Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Version 5 of The CB&Q in Wyoming

80229 views
728 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 5,943 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Monday, October 26, 2020 3:32 AM

Pruitt
Just imagine the amount of meat you get from a cow that makes you build a fence that high!

Gidday Mark, The thought of a medium rare T bone of that SIZE works wonders with the Bears taste buds, Dinner the downside being to cross the paddock to bring the beast in, you’d require waders, (just in case!)Ick!
 
I hope you’re pleased with the back drop; I certainly would be.
Cheers, the Bear.Smile

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,384 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Sunday, October 25, 2020 11:50 AM

25 October 2020

Here's a short video of a train on the tracks in front of the new backdrop.

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,384 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Sunday, October 25, 2020 10:50 AM

hon30critter
Say what?!? Are you planning on moving again?Huh? Please clarify.

No, but it always happens right after I start scenery. Every time I start scenery!

W-A-Y back in high school (1970's) I actually more or less finished some scenery on a model railroad.

And that was as far as I ever got with scenery. After that...

In Washington state in the early 1990's I got some hardshell finished and then had to move (no digitized photo of that one).

In Merchantville, on Version 2 of the layout, I was beginning scenery in late 2008 and early 2009. Then I was transferred by my company to South Carolina. 

After retiring and moving back to New Jersey and working happily on Version 4 of the layout, in 2019 property and state income taxes were jacked up over $2000 a year in 15 months, so I moved again.

So given this history, I'm expecting to have to move again for some reason. I hope not, but hey...

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,379 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Saturday, October 24, 2020 11:07 PM

Hi Mark,

I think the backdrop looks pretty good! I agree with your comment that it makes the mountains seem further away.

Pruitt
After that I'll plan to tear it all down again to move (Ever since high school -oh so many years ago! - every time I start scenery I always wind up tearing it all down to move ).

Say what?!? Are you planning on moving again?Huh? Please clarify.

I hate moving! I haven't moved in the last 33 years and I don't plan on moving until I absolutely have to. Ideally it will be in a pine box!

Cheers!!

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,384 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Saturday, October 24, 2020 9:59 PM

Thanks for all the different thoughts, everybody!

Oh come on, Bear! Haven't you ever seen a 30' tall barbed wire fence before? Just imagine the amount of meat you get from a cow that makes you build a fence that high! Dinner

Dave, I think your observations were spot-on. It looked even more out of whack in person than it did in the photos.

Rich, Douglas, David, I appreciate your thoughts. But from a standing perspective, the ground rose too much. And those out of scale elements near the bottom just had to go. Paradoxically, reducing the height of the backdrop seems to have the effect of pushing the mountains farther back into the distance. When I'm standing, the track is near my chin level, so the horizon just a few inches above that just feels right.

Scott, I'm glad the panoramic photos on your phone look like they're going to work out. Be sure to share your results with us!

Selector, The track is maybe an inch from the backdrop along the wall over Casper, so there's not much room for anything else in front of the backdrop, except at Hudson and the curved areas of the backdrop. There I'll add some 3-D trees and other shrubbery, and maybe one or two of those giant cows.

24 October 2020

So with the backdrop trimmed to final shape and temporarily installed, I took a few more photos to see how it looked.

Here's a train sitting in Hudson:

Looking along the wall behind Casper:

The train along the wall:

And looking at an angle at the nose of the train:

A couple days ago I picked up some hardboard (Masonite) for the fascia. After I permanently mount the backdrop I may install it, or I may do the scenery along the wall. Scenery shouldn't take too long since there's only 4" wide to scenic (counting the track!). After that I'll plan to tear it all down again to move (Ever since high school -oh so many years ago! - every time I start scenery I always wind up tearing it all down to move Sad).

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,306 posts
Posted by selector on Thursday, October 22, 2020 2:05 PM

Judiciously crop maybe the closest 20 feet of grasses, in scale, but that lower angle is so much better to me. Then, think of a blind, or a sub-backdrop, whether buildings, hedgerow, other vegetation, the odd taller tree, to take the eye away from the backdrop’s base where it joins.

  • Member since
    October 2020
  • 3,351 posts
Posted by NorthBrit on Thursday, October 22, 2020 11:15 AM

Some good answers by other members.

IMO  if you want the skyline to be far away then you need as much land as possible.    

Obviously shorten the land area brings the skyline closer.

Which is best?  I think only you can choose.

David

To the world you are someone.    To someone you are the world

I cannot afford the luxury of a negative thought

  • Member since
    March 2012
  • 216 posts
Posted by Lakeshore Sub on Thursday, October 22, 2020 10:28 AM

Hi Mark,

I'm with everyone else about trimming off the bottom to get the foreground scenery closer to scale.

I did try your technique with the panoramic picture on my cell phone and i like what I got.   Have to get it printed out yet, but looks really nice.  Thanks again for the explanation.

Scott Sonntag

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Heart of Georgia
  • 5,337 posts
Posted by Doughless on Thursday, October 22, 2020 8:37 AM

I agree with Rich.  I think the backdrop looks fine.  To me, the amount of ground venturing "up" from the benchwork is consistent with how much ground you would see "across" the horizon when viewed at the angle you would be viewing the backdrop.

The third dimension of depth...along the plain.... is projected vertically in our two dimensional backdrops.  Can't get around that.

Reminds me of when I would drive east on the Chicago Skyway back to Indiana.  A high bridge over the (Calumet?) river provides a view to the industrial buildings below as well as Lake Michigan.  From the high angle looking down, and with no variation in the color of Lake Michigan and the solid clear blue sky to provide a point of focus, a quick glance made it look like a wall of water many times higher than the buildings was approaching the shore.

Took me a few seconds to realize that I was looking down and across miles of water, not at a tall vertical wall of water.  That wall of water shrank as I decended down the bridge until it disappeared when I reached ground level.

Edit:  Taking a second look, maybe the backdrop could benefit from a little less ground (field) between the tracks and the mountains....making the backdrop a little shorter....depending upon how high that second deck is and how tall you are. 

A quick way to say it:  IMO, the horizon line is the point where the field meets the base of the mountains, and the horizon line should be close to eye level, and never higher.

- Douglas

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 23,633 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Thursday, October 22, 2020 7:20 AM

I would leave that backdrop just as you have it. Looks great! The amount of fields in the foreground of the backdrop create the necessary depth to convey the vastness of the prairie. Don't sacrifice ground for sky in this case.

Also, you will be quite pleased that you converted your turnouts to spring loaded turnouts. I have Peco spring loaded turnouts on my new layout, and I love them.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,379 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Thursday, October 22, 2020 2:06 AM

Pruitt
I'm thinking it might look a bit better if I cut 1 1/2 to two inches off the bottom to lower the horizon a bit.

Hi Mark,

I agree. When you did the mock up with your home printed backdrop the ratio of sky to scenery was quite pleasing IMHO. Now it looks totally out of whack, again IMHO. The taller scenery doesn't suggest the distance (or depth if you will) that the lower scenery did. I would cut it down to match your original mock up.

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 5,943 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Thursday, October 22, 2020 1:41 AM

Pruitt
As is, the lower part of the backdrop looks out of scale if you look close.

Yeah, I was thinking (???), lose the bottom third for that very reason, I believe there is also an out of scale fence at the rear of the caboose.
 
Cheers, the Bear, Armchair Critic.Smile

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,384 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Thursday, October 22, 2020 12:07 AM

Thanks for the compliment, David!

21 October 2020

Several things have been happening this past week.

I got the code 55 track I ordered from Walthers. I haven't done much but set a section next to the mainline in Hudson, to represent the station siding. Here's how that looks:

In another thread I posted about my experiments with a backdrop. Following some of the suggestions "youse guys" made, I found a printer to produce three copies (one backwards so I can put them end-to-end). Here's what one small section looks like. All three are printed on the shame wide sheet of paper. The backdrop is over 12 feet long, so between the three copies I can whip up 34 feet of backdrop! I'll lose a bit from one or two to avoid having obviously duplicated buildings right together.

Here's a comparison of the printed backdrop versus the one I printed at home. Quite a difference in quality!

I trimmed out two of the three backdrops over the last couple of days (my index finger is a bit sore from handling the Exacto knife for several hours each day!). I temporarily mounted two of the backdrops and took a couple of photos:

What do you all think? 

The printer-produced version is a bit larger than my home-printed one. I'm not sure why, since they came from the same file. But I'm thinking it might look a bit better if I cut 1 1/2 to two inches off the bottom to lower the horizon a bit. As is, the lower part of the backdrop looks out of scale if you look close.

I've also started converting my turnouts to throw them with fingers pushing the points by fabricating an over-center spring (so they can be thrown like a Peco turnout). Turns out that's not as hard to do as I expected, and it works great! I didn't take any pics of the converted turnouts yet. Maybe in a day or two...

  • Member since
    October 2020
  • 3,351 posts
Posted by NorthBrit on Saturday, October 17, 2020 11:25 AM

On to number 5.   Gosh!  I wish I had the space you have.Smile   I would still be on number one.

Following with interest.  Well done.

David

To the world you are someone.    To someone you are the world

I cannot afford the luxury of a negative thought

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,384 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Thursday, October 15, 2020 9:26 AM

Probbly not, Dave. Once the initial "adjustment" is finished, I don't think the seasonal variation will be enough to cause any problems. I don't remember any problems whatsoever when I lived in Cheyenne in the 70's, anyway.

Humidity fluctuates from averages of around 15% in the winter to about 30-35% in the summer. Very dry to dry, then back.

I've barely looked at Casper since starting on the CNW line, but that bowed turnout has been that way for several weeks, at least. Still had summer humidity at that time.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,379 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Thursday, October 15, 2020 12:58 AM

Pruitt
Suddenly I'm getting some benchwork contraction problems in Casper yard. I should have expected this - my benchwork was built in New Jersey, where the basement humidity was about 35%.

Hi Mark,

Would it be worth considering a humidifier?

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,241 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Thursday, October 15, 2020 12:54 AM

Pruitt
Suddenly I'm getting some benchwork contraction problems in Casper yard.

Just a Jersey layout adjusting to Wyoming freedom. You got this.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,384 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Wednesday, October 14, 2020 9:00 PM

14 October 2020

Suddenly I'm getting some benchwork contraction problems in Casper yard.

I should have expected this - my benchwork was built in New Jersey, where the basement humidity was about 35%.

Now that I'm in Casper, where a wet day is 40% and a typical day in the fall is about 20%, The benchwork grid, which is built out of 3/4" Oak Plywood cut into 3" strips, has shrunk a bit in the long direction. A couple of turnouts have bowed up a little bit, and the main turnout into the yard at the west end, which leads right into a curve, has pushed the curve a bit out of alignment.

Harrumph!

It's not major, and I've already fixed the main turnout (took about 30 minutes), but it is an annoyance. I still have to lift two bowing turnouts and trim the ends by about twice a cutoff wheel thickness to lay the turnouts flat.

There's also evidence that one or two body tracks will need to be relieved in a similar way.

What a pain!

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,241 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Sunday, October 11, 2020 7:55 PM

Mark

 

Just for reference to see what I'm going for, here's a medium-resolution photo of the real Hudson depot, ca. 1915. There are at least three tracks, but on the layout has only two.

The photo is looking west towards the bridge over the Popo Agie river in the far distance. The actual town of Hudson is in the middle distance to the left of the depot.

I don't know if you know this, but in between my attempts to get the Rock Ridge Railroad running, I built a 1950 PRR bench layout set in the town of Indiana, PA where I was living before AZ. 

Your picture reminded me.

I based the plan...

   On Sanborn maps:

Aerial photos...

And period photos

The hardware store was owned by Jimmy Stewart's dad. 

I got as far as the trackwork (I have 14 Fast Tracks Turnouts I salvaged from that,) before my wife put her foot down. It seems the layout was blocking access to her art storage shelfing, making it realy difficult to get her paintings in and out. 

Sorry to hijack your thread with my trip down memory lane. 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,241 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Sunday, October 11, 2020 7:28 PM

I'm impressed. While I'm struggling to complete my 29 foot mainline loop, you are adding new towns--benchwork to structures--every other week. 

That is what I call Gettner Done. 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,384 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Sunday, October 11, 2020 4:39 PM

Thanks, Bear!

11 October 2020

I got the subroadbed installed through Hudson:

And roadbed and track into the curve leading to Hudson was installed a few days ago.

Then I installed the cork base for Hudson, and built the ramp down from the mainline profile to the Hudson base. Here the ramp is under construction:

Yesterday I installed the first section of code 70 track past the east turnout at Hudson. Then I backed a train onto it.

The track past the turnout isn't powered yet. I still have to add the buss lines to Hudson, and the track feeders as well.

In a few days I'll get the code 55 track I ordered from Walthers, and I'll be able to start installing the Hudson siding. I'm really looking forward to trying that small rail track!

Just for reference to see what I'm going for, here's a medium-resolution photo of the real Hudson depot, ca. 1915. There are at least three tracks, but on the layout has only two.

The photo is looking west towards the bridge over the Popo Agie river in the far distance. The actual town of Hudson is in the middle distance to the left of the depot.

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 5,943 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Sunday, October 4, 2020 12:35 AM
Gidday Mark, thanks for the latest update, am pleased to hear your friends on the mend.
Cheers, the Bear.Smile

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,384 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Saturday, October 3, 2020 9:02 AM

Thanks, Mike!

3 October 2020

Yesterday I got the new backdrop painted (repainted).

 

Today I uploaded my latest construction update video:

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,231 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Saturday, October 3, 2020 6:58 AM

It's been awhile since I've checked your progress Mark.  Looking great!

Mike.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,379 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Saturday, October 3, 2020 12:45 AM

Pruitt
I spent a lot of happy years in New Jersey and elsewhere, but it's great to be back. 

Mark, I'm glad to hear that you are enjoying your new (old) location.

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,384 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Saturday, October 3, 2020 12:19 AM

Chip,

You've got quite a sense of humor. How does your wife put up with you?

Dave,

Thanks! 

I lived in Casper two different times, for a total of about seven years when I was a kid. So for the most part I knew what I was getting in to. Mostly it's the same old Casper, just a bit bigger on all sides. Where we live now was just prairie hills a couple miles east of town when I lived here in the late 60's. 

Downtown Casper is shockingly the same, for the most part. Some changes of course, but the old Rialto and American movie theaters are still there, as is the underpass beneath the tracks on Center Street. Those are all icons from my youth.

Car registration in Wyoming used to be under 30 bucks, but I paid over 900 on our new Jeep Gladiator! That was rather unexpected!

Having spent so much of my life on the east coast, I'd forgotten how clear and dry the air is here. Being just shy of a mile above sea level, the air is thinner, but paradoxically it's easier to breathe here, too. My reactive airways (from asthma as a young child and a parent that smoked like the Big Boy) have a lot less to react to here than they did in South Carolina and New Jersey. Less pollen, and less pollutants.

I love the sparse population! Ten minutes from the house leaves me six minutes from the nearest human being. And what many who aren't from here (and some that are) see as dry, semi-desolate wasteland has a hidden beauty that's very soothing to my spirit. This part of the America is called "God's country" for good reason (ok, done waxing poetic).

I spent a lot of happy years in New Jersey and elsewhere, but it's great to be back. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,379 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Friday, October 2, 2020 11:32 PM

Pruitt
...moved most of the way across the country.

Hi Mark,

As always you are making fantastic progress!

Just curious - how are you finding your new home town and surroundings? You made quite a move!

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,241 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, October 2, 2020 8:30 PM

I'd read your post, but I'm waiting for the movie to come out. 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,384 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Thursday, October 1, 2020 11:05 PM

1 October 2020

I mounted the backdrop frames for the section from the end of the back wall over Casper through the Hudson area:

And then cut one of  the backdrops from the previous layout to the correct height and mounted it. This "new" part of the backdrop is 24 feet long.

Sanding it and repainting it is next. You can't really tell from this picture, but the blue surface is all scratched up from being rolled up and moved most of the way across the country.

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,384 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Saturday, September 26, 2020 9:08 PM

26 September 2020

Construction has resumed on the layout. Over the last few days I completed CNW benchwork from the wall behind Casper, around the left end and back along the angled wall, where Hudson will go.

I'll be adding some sort of support to the long free span. At eleven feet, it's too springy in the center of the span to adequately support the area by itself. I'll probably use a threaded rod from the ceiling.

This is as far at the CNW benchwork will go (at least at this end) for some time. Track will be laid into Hudson and scenery completed behind Casper and around to at least the intersection of the angled section to the left-end wall.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!