From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet
R. T. POTEET wrote:SteamFreak, don't take my comment seriously since I am exercising a little bit of levity this afternoon.Without giving it too much thought at the time I think that Wills mentioned Knapp in one of his Colletor's Consist columns in RMC; this unit is not a Knapp, it is most likely in a Tenshodo box because it is a Tenshodo. The apparent rarity of Knapp units would infer that they are worth a great deal more money than this Tenshodo(?) unit went for. Even at one hundred and five dollars somebody just got themselves a real bargain!!! Even if this model never becomes more than a still feature on the mantelpiece it will still be a conversation-instigator!!!
Ah. Got ya. It's Friday.
But even if that unit were a Knapp that cluck seller would have still sold it as a Tyco and lost out on beaucoup $$.
Nelson
Ex-Southern 385 Being Hoisted
SteamFreak wrote: R. T. POTEET wrote: SteamFreak, I had never heard of Knapp either until the name was injected into this topic about three weeks ago; I never did google the name to find out what might be said about it but I was led to believe that they were one of the more significant manufacturers of the 1930s and, since they didn't cease production until 1945, they were, apparently the only manufacturer allowed to continue manufacturing model locomotives out of strategic metals during Big Brawl Two. I have been tugging on the chain of this individual who brought up the name since he first did so.Since this thread started almost a month ago I didn't remember that they were mentioned, and it wouldn't stick with me anyway since it's not a name I recognized. Interesting bit of history, though. I wonder what it's true value is. Anyone hazard a guess?
R. T. POTEET wrote: SteamFreak, I had never heard of Knapp either until the name was injected into this topic about three weeks ago; I never did google the name to find out what might be said about it but I was led to believe that they were one of the more significant manufacturers of the 1930s and, since they didn't cease production until 1945, they were, apparently the only manufacturer allowed to continue manufacturing model locomotives out of strategic metals during Big Brawl Two. I have been tugging on the chain of this individual who brought up the name since he first did so.
SteamFreak, I had never heard of Knapp either until the name was injected into this topic about three weeks ago; I never did google the name to find out what might be said about it but I was led to believe that they were one of the more significant manufacturers of the 1930s and, since they didn't cease production until 1945, they were, apparently the only manufacturer allowed to continue manufacturing model locomotives out of strategic metals during Big Brawl Two. I have been tugging on the chain of this individual who brought up the name since he first did so.
Since this thread started almost a month ago I didn't remember that they were mentioned, and it wouldn't stick with me anyway since it's not a name I recognized. Interesting bit of history, though. I wonder what it's true value is. Anyone hazard a guess?
R. T. POTEET wrote:SteamFreak, I had never heard of Knapp either until the name was injected into this topic about three weeks ago; I never did google the name to find out what might be said about it but I was led to believe that they were one of the more significant manufacturers of the 1930s and, since they didn't cease production until 1945, they were, apparently the only manufacturer allowed to continue manufacturing model locomotives out of strategic metals during Big Brawl Two. I have been tugging on the chain of this individual who brought up the name since he first did so.
SteamFreak wrote: I never heard of Knapp, so I Googled them and came up with this info. Scroll down to 'Knapp Electric.' It was made in 1938.
I never heard of Knapp, so I Googled them and came up with this info. Scroll down to 'Knapp Electric.' It was made in 1938.
Here is what I just received from the buyer. Did not say anything about Tyco.
Hello She arrived today . As promised, here is what it is : a partially built very early brass kit of a 4-8-2, probably Tenshodo as there is a sticker on the plain cardboard box that says Early Tenshodo 1954 or 1959 signed by Emil Pindzola? no name on the blue print which says Missouri Pacific Line 4-8-2 and is very basic, the extensive instruction sheets refer to a 2-8-2 Mikado and are Mantua instruction sheet N° 142 , 19/49 - kit N° : 208, there is also a MDC price list dated July 1st 1954 . Most parts are brass, the engine trailing axle is bronze, there are two six wheel brass Commonwealth bogies for the tender that are brighter than the rest, engine is the usual early japanese open frame type, transmission via a dark red rubber tube .
Rich
If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.
CNJ831 wrote: SteamFreak wrote: I'm tempted to shoot the buyer a message after 10 days or so to see if he has any idea what the heck it really is. Loathar started this mystery, and I want to know the answer. Maybe I should hit my old Mantua with some gold spray paint, then take photos from a distance. Do so and you're likely to get plenty of bids! After the buyer receives it though, it could be another story.The misrepresentation that goes on on eBay, intentional or otherwise, is simply terrible. Likewise, there are so many totally naive buyers pursuing eBay that it boggles the mind.Years back I always considered model railroaders a pretty intelligent, well informed bunch. However, with the coming of the Internet and seeing what folks post, I've since dropped that opinion. A perfect example is in what they will buy blind. A while back, I saw a very common 1950's Mantua 0-4-0 four car freight set, honestly worth perhaps $20, go for nearly $300 on eBay simply because the seller claimed, without any substantiation whatever, that it had been on display at the 1939 NY World's Fair. In fact, that particular Mantua loco and set didn't even appear until the 1950's! There were at least a dozen high dollar bids for the item and I'm almost sure the buyer is still going around telling folks he owns a unique, priceless, piece of model railroading's history. Yup, there's one born every minute!CNJ831
SteamFreak wrote: I'm tempted to shoot the buyer a message after 10 days or so to see if he has any idea what the heck it really is. Loathar started this mystery, and I want to know the answer. Maybe I should hit my old Mantua with some gold spray paint, then take photos from a distance.
I'm tempted to shoot the buyer a message after 10 days or so to see if he has any idea what the heck it really is. Loathar started this mystery, and I want to know the answer.
Maybe I should hit my old Mantua with some gold spray paint, then take photos from a distance.
Do so and you're likely to get plenty of bids! After the buyer receives it though, it could be another story.
The misrepresentation that goes on on eBay, intentional or otherwise, is simply terrible. Likewise, there are so many totally naive buyers pursuing eBay that it boggles the mind.
Years back I always considered model railroaders a pretty intelligent, well informed bunch. However, with the coming of the Internet and seeing what folks post, I've since dropped that opinion. A perfect example is in what they will buy blind. A while back, I saw a very common 1950's Mantua 0-4-0 four car freight set, honestly worth perhaps $20, go for nearly $300 on eBay simply because the seller claimed, without any substantiation whatever, that it had been on display at the 1939 NY World's Fair. In fact, that particular Mantua loco and set didn't even appear until the 1950's! There were at least a dozen high dollar bids for the item and I'm almost sure the buyer is still going around telling folks he owns a unique, priceless, piece of model railroading's history. Yup, there's one born every minute!
CNJ831
I sent a question a couple days ago and he said he would let me know. I am curious also.
Yes I know, I should be working on my layout, something constructive.
Tilden wrote: Hey, it sold for $105. Maybe somebody knows something we don't? Tilden
Hey, it sold for $105. Maybe somebody knows something we don't?
Tilden
Maybe something about one being born every minute???
Have fun with your trains
No matter how bizarre this is, nor how arcane it gets... It will not beat the lady I just bought a lionel engine from... I advised her that the engine and tender go together- she insisted that they were separate cars from a set, I sent her evidence from Lionel stating that this engine and that tender were never separate... She declined the idea. I offered to buy them now if she would combine shipping... She also declined- this was a mistake the combined buy it now prices and shipping would have gotten her just over 100 bucks... I bid and waited... and I won both... I sent her her 62.50 she refunded the 9.25 and combined the shipping and I wound up with a matched set 4-8-4 northern streamline steamer and tender models 1688 and 1689W for 45 and shipping... WHY DON'T THEY LISTEN WHEN WE TRY TO HELP THEM???
Tilden wrote: I don't see the $40 shipping charge. When I pulled up the listing the shipping cost is $69+.Are you guys sure this isn't 1 to 1 scale
I don't see the $40 shipping charge. When I pulled up the listing the shipping cost is $69+.
Are you guys sure this isn't 1 to 1 scale
I e-mailed the seller about the shipping, and they said it was a mistake. According to the listing it was supposed to have been about $65 for shipping to my address, but they said it should actually be $14.
from the info here I will skip buying it, good luck to the bidders, if they have probs they should look to bowser as their mountain looks very close to this. Bowser has taken up other product makers like Varney and Arbour, they havent done anythiong about the arbour stuff yet.
CNJ831 wrote: R. T. POTEET wrote:...you don't have the feebleist flippin' idea whether this Knapp company's Mountain went. . . . . . . . . . out of production around '45or if it was January, 1942 . . . . . . . . . . or August of '61 . . . . . . . . . . or December of '06 . . . . . . . . . . or if it was ever in production in the first place. If you ever figure out what in the aitch you are talking about be sure to let me know. Well...clearly you have not the slightest clue on the subject, nor obviously any background whatever in the hobby's history, a sad shortcoming all too common of this site's posts/posters. Most model railroad item production/availability dates are well documented and are not estimates nor W.A. guesses. And I certainly know the Knapp bronze 4-8-2 was produced, exactly what it looked like and its resemblance to the "Tycho" model in question...I have a Knapp example! CNJ831
R. T. POTEET wrote:...you don't have the feebleist flippin' idea whether this Knapp company's Mountain went. . . . . . . . . . out of production around '45or if it was January, 1942 . . . . . . . . . . or August of '61 . . . . . . . . . . or December of '06 . . . . . . . . . . or if it was ever in production in the first place. If you ever figure out what in the aitch you are talking about be sure to let me know.
...you don't have the feebleist flippin' idea whether this Knapp company's Mountain went
. . . . . . . . . . out of production around '45
Well...clearly you have not the slightest clue on the subject, nor obviously any background whatever in the hobby's history, a sad shortcoming all too common of this site's posts/posters. Most model railroad item production/availability dates are well documented and are not estimates nor W.A. guesses. And I certainly know the Knapp bronze 4-8-2 was produced, exactly what it looked like and its resemblance to the "Tycho" model in question...I have a Knapp example!
8500HPGASTURBINE wrote:My thought is who cares. Maybe it's some poor person who really doesn't know what it is. Or maybe some who knows but wants to bluff a little. If some idiot wants it for a big price then more power to the seller. I find it interesting that we can discuss it here. But when it comes to emailing them then posting it here for a small laugh then it's wrong. Let them sell what they want. If I see something wrong in a listing I learned to just let it be. Just my opinion. Agree or disagree.
I disagree. I e-mailed the seller and got the same "Thank You" response that she gave to others. Forgeting for the moment that she's advertsing somrthing which is inaccurately described at best, e-bay has a policy about excessive shipping charges. She is charging the same $40 shipping on all the stuff she has up for auction including plastic model airplanes which probably weight less than a pound. I reported her to e-bay for the excessive shipping charge. I won't even get into whether it's really a brass engine. If she had 30 or 40 sales, I might be inclined to give her a break but she's sold 177 things on e-bay. She's one of those sellers that really doesn't care what kind of profit she makes of an item, she rakes it in on shipping. Even if the engine was packed in a special box and sent insured, she's still making at least a $20 profit on shipping. E-bay doesn't approve and neither do I.
CNJ831 wrote: No reason to feel foolish, it just happens that I have a deep interest in the hobby's history and have done a lot of associated research.The Knapp 4-8-2 Heavy was introduced in 1938 and was, to my knowledge, never a big seller. In all probability the necessary bronze casting for the kits was all done prior to U.S.involvement in the war. Quite possibly there was only single run. It was not unusual to find certain loco kits containing "essential" war materials available well into the conflict, since they had been manufactured and stocked prior to January 1942. The hobby was quite small back then (less than 10k individuals) and there were no great runs of new products like you see today. A single relatively small run of an expensive item could remain available on the market for years. Typically, when the stock finally did run out, the item was regarded as OOP.CNJ831
No reason to feel foolish, it just happens that I have a deep interest in the hobby's history and have done a lot of associated research.
The Knapp 4-8-2 Heavy was introduced in 1938 and was, to my knowledge, never a big seller. In all probability the necessary bronze casting for the kits was all done prior to U.S.involvement in the war. Quite possibly there was only single run. It was not unusual to find certain loco kits containing "essential" war materials available well into the conflict, since they had been manufactured and stocked prior to January 1942. The hobby was quite small back then (less than 10k individuals) and there were no great runs of new products like you see today. A single relatively small run of an expensive item could remain available on the market for years. Typically, when the stock finally did run out, the item was regarded as OOP.CNJ831