
I want to get back into railroading...but very unsure as to which way to go.
I do remember the HO's being somewhat unreliable, but have things changed since then? Besides space considerations what are some differences btwn the gauges? I've got pretty good room, so can go with O gauge...
I want to do this with my 4 year old...I know, you'll say go with O b/c of the size...but my son is very advanced for his age, and that really won't be a consideration.
What about price? Seems like O is expensive...compared to what I thought it would cost...how are the other gauges compared?
Just any help would be appreciated for someone knowing NOTHING about the current state of Model Railroading...
Also, I'm interested in doing lots with electronic wiring, interface with a PC, automation, anything like that, if that plays a role in which gauge I should choose...


thanks,

jdhermit

[Anonymous]

Hoping to get some advice here...
Had HO scale as a kid, but haven't done anything in 25 years or so...
Still have my HO, but only a few cars, couple engines, and an old transformer...no tracks or buildings.
I want to get back into railroading...but very unsure as to which way to go.
I do remember the HO's being somewhat unreliable, but have things changed since then? Besides space considerations what are some differences btwn the gauges? I've got pretty good room, so can go with O gauge...
I want to do this with my 4 year old...I know, you'll say go with O b/c of the size...but my son is very advanced for his age, and that really won't be a consideration.
What about price? Seems like O is expensive...compared to what I thought it would cost...how are the other gauges compared?
Just any help would be appreciated for someone knowing NOTHING about the current state of Model Railroading...
Also, I'm interested in doing lots with electronic wiring, interface with a PC, automation, anything like that, if that plays a role in which gauge I should choose...


thanks,

jdhermit