Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Why would someone ship an airplane by flatcar?

23199 views
76 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 36 posts
Why would someone ship an airplane by flatcar?
Posted by trfindley on Thursday, March 17, 2011 12:19 PM

I'm sure others have thought of this question over the past 53 years:

EDIT: Click here for the link

 

Original URL if you can't use the link above:(You'll have to reassemble it, I added spaces to let it wrap)

http://cgi.ebay.com/Athearn-HO-RTR-40-Flat-w-Blue-Plane-NYC-495334_W0QQitemZ400196105170QQcategoryZ19130QQcmdZViewItemQQ_

trksidZp3286.m7QQ_trkparmsZalgo%3DLVI%26itu%3DUCI%26otn%3D3%26po%3DLVI

%26ps%3D63%26clkid%3D7803940796617981131

 

EDITED BY JWHITTEN: Added some spaces in the URL to let it wrap.

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • 245 posts
Posted by papasmurf on Thursday, March 17, 2011 12:27 PM

Not unusual, as NASA had several shuttle components shipped via rail, which were just small enough to fit through all rail line tunnels. My 2 cents. TTFN....Old Tom aka papasmurf in NH

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Thursday, March 17, 2011 12:27 PM

One reason might be:

Plane is located on east coast.

Plane going to private field on remote location west coast.

You could hire a pilot to fly it there (Expensive).  But how would he get back?  Drive to closest regional, then fly back as a passenger?  That is a pain in the duckass.

OR.....

Plane is being sold overseas and being shipped to a port.

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Hillsboro, Oregon
  • 934 posts
Posted by Eric97123 on Thursday, March 17, 2011 12:46 PM

I would lean with the shipping over seas as my story if I had one my layout.  Extra hours on the engine are bad as engine rebuilds are big $$$ but I am sure the cost to fly/ amortized into the rebuild price, would come up a lot cheaper than shipping by train if you wanted to get it from one side of the country to another. 

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:17 PM

That usually doesnt happen. Boeing ships alot of their fuselages by rail though.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    June 2010
  • 1,012 posts
Posted by Forty Niner on Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:19 PM

So then what would they do if say it was an "historical" airplane? I don't think you would want to "fly" a Sopwith Camel across the country...........or some other "valuable" historic airplane for that matter.

Just a fresh "monkey wrench" for the gears of reason to work with......;-)

Mark

WGAS

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:45 PM

Just because it's shaped like an aircraft doesn't mean that it's airworthy.  If it is, in fact, a 'historical' aircraft, it may very well be unflyable for any number of valid reasons.

That said, unless it's being shipped to a metal recycling site it would be much more likely to travel by truck.  Most air museums (and, for that matter, most airports) don't have rail service.

The one that always has me ROFLMAO is the Messerschmitt bF109 fuselage standing on its wheels on a flatcar.  That landing gear was notoriously flimsy, and would almost certainly suffer an 'involuntary retraction' if ubjected to the normal slam-bang slack action of a 1940-ish European train.  If that single-seater had to be shipped by rail it would have been shipped in a wooden cradle, with the landing gear safely unloaded and retracted.

Chuck (Former USAF aircraft maintenance tech modeing Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • From: Mt Pleasant, Utah
  • 93 posts
Posted by Dave Merrill on Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:49 PM

During my career in aviation we moved several planes by truck and trailer, all because of airworthiness and/or mechanical reasons.  To move one a long distance by rail for similar reasons is certainly feasible. 

FWIW the plane appears to be a Beech 33 Bonanza which has tricycle landing gear.  There is no nose gear on the model and the main gear appear to be too far forward and are missing the gear doors. 

And now my hobby is more 'down to earth'  Wink

Dave

From Mt Pleasant, Utah, the home of the Hill Valley and Thistle Railroad where the Buffalo still roam and a Droid runs the trains

  • Member since
    June 2010
  • 1,012 posts
Posted by Forty Niner on Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:53 PM

I would say you are right on the money about the truck thing today, but what about say 1965 or earlier? You know, before they started hauling houses down the Interstate.............

And having spent many years in the military I understand the love of abbreviations but what the heck is "ROFLMAO"?

P.S. I don't text mail either........

Mark

WGAS

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: Jersey City
  • 1,925 posts
Posted by steemtrayn on Thursday, March 17, 2011 2:14 PM

Do the wings of the Beech actually attach using tab-in-slot assembly?  ROFLMAO!!

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Canada's Maritime Provinces
  • 1,760 posts
Posted by Railphotog on Thursday, March 17, 2011 2:18 PM

Forty Niner

And having spent many years in the military I understand the love of abbreviations but what the heck is "ROFLMAO"?

P.S. I don't text mail either........

I suggest Googling the text, as forum censors might take offence if what it means was spelled out here.   This has been around a long time, before texting.  BOHICA!

 

 

Bob Boudreau

CANADA

Visit my model railroad photography website: http://sites.google.com/site/railphotog/

  • Member since
    June 2010
  • 1,012 posts
Posted by Forty Niner on Thursday, March 17, 2011 3:26 PM

BOHICA I know, learned it when I filled out my "2nd" tax return, my own personal favorite is WGAS. I have a cap without the abbreviation and wear it all the time, get everything from disapproving looks to "hey man, cool cap".

I guess this one will just be a mystery for now............life is full of mysteries.

The secret to a successful marriage..............is still a secret! HY

Mark

WGAS

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Memphis, TN
  • 3,876 posts
Posted by Packers#1 on Thursday, March 17, 2011 3:28 PM

Forty Niner

And having spent many years in the military I understand the love of abbreviations but what the heck is "ROFLMAO"?

To answer that would require breaking forum rules of no swearing. However, ROFLOL means rolling on the floor laughing out loud. Not much of a jump.

I know boeing ships fuselages by rail, but there are two answers for the small plane:

1) the aforementioned pilot scenario; if there's a plant on the east coast and a dealer on the west coast, I imagine shipping planes by rail to a distribution center to be trucked out, or a large regional dealer, makes sense.

2) The gigantic slingshot the factory previously used showed an alarming tendency to fling the aircraft unpredictable, often destroying it on it's travel to the dealer...

just my 2 cents worth :D

Sawyer Berry

Clemson University c/o 2018

Building a protolanced industrial park layout

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Thursday, March 17, 2011 3:46 PM

They are to be finally assembled in another location.  For instance, plants at various locations make subparts to be shipped to the final assembly point.  Or they are to be shipped beyond the plane's range even considering refueling, for instance, shipment of partially disassemblied P-39 planes to the Soviet Union during WWII.

  • Member since
    June 2010
  • 1,012 posts
Posted by Forty Niner on Thursday, March 17, 2011 3:47 PM

Looked it up on Google, you forgot the part about "Scaring the Cat"!! That's what confused me................;-)

Mark

WGAS

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: Boonville, In
  • 193 posts
Posted by B&O SteamDemon on Thursday, March 17, 2011 3:55 PM

You could always use the idea of  structual failure on the airframe and the aircraft is being shipped back to the manufacturer for repair or replacement.  Just an idea for shipping an aircraft by rail.

 

Ray

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:03 PM

Maybe someone bought a plane and wasn't a pilot.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Johnston, RI
  • 90 posts
Posted by sfcgadget on Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:36 PM

Wouldn't you for $18.40 plus $3.50 shipping and handling. I would with the price of gas up again.

SFC Gadget (Ret.)
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:56 PM

Why would GM ship an automobile by train to the dealer when they could have somebody drive it there from Detroit??

 Whistling

Stix
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 4,115 posts
Posted by tatans on Thursday, March 17, 2011 6:37 PM

Markpierce replied they shipped aircraft to Russia in boxes, they also flew hundreds of  fighters and bombers through Canada following the Alaska highway then over to Russia, Edmonton was a major staging area, not all of them made it to Alaska,  3, B-25 or B-26's crashed in one area  in the Yukon called "million dollar valley' they are still there.

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: O'Fallon, MO
  • 292 posts
Posted by Lateral-G on Thursday, March 17, 2011 6:43 PM

Northrop ships the aft fuselage of the F-18 to us in St Louis....they've been doing it for the past 30 years.

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 101 posts
Posted by BF&D on Thursday, March 17, 2011 7:00 PM

Lots of semi plausible answers - but for me those flatcar airplane loads are in a league with Official US Army Missile Launcher Car and other such toy trains stuff.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Thursday, March 17, 2011 7:11 PM

Regardless of the reason, I'll bet some where deep in the history of Athearn there is a real life photo of just such a Beechcraft on a flat car.

The dealer/final assembly thing makes sense to me, just like new cars. If I was buying a "new" airplane, I don't think I would want it to have hundreds of hours on it having been flown thousands of miles across the country.

I surely would not pay the "new" car price for a car that had been driven from Detroit to Baltimore. If a car comes with a 3 year/36,000 mile warranty, I expect to be the person who puts 35,989 of those miles on it.

Sheldon 

    

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,484 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Thursday, March 17, 2011 7:25 PM

Because Lionel had the same car in O-gauge?  That must be it.  I had that car in the 50s, and it was also a Beechcraft Bonanza, notable for the 45-degree angled tail section.

Seriously?  I doubt that Beech designed the wings to come off like that.  This was not a carrier-based aircraft, after all.

The plane, of course, was safe from train-launced missiles, unless it was located next to the exploding dynamite car.  Had one of those too, I did.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: US
  • 1,522 posts
Posted by AltonFan on Thursday, March 17, 2011 7:38 PM

Can one of the moderators please edit the OP so that it doesn't force the thread over the edge of the screen?

Dan

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Central Georgia
  • 921 posts
Posted by Johnnny_reb on Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:09 PM

Maybe at the time there were no trucking lines that where shipping nation wide. I don't know for sure, but I would think that it would have been in the late 60's or early 70's before trucking lines began going coast to coast with regular service.

Johnnny_reb Once a word is spoken it can not be unspoken!

My Train Page   My Photobucket Page   My YouTube Channel

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Central Georgia
  • 921 posts
Posted by Johnnny_reb on Thursday, March 17, 2011 8:19 PM

TA462

The only reason a plane would be shipped by rail is because it isn't air worthy.   It would cost to much to have a planes wings removed and then reattached and the recertified to fly again.

You know, now that I think about it. I seen one on a tow-truck once and for same reason. It was headed to a repair shop. The field it saw at didn't do repair work and wouuldn't let them work on it there. Why? unkown.

Johnnny_reb Once a word is spoken it can not be unspoken!

My Train Page   My Photobucket Page   My YouTube Channel

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: Jersey City
  • 1,925 posts
Posted by steemtrayn on Thursday, March 17, 2011 9:15 PM

Packers#1

 Forty Niner:

And having spent many years in the military I understand the love of abbreviations but what the heck is "ROFLMAO"?

 

To answer that would require breaking forum rules of no swearing. However, ROFLOL means rolling on the floor laughing out loud. Not much of a jump.

Aww, go ahead, tell him. This would be an ideal time to test the limits of the new moderator. Mischief

DILLIGAF?

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Orig: Tyler Texas. Lived in seven countries, now live in Sundown, Louisiana
  • 25,640 posts
Posted by jeffrey-wimberly on Thursday, March 17, 2011 9:38 PM

trfindley

For getting it from point A to point B without spending money on fuel and a pilot shipping it via flatcar makes good economic sense. It also save wear and tear on the planes engine(s).

 

EDITED BY JWHITTEN: Added some spaces in the URL to let it wrap.

Running Bear, Sundown, Louisiana
          Joined June, 2004

Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running Bear
Space Mouse for president!
15 year veteran fire fighter
Collector of Apple //e's
Running Bear Enterprises
History Channel Club life member.
beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam


  • Member since
    June 2010
  • 1,012 posts
Posted by Forty Niner on Thursday, March 17, 2011 10:20 PM

What about things such as Military Scout Planes, they don't have to be recertified to have their wings removed and reattached, come to think of it, neither did the Aero-Car.

Mark

WGAS

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!