Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

New mainline rework

17251 views
137 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: Redmond, Wa.
  • 171 posts
Posted by glutrain on Thursday, September 19, 2013 12:18 AM

Nice fearless approach to improving your railroad! I have seen too many people lose interest because they get "stuck" on a concept. Not only will your mainline be more interesting to run, you have also given yourself the gift of improved scenery potential.

Don H.

 

  • Member since
    April 2012
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 771 posts
Posted by middleman on Thursday, September 19, 2013 12:44 AM

Michael:

 Those big modern diesels and long freight cars (not to mention your steam and passenger trains) will look much better on those curves,and the open access will make life easier...but I know it's hard to start tearin' things up!

Mike

Edit: Michael,since the crossover on the access bridge  is in the same direction(outside to inside when going counter-clockwise) as the left hand curved switch,would a right hand curved switch running back the other way give you more operational options? You'd be able to crossover from either track in either direction... I'm assuming the curved switch will be part of a crossover,too? If not,and you're just going from 2 to 3 tracks at the curved switch,ignore all this...

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,257 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:53 AM

Aaaaaaarrrrrrggggghhhhh !!!!!! Not another "hands on " modeling thread Surprise ,heck,and by another Michael.

Well done Sir. Yes

Cheers, the Bear. Beer

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Thursday, September 19, 2013 5:32 AM

A nice improvement, and I think you will see many advantages from an operating standpoint as well as visually.  I tried to be disciplined with sticking to my 38" minimum radius on my layout (the temptation is to go lower to make room for sidings and other features) and was able to be so, including the use of easement curves into that 38" minimum.  The temptations were always there however -- "gee if I made this curve tighter I'd have more room for a siding" and that sort of thing.

I did however find that in some places some of the features I wanted were getting too crowded out by the big curves, so in select places I was able to make use of the Peco "large radius" curved turnouts.  I think the large curve on the Peco is 60" radius which in some applications fit nicely with my easement curves.  While I prefer "normal" turnouts the Peco curved turnouts, the large radius ones, did open up some planning options that otherwise would not be there. 

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Thursday, September 19, 2013 8:57 AM

Michael,

That's a great improvement in appearance. 38" radius is good for operations, too.

I thought my own layout was substantially finished a few years back. But I've found operating it gives you ideas about what can be improved. If you didn't squeeze everything in super tight to begin with, it's pretty satisfying to find out that reconfiguring track arrangements is usually possible.

One thing I've found that helps for me to alter track locations and works if you use matte medium for binding ballast down is 91% alcohol in a mister and a flat paint scraper. Remove the spikes as best possible. Hose down the ballast with the 91%, let it soak for a minute or so, then slip the blade of the scraper under the track and gently lift. I've been able to slid track as much as an inch sideways like this. Done carefully, most of the ballast even stays in place and just needs touch-up. You may have to cut some grooves for you power feeders to lay in once shifted sideways if you don't take it up all the way and redrill the holes for the feeders. If you take up the piece of track, use a vacuum when the ballast is still wet and most of it will come right off, making track reuse a lot easier, too.

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:15 AM

Thanks everybody for all the suggestions and comment, much appreciated.

Sorry I forgot the track plan for this area. I wanted all scenery along that back wall, and have an Ethanol Plant there lower left. And the farm will be on the lower right side.

I'm also replacing the backdrop soon. With mountains and flat farmfields in the valley foreground.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Monday, September 23, 2013 12:29 PM

Got the scenery almost done in the corner there. Next will be tracks need ballast now.

I left the corner alone for now. I'm gonna create some hills, and a bunch of trees to hide the hole in the wall.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Monday, September 23, 2013 2:55 PM

Micahel,

It's looking better and better.Thumbs Up

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Monday, September 23, 2013 4:20 PM

Thanks Mike!

I also replaced the section of foam were the creek was. Oh boy was this a difficult task. The Magic Water I used had fused to the wood base. It took me an hour with the hammer claw. I didn't that that stuff was so hard.

The new river will be carved out, to the left of this about 14". The two crossing tracks will be here.

  

This is what it looked like before.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    November 2012
  • 613 posts
Posted by UPinCT on Monday, September 23, 2013 6:42 PM

Looking Great Michael.  What a long way you have come from where you started,

Keep us posted with photos.  Derek

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Friday, September 27, 2013 6:10 PM

Thanks Derek!

Got the ballast completed on the two tracks there in the corner. Now its time to start laying the inside tracks.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Saturday, September 28, 2013 1:06 AM

Michael,

Looking better and better.

So whatcha got planned for that corner? Obviously not the Moffat Tunnel...Wink

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: Cresco, IA
  • 1,773 posts
Posted by ChadLRyan on Saturday, September 28, 2013 1:40 AM

Michael,
Untill now I didn't realize how intense this project is.
You are doing a really great job, it will be really nice, & rewarding when you run those units through there again!

Thanks for Sharing!

Chad L Ryan
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, September 28, 2013 3:05 AM

Thanks guys, its been a lot of work, but I'm getting there.

Mike, I'm gonna build up some small hills in the corner, and plant a bunch of trees to hide the hole in the wall.

I just ordered the new backdrops. Its two 24" x 12' continuous scene photos. Mountains with flat farmfields valley in the foreground.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Saturday, September 28, 2013 4:35 AM

What I want to know is when are you gonna get back to work on the extension room portion of the layout?

Huh, huh, huh?   Super Angry

Rich

P.S.  Great work so far on the main room portion of the layout.  You must have someone doing the work for you.   Laugh

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, September 28, 2013 7:59 AM

Thanks Rich. I will start working on the extension room as soon as I get all this trackwork done in the main room. I hired some elves to help me.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Saturday, September 28, 2013 8:12 AM

We've heard that before, Michael.   LaughLaughLaugh

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:51 PM

Now I'm working on the inside two mainline tracks. Working it out to see if it everything fits ok.

The middle straight track will have an ME 160' Girder bridge spanning the river. And the inside curved track nearest the edge, will have a wood curved deck bridge.

And today the delivery man brought me this. The Vollmer truss bridge, to replace the Atlas truss bridge.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Heart of Georgia
  • 5,406 posts
Posted by Doughless on Saturday, September 28, 2013 7:41 PM

Michael, I've been following this rework and I think it is coming along very nicely.  Having that big operating pit is a great idea for accessibility and you'll get better scene separations too.  Change presents opportunity...and with your skills at making scenery, I think its going to look great.

- Douglas

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, September 29, 2013 4:11 AM

Michael, that is looking great, but help us out here a little.

In your most recent reply, you mentioned that the middle straight track will have an ME 160' Girder bridge spanning the river. And the inside curved track nearest the edge, will have a wood curved deck bridge. The Vollmer truss bridge will replace the Atlas truss bridge.

Which bridge is that in the background, and will it stay?

Why are you replacing the Atlas truss bridge?

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Sunday, September 29, 2013 8:37 AM

Yes the bridge in the background you see in the photo, against the wall, is the Atlas bridge. I just wanted a better bridge there.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Sunday, September 29, 2013 1:38 PM

I removed the Atlas bridge, and now test fitting the Vollmer bridge. Damn it looks better already.

I also re-painted the bridge abutments and weathered them with powders. Then I flared them out, and used light weight sparkling to fill it in.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, September 29, 2013 3:47 PM

Geez, that looks good, Michael.  You are really picking up the slack.   Laugh

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Sunday, September 29, 2013 8:30 PM

No slackin here, been going at it for several days, non stop.

Got the river carved out.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    November 2012
  • 613 posts
Posted by UPinCT on Sunday, September 29, 2013 9:02 PM

Looking great so far.  I do like the new bridge better.  Keep up the great work and keep us posted with pics.

Derek

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Monday, September 30, 2013 12:33 AM

Michael.

I agree. Replacing that bridge with a better looking one is a great upgrade. It makes that scene, so a better bridge makes that scene better.Yes

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, September 30, 2013 3:35 AM

While I will agree that the new Vollmer bridge looks darn good, I didn't see anything wrong with the Atlas bridge.  Both are pretty good looking bridges.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Monday, September 30, 2013 11:55 AM

Rich,

The Atlas is not a bad bridge, in fact it may even be to scale (I've not seen that particular bridge up close, so not sure). It's just that the Vollmer bridge has a more delicate look to it that pleases my eye better.

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, September 30, 2013 12:28 PM

Mike, I agree with you on that.  And, I am sure that is the reason that Michael replaced the Atlas bridge with the Vollmer bridge.

But, being from Shi-caw-ga, we like our bridges built outta blood and iron up here, not that pansy steel work being installed in the Denver area.   Laugh

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Monday, September 30, 2013 1:45 PM

Well there's a lot more bridges in Chi-town, then here in Denver. We have like two or three rivers in the entire state. So were on un-experienced out here in the west.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Monday, September 30, 2013 2:14 PM

Michael,

You mean,, Chi-Town,eh..But in Rich's case,,I don't know,,,Laugh Smile, Wink & Grin

Cheers, Drinks

Frank

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Monday, September 30, 2013 2:24 PM

Fixed, that just didn't look right. Ooops. LOL

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Monday, September 30, 2013 2:40 PM

Michael,

Yeah but,,,now we won't know what Rich's comment,would have been,,,,,it appears,now you made me the sacrificial lamb,,,,Laugh

Cheers, Drinks

Frank

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, September 30, 2013 5:09 PM

I was able to snap a photo of the Atlas truss bridge at the moment of its demolition by Michael.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Monday, September 30, 2013 5:47 PM

I'll bet that was hard to explain when the Fire Dept. showed up...Smile, Wink & Grin

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Monday, September 30, 2013 6:33 PM

I got the brass walkways delivered today. And I got ripped off, I don't have enough for both sides, only one side. So I'm getting a refund.

I found a solution. I have a bunch of extra parts from the Milwakee Station, and I found some pieces that fit perfectly for the walkways.

I need some opinions. What should I do???? leave it as is, or add these parts. I will paint them same grey color as the bridge, and weather them up with rust powders.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    November 2012
  • 613 posts
Posted by UPinCT on Monday, September 30, 2013 7:11 PM

Hey Rich,  That's a good job out of you getting that pic of Michael's bridge demo.

Hi Michael, I like the bridge without the walkways but what do I know.  You are going to get opinions on both ways.  Why don't you go with what way you like or how a bridge in your neck of the woods looks like.

My two cents, Derek

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Monday, September 30, 2013 7:43 PM

I just painted and weathered the walkways. I think it looks real good. I'm going with this I think.

The prototype bridge I'm looking to match.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    November 2012
  • 613 posts
Posted by UPinCT on Monday, September 30, 2013 7:46 PM

See problem solved looks great!

I do have a question, Is the new bridge longer in length than the old one or are they the same length?

Just curious, Derek

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Monday, September 30, 2013 7:50 PM

UPinCT

See problem solved looks great!

I do have a question, Is the new bridge longer in length than the old one or are they the same length?

Just curious, Derek

Thanks Derek! There's always a solution to MRR problems right?

This bridge was longer than the Atlas bridge, by about 3 inches. So I had to re-adjust the abutments back a little.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Monday, September 30, 2013 8:46 PM

A longer bridge always looks better IMO.

Those walkways look great. Given how far back in the scene the bridge is, more detailed walkways might be a waste of good parts. Use them up front for something else.

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2013
  • From: PA
  • 481 posts
Posted by Schuylkill and Susquehanna on Monday, September 30, 2013 8:54 PM

Looks great!

Looking at the photos, it looks like there is a wooden beam on either side of the tracks by the walkways.  These are the outside guard rails, and are about 5" x 8".  To model them, I'd recommend using 1/16 x 3/32 basswood or 3/32 x 3/32 basswood and stain it using an india ink wash.

I have a similar bridge I need to work on, and this is a really great thread for reference.

S&S

 

Modeling the Pennsy and loving it!

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Monday, September 30, 2013 9:48 PM

Thanks everybody! I appreciate that. I just finished weathering the bridge with powders. I will install the bridge track and walkways. Then I'll post up more photos.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Monday, September 30, 2013 11:49 PM

OK the bridge is finished. Weathered up and all.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Tuesday, October 1, 2013 12:48 AM

YesYesYesBeer

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Tuesday, October 1, 2013 2:38 AM

richhotrain

I was able to snap a photo of the Atlas truss bridge at the moment of its demolition by Michael.

Rich

Rich,

I see that you finally got some use out of that Chemistry Set..Laugh

Michael,,Good job so far,,looking good.Yes

Cheers, Drinks

Frank

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, October 1, 2013 9:46 AM

 You can all shoot me, but the Atlas bridge looks more like the one in the prototype photo (not the exploding one!). The Vollmer one is a lot more airy and open, because it represents a lighter rated bridge using smaller structural members.

             --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, October 1, 2013 1:28 PM

While I like the Vollmer bridge, I agree with you Randy.  It lacks the buk of the Atlas truss bridge.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Tuesday, October 1, 2013 2:10 PM

The angle and closeup nature of the prototype shot probably exaggerate the bulkiness. I thought the same thing on first impression, then I considered those factors.

It's also the case that trying to match certain features of a prototype may not work as well on the layout as they do in 1:1. There may be other factors with the Atlas bridge that makes the Vollmer one better in that context. It's close proximity to the backdrop and consequent set back from the front of the layout also add to the "visual distance" the lighter structure conveys.

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Tuesday, October 1, 2013 2:53 PM

I happened to look at the Vollmer catalog page and it showed two,Box Girder Bridges,ready made,one is lighter looking and one is meatier looking,,,Michael just happened to pick,the ''Lessor of Two Weavel's''..Laugh Bow

Cheers,Drinks

Frank

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Tuesday, October 1, 2013 3:08 PM

zstripe

I happened to look at the Vollmer catalog page and it showed two,Box Girder Bridges,ready made,one is lighter looking and one is meatier looking,,,Michael just happened to pick,the ''Lessor of Two Weavel's''..Laugh Bow

Cheers,Drinks

Frank

Frank,

Mine is not the box girder bridge. Those box girders are too short in length and I didn't like the look of them either.

Mine is the Arched Girder Bridge, and its 22" long.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Tuesday, October 1, 2013 3:29 PM

Motley

I got the brass walkways delivered today. And I got ripped off, I don't have enough for both sides, only one side. So I'm getting a refund.

I found a solution. I have a bunch of extra parts from the Milwakee Station, and I found some pieces that fit perfectly for the walkways.

I need some opinions. What should I do???? leave it as is, or add these parts. I will paint them same grey color as the bridge, and weather them up with rust powders.

Yeah you are right,Michael,,,the lighter box and the arch,look similar,except for the arch...By the way speaking of that,,,,is it my eyes,the camera angle,or is that bridge,higher on one side,than the other,around the middle.Right side looks higher to me than the left..

Cheers,The picture above.

Frank

  

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Tuesday, October 1, 2013 3:49 PM

Its the camera distorting it from that angle. I inspected the bridge very carefully, and its dead on straight in every way.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Victoria, Australia
  • 72 posts
Posted by taildisk on Saturday, October 12, 2013 7:08 AM

Hi Michael

I am interested in the location of the prototype bridge that you posted.

Thanks from down under

Rob (taildisk)

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, October 12, 2013 8:32 AM

taildisk

Hi Michael

I am interested in the location of the prototype bridge that you posted.

Thanks from down under

Rob (taildisk)

Rob, that bridge is located in Arizona.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, October 12, 2013 9:17 AM

Been working on the ground cover and river banks.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Saturday, October 12, 2013 9:31 AM

Michael,

This is shaping up to be a really well composed scene. The river looks well-sculpted.

Whatcha gonna do about that #^&*@$*# electrical outlet? I suppose raising the layout 4" is probably out?WhistlingGrumpy

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, October 12, 2013 10:20 AM

mlehman

Michael,

This is shaping up to be a really well composed scene. The river looks well-sculpted.

Whatcha gonna do about that #^&*@$*# electrical outlet? I suppose raising the layout 4" is probably out?WhistlingGrumpy

Thanks Mike. As you can see the wall is bare. I took down my old backdrop, and putting in a new backdrop, so the wall socket will be covered.

I'm still waiting for delivery of the new set of backdrops I ordered from backdrop warehouse, and USPS seems to have lost it. It was supposed to be delivered on Thursday.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Saturday, October 12, 2013 12:43 PM

Motley
As you can see the wall is bare. I took down my old backdrop, and putting in a new backdrop, so the wall socket will be covered.

Gee, and I thought my memory was going.Confused Now I remember seeing the backdrop, so duhTongue Tied Bummer that USPS didn't come through for you. At least you get another chance today, so hoping they leave you a new goodie to play with. I know I'm looking forward to seeing it.Yes

Are you planning to "notch" the backdrop so that it drops down there to cover behind the bridge? Or maybe something else?

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, October 12, 2013 1:29 PM

mlehman

Motley
As you can see the wall is bare. I took down my old backdrop, and putting in a new backdrop, so the wall socket will be covered.

Gee, and I thought my memory was going.Confused Now I remember seeing the backdrop, so duhTongue Tied Bummer that USPS didn't come through for you. At least you get another chance today, so hoping they leave you a new goodie to play with. I know I'm looking forward to seeing it.Yes

Are you planning to "notch" the backdrop so that it drops down there to cover behind the bridge? Or maybe something else?

Yes there is a small space there that the backdrop won't cover. I'm placing a small mirror there, where the water meets the wall. To give a view of the water going farther back.

This is the mirror here.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: 4610 Metre's North of the Fortyninth on the left coast of Canada
  • 9,352 posts
Posted by BATMAN on Saturday, October 12, 2013 1:36 PM

Motley
Yes there is a small space there that the backdrop won't cover. I'm placing a small mirror there, where the water meets the wall. To give a view of the water going farther back.

I like the mirror idea. You could put a canoe in the river and paint the backside a different colour. That side would reflect in the mirror and it would look like two canoes in the river. Adding even more depth.

Brent

"All of the world's problems are the result of the difference between how we think and how the world works."

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, October 12, 2013 2:34 PM

Mike, you must be good luck. Guess what just showed up? USPS with the new backdrops!!!!!!!!

I'm working on installing them right now. Stay tuned......

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, October 12, 2013 4:34 PM

OMG! I just got the first one up. I can't believe how much better it looks than the old one. The paper is really thick and high quality. Like the vinyl without the adhesive backing. Photos can't really do it justice, it looks way better than what the camera depicts.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Saturday, October 12, 2013 4:45 PM

Wow! What a feeling of wide open spaces that opens up!YesYes

Great idea on the mirror.

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, October 12, 2013 4:50 PM

Thanks Mike! It fits my layout much better now. If you look closley on the bottom, there is a flat farm there with cows and horses. The second backdrop actually show more of it.

You see the mirror I have already have in there. The little bit of wall will be covered by some bushes.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, October 19, 2013 6:37 PM

I've been working on the middle bridge. Its an ME 160' combination girder & deck bridge.

Almost completed, still need to add the legs. Here's a test fit.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: Cresco, IA
  • 1,773 posts
Posted by ChadLRyan on Saturday, October 19, 2013 7:54 PM

Michael,

Wow, that will be sensational!!

That's it, I'm not building a Layout, I can't make one that nice....  Ha hah!!!!!

Looking real nice Michael!!

Chad L Ryan
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, October 19, 2013 8:30 PM

ChadLRyan

Michael,

Wow, that will be sensational!!

That's it, I'm not building a Layout, I can't make one that nice....  Ha hah!!!!!

Looking real nice Michael!!

Thanks Chad, appreciate the comments. You can build a layout like this, I've seen your modeling.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, October 20, 2013 4:00 AM

Motley

ChadLRyan

Michael,

Wow, that will be sensational!!

That's it, I'm not building a Layout, I can't make one that nice....  Ha hah!!!!!

Looking real nice Michael!!

Thanks Chad, appreciate the comments. You can build a layout like this, I've seen your modeling.

And you think that I am a slacker, Michael???    Hmm

Chad is a layout wannabee   Laugh

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: Cresco, IA
  • 1,773 posts
Posted by ChadLRyan on Sunday, October 20, 2013 9:21 AM

richhotrain
Chad is a layout wannabee 

I would agree, I like that, it sticks!!!

Chad L Ryan
  • Member since
    November 2012
  • 613 posts
Posted by UPinCT on Sunday, October 20, 2013 6:21 PM

WOW, Michael you have been busy.  I almost feel like I can armchair model through your efforts.  Keep on posting your progress as it looks excellent so far.

For the record I'm not a layout wannabee.  My name is Derek and I'm a slacker.  (is there a 12 step program)

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Sunday, October 20, 2013 6:33 PM

Derek, I'm what the athletes call "the zone". I'm on a roll right now, and not slowing down.

That makes both you and Rich slackers! Come on people I'm leaving you all in the dust. Get workin on those layouts.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, October 26, 2013 4:08 PM

Last night I painted the girder bridge. Now I need to install the ME bridge track, and then weather it.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Saturday, October 26, 2013 4:17 PM

Gorgeous!

What is that color, Killer Green?

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    November 2012
  • 613 posts
Posted by UPinCT on Saturday, October 26, 2013 6:39 PM

I see you are still in the Zone Michael.  That is going to be one hot scene once it is finished.

Love the green as well.

Keep up the great work, Derek

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, October 26, 2013 10:52 PM

Ya I'm still in the zone Derek. The green was Rich's idea.

It all done now, weathered up and everything now. Next step is the wood deck trestle.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: Cresco, IA
  • 1,773 posts
Posted by ChadLRyan on Sunday, October 27, 2013 12:15 AM

Michael,
Man that looks Awesome, Excellent work!!!

Nice Work!

Chad L Ryan
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, October 27, 2013 4:29 AM

ChadLRyan

Michael,
Man that looks Awesome, Excellent work!!!

Nice Work!

The man is a true artist!   Yes

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Sunday, October 27, 2013 9:13 AM

Yep, that's the ZONE alright.Big SmileThumbs UpYes

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Monday, October 28, 2013 10:56 PM

I just finished painting the river bottom. Wheewweee that was hard. With 4 different color acrylic paints. Light brown, medium brown, green, and dark blue. Trying to get them all blended, while trying to beat the clock before it dries so quickly. I kept re-doing sections over and over again.

Let me know what you guys think?

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:20 AM

Michael,

Might be just me,looks good,but I believe it would look better,if it was a closer match to your backdrop sky. Either that, or a color look like you have,on that stream bridge scene,that you built not too long ago..Just a Thought. To me,it just looks too blue for the surrounding scenery.

Cheers, Drinks

Frank

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,257 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:29 AM

Gidday Michael, like my only (less than satisfactory) attempt at water, I think it's a bit too blue!!!. Big Smile


One day I'll learn to do it properly, (I hope) Sigh

Cheers, the Bear

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:43 AM

Sorry but I don't agree with the too blue. Its actually a bit darker, the camera seems to brighten it up a bit.

Also, when I pour the water, I will add dark brown tint to it, so it will be darker then.

In this bridge photo, the water is pretty darn blue to me, almost matches my color.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,257 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 5:03 AM

Hmm OK so I'm commenting on a job half done Bang Head something that only fools and children do. Big Smile Being an awkward argumentative cuss I 'd say the water in the foreground of your photo is more teal, the brown tint may do the trick.

Looking at the rest of your progress I suspect it will turn out just fine.Thumbs Up

Cheers, the Bear.

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 5:03 AM

zstripe

Michael,

Might be just me,looks good,but I believe it would look better,if it was a closer match to your backdrop sky. Either that, or a color look like you have,on that stream bridge scene,that you built not too long ago..Just a Thought. To me,it just looks too blue for the surrounding scenery.

Cheers, Drinks

Frank

I have to agree with Frank on this, too blue.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 5:07 AM

Motley

Sorry but I don't agree with the too blue. Its actually a bit darker, the camera seems to brighten it up a bit.

Also, when I pour the water, I will add dark brown tint to it, so it will be darker then.

In this bridge photo, the water is pretty darn blue to me, almost matches my color.

But, is that the shade of blue that you want?

That is certainly not the color of the water on your layout previously.

You have to decide for yourself what color and shade please you, not the rest of us.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 5:27 AM

What do I want? I don't know what I want. The brown tint should change it so its not so blue. And we'll go from there see how it looks.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Pittsburgh Pa
  • 397 posts
Posted by dominic c on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 5:41 AM

Mike

The picture with the bridge has a cloudless sky giving the water that pretty blue.  Someone did mention earlier that matching the water with your drop's sky color would match up good. You do have clouds in your drop right? So tinting your water will do the trick. I once traveled to Laughlin NVand remembered that the Colorado river was so blue. It was just like yours. I never saw water so blue before. It was quite breath taking. But I do remember that there wasn't a cloud in the sky for days, giving that water your blue. If you want that blue go for it. 

Joe C

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 5:45 AM

Motley

What do I want? I don't know what I want.

Well, that's a fair and honest answer.  In that case, why not mix colors on the side until you find what suits your eye best?

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:00 AM

Here's another bridge over the Colorado river. Looks dark blue too.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:26 AM

That blue looks a lot less intense.

But, again, you have to decide what color and shade you like best.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 7:22 AM

Michael,

You have to remember,that water is clear,the surrounding scenery and sky reflections,create the apparent coloring..plus the river bottom.  Even swamp water is somewhat clear,just loaded with impurities,from surrounding area..

Cheers, Drinks

Frank

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 2:02 PM

OK I just poured it. I mixed in some dark green, brown, and a tiny bit of black. It definatlely toned down the blue. And I think it matches the backdrop sky now.

Let me know what y'all think now? Good, bad, or indifferent.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 2:30 PM

Michael,

In my opinion,,,100% better..Yes

Cheers, Drinks

Frank

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 2:52 PM

Thanks Frank! And I appreciate all your help and suggestions.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 4:30 PM

Michael, you nailed it this time around.   Bow

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Pittsburgh Pa
  • 397 posts
Posted by dominic c on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 4:43 PM

Fantastic!  What a steady hand.  Gotta mention the rock formation too. Outstanding!

How did you come up with that combo of colors?

Joe C

  • Member since
    March 2012
  • 716 posts
Posted by trwroute on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 5:42 PM
Michael, this is fantastic! The water looks great. Off the wall question...what colors did you use on your road? I have a road poured from plaster, sanded, and ready to paint. I really like the color of yours.

Chuck - Modeling in HO scale and anything narrow gauge

  • Member since
    November 2012
  • 613 posts
Posted by UPinCT on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:57 PM

WOW!!!!!!!  Wow  That rocks!!!!

Talk about being in the zone,Bow  As Rich says you nailed it!!

Keep posting pics of these "HOT" updates.Stick out tongue

Derek

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:36 PM

dominic c

Fantastic!  What a steady hand.  Gotta mention the rock formation too. Outstanding!

How did you come up with that combo of colors?

Joe C

Thank you Joe. I had to keep playing with the colors. First I added the green, though it looked good, but then I started pouring it and it didn't cover the blue much. So I kept adding drop by drop, the brown and black.

As you can see, the water wicked up on the rocks a little bit, so I'll have to go back and add more rocks after its fully dried.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:40 PM

trwroute
Michael, this is fantastic! The water looks great. Off the wall question...what colors did you use on your road? I have a road poured from plaster, sanded, and ready to paint. I really like the color of yours.

Thanks you sir. Its been so long since I did that road. Let me see. I painted it with a brush. It was Floquil medium grey. Then I used the black chaulks from Michael's art supply, and created the tire marks.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:42 PM

Looks good! Thumbs UpYes

Water is always one of those "gotta have faith" things. I went through similar angst when pouring my Rio de las Animas and it came out fine.

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:44 PM

Derek and Rich, thanks guys. Great feedback here got me to do the right colors. Yes at first that blue was too bright. But easily fixed with the tint.

I will also add some ripples in the water. But I have to wait 12 hours from pouring time to do that.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,257 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Wednesday, October 30, 2013 2:28 AM

"JaBear"
Looking at the rest of your progress I suspect it will turn out just fine.Thumbs Up

Am I psychic or not, (no comments from the cheap seats please!!!)

Michael BowBow

Cheers, the Bear.

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Wednesday, October 30, 2013 11:14 AM

Mike and the Bear, thanks a lot for the encouragement. It was dicey there for a while, I must admit I was scared it would turn out looking like crap.

Last night I was going to add ripples. Its supposed to set up in 12 hours. But I kept trying over and over well after 14 hours, and it still didn't take. So I went to bed.

So no ripples. Oh well it will be a slow moving river. I think it looks fine the way it is.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Wednesday, October 30, 2013 12:52 PM

The worst is over. Ripples will come. Were you trying to use Mod-Podge or something like that? I gave up on it, puny ripples that would've taken 30 coats to get going good -- and I needed rapids.

What I got was some silicone that's used by cake decorators. You can mix color into it as needed and you get instant ripples, whatever size you need. You're only going to need extra coats if you're talking about surfin' waves.

Anyway, that's what I did, adding in some white acrylic to the silicone. It can be peeled off if you don't like the results, but otherwise stays in place. It was around $6/tube, but is plenty unless you're building an ocean.





Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    March 2012
  • 716 posts
Posted by trwroute on Thursday, October 31, 2013 3:22 PM

Thanks for the help, Michael! 

Chuck - Modeling in HO scale and anything narrow gauge

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Saturday, November 2, 2013 9:27 PM

The Vollmer truss bride is installed, and the track to the right of it is completed and ballasted.

On the right side of the river, there is a space there in between the raised track and the two inside tracks where they cross. When I ripped out the middle section, I had some rock faced hills. I was able to cut that out and saved it. Its made of foam pieces glued together.

So today I cut that to fit the area. Now I just need to add some lightweight spackling to the backside with the raised track, and on the left where I cut it.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Saturday, November 2, 2013 11:52 PM

Michael,

That is looking,really good. The last pic. says to me,that it belongs there. Almost,maybe is,perfect match,for that back drop. Yes

Cheers, Drinks

Frank

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,449 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:16 AM

Hi!

That is some really nice work, and a terrific progression of photos!   That is MR mag material to me!

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Trois-Rivieres Quebec Canada
  • 1,063 posts
Posted by jalajoie on Sunday, November 3, 2013 10:23 AM

I presume it is due to the camera lighting and that under normal lighting this shadow of the bridge will disappear.

Jack W.

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Sunday, November 3, 2013 12:41 PM

jalajoie

I presume it is due to the camera lighting and that under normal lighting this shadow of the bridge will disappear.

I'm not sure I follow you. Are you saying that the sun outside doesn't make shadows?

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, November 3, 2013 12:52 PM

Shadows.

Just like on the prototype.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Trois-Rivieres Quebec Canada
  • 1,063 posts
Posted by jalajoie on Sunday, November 3, 2013 1:26 PM

Yes of course the sun will cast a shadow, but I doubt it will show on a distant mountain. The shadow will be on nearby structures or on the ground. The only shadow I ever saw on a mountain are from clouds.

Your background give a good impression of distance, that shadow breaks the effect, to me anyway.  I was under the impression it was only from a camera angle and not from the normal lighting of your layout.

Jack W.

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Sunday, November 3, 2013 2:17 PM

Oh I thought you were talking about the shadow underneath the bridge. You're talking about the shadow on the backdrop. Nothing I can really do about that because of my layout lighting. I think it shows up on the photo more than it does in person, I can barely see that. And it doesn't bother me either.

Every layout I see has shadows, its just something we all have to deal with when using indoor lighting.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, November 3, 2013 2:59 PM

jalajoie

Yes of course the sun will cast a shadow, but I doubt it will show on a distant mountain. The shadow will be on nearby structures or on the ground. The only shadow I ever saw on a mountain are from clouds.

Your background give a good impression of distance, that shadow breaks the effect, to me anyway.  I was under the impression it was only from a camera angle and not from the normal lighting of your layout.

Picky, picky, picky.

I think that the whole purpose of the photo was for Michael to update us on his progress, not to win a photo contest for realism.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: Cresco, IA
  • 1,773 posts
Posted by ChadLRyan on Sunday, November 3, 2013 3:04 PM

Yes, I agree...
I'll be watching the train & probably not be viewing it from that angle anyway..
Besides backdrops always run that challenge unless you have a warehouse & have the backrops 2 or more feet from the nearest track or structure.
I like what Michael is doing, it is a nice job, Great Work Michael!!!! 

Chad L Ryan
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Sunday, November 3, 2013 3:14 PM

Maybe I'll just tear down my layout because of backdrop shadows, and go build it outside and use real scenery and not have to use backdrops?

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Sunday, November 3, 2013 3:15 PM

My My 2 Cents about the shadow on the back drop, all structures,will cast a shadow,depending upon,what position the sun is. A tree in a forest,will cast a shadow,on other tree's in the forest.. Boy!, It, sure is Hot out here!, would you stand in front of the tree,in the sun? or behind the tree,in the shade,created by the tree's shadow?   Now if Michael,stood in front of the light source, the shadow cast,would cover the bridge and maybe look like '' Godzilla '', JUST kidding Michael. Smile, Wink & Grin

Cheers, Drinks

Frank

  • Member since
    November 2012
  • 613 posts
Posted by UPinCT on Sunday, November 3, 2013 3:18 PM

I'm with Rich and Chad, I think it's great.  

Michael I've been watching your progress over the years and you have come a very long long way.  Keep posting pics of the updates as I think they are fantastic.

Keep up the great work, Derek

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, November 3, 2013 3:22 PM

And, while we're at it Michael, what's with the cork on the ground???   Confused

You wouldn't see that on a real railroad.    Laugh

Yes, tear out that layout and start over.   Super Angry

And don't come back until you get it right.   Stick out tongue

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Heart of Georgia
  • 5,406 posts
Posted by Doughless on Sunday, November 3, 2013 7:55 PM

I think Michael's progress and modeling work is fantastic.

I also think jalajoie's comments are valid. 

The shadow just shows the difference between photographing a real layout, like Michael's, and a diorama, which is built specifically to be photographed from a specific angle; or photographing a layout scene that has the lighting set up perfectly for a specific picture.

Other modelers understand lighting much better than I

And if the issue bothers Michael enough, I'm sure he'll figure out lighting to perfection when he takes his pictures.

- Douglas

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:04 PM

Nice looking backdrops!  Tempting!

Do they have any desert or canyon scenes?

 

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Pittsburgh Pa
  • 397 posts
Posted by dominic c on Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:11 PM

riogrande5761

Nice looking backdrops!  Tempting!

Do they have any desert or canyon scenes?

 

These are just a few, but there is a great selection.

http://backdropwarehouse.com/images03/HL-SKL-213M.jpg 

http://backdropwarehouse.com/images03/HL-SK-220E.jpg

Joe C

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: high desert so cal
  • 997 posts
Posted by BIG JERR on Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:13 PM

moving along nicely Michael, Cant believe how much you've got done , and what a difference ....the green bridge well be copied, sorry...JW 

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Monday, November 4, 2013 12:42 AM

JW,

The green bridge is the Micro Engineering 160' combination thru & deck girder. Its a nice little kit and easy to build too.

I think I'm still having nightmares from that Central Valley truss bridge.

Derek, Jim, Doughless, Chad and Rich, all many thanks for the positive comments.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Friday, November 8, 2013 9:39 AM

I finally finished the rock faced hills. I think I was able to match the backdrop grass colors, with some sage blue grass I found at my LHS.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Friday, November 8, 2013 10:24 AM

The grass color looks good, a brighter, closer version of the sagey-looking backdrop.

On the other hand, what are the plans for that tree? Seems like it should be evergreen, not deciduous, but I'm a little uncertain of the prototype landscape so maybe it fits better than it seems to me?

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Friday, November 8, 2013 10:29 AM

Mike I was trying to match the tree in the backdrop foreground you see there. I might at a later time, add some more pine trees in this area.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Friday, November 8, 2013 1:27 PM

OK, I see it now. Like a cottonwood? Makes sense down by the river. Maybe that's it...It shouldn't be a single tree on top the small hill by itself, but a small copse of them leading from it down to a little closer by the river? Then all the visual cues will be right for cottonwoods.

But that's a nice tree and it probably wasn't cheap. And it does start to hide the seam, which i hadn't noticed until I looked a little closer. I know all about trees and money, though. Right now I'm making bumpy chenille trees and moving my bigger store-bought trees forward -- while spending minimal $$

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Friday, November 8, 2013 4:03 PM

I just got another new backdrop delivered today. This one will replace the downtown yard scene, along the left wall, covering the window.

I'm working on it right now, stay tuned everybody.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Friday, November 8, 2013 7:07 PM

Hah!Chef

You're gonna have to rig up some rollers, that way you can crank to the scene du jour.

That is going to make matching nearby scenery tricky.

Or maybe Michael is the lead customer for the first widescreen LCD display backdrop?

Comes pre-loaded with a collection of 999 of the world's greatest railway views(Note for American Customers: 50% are of Chinese railways). Has automatic mood sensor so it shifts the scene to a more soothing color immediately after a derailment. Comes in three models: the Shortline (12 foot wide); The UP Think's It's Bigger than It Really Is (23 feet wide); and the Grande (100 feet wide, with custom extensions up to the distance to Mexico City and San Francisco available by Special Order).Smile, Wink & Grin

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Friday, November 8, 2013 7:36 PM

Along the Moffat route there are several small rail yards. Aspen Branch, Leadville Branch, Minturn,

My rail yard will now be located in Minturn, CO near the Tennessee pass. At the Minturn yard there's a 5-6 tracks there, complete with loco maintenance facilities.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Friday, November 8, 2013 11:24 PM

OK new backdrop is up now! I'm really happy with it. Much better transitions scenes now.

This is the old backdrop. This was 24" x 6 ft.

And here's the new backdrop. This one is 24" x 9 ft.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Saturday, November 9, 2013 12:02 AM

Motley

My rail yard will now be located in Minturn, CO near the Tennessee pass. At the Minturn yard there's a 5-6 tracks there, complete with loco maintenance facilities.

Min-Urn?!! [Note correct pronunciation]

Cool! I love the smell of diesel in the morning.Big Smile

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Wednesday, November 13, 2013 8:48 AM

Since there is no intermodal yard in Minturn. I removed the concrete styrene from the 2 tracks. And ballasted those 2 tracks that will now be yard tracks that will hold the D&RGW power for helper service to add to trains before heading up the Tennesee Pass.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Wednesday, November 13, 2013 6:09 PM

I'm imaging the possibilities...Smile, Wink & Grin

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!