SpaceMouse wrote: Supreme Line wrote:They were all early diesel or Steam layouts so I didnt like that at all. I also really did not like any of the HO designs at all. They were all boring in my little opinionI see you looked really closely. The first one was late 90's NS/CSX and the second one was Modern day Norfolk Southern. Next time show us how it's done.
Supreme Line wrote:They were all early diesel or Steam layouts so I didnt like that at all. I also really did not like any of the HO designs at all. They were all boring in my little opinion
I see you looked really closely. The first one was late 90's NS/CSX and the second one was Modern day Norfolk Southern. Next time show us how it's done.
There was also an electrified line (the Japanese one), and one based on a 2002 protoype. Sure.
But be advised that "Supreme Line" is a poster with a short posting history - he might be deliberately fishing for flames.
Please don't let his - umm - perhaps somewhat less than 100% informed - post derail this thread.
Grin, Stein
Chip
Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.
Favorites1. Altoona and Johnstown
2. Southern Railways
3. Philadelphia and ErieFavorite by ScaleHO- Philadelpha and Erie
N - Altoona and Johnstown
G - Borracho Traction Co.
HO: Progressive Rail ... in my opinion the clear winner ... it attempts and succeeds at portraying the sometimes difficult and unique aspects of prototype operations... much like Lance Mindheim's Miami CSX layout which also doesn't have a runaround, the prototype rail company has found a way to make it work... my layout based on the CSX Bethlehem Branch operates prototypically by exclusively using push-pull setups to make it work and i find the Progressive Rail setup to be of great interest to me
N: Snover and Port Fuller
Overall:
1: Progressive Rail
2: Kinesube Utsube Libe
3: Snover and Port Fuller
Favorite in each scale:
N - Appalachian Central
HO - Buffalo and Susquehanna
G - Borracho Traction Company
1.Buffalo and Susquehanna
2.Appalachian Central
3.Borracho Traction Company
Both of the first two have continuous running and a long branch line. For a space this size I think that represents a good combination. The third one is a nice around the walls layout.
Enjoy
Paul
There's some great project layouts here. The Johnstown and Altoona walks away as my favorite, but I'm biased as an N scaler. The River Valley is also a great twist on the "big square table in the middle of the room" concept.
Here's the rankings:
N scale - Johnstown and Altoona, with River Valley a close second.
HO scale - The Coal Branch. I look at that and I think of how magnificent it would be to take the exact same plan and lay N scale track instead. Great flow, lots of scenic opportunities there, even in Humongously Oversized...
G- scale, if one must run G scale indoors, a traction layout is a grand idea. I liked Koester's modular G scale rig... Short line running lends itself to Ginormous Scale.
Best overall
Johnstown and Allentown. You HO guys can NEVER do that in a spare bedroom.
Coal Branch - A great track plan that would be even greater as an N scale project.
River Valley - Again, a great twist on a table top layout. Great use of the space.
Thanks for hosting this, Spacey. I hope the MR editors aren't shy about contacting the creators of these designs. They are all worthy of note.
Lee
Route of the Alpha Jets www.wmrywesternlines.net
Great job everyone here is my pics
altoona and johnstown
Buffal
Twin peaks(This one has potential in the mountains to run logging trains I think up the grade to a clear cut on top , At the least it would look neat climbing a train through the woods.
alco's forever!!!!! Majoring in HO scale Minorig in O scale:)
The Kinesube Utsube and Snover & Port Fuller standout. Both layouts look like they would be easy to maintain in that everything is within reach. Another nice characteristic is the lower quantity of track in each scene. I especially like how the Kinesube Utsube does not crowd the room.
My picks :
Best overall in Scale
N = Altoona and Johnstown
HO = Philadelphia and Erie
G = I'm on the fence with this one
Top 3 overall
1 - Philadelphia and Erie
2 - Johnstown and Altoona
3 - Christmas Special
Empire under construction !
The early bird catches the worm.
But, the second mouse gets the cheese!
N-scale: Altoona and Johnstown
HO-scale: Lower Susquehanna Works
G-scale: Of course the Borracho Traction Company, what else?
Overall
#1: Lower Susquehanna Works
#2: Philadelphia and Erie
#3: Progressive Rail
Autobus Prime wrote: C&OF:The P & E could be mirror-flopped without otherwise altering the plan. I have it on good authority that the designer's head was accidentally working backwards that day, and left a nice big door space in the wrong bottom corner. Call it the Southern Hemisphere version, because everybody knows that trains run the other way down there.
C&OF:
The P & E could be mirror-flopped without otherwise altering the plan.
I have it on good authority that the designer's head was accidentally working backwards that day, and left a nice big door space in the wrong bottom corner. Call it the Southern Hemisphere version, because everybody knows that trains run the other way down there.
I saw that and wondered if he got out of bed on the wrong side that day
TerryinTexas
See my Web Site Here
http://conewriversubdivision.yolasite.com/
Favorites, per Scale:
N: Snover & Port Fuller
HO: Buffalo & Susquehanna
G: (well...)
Overall Favorites:
1: Snover & Port Fuller
2: Buffalo & Susquehanna
3: Altoona & Johnstown
There are some really nice ideas here. Great job (and a big hats off) to everyone represented here!
Peter
Hi chip!
Here's my picks:
Each scale
N Snover & Port Fuller
HO Buffalo & Susq
G Borracho(the oteher G scale plans were waaaay too hard to follow.)
1. Snover &Port Fuller
1. Bullalo & Susq.
3. Progessive Rail( nice prototype/job!!)
The other Terry, in Wisconsin(Hopple, sorry 'bout yer Cowboys and GO PACKERS!)
Terry in NW Wisconsin
Queenbogey715 is my Youtube channel
My votes:
By scale:
#1 N: River Valley. I just like it, and room for expansion is a nice bonus.
#1 HO: Kinesube Utsube Line. Good design, and a nice drawing too.
#1 G: Some kinda traction line...I forget the name now. You know, the one with the B. Those big trains would really be a hit with nonfanatic visitors, too.
#1 - Kinesube Utsube Line
#2 - River Valley
#3 - Progressive Rail. I like this switching plan, and it's a good place to take a nap, too.
While I still like my own the best I wont vote for myself in the overall competition
After carefull review...
N-Altoona & Johnstown, very nicely done
HO- Kinesube Utsube, this is very elegantly layout out.
G- yeah, that one
1. Kinesube Utsube, This one just looks like it would be a whole lot of fun to build. Plus I still have a soft spot for HOn30.
2. Altoona & Johnstown, nice blend of scenery and trackwork
3. Buffalo and Susquehanna, nice trackwork plan
Overall I have to say the Kinesube impressed me the most in terms of trackwork and scenery, namely the urban area it travereses, it would be very unique once built.
Though if I built it I would have a cutout of the Big Guy somewhere on the backdrop.
Chip I have a thought, after the voting is done, after the awards ceremony is attended, after the awards passed out, and after the drunken acceptance speeches given out (or will it just be a "news conference" due to the writers strike)...can we have a deconstruction session regarding these submittals? I see some things in them that I would like to discuss but I dont want to risk tainting the voting pool one way or another. Just a thought...and if everyone elses egos are up to the possible bruising along with the praises.
Have fun with your trains
DigitalGriffin wrote: They can be smaller than 10x12. It's up to you how you use the space.I may be mistaken, but Chip implied that the door would be useable. Hence forth why he stated a 30" dimension on the door.I looked at the layouts, and I can only see branchline coal as the only potential to block the door.
They can be smaller than 10x12. It's up to you how you use the space.
I may be mistaken, but Chip implied that the door would be useable. Hence forth why he stated a 30" dimension on the door.
I looked at the layouts, and I can only see branchline coal as the only potential to block the door.
Well when i looked the Snover & Port Fuller measured 12x12
The Philadelphia and Erie blocks the door unless it's a duck and crawl way under
The Branch Line Coal blocks the door unless it's a duck under but he removed the door because it opened inward
List number
1 Overall Favorites
#1 Philiadelphia & Erie
#2 Southern Railways
#3 Altoona & Johnstown
List number 2 Winner of each scale
HO- Philadelphia & Erie
N - Southern Railways
A big thank you to all who entered. I have found many ideas from the entries. You will see my bias towards simpler, easy to follow track plans. I'm a big fan of scenery.
N Scale: Altoona and Johnstown
HO Scale: Philadelphia and Erie
G Scale: This one is obvious. It shouldn't take away the credit for a nice layout though.
Top three:
1. Altoona and Johnstown
2. River Valley
3. Philadelphia and Erie
CO Fan wrote: I have acouple of questions before I voteWas the room size supposed to be 10x12 ?
I have acouple of questions before I vote
Was the room size supposed to be 10x12 ?
Yes.
Were we allowed to remove the door ?
No.
Isn't the orentation of the door supposed to be in the lower left corneron the 12 foot wall ?
on the 12 foot wall ?
I'm aware that several people did not follow the rules of the contest. But I was allowing each person to assess how badly, the person stepped out of bounds on their own. I certainly did not want to disqualify anyone who had put the work in.
However, I neglected to post the rules for the judges, so how would they know?
Hmmmmm I just noticed something here..... "and not because I have an I.Q. of 160"
The layout "Big Fork & Dielh" is awfully close to "Big Freakin Deal".
Nice play on words there
Hi Chip,
These are my picks,
OVERALL.......................
1st. Appalachian Central
2nd. Philadelphia & Erie
3rd. Stover & Port Fuller
BY GAUGE.....................
N. Appalachian Central
HO. Philadelphia & Erie
G. Borracho Traction
Good job by all entrants, no losers here.
Thanks for all your time and effort Chip, We all appreciate what you do.
Johnboy out.........
from Saskatchewan, in the Great White North..
We have met the enemy, and he is us............ (Pogo)
C_O Fan wrote: I have acouple of questions before I voteWas the room size supposed to be 10x12 ?Were we allowed to remove the door ?Isn't the orentation of the door supposed to be in the lower left corneron the 12 foot wall ?
Isn't the orentation of the door supposed to be in the lower left corner
Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions
Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!
N scale- Shover & Port Fuller RR Co.
HOscale- Kinesube Utsube Line
G Scale- Borracho Traction
Overall favorites:
1-Kinesube Utsube Line
2-Shover & Port Fuller RR Co.
3-Buffalo & Susquehanna
Here's my vote
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." - Jim Elliot Visit my blog! http://becomingawarriorpoet.blogspot.com
Finally it's up!
G Scale Favorite: (Duh!) Borracho Traction Co.
HO Scale Favorite: Philidelphia and Erie
N Scale Favorite: River Valley
OVERALL TOP 3
1: Philadelphia and Erie
2: Buffalo and Susquehanna3: Big Fork and Diehl
I was suprised the N scalers didn't go nuts with all that space!
Overall Favorites#1 Borracho Traction Co.
#2 Snover and Port Fuller Rairoad Co.
#3 Branch Line CoalWinner of each scaleHO- Branch Line Coal
N - Snover and Port Fuller Rairoad Co.
I find this contest very helpful in the fact that I myself am building a HO scale layout in a 9.5ft x 13ft bedroom. And while not all of the entry's used all of the available space they are fine examples in their own right. If I had not invested in HO rolling stock and Loco's and were looking into model trains for the first time I would be investing in G scale as I find the Borracho Traction Co. very impressive.
Johnnny_reb
Johnnny_reb Once a word is spoken it can not be unspoken!
My Train Page My Photobucket Page My YouTube Channel
Top layout in each scaleN-scale: "Snover and Port Fuller Railroad Company"H0-scale: "Kinesube Utsube Line"G-scale: "Borracho Traction Company" :-)
Top three favorites any scale:#1 Kinesube Utsube Line (H0)#2 "Buffalo and Susquehanna" (H0)#3 "Snover and Port Fuller Railroad Company" (N)
I am particularily impressed by the Kinesube Utsube Line. Very elegant with the narrow curved shelves and narrow curved peninsula - a true case of "less is more". And an elegant operating scheme for local trains - something which is also unusual.
Bravo!
Stein