Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Who runs DC only?

12664 views
149 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • 2,297 posts
Posted by Burlington Northern #24 on Sunday, June 14, 2015 7:36 PM
I still have my DC power packs, I'm a convert though. Era and road swap pretty much made a DCC swap easy.

SP&S modeler, 1960's give or take a decade or two for some equipment.

 http://www.youtube.com/user/SGTDUPREY?feature=guide 

Gary DuPrey

N scale model railroader 

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 83 posts
Posted by theodorefisk on Sunday, June 14, 2015 7:27 PM

Floridaflyer - you are off base. I have no issue with those that use DCC. But do it prototypically or at least not toy train like. At a show that happens annually, I see trains being run as if they were racing, ON THE SAME TRACK, SAME DIRECTION. In normal operation, two trains should not occupy the same block. What I saw was the train following the other one very close to the front trains caboose. Do all do that? probably not. But doing it at all is running trains stupidly and DCC allows that to happen. Any club should have rules. 

Staying with DC as it is easy to understand. I have read the DCC column in MR and while it is interesting, I rather stay with something I understand as I am more interested in running my trains than getting screwed up in some technological nightmare that takes away from the hobby I  enjoy. MY OPINION. 

Ted

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Sebring FL
  • 842 posts
Posted by floridaflyer on Sunday, June 14, 2015 3:43 PM

What does running trains stupidly, ie fast, have to do with wether or not the control system is DC or DCC? I believe the trains will go equally fast regardless of power source. Perhaps a shot at DCC users is more to the point. Which system to use is a personel choice based on the needs of the owner of the railroad. both systems allow for the railroad to be run the way the owner wishes.  

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 83 posts
Posted by theodorefisk on Sunday, June 14, 2015 3:14 PM

I have been DC since the mid 60s and I have so much invested, that adding DCC would add to the expense. Since I do not run on anyone else's layout, I am happy with DC and block selectors. 

I agree with other posters on this subject that I have seen a lot of DCC operating layouts run stupidly, as if they were racing their trains. Model railroading can be a lot of fun, if you just run like real railroads do. 

Staying with DC. 

  • Member since
    April 2015
  • 72 posts
Posted by DRfan on Sunday, June 14, 2015 5:04 AM

Hi,  I am a DC railroader.  There are several reasons I am staying with it as well.  I have a very small amount of space available for my hobby (no basement in my house) so I have a 4' x 6' layout.  Although I have managed to create a nice layout with the small space, I don't really see how DCC could be any advantage since all of my trains have a single locomotive and the average length is only 5-8 pieces of rolling stock.  The only thing DCC might add for me is sound but since my layout is in a small spare bedroom next to all the other bedroooms, I don't thing my family would appreciate it since I am a nocturnal railroader.  The other thing keeping me away from DCC is cost, I have a limited hobby budget (I run mostly Athearn RTR, Walthers Mainline and Atlas Trainman).  I am happy with DC and plan to stick with it.

  • Member since
    April 2013
  • 917 posts
Posted by Southgate on Sunday, June 14, 2015 2:04 AM

This discussion has remained friendly and respectful, even as some varying opinions have been presented.  Hats off to ya gents!

I doubt DC will ever go away completely. I've enjoyed hearing the input since the last time this subject went this big, a couple years ago Dan

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Saturday, June 13, 2015 7:11 PM

Paul, just to refresh, my biggest reason for not going DCC is lack of interest in sound, and little need for its other features. I could "aford it", I choose not to - it would be a big expense on my layout for very little gain. 

With CTC and signaing you need a complex wiring infrastructure anyway - that can deliver the track power at no extra cost.

I don't like onboard sound in HO.

I'm not into helper service.

I model the 50's - loco lighting is not an issue - no ditch lights or other fancy lighting rules.

I model the 50's  - most diesels still ran as matched sets.

I model the 50's  - all my "plastic brass" steam locos that I would want to double/triple head, do that just fine on DC without consisting or speed matching - just like my fleet of diesels does.

So what would I gain from DCC - more flexible operation in the engine terminal - pretty expensive upgrade - easily $3,000 for me.

A handfull of $2 kill switches handles that problem.

And the biggest "cost" of DCC for me would be the time to install 130 decoders and possibly have to speed match dozens of sets of locos - that time is worth way more than the $3000 for decoders and throttles.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Saturday, June 13, 2015 7:00 PM

Paul3

Sheldon,
My point to Rick (especially Rick...we're both in the NHRHTA and I've known him personally for years) is that using the "I've got hundreds of locos so I can't afford DCC!" argument is not justifiable.  The argument used is that the lack of money is the big reason why one won't go DCC.  My counter-argument is that folks who have hundreds of locos have the resources to go DCC, it's just tied up in physical assets.

The real argument is that they aren't willing to go DCC for other reasons.  And perhaps one of those reasons is that they prefer collecting locos over learning DCC.  Instead of saying that, however, it's easier to just say "I can't afford it."

And there's nothing wrong with using DC, DCC, DCS, or AC (for all I care).  But I do wish folks would be a bit more in depth in their reasoning.  Sheldon, we've been down this road a lot, so I know why you're DC, but Rick is rather infamous in the NHRHTA for being anti-DCC (the catcalls from the peanut gallery at the various RPM shows have been amusing about the whole thing).  So, yes, I'm yanking his chain a bit with this one...

Oh, and FWIW, I hated the Aristo radio throttle interface when I tried them out.  The buttons are hard on one's fingers, or at least on mine.  Give me a knob every time.

Paul A. Cutler III

 

I don't mind a knob - if it has a stopping and starting point.......

Don't understand why the buttons would be hard on your fingers? You only push them to make changes in speed or direction?

I did not know if I would like it, a guy let me borrow one for a month - I was hooked.

Again, one of my big issues with DCC is all the handhelds are poorly designed in my view. But I do have built in prejudice since I have no interest in turning on lights, playing sounds, operating turnouts, and so forth.

I don't want or need two throttle wheels, 32 buttons and display I can't even see.

I can hold my Aristo throttle in one hand and without looking - go faster - go slower - go east - go west - stop in emergency.

Simple is better.

 

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: North Carolina
  • 13 posts
Posted by MGHR59 on Saturday, June 13, 2015 6:58 PM

Interesting subject and good comments.  I've read all the posts to this point. I'm DC all the way with a dozen or so brass engines, mostly steam and some plastic 1st generation diesels (HO).  I've been putting my double track dogbone and branchline  together for about 40 years; 5 years on, five years off...at this rate you can bet I'm not going DCC, might be a good choice for a newbie.  I have a bunch of hobbies that divert me while the light on the horizon is steadily growing dimmer.

Ed

  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Massachusetts
  • 2,899 posts
Posted by Paul3 on Saturday, June 13, 2015 3:41 PM

Sheldon,
My point to Rick (especially Rick...we're both in the NHRHTA and I've known him personally for years) is that using the "I've got hundreds of locos so I can't afford DCC!" argument is not justifiable.  The argument used is that the lack of money is the big reason why one won't go DCC.  My counter-argument is that folks who have hundreds of locos have the resources to go DCC, it's just tied up in physical assets.

The real argument is that they aren't willing to go DCC for other reasons.  And perhaps one of those reasons is that they prefer collecting locos over learning DCC.  Instead of saying that, however, it's easier to just say "I can't afford it."

And there's nothing wrong with using DC, DCC, DCS, or AC (for all I care).  But I do wish folks would be a bit more in depth in their reasoning.  Sheldon, we've been down this road a lot, so I know why you're DC, but Rick is rather infamous in the NHRHTA for being anti-DCC (the catcalls from the peanut gallery at the various RPM shows have been amusing about the whole thing).  So, yes, I'm yanking his chain a bit with this one...

Oh, and FWIW, I hated the Aristo radio throttle interface when I tried them out.  The buttons are hard on one's fingers, or at least on mine.  Give me a knob every time.

Paul A. Cutler III

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 42 posts
Posted by gbcutter on Saturday, June 13, 2015 12:15 PM

I also run DC only, mainly for the cost and simplicity of wiring. I am the sole operator, no complicated switching or scheduling - I just like to see a train running through my scenery. I use the Stapleton PWM throttle, and am not impressed by the scale-sized sound on most layouts. No matter how 'realistic' it sounds, it's still sounds 'small'.

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Saturday, June 13, 2015 12:07 PM

Larry,

A little off topic, but in the early 50's in grammer school, Chgo. Bridgeport to be precise, I lived on a dead-end st. next to a Industrial area, which was less than a 1/2 mile from my house, right next to the South branch of the Chgo river, which had a gigantic covered grain elevator, which got the grain from covered river barges, in turn they loaded it into 40ft boxcars, many boxcars, the one's with the doors partially open and wooden grain planks covering 3/4 of the opening. Also there were many tank cars for the other industries, animal fat etc. Anyway to make a long story short..the Illinois Central with RS1's/2's used to switch that yard at nite mostly, starting at 9:00pm. I remember laying in bed and listening to the RS turbo's going to full power and then stop, back to idle and then count how long it would take to hear the bang when the cars they cut would hit the ones that were standing on the track. I guess that was switching on the fly and classification, another set of engines would come by in the morning and do more of a precise switching. I got to know the day crew very well and at times, if they were not real busy, they would let me ride in the cab. I remember a water cooler in the cab...for drinking and a very heavy oder of diesel fuel and exhaust. To this day...I will never forget those experiences. When I lived nearer to downtown Chgo. in the 40's. I saw 0-6-0's and 0-8-0's doing about the same thing...a lot more noisier though.  Memories....Sigh

Take Care! Big Smile

Frank

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Saturday, June 13, 2015 9:34 AM

BRAKIE

 

 
ATLANTIC CENTRAL
Yes, everyone's idea of fun is different. I find being the engineer rather boring, much more interesting to be the dispatcher, or railroad vice president, or a railfan.

 

Sheldon,Just for fun(underscore that) I seriously doubt if many could switch cars on my ISL using one of my DCC/Sound or DC locomotives without getting into trouble.

Why is that?

I have momentum,speed step and start voltage CV set in my DCC/Sound locomotives where one doesn't simply start or stop by twisting the knob.

I can do the same settings in the DC mode of my MRC Tech 6.I program the T-6 by adjusting momentum and start volt and every DC engine I own will respond to those settings and again there's no simple knob twisting to stop or start...

Like a real engineer you have the weight of the cars and their momentum to overcome after the switchman gives a "that will do" or a stop  hand signal and plan your coupling where it's a "kiss" coupling and not  a crash coupling..Starting a move is slow as well.

That type of switching realism isn't for everybody but,its load of fun for me. 

 

Larry,

Things are similar here. The Aristo throttles have a momenum that is preset at one of five levels. I have mine set on the lowest, or no momentum in theory, but in reality there is still a small momentum.

The push button controls for "faster" and "slower" have "ramp up/ramp down" speed even set on zero momentum. So the effect is similar to what you describe.

So just like you, and real life, you must "learn" the feel of each loco for switching, with and without a load.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Saturday, June 13, 2015 6:09 AM

ATLANTIC CENTRAL
Yes, everyone's idea of fun is different. I find being the engineer rather boring, much more interesting to be the dispatcher, or railroad vice president, or a railfan.

Sheldon,Just for fun(underscore that) I seriously doubt if many could switch cars on my ISL using one of my DCC/Sound or DC locomotives without getting into trouble.

Why is that?

I have momentum,speed step and start voltage CV set in my DCC/Sound locomotives where one doesn't simply start or stop by twisting the knob.

I can do the same settings in the DC mode of my MRC Tech 6.I program the T-6 by adjusting momentum and start volt and every DC engine I own will respond to those settings and again there's no simple knob twisting to stop or start...

Like a real engineer you have the weight of the cars and their momentum to overcome after the switchman gives a "that will do" or a stop  hand signal and plan your coupling where it's a "kiss" coupling and not  a crash coupling..Starting a move is slow as well.

That type of switching realism isn't for everybody but,its load of fun for me. 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Saturday, June 13, 2015 12:18 AM

Paul3

Rick,
Ha!  Not for nothing, man, but you could sell off a few of those 600 locos and easily afford the cost of DCC installations for the rest of them...and for your layout...and for several other people's layouts.  What's the going rate for an EP-5?  Whistling

As you know, I'm a member of a large club (and Operations Chairman), and I don't expect Operators to be 100% realistic at all times.  Why?  Because it's a hobby, not a job.  I'm lucky if I can get them to stop at a red signal.  Sure, I want them to follow the club rules, but those rules are kept simple (about 2 pages of text) because there's a fine line between "fun" and "work".  Just remember, Rick, the railroad had to pay you to work everyday.  In our hobby, the "workers" have to pay to work, and maybe once a month to run trains.  There's only so many rules that people will follow before they tell you to take a hike.  Laugh

My next door neighbor walked me through a real TTO experience on his layout once.  It took a while.  "To C&E Extra 1201 o-n-e-t-w-o-n-a-u-g-h-t-o-n-e, at Attleboro a-t-t-l-e-b-o-r-o...", etc. while I filled in the Form, then I had to repeat it back to him, etc.  No way would my club put up with that.

Paul A. Cutler III

 

And that is the beauty of a system like mine. It does not "require" the engineers to know a lot about prototype operation, and the sytem is easy for new engineers to learn, especially in dispatcher mode. The throttles are simple, and if they over run their authorized territory, their train simply stops - nothing bad happens.

Sure the dispatcher must know the layout, but even his duties have been "streamlined" compared with the prototype. But it still has a very prototype feel for those who appreciate that.

As for selling off engines to fund DCC - I've recieved that comment as well in the past - but it takes all 130 locos/powered units on the ACR to protect the schedules of the 25-30 train in the session.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Massachusetts
  • 2,899 posts
Posted by Paul3 on Friday, June 12, 2015 10:54 PM

Rick,
Ha!  Not for nothing, man, but you could sell off a few of those 600 locos and easily afford the cost of DCC installations for the rest of them...and for your layout...and for several other people's layouts.  What's the going rate for an EP-5?  Whistling

As you know, I'm a member of a large club (and Operations Chairman), and I don't expect Operators to be 100% realistic at all times.  Why?  Because it's a hobby, not a job.  I'm lucky if I can get them to stop at a red signal.  Sure, I want them to follow the club rules, but those rules are kept simple (about 2 pages of text) because there's a fine line between "fun" and "work".  Just remember, Rick, the railroad had to pay you to work everyday.  In our hobby, the "workers" have to pay to work, and maybe once a month to run trains.  There's only so many rules that people will follow before they tell you to take a hike.  Laugh

My next door neighbor walked me through a real TTO experience on his layout once.  It took a while.  "To C&E Extra 1201 o-n-e-t-w-o-n-a-u-g-h-t-o-n-e, at Attleboro a-t-t-l-e-b-o-r-o...", etc. while I filled in the Form, then I had to repeat it back to him, etc.  No way would my club put up with that.

Paul A. Cutler III

  • Member since
    July 2014
  • 175 posts
Posted by Bernd on Friday, June 12, 2015 2:27 PM

I run DC, AC, or DCC with a Deltang R/C receivers.

Bernd

New York, Vermont & Northern Rwy. - Route of the Black Diamonds

protolancer(at)kingstonemodelworks(dot)com

  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Corpus Christi, Texas
  • 2,377 posts
Posted by leighant on Friday, June 12, 2015 2:00 PM

I HOPE to run DC only soon on a "real" layout.  I do have a tiny portable layout that runs DC only, from choice of a power pack, or a 9 volt battery when taking it to the wilderness.  I dismantled my old "big" layout several years ago, and haven't gotten the room cleared yet to get the new layout ready to run at all.  I have DC locos I bought 45 years ago that I am going to paint for my chosen RR and fit with MTL couplers some day.  So I am not about to change to DCC.  (Unless I get things halfway going and decide I want to...)

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Friday, June 12, 2015 1:21 PM

Bob Schuknecht

 

 
Rick Abramson

 I've been to op sessions on DCC layouts and have never seen such non-prototypical railroading. Most have no dispatchers and operators throw mainline switches on their own. That is totally rediculous! 

 

 

 

Are they having fun? If so, maybe that is more important than following FRA rules.

 

 

Yes, everyone's idea of fun is different. I find being the engineer rather boring, much more interesting to be the dispatcher, or railroad vice president, or a railfan.

My layout is designed for good display running and group CTC/signaled operation - no DCC needed in either case.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 12, 2015 1:17 PM

ATLANTIC CENTRAL

 

 
Sir Madog

Sheldon,

 

isn´t it a great hobby! It offers so much for just about any interest! You´d like to be the chief of operations - great. I prefer to be an engineer, so that´s why DCC is my choice, even for the little layout I eventually will have, once I have overcome the limitations of a recent stroke.

 

 

 

Yes, it is.

And I have said over and over, for many modelers, and their specific goals DCC is the best choice. But it is far from the best choice for EVERY set of goals, especially when viewed from cost/benefit point of view.

Wish you well on your recovery.

Sheldon 

 

Sheldon - I think that sentence sums it up nicely!

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Friday, June 12, 2015 12:55 PM

Sir Madog

Sheldon,

 

isn´t it a great hobby! It offers so much for just about any interest! You´d like to be the chief of operations - great. I prefer to be an engineer, so that´s why DCC is my choice, even for the little layout I eventually will have, once I have overcome the limitations of a recent stroke.

 

Yes, it is.

And I have said over and over, for many modelers, and their specific goals DCC is the best choice. But it is far from the best choice for EVERY set of goals, especially when viewed from cost/benefit point of view.

Wish you well on your recovery.

Sheldon 

    

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 12, 2015 12:49 PM

Sheldon,

 

isn´t it a great hobby! It offers so much for just about any interest! You´d like to be the chief of operations - great. I prefer to be an engineer, so that´s why DCC is my choice, even for the little layout I eventually will have, once I have overcome the limitations of a recent stroke.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Friday, June 12, 2015 12:23 PM

Sir Madog

 

 
Rick Abramson
I've been to op sessions on DCC layouts and have never seen such non-prototypical railroading.

 

What´s that got to do with DCC?

Actually, DCC allows for more prototypical operation, as you can select your acceleration/deceleration parameters to simulate actual load. DCC puts you in the driver´s seat and not on a switchboard to direct the power.

I was hoping to read new "excuses" here for not going down the DCC route, but I have not found any. While it is perfectly to stay with DC if you have a large engine roster and/or an extensive layout, which is all wired-up for DC, I can´t understand those folks, who are just starting and stay with the horse-drawn buggy instead of driving a Porsche. Entry-level DCC command systems are not much more expensive than a decent power pack, and the cost of decoders (w/o sound) can be easily offset by the wire and switches you don´t have to buy if you want multiple train operation on your layout. Wiring a DCC layout is rather simple and you will have your trains up and running in a lot less time and effort.

 

Ulrich,

You are missing the point, as do many.

DCC puts you you more in the engineers seat - true. It allows you to be wrong, run red signals, move without proper clearance, etc.

Some modelers prefer to simulate the whole "process" of train movement on signal/CTC controlled trackage. That is a separate infrastructure above and beyond "making the train move".

DCC adds nothing to make that infrastructure easier to simulate/implement and well designed DC CTC/signal controlled layouts approach DCC in terms of the engineers "experiance" - without the cost - because you need the CTC/signaling infrastructure anyway, that same network can be used to direct track power at no measureable additional cost.

All of this applies mainly to large or moderate sized layouts designed to simulate the multi train movements on busy Class I railroads, typical of the US Northeast corridor and other high density locations.

It does not apply to the back woods branch line, etc.

To best understand it, one should read the articles in MR from the 70's about MZL control and about Bruce Chubb's original signal/control system.

Sure you have CTC and signaling with DCC - but having DCC will not save you one wire, or complexity over building a similar CTC/signaling system with DC.

So for some of us, CTC and signaling is way more important than the other features DCC brings to the table. And DCC adds potential complications some don't want or need.

Entry level DCC is worthless in my mind. My DC trackside radio throttles are better. My excuse is still the same, decoders/installs for 130 locos is money and time I don't want to spend that would add very little to my operational goals.

I don't have any interest in being the engineer of one loco on a 1/4 mile of branch line - I am the head operations chief for a busy sub division on eight miles of busy Class I railroad where train pass any given spot ever 5 minutes.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 12, 2015 11:50 AM

Rick Abramson
I've been to op sessions on DCC layouts and have never seen such non-prototypical railroading.

What´s that got to do with DCC?

Actually, DCC allows for more prototypical operation, as you can select your acceleration/deceleration parameters to simulate actual load. DCC puts you in the driver´s seat and not on a switchboard to direct the power.

I was hoping to read new "excuses" here for not going down the DCC route, but I have not found any. While it is perfectly to stay with DC if you have a large engine roster and/or an extensive layout, which is all wired-up for DC, I can´t understand those folks, who are just starting and stay with the horse-drawn buggy instead of driving a Porsche. Entry-level DCC command systems are not much more expensive than a decent power pack, and the cost of decoders (w/o sound) can be easily offset by the wire and switches you don´t have to buy if you want multiple train operation on your layout. Wiring a DCC layout is rather simple and you will have your trains up and running in a lot less time and effort.

  • Member since
    February 2013
  • From: Saginaw, MI
  • 205 posts
Posted by Bob Schuknecht on Friday, June 12, 2015 11:04 AM

Rick Abramson

 I've been to op sessions on DCC layouts and have never seen such non-prototypical railroading. Most have no dispatchers and operators throw mainline switches on their own. That is totally rediculous! 

 

Are they having fun? If so, maybe that is more important than following FRA rules.

  • Member since
    June 2015
  • 3 posts
Posted by anka on Friday, June 12, 2015 10:57 AM

DAVID FORTNEY
dave

  I agree with you Dave. AT my age I dont see that much advantages. I run with b.l.i. locos. with the d.c. master. this gives me all the great sounds I need.   GENE

  • Member since
    June 2015
  • 3 posts
Posted by anka on Friday, June 12, 2015 7:55 AM
I TOO RUB ON ONLY D.C. I THINK ITS FINE. GENE
  • Member since
    April 2014
  • 29 posts
Posted by Rick Abramson on Thursday, June 11, 2015 8:46 PM

My layout has 4 cabs and is strictly DC and will stay that way! Cramming engines full of decoders generates a large expense depending on the amount of engines and immediately restricts them from  running on a DC layout. I currently have over 600 engines. I've been to op sessions on DCC layouts and have never seen such non-prototypical railroading. Most have no dispatchers and operators throw mainline switches on their own. That is totally rediculous! I retired after 44 years on the RR. If there was such a thing as an HO or any other scale FRA, these layouts would be shut down.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • 288 posts
Posted by CNSF on Thursday, June 11, 2015 8:09 PM
Two layouts in my house. The big one (mine) is DCC; the small one (my son's, which I'm maintaining now that he's in his university/girls/no fixed address years) is straight DC. Both layouts do what they were designed to do very well, and isn't that the point? I also agree with those who don't think onboard sound is good enough to justify the extra cost/hassle. If you're in that camp, you might want to check out SoundTraxx's SurroundTrax system - it uses speakers placed under the layout (and supports sub-woofers!) I believe it does require DCC though, to track the train's location/direction/speed. Haven't taken the plunge yet myself as I have too many more pressing layout priorities, but I'm interested.
  • Member since
    January 2013
  • 1,034 posts
Posted by PM Railfan on Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:23 PM

I use only Antique Direct Current (or ADC if you will Laugh ) here too.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!