Login
or
Register
Home
»
Garden Railways
»
Forums
»
Garden Railroading
»
smallest curves on your layout
smallest curves on your layout
7971 views
26 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
1
2
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Saturday, May 1, 2004 9:00 PM
Firstly; I really should not be getting involved in any non metric conversations, however maybe the local authorities won't find out.
I have to agree with Smoggy, I use LGB's tightest curves and I must say my LGB Mallet and its associated carriages (600mm long) look really strange, as does my ICE train on these curves. I have many in my reversing loop but I have no choice as I am determined to make my railway fit my garde and and not the other way around. To put an LGB Mike through my reversing would be an incredible sight. However I do have a few of these tight curves on my main line and I have no trouble with them at all, as I run only LGB rolling stock.
I used some second hand LGB R1 curves but nearly all my track is LGB and Garden Railway Club of Australia club track, which is similar to flextrack only better in my opinion. But I do use LGB curves as minimum templates to compare any curves I do make and it works for me.
Regards
Ian; Kawana Island Tropical Railway.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Saturday, May 1, 2004 9:00 PM
Firstly; I really should not be getting involved in any non metric conversations, however maybe the local authorities won't find out.
I have to agree with Smoggy, I use LGB's tightest curves and I must say my LGB Mallet and its associated carriages (600mm long) look really strange, as does my ICE train on these curves. I have many in my reversing loop but I have no choice as I am determined to make my railway fit my garde and and not the other way around. To put an LGB Mike through my reversing would be an incredible sight. However I do have a few of these tight curves on my main line and I have no trouble with them at all, as I run only LGB rolling stock.
I used some second hand LGB R1 curves but nearly all my track is LGB and Garden Railway Club of Australia club track, which is similar to flextrack only better in my opinion. But I do use LGB curves as minimum templates to compare any curves I do make and it works for me.
Regards
Ian; Kawana Island Tropical Railway.
Reply
Edit
Shadowbourne Inc
Member since
May 2004
From: Lorain,Ashland&Southern RR
2 posts
Posted by
Shadowbourne Inc
on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:11 PM
When I started my layout last year I was using 4ft curves which was working good for my moguls and 0-4-0s but after purchasing my LGB Mike this year I finding it binding up on R1 curves. I am also having problems with keeping it from derailing on manual switches, any suggestions? All my track and switches are LGB. Rolling stock is a mixture of LGB, Bachmann, and Lionel.
Reply
Shadowbourne Inc
Member since
May 2004
From: Lorain,Ashland&Southern RR
2 posts
Posted by
Shadowbourne Inc
on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:11 PM
When I started my layout last year I was using 4ft curves which was working good for my moguls and 0-4-0s but after purchasing my LGB Mike this year I finding it binding up on R1 curves. I am also having problems with keeping it from derailing on manual switches, any suggestions? All my track and switches are LGB. Rolling stock is a mixture of LGB, Bachmann, and Lionel.
Reply
Tom The Brat
Member since
August 2004
From: North of Chicago
1,050 posts
Posted by
Tom The Brat
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 11:53 AM
The smallest in the shop layout is 11.5 ft diameter. The biggest is 16.5 ft.
Reply
Tom The Brat
Member since
August 2004
From: North of Chicago
1,050 posts
Posted by
Tom The Brat
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 11:53 AM
The smallest in the shop layout is 11.5 ft diameter. The biggest is 16.5 ft.
Reply
Capt Bob Johnson
Member since
January 2005
From: Slower Lower Delaware
1,266 posts
Posted by
Capt Bob Johnson
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 12:38 PM
My main line is currently 20', however when I get the mountain division built it will be down to 15'. It has been the plan to maybe use some 10' in yards or on sidings when I get around to building them. My rule was nothing smaller than 10'!
Reply
Capt Bob Johnson
Member since
January 2005
From: Slower Lower Delaware
1,266 posts
Posted by
Capt Bob Johnson
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 12:38 PM
My main line is currently 20', however when I get the mountain division built it will be down to 15'. It has been the plan to maybe use some 10' in yards or on sidings when I get around to building them. My rule was nothing smaller than 10'!
Reply
markperr
Member since
August 2004
From: Whitmore Lake, Michigan
350 posts
Posted by
markperr
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:27 PM
Outdoors 8 ft
Indoors 4 ft
Reply
markperr
Member since
August 2004
From: Whitmore Lake, Michigan
350 posts
Posted by
markperr
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:27 PM
Outdoors 8 ft
Indoors 4 ft
Reply
Chompers
Member since
April 2003
From: New York
214 posts
Posted by
Chompers
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:41 PM
my minimum is a lgb R2 curve.
The P.C.&.M.R.R SA#14
Reply
Chompers
Member since
April 2003
From: New York
214 posts
Posted by
Chompers
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:41 PM
my minimum is a lgb R2 curve.
The P.C.&.M.R.R SA#14
Reply
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 6:35 PM
The smallest curve on my G.R.R. IS 6 FT. ben
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 6:35 PM
The smallest curve on my G.R.R. IS 6 FT. ben
Reply
Edit
ghelman
Member since
April 2005
From: Kingsland Georgia, USA
203 posts
Posted by
ghelman
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 8:40 PM
My layout as it is today has 4 ft dia (1.22 meters) because that is the room I was trying to fit it in. But, I am enlarging to another part of the yard. The plan is to have nothing smaller than a 10 ft dia.(3.05 Meters) The new section will be reserved for the larger trains.
George (Rusty G)
Reply
ghelman
Member since
April 2005
From: Kingsland Georgia, USA
203 posts
Posted by
ghelman
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 8:40 PM
My layout as it is today has 4 ft dia (1.22 meters) because that is the room I was trying to fit it in. But, I am enlarging to another part of the yard. The plan is to have nothing smaller than a 10 ft dia.(3.05 Meters) The new section will be reserved for the larger trains.
George (Rusty G)
Reply
Train 284
Member since
May 2004
From: Redding, California
1,428 posts
Posted by
Train 284
on Thursday, June 2, 2005 3:50 PM
Mine are 4ft. I'm operating a narrow guge layout, so it works good.
Matt
Espee Forever! Modeling the Modoc Northern Railroad in HO scale Brakeman/Conductor/Fireman on the Yreka Western Railroad Member of Rouge Valley Model RR Club
Reply
Train 284
Member since
May 2004
From: Redding, California
1,428 posts
Posted by
Train 284
on Thursday, June 2, 2005 3:50 PM
Mine are 4ft. I'm operating a narrow guge layout, so it works good.
Matt
Espee Forever! Modeling the Modoc Northern Railroad in HO scale Brakeman/Conductor/Fireman on the Yreka Western Railroad Member of Rouge Valley Model RR Club
Reply
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, June 2, 2005 8:22 PM
im 8' 10' thats all nothing smaller.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, June 2, 2005 8:22 PM
im 8' 10' thats all nothing smaller.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, June 2, 2005 9:16 PM
Mine a r-1 (4 ft dia) . I've been thinking of redoing it using r-2 (5 ft dia), but I'd have to move a few small trees and bushes. We rent, so a larger layout just isn't in the cards for the forseeable future.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, June 2, 2005 9:16 PM
Mine a r-1 (4 ft dia) . I've been thinking of redoing it using r-2 (5 ft dia), but I'd have to move a few small trees and bushes. We rent, so a larger layout just isn't in the cards for the forseeable future.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Friday, June 3, 2005 1:01 AM
My newly completed area 3 has almost all 1.1 m rad curves, however i have had to have 2 onlly R 2 aprox i e bigger than R1 but smaller than R3.
Rgds Ian
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Friday, June 3, 2005 1:01 AM
My newly completed area 3 has almost all 1.1 m rad curves, however i have had to have 2 onlly R 2 aprox i e bigger than R1 but smaller than R3.
Rgds Ian
Reply
Edit
1
2
Search the Community
FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER
Get the
Garden Railways
newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month
Sign up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from
Garden Railways
magazine. Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy