Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Are trains getting uglier?

5323 views
70 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 3:33 PM
The only modern engines I have a problem with as far as their looks are concerned are switchers. They remind me of my ex-wife!. Need I say more...
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 3:13 PM
There is no competition in the locomotive market. I think GE and GMD don't think they have to design anything better looking (and I guess they don't). They are more involved trying to meet the tougher EPA regulations and such. Come to think of it, 18-wheelers are going the same direction. Most trucks on the road are the ant-eater design. You don't see cab-overs any more, which I thought were butt-ugly anyway.
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Massachusetts
  • 664 posts
Posted by mustanggt on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:51 PM
Actually, I think Trains are getting easier on the eyes- well, the equipment and not the paint. UP is the worst. That yellow's been around since, the 30's? Anyway, I like the look of an F40PH or F59PH better than the old "bulldog nose" F units. Also, you have to admit Dash 8's and Dash 9's are prettier than the U boats with their ugly little short hood. And some people dislike the euro- inspired styling of the AMD103/P40/P42? I love it![:D]

P.S. I hope I did'nt offend anyone that likes old trains. But anything is prettier than the BL2, right?
C280 rollin'
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:36 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse

I posted this on another thread, but this one rolls past my door. I think it looks pretty good.



I actually think that the low-nose EMD cab isn't that bad. It's those new SD wide noses and the GE wide noses I'm talking about.
Trainboy
P.S. SteamerFan, you have to agree that F units look better than the new SD cab.

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:28 PM
of course they're getting uglier, they've nbeen getting uglier since the day they decided steam was no more. Only way they'll get better looking is to bring steam back. :)
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:23 PM
I posted this on another thread, but this one rolls past my door. I think it looks pretty good.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:08 PM
AC4400CW and SD90/43MAC
I don't like Candy Apple Red as much as the old Action red. It is too dark, and with a little dirt or exhaust looks like crap.
Trainboy

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:00 PM
I think the locomotives that CP is currently using (don't know diesel, so can't say what they are) are nice looking.

It seems to me that, when diesels were first introduced, we were at the tail end of the Art Decco and Buck Rogers eras, so it should come as no surprise that the newest type of (future) locos should be rocket-like in appearance. Now, however, with rail competing against trucks and other forms of tpt, keeping solvent is the name of the game. It is now function, not form.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 1:48 PM
I don't think so. Most modern American train designers seem to think that European trains are the epitomy of style. Bull; they're at LEAST as ugly as they've always been, which is why American railroads traditionally didn't copy them in the first place. If some doofus designer tried to create stylish modern freight engines for this market, they'd end up looking like a suppository (or worse).

And the F-series by EMD is generally considered to be the "standard" American stylish diesel. Even though they haven't been seen regularly on the rails in almost 30 years, you can show Joe Public a nose-on profile of an F, and the'll immediately recognize it (Metra still uses it on their "train station here" sign). And the F is a freight engine.

Personally, I think anything not steam or at least first generation diesel paint scheme is ugly as sin.

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 1:40 PM
Locomotives today are more focused on function rather than form as they were in the '40s and '50s due mainly to the fact that they are freight and not passenger oriented. If there was a significant change in our transportation habits back to long distance trains, I am sure there would be a lot of re-styling done.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Are trains getting uglier?
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 1:30 PM
When I look back to the cab units of the '40s and '50s, they look so nice, especially EMD Es and Fs, in that deep gloss coat that they applied. Then we went to the high nose geep. That was a step down. *** Dilworth did, as it says in "Nicholas Morant's Canadian Pacific", design an "Ugly duckling". Then we got to the low nose units. They look pretty nice, but they still don't compare with Fs. Then we got into the wide nose phase. The 2 window SD60s and 70s look niceish with their rounded nose. Meanwhile, GE designed their own wide cab. In my mind it is quite ugly. And now we have that new wide nose from GMD. It looks like it was designed around a door, and made from scrap metal. Compared to F-units, it is[censored]ugly. What do you think? Will they continue to get boxier and uglier, like they have done?
Trainboy

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!