cuyama wrote: BRAKIE wrote: To real railroad men its a switch...And being a former brakeman I can't call 'em a "turnout". Guess the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. is not a "real railroad" by your defintion. In their Employee Timetable dated January 15, 1989, the term turnout is used dozens of times to refer to the overall structure -- just like model raillroaders use the term.
BRAKIE wrote: To real railroad men its a switch...And being a former brakeman I can't call 'em a "turnout".
To real railroad men its a switch...And being a former brakeman I can't call 'em a "turnout".
Guess the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. is not a "real railroad" by your defintion. In their Employee Timetable dated January 15, 1989, the term turnout is used dozens of times to refer to the overall structure -- just like model raillroaders use the term.
Well that may be in the book but,I bet the railroaders call it a switch..Only a rookie train buff trainman would use such a term on the PRR or Chessie and that was never a good idea if they did.
Even today on my scanner I hear the term switch used..
Larry
Conductor.
Summerset Ry.
"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt Safety First!"
The cool thing is that this is about the SIXTH or SEVENTH one of these turnout vs. switch threads I have read on the Op Sig, LDSig and Trains.com forums, and each one regardless of location follows a nearly identical pattern of posts.
Its eerie.
Oh, by the way, it hasn't stopped anybody from using either term. 8-)
Dave H.
Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com
markpierce wrote: Paul3 wrote: markpierce,Of all the things in this hobby, this is what you're concerned about? Turnout vs. switch... Meh. While it might make great fodder for a stand up routine ("Why does cargo go by ship and shipments go by car?" - Gallagher), what's the point of this thread? If it's to point out that real railroaders look down their noses at us for using "buff" terminology, well, that's hardly news. But if we limited ourselves to only using what real railroaders would say, then we couldn't call something a GP9, we'd only say that's one of those 1200's (or whatever number series they were on each RR that had 'em). Oh, well. At least it's better than other round of "Why is standard guage 4' 8 1/2"?"Paul A. Cutler III************Weather Or No Go New Haven************Sorry, Paul, but I get more enjoyment out of the hobby when I hear and use the vocabulary of train men.Mark
Paul3 wrote: markpierce,Of all the things in this hobby, this is what you're concerned about? Turnout vs. switch... Meh. While it might make great fodder for a stand up routine ("Why does cargo go by ship and shipments go by car?" - Gallagher), what's the point of this thread? If it's to point out that real railroaders look down their noses at us for using "buff" terminology, well, that's hardly news. But if we limited ourselves to only using what real railroaders would say, then we couldn't call something a GP9, we'd only say that's one of those 1200's (or whatever number series they were on each RR that had 'em). Oh, well. At least it's better than other round of "Why is standard guage 4' 8 1/2"?"Paul A. Cutler III************Weather Or No Go New Haven************
markpierce,Of all the things in this hobby, this is what you're concerned about? Turnout vs. switch... Meh. While it might make great fodder for a stand up routine ("Why does cargo go by ship and shipments go by car?" - Gallagher), what's the point of this thread? If it's to point out that real railroaders look down their noses at us for using "buff" terminology, well, that's hardly news. But if we limited ourselves to only using what real railroaders would say, then we couldn't call something a GP9, we'd only say that's one of those 1200's (or whatever number series they were on each RR that had 'em). Oh, well. At least it's better than other round of "Why is standard guage 4' 8 1/2"?"
Paul A. Cutler III************Weather Or No Go New Haven************
Sorry, Paul, but I get more enjoyment out of the hobby when I hear and use the vocabulary of train men.
Mark
Why are you so set against it?
Keep in mind that railroaders use their own slang terms, nicknames etc. for things. It could well be that what someone in the railroad's technical engineering dept. calls "a turnout", Joe Brakeman may call "a switch". Similarly there are plenty of model railroader / railfan terms (like "phases" of a diesel's production life) that a working railroader would have no idea about. So there really may not be a complety right answer.
One similar thing that comes up in my work (taxes) is "return", how many people say "I got a big return from the IRS this year" when they mean to say they got a big "refund"...a "return" is the tax form (like a 1040) you file to get the refund.
ccaranna wrote:And to complicate things further, there are also wyes.
No complication whatsoever. A 'wye' is just an equalateral switch. It describes the geometry just like a left hand and right hand describe the other geometries.
Its just another switch.
dehusman wrote: ccaranna wrote:And to complicate things further, there are also wyes. No complication whatsoever. A 'wye' is just an equalateral switch. It describes the geometry just like a left hand and right hand describe the other geometries.Its just another switch.Dave H.
Uh....I thought it was a wye turnout
Wye switch? is what everyone asks me when they find out I switched from HO to S.
I just love the insanity of it all!!!
Paul
Railroad speak.
Larry,the first 3 goes to Slaughter house( No slaughter there!),hang on to your pickups and proceed to the C&O switch and pickup seven there and return the cut to 3.Pick up the Central cut on 5 and take 'em to the Central.
That's the kind of stuff I had to remember as a rookie brakeman on the PRR.
You know, I was flipping through my dictionary on my way to "switch" and "turnout" and came across this little gem:
ped-ant /ˈpɛd-nt/ -noun
Thus endeth the sermon!
Connecticut Valley Railroad A Branch of the New York, New Haven, and Hartford
"If you think you can do a thing or think you can't do a thing, you're right." -- Henry Ford
BRAKIE wrote:To real railroad men its a switch...And being a former brakeman I can't call 'em a "turnout".
Yup.
The only people I hear calling them "turnouts" are either the buffies or the office guys who have never worked a day of "REAL" train service from their desk job.
(This doesn't apply to people that aren't working in the rail industry. Merely talking about the railroad people I encounter on daily basis'. )
--Edit to add--
And Brakie - I know exactly what you mean.
"Pick up the northbounds on track 2, back em off on to track 4, line the 1-2 switch back, pickup the remaining northbounds and the haulage traffic and stick it to track 3."or... "Kick one to four, pick up three on five, set two to four, one to six, pickup the rest of four and double it to the main" Switchlists and paperwork? That's a good way to get one of the veterans of the industry to make you learn by the school of hard knocks
This space reserved for SpaceMouse's future presidential candidacy advertisements
wjstix wrote:Keep in mind that railroaders use their own slang terms, nicknames etc. for things. It could well be that what someone in the railroad's technical engineering dept. calls "a turnout", Joe Brakeman may call "a switch".
Keep in mind that railroaders use their own slang terms, nicknames etc. for things. It could well be that what someone in the railroad's technical engineering dept. calls "a turnout", Joe Brakeman may call "a switch".
That applies in many languages, I'm sure. In Norwegian, the rule books refer to "sporveksel" ("track changer"). That is the official name - and the one professional railroaders are supposed to use in official documents.
But lots of people still refer to them as "pens" (which is a Norwegian adaptation/phonetic contraction of the British term "points", which was brought to Norway with Stephenson's people when they built the first RR in Norway back in 1854).
Also, some these things can have funny nicknames. A double crossover is known among some oldtimers as a "full Englishman". The word "full" can also mean "drunk". Hence the look of total incomprehension you may get when someone apparently says "We have to wait for the drunk Englishman up ahead to get unstuck before we can continue".
In the context of model railroading, use whatever term (turnout or switch or something else) you like. Your choice of words when communicating on or about a model railroad will not cause loss of human life or limb in case of a misunderstanding.
Grin, Stein