QUOTE: Originally posted by talon104 MAbruce, - you give character to this forum and you have your opinions is what i was trying to say , The intent was to try and get everyone on the same page ,make suggestion, then everyone try to figure out how to impliment them. THanks for your interest in what i have to say MAbruce respectfully Chris
QUOTE: Originally posted by grande man QUOTE: Originally posted by rolleiman That's why I don't go to the trouble anymore.. Not within the forums anyway.. Jeff, that's my point exactly! Wouldn't it be great if experienced modelers felt like it was worthwhile to post technique here? It could easily be made into just such a place.
QUOTE: Originally posted by rolleiman That's why I don't go to the trouble anymore.. Not within the forums anyway..
QUOTE: Originally posted by rolleiman While I appreciate and respect the talent, skill, and writing of people like Joe Fugate on this forum, I don't think his clinic style, full of "good job" and "me too" posts make it easy to extract the information he is trying to convey. I think they would be Much easier to gleen the information out of if he hosted them on his own website and simply posted a link, to a sticky, where the information can be accessed in a more pure form. Jeff
Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon
Chip
Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse Jeff, Maybe this fits with what you are saying, but I have given Joe a hearty good job a couple times. However, the purpose of doing such was to bump the thread (N to say that you weren't doing a good job, Joe.) I think that maybe others had the same idea. However, I had not thought that doing so would mess up the search function.
http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=5959
If one could roll back the hands of time... They would be waiting for the next train into the future. A. H. Francey 1921-2007
- Mark
QUOTE: Originally posted by grande man Guys, when experienced modelers (like Joe) aren't posting how-to's because of the outlined issues, we all lose. It's good to know positive changes are coming.
Mark P.
Website: http://www.thecbandqinwyoming.comVideos: https://www.youtube.com/user/mabrunton
QUOTE: Originally posted by CNJ831 QUOTE: Originally posted by grande man Guys, when experienced modelers (like Joe) aren't posting how-to's because of the outlined issues, we all lose. It's good to know positive changes are coming. Something regarding this and many other points, that is continually overlooked, is the fact that Kalmbach is in business to make a profit and a large part of that comes from selling their ever expanding line of How To books. Posting a host of How To, stickie, or permanent, clinics on-line would certainly not be in their best financial interest. In fact, I think they would consider it a very poor idea indeed. In considering any advice/suggestions to Bergie/MR/Kalmbach, try to keep in mind how your suggestions might impact the company. Many of the suggestions made here have been harmless and could be easily implemented (dropping those stupid stars, for instance!). However, a number of the more complex, time consuming, expensive suggestions, or those harmful to the company's business, would make me consider pulling the plug rather than to institute them if I were in their place. So, employ a little more careful thought toward the company's interests before asking for all manner of changes. What we have here is a gift, not a right. CNJ831
QUOTE: Originally posted by CNJ831 QUOTE: Originally posted by grande man Guys, when experienced modelers (like Joe) aren't posting how-to's because of the outlined issues, we all lose. It's good to know positive changes are coming. Something regarding this and many other points, that is continually overlooked, is the fact that Kalmbach is in business to make a profit and a large part of that comes from selling their ever expanding line of How To books. Posting a host of How To, stickie, or permanent, clinics on-line would certainly not be in their best financial interest. In fact, I think they would consider it a very poor idea indeed.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Brunton Most of the "How -to" threads everyone is moaning about being buried really belong over in the "Layouts and Layout Building" forum anyway. They wouldn't get pushed down nearly so fast over there. Adding a bunch of other categories wouldn't help since obviously people ignore the categories and post almost everything here anyway.
Owner and superintendant of the N scale Texas Colorado & Western Railway, a protolanced representaion of the BNSF from Fort Worth, TX through Wichita Falls TX and into Colorado.
Check out the TC&WRy on at https://www.facebook.com/TCWRy
Check out my MRR How-To YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/c/RonsTrainsNThings
QUOTE: Originally posted by n2mopac I, like many others, have truly enjoyed the clinics posted by Joe Fugate and others. As expressed above, I think I would benefit from a separate category for such substantive threads and one for real questions and answers posted by and responded to by those who truly need help or have good help to offer about modeling solutions. Nothing frustrates me more--for myself and others as well--than to see a question raised and one or two (sometimes none) responses offered.