Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

How tall is your layout?

5666 views
33 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
How tall is your layout?
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, January 7, 2005 7:20 AM
I'm thinking somewhere between 30-36" what is your height to ground level --table plus ply and foam.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Friday, January 7, 2005 7:24 AM
Between 50" and 58".

Most modular layouts (N Trak, et al) are set at 40".

Dave H

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Anderson Indiana
  • 1,301 posts
Posted by rogerhensley on Friday, January 7, 2005 8:58 AM
44 to 48 inches.

Roger Hensley
= ECI Railroad - http://madisonrails.railfan.net/eci/eci_new.html =
= Railroads of Madison County - http://madisonrails.railfan.net/

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 7, 2005 8:59 AM
"Ground" level is around 50", with tracks running to about 6-7" above that and about 4-5" below (staging).
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Friday, January 7, 2005 9:05 AM
29"

I wanted to keep it low so that my kids (5 and 7) can reach the entire layout. All our switches are hand throw and they are responsible for re-railing and cars that jump a switch. I use Peco turnouts and with their sprung point they are not very forgiving when run over the wrong way. It is not such a pain to work on, as when I am on my back on the floor, my hands can easily reach the underside of the layout for wiring.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: AIKEN S.C. & Orange Park Fl.
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by claycts on Friday, January 7, 2005 9:07 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jsalemi

"Ground" level is around 50", with tracks running to about 6-7" above that and about 4-5" below (staging).

OK at this BPE (base point elevation) your TOR (Top of Rail) at your highest track is around 57" how is your maint acess at those numbers? My BPE is 36 with high TOR at 54". My eye level is 63" BUT I plan to use a chair most of the time for runiing which sets my eye at 43".
Take Care George Pavlisko Driving Race cars and working on HO trains More fun than I can stand!!!
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Corpus Christi, Texas
  • 2,377 posts
Posted by leighant on Friday, January 7, 2005 9:20 AM
Tabletop 48" but I will go 6-8" higher next time.
Treetops 55"
Top of town water tower 58"
top of sky background 95"
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 7, 2005 9:25 AM
Table top is 50 inches above the floor
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Kent, England
  • 348 posts
Posted by challenger3802 on Friday, January 7, 2005 10:27 AM
My lower level baseboard sits 38" off the ground, ample height for sitting in a chair and watching them at eye level. The higher level station is a further 6" up (meaning I have to sit bolt upright to see them from the same chair!)

Ian
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Fargo, ND
  • 136 posts
Posted by michealfarley on Friday, January 7, 2005 10:56 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ebriley

Table top is 50 inches above the floor


Mine too. Just barely clears the light switch and breaker box. Plenty of storage underneath.

If your layout is high enough, then you can put your workbench underneath and save space, especially if space is a premium
Micheal Farley Fargo, ND NCE Powerhouse user Modeling the BN in ND, circa 1970-1980
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Friday, January 7, 2005 10:58 AM
Top of table is 58". I have two drop down sections at 54" for planned scenic effects, but track will still be at 58".
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Ridgeville,South Carolina
  • 1,294 posts
Posted by willy6 on Friday, January 7, 2005 11:27 AM
36" because when built the benchwork, i used 6ft 2x4's and didn't want to waste wood.
Being old is when you didn't loose it, it's that you just can't remember where you put it.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, January 7, 2005 11:35 AM
The section I have now is at 48". This will go off into the rest of the layout which will be double-decked. The lower level will be at 36", the upper level at 54".

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: CN Seymour Industrial spur
  • 262 posts
Posted by Dayliner on Friday, January 7, 2005 11:35 AM
51". Good for keeping the trains safe from small children (the railroad shares their playroom); not good when they want to run and watch the trains (we've had a couple of nasty falls off stools). I expect you will want yours lower because you are involving your children. 36" sounds good for that.
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Warren, MI
  • 89 posts
Posted by rfross on Friday, January 7, 2005 11:57 AM
My around the room shelf layout is 58" off the floor. It lets me use the room as a real room with a futon for guests, my PC, modeling workbench, etc. because everything fits underneath it.
Modeling the Ballard Terminal Railroad (a former Northern Pacific line) in Ballard, a district north of downtown Seattle in 1968, on a two-rail O-scale shelf switching layout. The Ballard Terminal didn't exist in 1968 but my version of the BTRR is using NP power. (My avatar photo was taken by Doc Wightman of Seattle)
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Friday, January 7, 2005 12:16 PM
First level 36" to 44"
Second level 44" to 54"
Third level 54" to 63"

My last layout was at 48", and if I ever build another one level layout, it'll be at 52"-54" which for me at 6'2" is a pretty good walkaround layout height.

Desks are at 32", which is supposedly optimal sitting height, so a layout at 36" should be a sitting down to operate pike. My workbench is at 40" which seems to be a good sitting height for me, and keeps my back straight.

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,249 posts
Posted by tstage on Friday, January 7, 2005 12:24 PM
Chip,

You're going to get (as you've already seen) a plethora and variety of answers. Mines 42" high. It's a nice height for me (at 6'-4') to work on the layout and more at my eye level to enjoy viewing it - but still low enough for any kids who come to visit. You do have to consider your son and daughter in the ratio. If you decide on that range, I would go for the higher end. What height is the club layout?

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 228 posts
Posted by mike33469 on Friday, January 7, 2005 1:06 PM
54", plenty of room for a lower level someday, and a great place for my workbench.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: US
  • 641 posts
Posted by mikebonellisr on Friday, January 7, 2005 1:26 PM
I'm 5'11" and my layout is pretty much a shelf layout around the room.Easy enough to work on wiring and tortoises and great for watching trains run by at chest level.I do have to use a small stool to reach anything that is not right near the edge of the layout but that has'nt been a big problem.Right now it,s too high for my grand kids,but they'll grow into it.It's also great to have all that usable space under it.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Friday, January 7, 2005 3:43 PM
6'5" and don't much care for anything above 48". 42-44" is what I prefer with one caviat - ABSOLUTELY NO MORE DUCKUNDERS!!!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 7, 2005 4:34 PM
I think that mine is about 43" tall.
Reed
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 437 posts
Posted by BNSFNUT on Friday, January 7, 2005 4:48 PM
My base level is 48". I chose this level because I have to sit while I operate and this worked out to be the right level when I sit on my old bar stool. It its a little high for children but about right for most adults. I had a church youth group in to see the layout (never again 12 kids 24 hands and nervous break down for me) and I had a couple of short step stools for the few of the kids that could not see. Note always have an adult hold on to a kid on a stool they WILL fall off.

There is no such thing as a bad day of railfanning. So many trains, so little time.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 7, 2005 5:19 PM
In Australia we use metric measurements; my layout is 1 metre above the ground to the base board...which is roughly 36 inches in imperial measurements.

phil
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: SE Nebraska
  • 249 posts
Posted by camarokid on Friday, January 7, 2005 6:29 PM
42" to 66" which is just about right to sit on a bar stool and see the whole layout if you sit in the right place.
Archie
Ain't it great!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 7, 2005 7:45 PM
35" on a 3 4x8 'lazy C' (in center of 2-car garage) that I can walk all around, reach into the center easily enough, and being a old duffer set down in a regular chair at. :) BTW, 'old' 2-drawer metal filing cabinets mounted on wheels used for storage of tools and train stuff roll nicely under it.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 8, 2005 2:57 AM
58 inches, Eye level and I use the underneath for hanging clothes with a closet rod and other storage plus it is at the level of windows to another part of the basement(old house added on) future expansion into other part of basement but will first need to knock hole in wall and dig out cellar floor.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 8, 2005 8:11 PM
29" baseline for me. This layout is mainlu for the kids (5 and 6)... even included two seperate mainlines, one for each kid to run their own train!

ihghest track point is near 38", highest scenic is about 44". It was quite a challenge to layout 2 mainlines in 3x6 (N gauge), but it's turning out pretty nice.

--- peterd
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 10, 2005 5:43 AM
40 inches from the floor to the top of the railhead at 0 elevation. That way I can reach everything on the layout to work on it while standing up, and when I sit in an office-type swivel chair to operate it, things are pretty much at eye level.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Ottawa, Canada
  • 234 posts
Posted by jkeaton on Monday, January 10, 2005 7:59 AM
Base tabletop level is planned for 44 inches/112 cm, with tracks in the mountains up to 3 inches/7.5 cm higher and staging tracks a bit lower. The height is partly driven by the need for storage below, so it may get adjusted upwards. This wil also help with the 'little hands' problem. Interior turnouts are going to have to be power, though - this isn't a walkaround shelf-type layout!

Jim
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: East Lansing, MI, US
  • 223 posts
Posted by GerFust on Monday, January 10, 2005 11:25 AM
MIne is 54". Items I took into account are:

Reaching over buildings - At 5' 11" tall, this allows my armpit to clear the layout surface by several inches to reach over buildings, etc.

Eye level - Trains look best running at eye level. For me 54" means looking down on the layout a bit, but I plan on sitting on a bar stool while running, so the height works there. My son will be able to see it at eye level, but my daughter will have to watch using a stool.

Available space - I am building a shelf layout in my basement "shop". The walls are lined with metal utility shelves, that I build to only half-height. 54" allows me 14 inches above the metal shelfs to build brackets that reach out 24" to support the railroad (1/5" foam insulation). By the way, I am building my support brackets out of metal studs, rather than invest in expensive brackets, or have to deal with legs supporting the train "shelf" layout.

Build it at whatever height works for you, but base it on some criteria.
[ ]===^=====xx o o O O O O o o The Northern-er (info on the layout, http://www.msu.edu/~fust/)

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!