QUOTE: Originally posted by drephpe RE: SPV's and ML trolley cars. Both are off the line, to my knowledge, and not a moment too soon, as they were both dogs. Ask any ATK maintenance person who had to mess with them. Those ML's may have looked sleek, but they only blew by at 110 because ATK had to assign an on-board electrician to each train to keep them running, and don't ask them to run in the snow, because the cooling air intakes and resistor grids were under the cars and would clog, leaving them dead and (poetic justice!) they'd have to be hauled in by a G! That's why they got reshopped and the grids put on top. Another interesting tidbit--the pans were aerodynamic, of course, but where a conventional train would have one or maybe 2 up, the MLs, being EMUs, had to have one up for each paired carset. If the train got any longer than about 3, the slipstream turbulence from the forward pans would cause the pans on the rear cars to gallop on and off the wire, playing havoc with the traction motors and creating a psychedelic ride for the passengers. Hence AEM7's hauling Amcans on the NEC spine ASAP and the trolleys relegated to the Harrisburg line where they could lope along and not see as many picky passengers. The SPVs were owned by ConnDOT and to my knowledge have been replaced by a locomotive hauled trainset. I seem to recall at least one fire, the exhaust leaked into the cabin, the ride was horrendous, etc. Can someone confirm, I think they may have been de-engined like MBTA did to some of their RDCs and turned into trailers. The RDCs were also genuine maintenance headaches until the Canadians rebuilt them, which helped a lot but did not completely solve the problem, although my old friend Jack Humbert (nee of the Reading, B&O and IC) swore by them when he had them in commute service in Philly and Baltimore. Dallas/Ft Worth (Trinity Railway Express, jointly owned by DART and The T) runs re-engined, re-transmissioned RDCs bought from Canada, MU-ed routinely in trains, but with no trailer cars. They were gutted and are quite nice inside. Here's one of several available links: http://www.trinityrailwayexpress.org/images.html They are also running bilevels between Dallas and Fort Worth, accessible by free shuttle from DFW Airport. And if it's still running this week (you Canadians help me out here) the E&N on Vancouver Island (VIA) ran a pair of RDC-1's between Victoria and Courtenay ( I think now just Nanaimo)--there has been quite a controversy over this line, with Rail America on again-off again; the last I saw, back on with the intervention of a shipper. It's a beautiful trip, although the lack of accommodations made it decidedly third-world, but I never could understand why they locked the doors between the two cars, even though both were occupied. I'll always be grateful to the conductor and brakeman who held the train for my then-young son and me at Courtenay so we could run to a store several blocks away and get some food and drinks (there wasn't even water on the train). B&O ran an all-RDC consist called the "Daylight Speedliner" in the late 50's and early 60's as a mainline train replacement. This train even had an RDC adapted as a food service car. They wound up in commute service (I rode one in 1966 between Pittsburgh and McKeesport) with the train name plates still on the equipment. Definitely one-of-a-kind. Hope this info is useful. Happy hunting.
QUOTE: Originally posted by passengerfan Longest RDC run in North America was Western Pacific who opertaed a pair of RDC-2's separately between Oakland Pier and Salt Lake City tri-weekly. Meals were at station stops and forward compartment was for train crews traveling home or between bases after compartment had better seating and was for passengers. When service ended cars sold to NP. Longest RDC service north of U. S. border was on PGE later BCR between North Vancouver and Prince George. The RDC-3 units were actually RDC-2 units with galley to serve meals at passengers seats. Probably most spectacular train trip scenery wise in North America. Service discontinued a couple of years ago. Crews were among the most friendly anywhere and was even allowed to shoot pictures through open baggage door on several occasions.
"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"
--David
Originally posted by AntonioFP45 Drephpe, Could you please post that link? I'm not familiar with it and would like to see the passenger equipment that you are referring to. Thanks![;)][:)] _______________________________________________________________ Happy to. This is one of several that shows the refurbed RDCs in Dallas. http://www.trinityrailwayexpress.org/images.html There are a lot more photos. Just go into google and put in "Trinity Railway Express" By the way, for those of you unfamiliar with the DFW Metroplex, TRE runs between Dallas and Fort Worth over the tracks of the former Burlington-Rock Island (B-RI) which hosted the Texas Zephyr, Sam Houston Zephyr, Texas Rocket, Twin Star Rocket and Frisco's Firefly and Black Gold. Reply Edit AntonioFP45 Member sinceDecember 2003 From: Good ol' USA 9,642 posts Posted by AntonioFP45 on Sunday, March 21, 2004 8:56 AM Drephpe, Could you please post that link? I'm not familiar with it and would like to see the passenger equipment that you are referring to. Thanks![;)][:)] Bill, thank you for your info. Very good tips as I'm about to "get serious" in using metalizers. You brought up an excellent point about typical ss passenger equipment looking a little "dulled down". However, after seeing some really nice shots on "railfan.net", I would like to make my Bachmann HO Metroliners look relatively new in the Penn Central scheme. [:)][:p][8D] The stainless steel sides on the prototype Metroliners still looked very shiny in 1972, when these MU units were about 4 to 5 years old. It is true that in the early 80s, the Metroliners that had not been repainted by Amtrak did look VERY DULL. Saw this in other photos that had 1980s dates on them, so your statement has a lot of merit. [^][tup] BTW, I've just read a tip on another thread regarding clears. A lot of the solvent based Clears that we've all been using for years tend to "yellow" over time. Apparently water-based or "Acrylic" Clears don't have that problem. I'm thinking about purchasing Model Master's acrylic clear. Have any of you all tried it or a comparable acrylic clear yet? [8)] Thanks a lot![:D][8D][8)][:)] "I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!" Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 20, 2004 9:31 PM Bill-- Don't forget, though, that when these things were new, they were generally kept up well (i.e., washed with fairly strong cleaning solutions on a very regular basis), so the bright metal finish is likely going to be fine, especially if you do the demo. You might try a sample of the stuff with a light overspray of dullcote to kill the sheen, if it's too bright for you. Take a quick look at those TRE cars on the link I originally posted a couple of pages back; those exteriors have been reworked and cleaned and they are definitely bright. A slightly dulled metallic coat might be just about right. Now , if it's been in service for a while without much ext. maintenance, well that's another story. Let us all know how it turns out. Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 20, 2004 11:22 AM AntonioFP45, I checked out the Alclad website and a few of it's 'links' . It gives good basic application instructions and the pics of scale aircraft were incredible. One of the links mentioned a new 'rattle can' Alclad for those who don't have an airbrush. It's pricey at $12.99 per can but if it works it's worth it. My only reservation about super glossy finishes is that they often look too good and don't replicate reality. If you view a full size train from a distance that would be equivalent to viewing an HO model from a couple of feet away, it would appear to have a much duller finish under most lighting conditions. At least that's how my tired eyes see things. For a freshly-shopped or brand new s.s. car, Alclad would make a great finish for a display model to be viewed up close. In my earlier post -same subject- I failed to mention the "Metalizer" brand that was orig. 'Humbrol' from UK (I think), then Monogram marketed it and later by Testors. It comes in quite a few metal finishes incl. stainless steel. Some of the colors have been available in spray cans and all are avail in approx 1 or 2 ounce bottles (they orig were in those annoying little 'Humbrol' metal tins). They do not brush well and should be airbrushed, or buy rattle cans. They can be easily and selectively buffed to achieve various levels of sheen. They must be top coated with "Metalizer Sealer" , a protective clear coat that unfortunately slightly dulls and moderately darkens the final color. You may have to experiment with different 'base' colors other than s.s. to achieve the desired finish. Note: -Sealer is not required if the model is not going to be handled, so it might be okay to skip that step for a display only model, especially if in display case. And the beat goes on. . . Reply Edit AntonioFP45 Member sinceDecember 2003 From: Good ol' USA 9,642 posts Posted by AntonioFP45 on Friday, March 19, 2004 3:03 PM Bill,[:)] Check out the web-site I wrote on my previous response and write back with your thoughts. [;)][:D][8D] Alclad II comes in a nice variety of metal shades. Duraluminum, Polished Aluminum, White Aluminum, and Chrome ( which is used to imitate SS) From what I've seen, this Alclad system is worth trying out as it provides very realistic metal finishes, new or worn. "I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!" Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 19, 2004 2:28 PM Floquil "old silver" is a good fini***o depict an older unit that didn't just go thru wash rack. This color is also used by model aircraft modelers to depict aircraft-esp WWII US planes that had been in service for a relatively short time; US did not paint planes 'silver' -it was natural metal (alum alloy)- used to reduce drag )from paint) and to expedite production and reduce costs. Although RR equipment like RDCs are s.s., and not alum, color of "weathered' metal is very close. Reply Edit AntonioFP45 Member sinceDecember 2003 From: Good ol' USA 9,642 posts Posted by AntonioFP45 on Friday, March 19, 2004 6:22 AM Hey Guys, [:D][8D][:)][8)] It's been great that there has been so much interest in RDCs! In case some of you haven't seen it, check out the July 2003 Moder Railroader. There is a feature on a painting technique for plastic model passenger cars to give them a much more realistic "stainless steel look" using the Alclad II Chrome. The subjects used are RDCs! It's an excellent article. This week I will use the techniques described to repaint one of my HO Bachmann Metroliners. [;)] From what I"ve read, you have to take your time and be patient when trying this technique. A rep at a hobby shop told me to make sure that "every square inch" of the surface of the model is covered with the base paint or primer before using Alclad II or you can wind up with some pitting or crazing of the plastic. Alclad II is regularly used by scale model aircraft modelers. On your search engine type in Alclad II lacquers FAQ. Check out some very impressive pictures of plastic planes that look incredibly like metal. AFP45 "I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!" Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:47 PM Thanks-hope I can reciprocate some day! Reply Edit ndbprr Member sinceSeptember 2002 7,486 posts Posted by ndbprr on Thursday, March 18, 2004 1:08 PM Well I'll dig it out and give you the numbers. the earliest I can possibly get to it is sometime next week so keep checking and I'll post them asap. Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 18, 2004 11:53 AM Lighten up guys-( I'm assuming you are guys, and in fact, let's not act like cranky women over this! Boy was that politically incorrect. . .) All of this info has been great and rekindled my interest in RDCs.. In fact it has been one of the better on-line ' topics' on this forum in some time. Trainworld has Proto 1000 RDCs on sale in latest MR ad for as little as $19.99. Going to get a couple just for the hxxx of it. heah 'ndbprr-there you go again teasing us with the possibility that you have a mimeographed list of the original buyers of the early production RDCs! And the beat goes on. . . Reply Edit ndbprr Member sinceSeptember 2002 7,486 posts Posted by ndbprr on Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:08 AM No I didn't take offense merely expressing that at the time there was absolutely no interest and as I said if I was interested in selling copies I would post how to contact me. I'll have to dig it out of the stack of stuff and see what I can do. I know that there is a mimeographed list glued in by Budd of the original buyers to the date they sent it to me as a kid which was probably around 1952. Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 17, 2004 10:43 PM Bill-- Actually, I think it's great that he has the brochure and was willing to share some of the info in it with us. And as to whether ndbprr was trying to sell his brochure, I thought by his last post he might have taken some offense at one of my comments (not anything anyone else had said), and I certainly don't want to hit anyone's nerves. I took his original post to mean that he had found no earlier interest from anyone regarding the subject, and as you pointed out so well, he hit the mother lode on interest here. I hope he can figure out how to post parts of it if he feels so inclined, because everyone here seems to have an interest in that information. The collectable nature of his piece is another matter altogether. By the way, I found another post on here that says I can't directly post the pix I referred to, but when I get a chance I may try anyway. Reply Edit 1234 Subscriber & Member Login Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more! Login Register Users Online There are no community member online Search the Community ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Model Railroader Newsletter See all Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox! Sign up