Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

RDC passenger consists

17656 views
113 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 11, 2004 11:35 AM
When did Amtrak's last RDC run?

DOGGY
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 11, 2004 8:34 AM
My grandfather was an engineer on one of the "Daylight Speedliners" in the late 50's and early 60's and I got to ride with him sometimes and have fond, albeit dim, memories of them. I've been searching for a few years now to get information and a picture of one. Your one paragraph gave me more information than I've been able to get so far and it's leading me to some good sources. Any suggestions as to where I can get a photo of one? I've tried all the usual - B&O, local historical, newspapers, etc. - but no luck so far.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 11, 2004 8:28 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by drephpe

RE: SPV's and ML trolley cars. Both are off the line, to my knowledge, and not a moment too soon, as they were both dogs. Ask any ATK maintenance person who had to mess with them. Those ML's may have looked sleek, but they only blew by at 110 because ATK had to assign an on-board electrician to each train to keep them running, and don't ask them to run in the snow, because the cooling air intakes and resistor grids were under the cars and would clog, leaving them dead and (poetic justice!) they'd have to be hauled in by a G! That's why they got reshopped and the grids put on top. Another interesting tidbit--the pans were aerodynamic, of course, but where a conventional train would have one or maybe 2 up, the MLs, being EMUs, had to have one up for each paired carset. If the train got any longer than about 3, the slipstream turbulence from the forward pans would cause the pans on the rear cars to gallop on and off the wire, playing havoc with the traction motors and creating a psychedelic ride for the passengers. Hence AEM7's hauling Amcans on the NEC spine ASAP and the trolleys relegated to the Harrisburg line where they could lope along and not see as many picky passengers. The SPVs were owned by ConnDOT and to my knowledge have been replaced by a locomotive hauled trainset. I seem to recall at least one fire, the exhaust leaked into the cabin, the ride was horrendous, etc. Can someone confirm, I think they may have been de-engined like MBTA did to some of their RDCs and turned into trailers. The RDCs were also genuine maintenance headaches until the Canadians rebuilt them, which helped a lot but did not completely solve the problem, although my old friend Jack Humbert (nee of the Reading, B&O and IC) swore by them when he had them in commute service in Philly and Baltimore.

Dallas/Ft Worth (Trinity Railway Express, jointly owned by DART and The T) runs re-engined, re-transmissioned RDCs bought from Canada, MU-ed routinely in trains, but with no trailer cars. They were gutted and are quite nice inside. Here's one of several available links: http://www.trinityrailwayexpress.org/images.html They are also running bilevels between Dallas and Fort Worth, accessible by free shuttle from DFW Airport.

And if it's still running this week (you Canadians help me out here) the E&N on Vancouver Island (VIA) ran a pair of RDC-1's between Victoria and Courtenay ( I think now just Nanaimo)--there has been quite a controversy over this line, with Rail America on again-off again; the last I saw, back on with the intervention of a shipper. It's a beautiful trip, although the lack of accommodations made it decidedly third-world, but I never could understand why they locked the doors between the two cars, even though both were occupied. I'll always be grateful to the conductor and brakeman who held the train for my then-young son and me at Courtenay so we could run to a store several blocks away and get some food and drinks (there wasn't even water on the train).

B&O ran an all-RDC consist called the "Daylight Speedliner" in the late 50's and early 60's as a mainline train replacement. This train even had an RDC adapted as a food service car. They wound up in commute service (I rode one in 1966 between Pittsburgh and McKeesport) with the train name plates still on the equipment. Definitely one-of-a-kind.

Hope this info is useful. Happy hunting.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 8, 2004 10:03 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by passengerfan

Longest RDC run in North America was Western Pacific who opertaed a pair of RDC-2's separately between Oakland Pier and Salt Lake City tri-weekly. Meals were at station stops and forward compartment was for train crews traveling home or between bases after compartment had better seating and was for passengers. When service ended cars sold to NP.
Longest RDC service north of U. S. border was on PGE later BCR between North Vancouver and Prince George. The RDC-3 units were actually RDC-2 units with galley to serve meals at passengers seats. Probably most spectacular train trip scenery wise in North America. Service discontinued a couple of years ago. Crews were among the most friendly anywhere and was even allowed to shoot pictures through open baggage door on several occasions.

THE WP RDC ran due to Passes not accepted on the California Zeypher and the Train was losing Money

DOGGY
GO CUBS
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 5:37 PM
M636C

Thanks for the info. [;)][:)]

I saw the locomotives that you mentioned that slightly resemble SDP40fs with E unit style carbody. Saw one on the same PBS special that I mentioned earlier that covered an Indian Pacific passenger train. It was a single, green colored unit pulling a streamlined passenger train. There were video shots in the cab with the engineer (called the driver) operating the locomotive from the left side.

Cheers![:D][8D][:)]

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 4, 2004 3:44 AM
If you're not aware of this, you may refer to a two-page article about RDC's in Railroad Model Craftsman (July,2001 pgs 48-49). In that article they mentioned an RDC-9, described as a coach w/ but one engine, not two and without controls. Also, it described a B&O name train: "Daylight Speedliner", which was a three car consist including an RDC-2 with a kitchen and 24-seat dining section and a bar in front of 24 coach seats. It also mentions that some are still running in Cuba, at least at the time the article appeared, some as powered units and some as unpowered coaches. It didn't clarify whether powered RDCs pulled unpowered RDCs as trailers, or whether the unpowered units were pulled as coaches behind something else. The article is a short read but a good one.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Saturday, April 3, 2004 6:39 AM
Guys,

There's a good book, called "Budd Car, The RDC Story" by Chuck Crouse, published by Weekend Chief, which covers exports as well as US RDCs. It gets a little confused by some Australian non-Budd copies, but is otherwise pretty good.

The cars in South America were delivered to Brazil, according to this book..
It describes four standard RDC-1s (well, relatively standard, they were 5'3" gauge) as working between Rio and Sao Paulo on the Central Railway. There were also 19 cars for metre gauge, 61 feet long but otherwise standard "Pioneer III" cars, like diesel powered shortened "Silverliners". These were apparently spread over various different systems in Brazil.

To address the EMD cab units in Australia mentioned earlier, these were mainly model A-16C, a sort of SD-9 with a body like an E unit (much like UP's E units with GP38-2 equipment, except the Australian units were mainly C-C, bit with the first 11 units being A-16A, with A1A-A1A trucks. There were 17 units built with SD-40 equipment. These were vaguely like an SDP40F (or F40C) fitted with an E-9 cab, and a reasonably neat fairing matching the curved cab roof to the angled engine cowl. These (except for one wrecked) are still in service in Genessee & Wyoming orange and black.

Peter
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 1, 2004 1:52 PM
There was a feature about Budd cars operating in South America in Continental Modeller magazine recently. Some were being used as normal passenger cars (demotored), some had had extra non-standard diaphragms added to the outer ends, and the was even a batch of special variants for narrow-gauge work - these had inside-bearing trucks, round-ended side windows, and no "hump" on the roof - the radiators were relocated. Sadly I can't remember precisely where these were operating and cannot find the original article at the moment - If I come across it I'll post some more information on these.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Thursday, April 1, 2004 10:13 AM
M636C

Thanks! Great info. While my primary interest is American railroading I've always had a curiosity about Austrailian railroading. I've seen two PBS specials that covered passenger operations in Australia, very impressive. My favorite one was of the long passenger train run by the Indian Pacific. One one stretch the train's locomotives were EMD "E" units, though I think in Austrailia EMD locomotives use different designations.

Its good to know that Budd has built products that have lasted a long time and can be found around the world.

Cheers to you!

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Tuesday, March 30, 2004 11:33 PM
Antonio,

The train that was called "The Fish" was an eight car set of electric cars, with cabs in one end of the motor car only, so they ran as motor/trailer/trailer/motor. The car bodies were built under licence from Budd, as were many other cars including the "Indian Pacific" and "The Ghan" which run from East to West and South to North coasts (respectively). These electric cars worked at 1500 volts DC (from overhead) and had four 190 HP motors on each power car. These trains ran most of the passenger services on the line West of Sydney. The name "Fish" dated back to the early days of the railway, and was the nickname of the driver (whose name was Heron, a bird that eats fish). The use of the train name finally died out in about 1970. The train was a commuter train with reserved seats, and had a really consistent set of passengers. I think the growth of traffic meant that seat reservation was eliminated, and more (unnamed) trains were run. Present trains are stainless steel double deck cars, somewhat similar to Bombardier cars, but with entrances above the trucks for high level platfoms.

The single deck cars continued to be used until about five years ago, and many are in museums, with I think one set of four cars in (electric) working order. The others are hauled by locomotives when required. They were identified by small steel plates on the ends of the four car sets, which carried the letter "U" and a set number (up to 12). Some fans called them "U-boats" (there were no GE locomotives to confuse anyone). They were not airconditioned but could run at more than 70 mph, and as kids we enjoyed riding on them with the windows open (at least in fine weather).

The movie "The Matrix" used two of these cars as the subway train, with the lead car modified to look more like a New York City train. These cars had hinged end doors, and the modified car was fitted with sliding doors in the centre for the movie. Some scenes were in a movie set with real track (but no wires) through it, and others in Sydney underground stations (without trains). If you watch the movie carefully enough, you can see that the second car has no centre door.

The final scene in the third movie was set in a park in Sydney, with the sun rising in the West, (I don't know how they did that, but it wasn't hard by their standards) and computer generated buildings hiding the Harbour Bridge, Opera House and similar items not generic enough.

The Australian Budd RDC cars were very similar in appearance to the RDC-1, but were shorter and lower in height. The only real difference in appearance was that they had corridor connection diaphragms on each end. The trailer car, which had a food bar, had a smaller "hump" since it only needed radiators for a generator set. The Athearn cars are well liked for being about the right length, although they are a bit too high. Our cars didn't have the "fluting" extending around the ends, either, which the Athearn cars have.

Peter
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Tuesday, March 30, 2004 7:10 AM
M636C

Were these the same type of cars that were used on an Austrailian railcar train called the Flying Fish? I saw a picture of this train back in the late 70s and thought the stainless steel cars on it were very attractive. The styling was similar but not exact as the RDC.

I can't remember if the lead car was rail diesel or used overhead electric power. This was a very shiny, nice looking passenger train. [:)][:D][8)]

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Monday, March 29, 2004 11:52 PM
Guys,

The Australian "Commonwealth Railways" bought three RDC-1s in 1950, and ran them on shorter runs at the East end of the line, although before the introduction of diesel locomotives in late 1951, a couple of runs were made right across the desert, partly to show what could be done by cutting out the water stops needed by steam operation.

A number of retired Reading gas-electric trailer cars were purchased particularly to run as trailers, and these RDC cars hauled trailers for most of their lives. Later, some former narrow gauge railcars were used as trailers, and some Belgian built steel boxcars were painted silver and had their brakes modified to work with the RDCs. They generally only hauled two trailers at a time as a maximum, and the grades weren't too bad.

The cars were taken out of service in the 1990s after a bad crossing accident with a truck carrying steel reinforcing bars. One car was basically unrepairable.

One is preserved in the National Railway Museum in Adelaide South Australia.

Budd must have accepted that Australians were incorrigeable and the local licensee Commonwealth Engineering built a five car set for New South Wales with a purpose designed trailer! These cars were only 77 feet long, and can be represented by the Athearn models - see, there is a prototype for everything if you look hard enough!
These cars were all cut up by an admiinistration that didn't understand that stainless steel doesn't deteriorate. They kept some corrosion ridden composite aluminium and steel cars because they were 13 years newer.

There are still some bigger cars vaugely like RDCs running in Western Australia, called "Prospector", because of gold mining associations, not consciously named after the early Rio Grande cars. A few of these were trailers too! They are being replaced by new streamlined cars, without the humps for radiators, but basically the same idea, underfloor engines driving the inner axles!

Peter
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Monday, March 29, 2004 5:26 PM
Longest RDC run in North America was Western Pacific who opertaed a pair of RDC-2's separately between Oakland Pier and Salt Lake City tri-weekly. Meals were at station stops and forward compartment was for train crews traveling home or between bases after compartment had better seating and was for passengers. When service ended cars sold to NP.
Longest RDC service north of U. S. border was on PGE later BCR between North Vancouver and Prince George. The RDC-3 units were actually RDC-2 units with galley to serve meals at passengers seats. Probably most spectacular train trip scenery wise in North America. Service discontinued a couple of years ago. Crews were among the most friendly anywhere and was even allowed to shoot pictures through open baggage door on several occasions.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Monday, March 29, 2004 3:26 PM
Would be interested in seeing the outside disk brakes and how they fit on the truck.

I suspect they will look like the Silverliner cars that the PRR bought in the 60's. Basically it is an outboard very shiny disk about half the hieght of the wheel with a caliper.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 28, 2004 9:50 PM
Guess what--thanks to Buckeye Riveter post on CTT, here is the RDC1 demo and map of the tour:



Please don't use for any commercial purposes!

Also note--no outside disk brakes. Std drop equalizer trucks with outside roller bearings. This is a roller bearing mfr ad from 1950. Matches the images in the Budd ads. Would be interested in seeing the outside disk brakes and how they fit on the truck.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Guelph, Ont.
  • 1,476 posts
Posted by BR60103 on Monday, March 22, 2004 10:34 PM
I've been off for a few weeks, but I'll pick up an old thread.
The RDC demonstrator was sold to CNR. It originally had outside disk brakes and maybe inside frame trucks. By the time I was aware of it, CN had made it consistent with the rest of their fleet. Decades ago, there was a book "The Budd RDC in Canada" by Ray Corley. It was a good story, up to the mid 60s. (Ray died last year.)

--David

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 22, 2004 8:49 PM
You're quite welcome.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Monday, March 22, 2004 12:23 PM
[8D] Drephpe

Thanks! These are very good shots of the RDC's. The stainless steel corrugation still has some "sheen" but the roof and other sections do show considerable fade and look duller from a distance as Bill Matthewson indicated. These pictures are very good guides. While I still intend to make my Budd Metroliners look fairly new with the Alclad II Chrome, I'll use a variation of the metalizer so that my Rivorossi passenger cars won't look so new. I'll continue to study the aircraft pictures on that Alclad site and experiment with some metalizer mixes to make weathering variations.

Thanks again Drephpe and Bill! [swg][tup]

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 21, 2004 8:14 PM
Originally posted by AntonioFP45

Drephpe,

Could you please post that link? I'm not familiar with it and would like to see the passenger equipment that you are referring to. Thanks![;)][:)]
_______________________________________________________________

Happy to. This is one of several that shows the refurbed RDCs in Dallas.

http://www.trinityrailwayexpress.org/images.html

There are a lot more photos. Just go into google and put in "Trinity Railway Express"

By the way, for those of you unfamiliar with the DFW Metroplex, TRE runs between Dallas and Fort Worth over the tracks of the former Burlington-Rock Island (B-RI) which hosted the Texas Zephyr, Sam Houston Zephyr, Texas Rocket, Twin Star Rocket and Frisco's Firefly and Black Gold.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Sunday, March 21, 2004 8:56 AM
Drephpe,

Could you please post that link? I'm not familiar with it and would like to see the passenger equipment that you are referring to. Thanks![;)][:)]

Bill, thank you for your info.
Very good tips as I'm about to "get serious" in using metalizers.
You brought up an excellent point about typical ss passenger equipment looking a little "dulled down". However, after seeing some really nice shots on "railfan.net", I would like to make my Bachmann HO Metroliners look relatively new in the Penn Central scheme. [:)][:p][8D]

The stainless steel sides on the prototype Metroliners still looked very shiny in 1972, when these MU units were about 4 to 5 years old. It is true that in the early 80s, the Metroliners that had not been repainted by Amtrak did look VERY DULL. Saw this in other photos that had 1980s dates on them, so your statement has a lot of merit. [^][tup]

BTW, I've just read a tip on another thread regarding clears. A lot of the solvent based Clears that we've all been using for years tend to "yellow" over time. Apparently water-based or "Acrylic" Clears don't have that problem. I'm thinking about purchasing Model Master's acrylic clear. Have any of you all tried it or a comparable acrylic clear yet? [8)]

Thanks a lot![:D][8D][8)][:)]

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 20, 2004 9:31 PM
Bill--

Don't forget, though, that when these things were new, they were generally kept up well (i.e., washed with fairly strong cleaning solutions on a very regular basis), so the bright metal finish is likely going to be fine, especially if you do the demo. You might try a sample of the stuff with a light overspray of dullcote to kill the sheen, if it's too bright for you. Take a quick look at those TRE cars on the link I originally posted a couple of pages back; those exteriors have been reworked and cleaned and they are definitely bright. A slightly dulled metallic coat might be just about right. Now , if it's been in service for a while without much ext. maintenance, well that's another story.

Let us all know how it turns out.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 20, 2004 11:22 AM
AntonioFP45, I checked out the Alclad website and a few of it's 'links' . It gives good basic application instructions and the pics of scale aircraft were incredible. One of the links mentioned a new 'rattle can' Alclad for those who don't have an airbrush. It's pricey at $12.99 per can but if it works it's worth it. My only reservation about super glossy finishes is that they often look too good and don't replicate reality. If you view a full size train from a distance that would be equivalent to viewing an HO model from a couple of feet away, it would appear to have a much duller finish under most lighting conditions. At least that's how my tired eyes see things. For a freshly-shopped or brand new s.s. car, Alclad would make a great finish for a display model to be viewed up close. In my earlier post -same subject- I failed to mention the "Metalizer" brand that was orig. 'Humbrol' from UK (I think), then Monogram marketed it and later by Testors. It comes in quite a few metal finishes incl. stainless steel. Some of the colors have been available in spray cans and all are avail in approx 1 or 2 ounce bottles (they orig were in those annoying little 'Humbrol' metal tins). They do not brush well and should be airbrushed, or buy rattle cans. They can be easily and selectively buffed to achieve various levels of sheen. They must be top coated with "Metalizer Sealer" , a protective clear coat that unfortunately slightly dulls and moderately darkens the final color. You may have to experiment with different 'base' colors other than s.s. to achieve the desired finish. Note: -Sealer is not required if the model is not going to be handled, so it might be okay to skip that step for a display only model, especially if in display case. And the beat goes on. . .
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Friday, March 19, 2004 3:03 PM
Bill,[:)]

Check out the web-site I wrote on my previous response and write back with your thoughts.

[;)][:D][8D] Alclad II comes in a nice variety of metal shades. Duraluminum, Polished Aluminum, White Aluminum, and Chrome ( which is used to imitate SS) From what I've seen, this Alclad system is worth trying out as it provides very realistic metal finishes, new or worn.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 19, 2004 2:28 PM
Floquil "old silver" is a good fini***o depict an older unit that didn't just go thru wash rack. This color is also used by model aircraft modelers to depict aircraft-esp WWII US planes that had been in service for a relatively short time; US did not paint planes 'silver' -it was natural metal (alum alloy)- used to reduce drag )from paint) and to expedite production and reduce costs. Although RR equipment like RDCs are s.s., and not alum, color of "weathered' metal is very close.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Friday, March 19, 2004 6:22 AM
Hey Guys, [:D][8D][:)][8)]

It's been great that there has been so much interest in RDCs! In case some of you haven't seen it, check out the July 2003 Moder Railroader. There is a feature on a painting technique for plastic model passenger cars to give them a much more realistic "stainless steel look" using the Alclad II Chrome. The subjects used are RDCs! It's an excellent article. This week I will use the techniques described to repaint one of my HO Bachmann Metroliners. [;)]

From what I"ve read, you have to take your time and be patient when trying this technique. A rep at a hobby shop told me to make sure that "every square inch" of the surface of the model is covered with the base paint or primer before using Alclad II or you can wind up with some pitting or crazing of the plastic.

Alclad II is regularly used by scale model aircraft modelers. On your search engine type in Alclad II lacquers FAQ. Check out some very impressive pictures of plastic planes that look incredibly like metal.

AFP45

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:47 PM
Thanks-hope I can reciprocate some day!
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Thursday, March 18, 2004 1:08 PM
Well I'll dig it out and give you the numbers. the earliest I can possibly get to it is sometime next week so keep checking and I'll post them asap.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 18, 2004 11:53 AM
Lighten up guys-( I'm assuming you are guys, and in fact, let's not act like cranky women over this! Boy was that politically incorrect. . .) All of this info has been great and rekindled my interest in RDCs.. In fact it has been one of the better on-line ' topics' on this forum in some time. Trainworld has Proto 1000 RDCs on sale in latest MR ad for as little as $19.99. Going to get a couple just for the hxxx of it. heah 'ndbprr-there you go again teasing us with the possibility that you have a mimeographed list of the original buyers of the early production RDCs! And the beat goes on. . .
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:08 AM
No I didn't take offense merely expressing that at the time there was absolutely no interest and as I said if I was interested in selling copies I would post how to contact me. I'll have to dig it out of the stack of stuff and see what I can do. I know that there is a mimeographed list glued in by Budd of the original buyers to the date they sent it to me as a kid which was probably around 1952.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 17, 2004 10:43 PM
Bill--

Actually, I think it's great that he has the brochure and was willing to share some of the info in it with us. And as to whether ndbprr was trying to sell his brochure, I thought by his last post he might have taken some offense at one of my comments (not anything anyone else had said), and I certainly don't want to hit anyone's nerves. I took his original post to mean that he had found no earlier interest from anyone regarding the subject, and as you pointed out so well, he hit the mother lode on interest here. I hope he can figure out how to post parts of it if he feels so inclined, because everyone here seems to have an interest in that information. The collectable nature of his piece is another matter altogether.

By the way, I found another post on here that says I can't directly post the pix I referred to, but when I get a chance I may try anyway.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!