Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

MTH quality

28402 views
51 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Sunday, May 30, 2010 12:30 PM

 I wouldn't stay away from a product because of couplers.  I simply changed MY SD70's to Kadees and was done with it.  MTH recognizes this which is why they include a standard knuckle coupler in the box.  They also thought ahead and included the screw hole of the coupler box.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Sunday, May 30, 2010 1:22 PM

Hamltnblue

 I wouldn't stay away from a product because of couplers.  I simply changed MY SD70's to Kadees and was done with it.  MTH recognizes this which is why they include a standard knuckle coupler in the box.  They also thought ahead and included the screw hole of the coupler box.

Hamltnblue, I do not use DCC or sound, and the couplers are just one more high tech item I do not wish to pay for just to remove/disable.

So far, very few of the locos MTH has offered fit my layout scheme or would ever be on my want list.

But for any future release to be considered, it would have to be offered DC (Commonly known these days as DCC ready).

I was very impressed with your DCC installation you posted a while back, but again I personally would not spend MTH prices to then remove the sound/DCS.

I model the early 50's, so the SD70 is of no personal interest, the only MTH loco so far offered in DC.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • 9 posts
Posted by Armour Yellow on Saturday, October 9, 2010 12:20 AM

I have KATO and MTH and I think MTH is the better value. They're solid, heavy and detailed (not to mention AVAILABLE, unlike KATO).

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Saturday, October 9, 2010 10:13 AM

Welcome to the Forums Armour Yellow Welcome

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Gahanna, Ohio
  • 1,987 posts
Posted by jbinkley60 on Saturday, October 9, 2010 6:34 PM

I picked up my first DCC ready MTH Norfolk Southern SD70M-2 yesterday.  I have the same model, different road number, with Protosound 3.0 .  Once I get a DCC sound decoder installed in the new unit, I'll be able to do some side-by-side comparisons.  My main complaint so far with the Protosound 3.0 unit is the lack of CV29 support.  I am living with it but it is a pain.  I plan to get the sound decoder, likely a QSI Revolution, installed in the next few. days.  I'll report back.

 

Engineer Jeff NS Nut
Visit my layout at: http://www.thebinks.com/trains/

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • 9 posts
Posted by Armour Yellow on Saturday, October 9, 2010 11:21 PM

Thank you, sir.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 29 posts
Posted by SeadooChooChoo on Monday, October 18, 2010 1:39 AM

Hamltnblue,

I saw your Photobucket photos of the Tsunami install.  I received my MTH CSX SD70ACe a few weeks ago.  It is DCC-ready & I'd like to have a DCC (motor &) sound decoder installed.  I'm not familiar with an Tsunami products.  Which Tsunami decoder would I need to order to get the prototypical motor & horn sounds that this loco should have?

Thanks for your help.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Monday, October 18, 2010 10:24 AM

johngriffey18ca1

I wouldn't say MTH prices are astronomical.   Or take into account my 2 MTH Steam engines.  I paid $519.00 for my Challenger 3985 but it is die cast and is great sounding.  I paid $389 for the SP Daylight 4449, but BLI wants about the same for their version of teh 4449.

Whenever I look at MTH's prices I balk.  They are typically listed in the MSRP $400->$500 range or more.  Add to this they have a MAP (minimum advertised price) and that dealer margins are quite low (told to me by a shop owner) it's no wonder I rarely see much of a discount on them.

I looked at their Berk's.  I wanted one for my C&O fleet.  Even with places that do offer discounts, it's significantly more expensive then fully working QSI P2K Berks, or Bachmann berks with a post sound install.  And the details are all wrong on the MTH version.  (the P2K, and Bachmann berks have incorrect pilots, but the details on the MTH C&O Berks are just way wrong.)

I both cringe and look forward to when they make the C&O H-8 2-6-6-6.  (They did it in O scale, and RR/Hornby doesn't sound like they are going to make any more any time soon.)  I know MTH's are built well, but I fear the price and detail errors.

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Monday, October 18, 2010 3:33 PM

SeadooChooChoo

Hamltnblue,

I saw your Photobucket photos of the Tsunami install.  I received my MTH CSX SD70ACe a few weeks ago.  It is DCC-ready & I'd like to have a DCC (motor &) sound decoder installed.  I'm not familiar with an Tsunami products.  Which Tsunami decoder would I need to order to get the prototypical motor & horn sounds that this loco should have?

Thanks for your help.

I used the TSU-1000 EMD 710. You will also need to get an 8 pin connector and solder the wires for your application.  The DCS version has polarity issues when changing decoders to DCC but yours should be no problem since it was made DCC ready.

http://www.soundtraxx.com/dsd/tsunami/1000.php

 

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • 9 posts
Posted by Armour Yellow on Friday, January 14, 2011 8:30 PM

Hi Dave,

I really hope you can reply to this comment since you seem to be very knowledgable. Here's my issue: I own four MTH SD70ACes (DCC ready aka DC analog) and have a simple DC system. I was using an MRC Tech 4 260 transformer and couldn't consist more than two of them due to a lack of power. I figured I needed more power and just deployed a brand new MRC AA444 Controlmaster 20. Since the CM20 is famously powerful and used at many clubs, I thought I over-killed my lack of power problem. I tried running all four MTH locos and could only apply about 25% of the throttle (either mode, didn't matter) before the transformer kicked off due to overloading. I am using 14 gauge copper wire soldered to two separate feeder tracks. I honestly can't believe these locos can use over an amp each. Any thoughts?

 

Thanks,

Zach

Tags: MTH
  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Saturday, January 15, 2011 5:28 PM

I'm not Dave but I'd suggest that you check the mode switch and voltage output. If you are on the mode for G scale you could damage your HO loco's. I think you want mode II or HO mode.

 

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Saturday, January 15, 2011 5:40 PM

Here's a link to the manual if you don't have one:  There's a warning about running HO on the G scale mode

http://www.modelrectifier.com/resources/trainsound/AA444.pdf

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: australia
  • 329 posts
Posted by peterjenkinson1956 on Saturday, January 15, 2011 11:29 PM

MTH...i bought two mth locos   ho scale   sd70ace  and a sd70-2      i was very disapointed then i could not programme the cvs that control the top  and mid speeds  as well as the acceleration and decelleration...  i completely stuffed up one of my locos and mth repaired it for free....see my forum regarding mth and the good service i recieved

mth are verrrrry nice locos  they pull great and look good....  if i could get them to speed match my other locos i would buy lots more

as to getting locos to run together straight out of the box.... you may be lucky to get a mth loco and have it run ok with a kato loco for example    however i have found that by fine tuning with dcc i can get any loco to run ( allmost )  exactly the same

i have found that i can have 4 x new in box locos  exactly the same and they will need to be programmed to match the speeds   this could be due to more frictins  tighter bearings etc

yes i do like mth   can use them ...no   would i buy more   ...no   peter

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Nevada
  • 825 posts
Posted by NevinW on Sunday, January 16, 2011 8:20 AM

I have been very impressed with all of the MTH engines I have seen run.  The quality is top notch.  

I run DCC, but the day MTH comes out with a small 4-6-0 or 2-8-0, I buy 6, DCS and all.  (unless it has a Belpaire firebox).  -  Nevin 

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Sunday, January 16, 2011 8:49 AM

I think the DCC Ready experiment with MTH was a big step.  Hopefully it went well and they consider doiing it with future releases.  One thing that may have hurt it was Athearn's Release of the same loco.

 

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • 9 posts
Posted by Armour Yellow on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 10:01 AM

Hello Hamltnblue,

Thanks for replying even though I accidentally replied to the wrong post. Your info and links were helpful.

It turns out that my new MRC AA444 (aka Control Master 20) is more than adequate to meet my MTH power needs. The problem was one of my four MTHs had a defective motor and was shorting out my layout. I called MTH and they asked that I ship the defective loco to them for warranty repair.

Thanks again,

Zach

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: South Carolina
  • 1,719 posts
Posted by Train Modeler on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 10:57 AM

Harley-Davidson
What about MTH HO quality products, working in DCC systems? Are realiable? thanks

I have one of the their SD70ACes with sound and it is great.  I really like the remote coupler control!  I can access all the functions with my Digitrax 402D.    The quality of the unit is superior in construction and sound to that of the new Athearn--IMHO.    I buy a lot of Athearn, for example the latest Gas Turbine, but that SD70ACe of their's has problems--just check the other forums--I think they are coming out with a fix for the sound however.     MTH also has a service dept that's easy to deal with--I called them before buying this loco since I liked Athearn's service group too.

The only issue is the lack of flexibility in the CVs as it is not really a DCC chip.   It is DCS.   But since it works great I've not really needed to spend the time changing things.

Richard

 

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • 130 posts
Posted by bn7026 on Saturday, January 22, 2011 7:02 AM

I've had some problems setting CV's into a pair of SD70ACE locomotives that one of my fellow club members bought.  We've tried to set the address off 03 on a dozen situations - the address change works while the loco has power - as soon as power is broken and then reapplied the loco's reset back to factory settings.

This was on both a Digitrax and NCE system with the same results every time.  I've done similar models of the same loco type before successfully so something is clearly wrong with the decoder in the loco's.

Now the owner has to send them all the way back to the USA from Australia to be re-programmed - not a great result.  Do MTH test their decoder batches to make sure they will program correctly.

Can't see myself buying one of these......

Tim 

Modelling Burlington Northern in Perth, Western Australia NCE DCC user since 1999
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Trois-Rivieres Quebec Canada
  • 1,063 posts
Posted by jalajoie on Saturday, January 22, 2011 9:30 AM

Now everything is not pure joy with MTH, the only one I have, a DCC ready SD70 ACe, had a few problems right out of the box.

First the shell was a nightmare to remove. The retainers tabs would not disengage no matter how hard I pushed outwards on these tabs they would not disengage. I finally took a screwdriver inserted between the shell and the walkway and yank the thing off, smearing the shell a bit in the process. Needless to say those tabs were cut off immediately to fix this problem. The easy part was to dismantle and reassemble the trucks

 Handrails that wont stay put in their stanchions, stanchions that are out of plumb, missing grab iron on the top of the long hood. Yes I know it is and easy fix but I had to purchase special glue to fix what reminds me of old Athearn Blue Box handrails. This problem is common as I have seen it on others MTH SD70 ACe locos. 

Lastly this DCC ready loco will overheat every decoders I installed so far and has already toasted an NCE decoder. (5 of them rated at 1.3 Amp continuous and 2 Amp stall). I am still investigating what is the cause, probably the light board or the motor. In any event I will take the matter with MTH reps at the West Springfield show coming next weekend

3 of these MTH SD70 Ace did not make the grade at the Chicago Museum of Science, one of them was retired after only 4 hours of operation (gears and motor problems) and the remaining  did not last very long. In the meantime those awful Athearn SD70 ACe are merely earning their keeps on the same layout.

Otherwise I do like the loco, and hope to resolve the overheating problem soon.

 

Jack W.

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • 9 posts
Posted by Armour Yellow on Saturday, January 22, 2011 2:04 PM

In regards to the overheating, have you tried running the loco at full throttle w/o a decoder in DC mode? I have an ACe the runs perfectly up to 75% throttle, but after that the motor shorts out. Called MTH and was told this was common on earlier models and to mail it back. I just shipped it a few days ago, so I don't have it back to report anything new. MTH was very helpful and getting them to fix under warranty was a simple process. Good luck. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Trois-Rivieres Quebec Canada
  • 1,063 posts
Posted by jalajoie on Saturday, January 22, 2011 6:41 PM

Armour Yellow, I did test the loco on a DC layout, before installing a decoder. Although I did not test it at full throttle, I run it at 7 volts, at this voltage the loco was running at what seems to me about 50 mph and was draining 0,03 Amp. I figure it was running well enough on DC for me to go further and install DCC.

I was running it this afternoon on the club's layout, this time with all lights off. the overheating while still present seems less than with all lights on. If it is a faulty light board, the replacement is an easy task as it only snap on the structure.   

Jack W.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!