Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

If you were a locomotive, what would you be?

7201 views
74 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: upstate NY
  • 9,236 posts
If you were a locomotive, what would you be?
Posted by galaxy on Friday, June 27, 2008 9:59 PM

....and why?

I would be a PRR 4-8-2 Mountain.

Why? Impressive, powerful, majestic, goes for the long haul.

That, and because I fell in love with PRR M1B (nee M1A) #6755 at the Pensylvania Railroad Museum in Strasburg, PA (static display but boy would pay to see her run and ride in her cab!). I was more impressed with her than I was with the Big Boy at Steamtown National Park in Scranton, PA. With a "oversized coast-to-coast" tender for long hauls and with a dog house for the brakeman.

My oh MY

 

-G .

Just my thoughts, ideas, opinions and experiences. Others may vary.

 HO and N Scale.

After long and careful thought, they have convinced me. I have come to the conclusion that they are right. The aliens did it.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Friday, June 27, 2008 10:54 PM

I would be a Withuhn-Garratt eight-cylinder triple expansion high pressure 4-8-4+4-8-4 with 70-inch drivers, a 500psi water-tube boiler, a cyclone gasifier Porta firebox, dynamically counterbalanced machinery and end-of-locomotive cabs similar to modern diesel cabs.  Microprocessor control and automatic stoking, of course.

Why?  Because I write science fiction, and that strikes me as a great, "What if we could resurrect steam," locomotive.

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - ten years before Bill Withuhn's ideas were published in Trains)

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Friday, June 27, 2008 10:59 PM
Real or Model? What would I want to be, or what would my personality end up making me be?
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: The mystic shores of Lake Eerie
  • 1,329 posts
Posted by Autobus Prime on Friday, June 27, 2008 11:44 PM
Folks:

I would be an H8/H9/H10. A little backward, not real elegant, not at all fancy, but it gets the job done. Plus the H is a ruggedly handsome devil. Wink [;)]
 Currently president of: a slowly upgrading trainset fleet o'doom.
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Indiana
  • 3,549 posts
Posted by Flashwave on Friday, June 27, 2008 11:51 PM

Gee, I'm not sure. My immediate action would be to take the place of the 4449. Since she has a long service life, plus all the fun of the excoursions. Alsoone of my first loco love affairs. But knowing what I also do with the likelyness of that fun continueing, a diesel such as UP 1996 might be a more fun route.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nah. Hand me the steamer.  

-Morgan

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Clinton, MO, US
  • 4,261 posts
Posted by Medina1128 on Saturday, June 28, 2008 1:26 AM
That's easy.. I'm 6'1", 255#... A 4-8-8-4 Union Pacific Big Boy..
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Saturday, June 28, 2008 1:31 AM
Broke and out of fuel.Big Smile [:D]
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Saturday, June 28, 2008 2:10 AM

See now, this is the question Barbara Walters should have asked President Ford, rather than "what kind of tree would you be, if you were a tree??".  

Well I'm pretty big and un-streamlined...so maybe an ALCO C-628 highnose in CNW colors. preferably hauling iron ore / taconite. Of course my wife would probably agree I'd be an ALCO, with lots of rumbling and sputtering followed by noxious 'exhaust' emissions. Dead [xx(]

Stix
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Ashtabula, Ohio
  • 158 posts
Posted by 2-8-8-0 on Saturday, June 28, 2008 8:37 AM

I would probably just be one of the many Q4 2-8-2s B&O had roaming every inch of their system. Common, hard working, and underappreciated!

Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Appleton, WI
  • 36 posts
Posted by Crewman1 on Saturday, June 28, 2008 9:04 AM
I would be either: an Erie Triplex (2-8-8-8-2) or a shay.  Either way, big and slow, but impressive...Wink [;)]
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,255 posts
Posted by tstage on Saturday, June 28, 2008 9:23 AM

Probably an 0-8-0 switcher: Quiet, unassuming - but pulling my weight and doing my job.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: St. Peters, Missouri (USA!)
  • 163 posts
Posted by sfrr on Saturday, June 28, 2008 9:30 AM

Gee, I will have to say an SD90/43MAC just because of the size, and the nice sharp look.

 

Mike

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Ogden UT
  • 1,055 posts
Posted by PA&ERR on Saturday, June 28, 2008 10:58 AM

I'd be an E-44. Just quietly doing my job without any fuss or fanfare!

-George

"And the sons of Pullman porters and the sons of engineers ride their father's magic carpet made of steel..."

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Saturday, June 28, 2008 11:29 AM

I'd be an M-3/4 Yellowstone.  That way I could spend my winters in Colorado Tongue [:P]

Tom Big Smile [:D] 

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Northeast
  • 746 posts
Posted by GraniteRailroader on Saturday, June 28, 2008 1:46 PM

I'd be the lonely diesel switcher working 12 hour days in the yard. With the clean square lines of the GP-9, and the soul of a hard working mountain engine...

What? No.. it wasn't a long night last night. It's not like I derailed half a train on a customer siding, either. Whistling [:-^]

This space reserved for SpaceMouse's future presidential candidacy advertisements

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 28, 2008 2:23 PM

I would be a Prr K4 pacific

the standard of the PRR,magestic, beautiful, and the ability to run almost anything anywhere...that and it is the whole reason i model the PRR(so it is my favorite locomotive) 

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Memphis
  • 931 posts
Posted by PASMITH on Saturday, June 28, 2008 2:27 PM
SP Cab Forward MM-2 No 4200 with 4 wheel lead truck modification.

Peter Smith, Memphis
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 452 posts
Posted by Berk-fan284 on Saturday, June 28, 2008 4:43 PM

GP-38/38-2

Why, jack of all trades, frequently overlooked and usually get's the job done while everyone else lusts after the more "glamorous" types (I couldn't decide on which steamer either truth be told).

 

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Eastern Shore Virginia
  • 3,290 posts
Posted by gandydancer19 on Saturday, June 28, 2008 4:56 PM
I would be a little 2-4-4-2 logger.  Just working out in the country.  They only made one I think.

Elmer.

The above is my opinion, from an active and experienced Model Railroader in N scale and HO since 1961.

(Modeling Freelance, Eastern US, HO scale, in 1962, with NCE DCC for locomotive control and a stand alone LocoNet for block detection and signals.) http://waynes-trains.com/ at home, and N scale at the Club.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Ft Wayne IN
  • 332 posts
Posted by BRJN on Monday, June 30, 2008 8:46 PM

I would be a 2-4-2 Columbia.

Because it must have been unique - I can't find a model of it anywhere !

Modeling 1900 (more or less)
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: THE FAR, FAR REACHES OF THE WILD, WILD WEST!
  • 3,672 posts
Posted by R. T. POTEET on Monday, June 30, 2008 8:56 PM

A rigid framed 0-8-8-8-8-8-0! If you want your curves straightened out this is the locomotive of your dreams!

On a serious note I suppose I would be something like a Little Joe electric!

From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Monday, June 30, 2008 9:09 PM
I would be an SD40-2. Old but still working every day.I don't stand out from the crowd,but I keep plugging along getting my job done.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    November 2015
  • 668 posts
Posted by Tjsingle on Monday, June 30, 2008 9:13 PM
Mine would be a SD80mac, love those big beasts
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Monday, June 30, 2008 9:16 PM

 PASMITH wrote:
SP Cab Forward MM-2 No 4200 with 4 wheel lead truck modification.

Peter Smith, Memphis

Peter--

I'm glad you said with a 4-wheel lead truck modification, I had horrible visions of you waltzing off the tracks near Gold Run and ending up in someone's apple orchard.  Those 'Little Malleys' were sure cute, weren't they?

Tom Smile [:)]

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,449 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Monday, June 30, 2008 11:14 PM

Hi!

What an interesting posting!

If I were a steam loco, I would be a USRA 2-8-0 Consolidation (or 0-8-0 switcher).  They were dependable, did a lot of work, and got the job done - without much glory or fanfare.

If I were a diesel loco, I would be a GP7/9, for the same reasons as above.

Not very glamorous, but the RRs couldn't survive without them!

Mobilman44

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: THE FAR, FAR REACHES OF THE WILD, WILD WEST!
  • 3,672 posts
Posted by R. T. POTEET on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 1:02 AM
 mobilman44 wrote:

Hi!

What an interesting posting!

If I were a steam loco, I would be a USRA 2-8-0 Consolidation (or 0-8-0 switcher).  They were dependable, did a lot of work, and got the job done - without much glory or fanfare.

If I were a diesel loco, I would be a GP7/9, for the same reasons as above.

Not very glamorous, but the RRs couldn't survive without them!

Mobilman44

A USRA 2-8-0? They're even rarer than the USRA 0-8-8-8-8-8-0s!

From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,449 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 8:36 AM

Good catch!

I started to write USRA steam switcher, thought about it, and changed my mind to the 2-8-0 - without removing the "USRA". 

Mobilman44

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Indy
  • 997 posts
Posted by mononguy63 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 9:40 AM
I would have been scrapped years ago due to obsolesence.

"I am lapidary but not eristic when I use big words." - William F. Buckley

I haven't been sleeping. I'm afraid I'll dream I'm in a coma and then wake up unconscious.  -Stephen Wright

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Memphis, TN
  • 3,876 posts
Posted by Packers#1 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 11:39 AM

Probably an SD40-2.

The main source for mainline muscle as of now.

Sawyer Berry

Clemson University c/o 2018

Building a protolanced industrial park layout

 

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • 17 posts
Posted by TrainMaster1212 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 11:45 AM

I would be a PRR GG1.

 

Why, becausthey were big, strong, fast, and more. 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!