Login
or
Register
Home
»
Garden Railways
»
Forums
»
Garden Railroading
»
smallest curves on your layout
smallest curves on your layout
7972 views
26 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
1
2
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Friday, June 3, 2005 1:01 AM
My newly completed area 3 has almost all 1.1 m rad curves, however i have had to have 2 onlly R 2 aprox i e bigger than R1 but smaller than R3.
Rgds Ian
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Friday, June 3, 2005 1:01 AM
My newly completed area 3 has almost all 1.1 m rad curves, however i have had to have 2 onlly R 2 aprox i e bigger than R1 but smaller than R3.
Rgds Ian
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, June 2, 2005 9:16 PM
Mine a r-1 (4 ft dia) . I've been thinking of redoing it using r-2 (5 ft dia), but I'd have to move a few small trees and bushes. We rent, so a larger layout just isn't in the cards for the forseeable future.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, June 2, 2005 9:16 PM
Mine a r-1 (4 ft dia) . I've been thinking of redoing it using r-2 (5 ft dia), but I'd have to move a few small trees and bushes. We rent, so a larger layout just isn't in the cards for the forseeable future.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, June 2, 2005 8:22 PM
im 8' 10' thats all nothing smaller.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, June 2, 2005 8:22 PM
im 8' 10' thats all nothing smaller.
Reply
Edit
Train 284
Member since
May 2004
From: Redding, California
1,428 posts
Posted by
Train 284
on Thursday, June 2, 2005 3:50 PM
Mine are 4ft. I'm operating a narrow guge layout, so it works good.
Matt
Espee Forever! Modeling the Modoc Northern Railroad in HO scale Brakeman/Conductor/Fireman on the Yreka Western Railroad Member of Rouge Valley Model RR Club
Reply
Train 284
Member since
May 2004
From: Redding, California
1,428 posts
Posted by
Train 284
on Thursday, June 2, 2005 3:50 PM
Mine are 4ft. I'm operating a narrow guge layout, so it works good.
Matt
Espee Forever! Modeling the Modoc Northern Railroad in HO scale Brakeman/Conductor/Fireman on the Yreka Western Railroad Member of Rouge Valley Model RR Club
Reply
ghelman
Member since
April 2005
From: Kingsland Georgia, USA
203 posts
Posted by
ghelman
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 8:40 PM
My layout as it is today has 4 ft dia (1.22 meters) because that is the room I was trying to fit it in. But, I am enlarging to another part of the yard. The plan is to have nothing smaller than a 10 ft dia.(3.05 Meters) The new section will be reserved for the larger trains.
George (Rusty G)
Reply
ghelman
Member since
April 2005
From: Kingsland Georgia, USA
203 posts
Posted by
ghelman
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 8:40 PM
My layout as it is today has 4 ft dia (1.22 meters) because that is the room I was trying to fit it in. But, I am enlarging to another part of the yard. The plan is to have nothing smaller than a 10 ft dia.(3.05 Meters) The new section will be reserved for the larger trains.
George (Rusty G)
Reply
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 6:35 PM
The smallest curve on my G.R.R. IS 6 FT. ben
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 6:35 PM
The smallest curve on my G.R.R. IS 6 FT. ben
Reply
Edit
Chompers
Member since
April 2003
From: New York
214 posts
Posted by
Chompers
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:41 PM
my minimum is a lgb R2 curve.
The P.C.&.M.R.R SA#14
Reply
Chompers
Member since
April 2003
From: New York
214 posts
Posted by
Chompers
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:41 PM
my minimum is a lgb R2 curve.
The P.C.&.M.R.R SA#14
Reply
markperr
Member since
August 2004
From: Whitmore Lake, Michigan
350 posts
Posted by
markperr
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:27 PM
Outdoors 8 ft
Indoors 4 ft
Reply
markperr
Member since
August 2004
From: Whitmore Lake, Michigan
350 posts
Posted by
markperr
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:27 PM
Outdoors 8 ft
Indoors 4 ft
Reply
Capt Bob Johnson
Member since
January 2005
From: Slower Lower Delaware
1,266 posts
Posted by
Capt Bob Johnson
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 12:38 PM
My main line is currently 20', however when I get the mountain division built it will be down to 15'. It has been the plan to maybe use some 10' in yards or on sidings when I get around to building them. My rule was nothing smaller than 10'!
Reply
Capt Bob Johnson
Member since
January 2005
From: Slower Lower Delaware
1,266 posts
Posted by
Capt Bob Johnson
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 12:38 PM
My main line is currently 20', however when I get the mountain division built it will be down to 15'. It has been the plan to maybe use some 10' in yards or on sidings when I get around to building them. My rule was nothing smaller than 10'!
Reply
Tom The Brat
Member since
August 2004
From: North of Chicago
1,050 posts
Posted by
Tom The Brat
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 11:53 AM
The smallest in the shop layout is 11.5 ft diameter. The biggest is 16.5 ft.
Reply
Tom The Brat
Member since
August 2004
From: North of Chicago
1,050 posts
Posted by
Tom The Brat
on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 11:53 AM
The smallest in the shop layout is 11.5 ft diameter. The biggest is 16.5 ft.
Reply
Shadowbourne Inc
Member since
May 2004
From: Lorain,Ashland&Southern RR
2 posts
Posted by
Shadowbourne Inc
on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:11 PM
When I started my layout last year I was using 4ft curves which was working good for my moguls and 0-4-0s but after purchasing my LGB Mike this year I finding it binding up on R1 curves. I am also having problems with keeping it from derailing on manual switches, any suggestions? All my track and switches are LGB. Rolling stock is a mixture of LGB, Bachmann, and Lionel.
Reply
Shadowbourne Inc
Member since
May 2004
From: Lorain,Ashland&Southern RR
2 posts
Posted by
Shadowbourne Inc
on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:11 PM
When I started my layout last year I was using 4ft curves which was working good for my moguls and 0-4-0s but after purchasing my LGB Mike this year I finding it binding up on R1 curves. I am also having problems with keeping it from derailing on manual switches, any suggestions? All my track and switches are LGB. Rolling stock is a mixture of LGB, Bachmann, and Lionel.
Reply
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Saturday, May 1, 2004 9:00 PM
Firstly; I really should not be getting involved in any non metric conversations, however maybe the local authorities won't find out.
I have to agree with Smoggy, I use LGB's tightest curves and I must say my LGB Mallet and its associated carriages (600mm long) look really strange, as does my ICE train on these curves. I have many in my reversing loop but I have no choice as I am determined to make my railway fit my garde and and not the other way around. To put an LGB Mike through my reversing would be an incredible sight. However I do have a few of these tight curves on my main line and I have no trouble with them at all, as I run only LGB rolling stock.
I used some second hand LGB R1 curves but nearly all my track is LGB and Garden Railway Club of Australia club track, which is similar to flextrack only better in my opinion. But I do use LGB curves as minimum templates to compare any curves I do make and it works for me.
Regards
Ian; Kawana Island Tropical Railway.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Saturday, May 1, 2004 9:00 PM
Firstly; I really should not be getting involved in any non metric conversations, however maybe the local authorities won't find out.
I have to agree with Smoggy, I use LGB's tightest curves and I must say my LGB Mallet and its associated carriages (600mm long) look really strange, as does my ICE train on these curves. I have many in my reversing loop but I have no choice as I am determined to make my railway fit my garde and and not the other way around. To put an LGB Mike through my reversing would be an incredible sight. However I do have a few of these tight curves on my main line and I have no trouble with them at all, as I run only LGB rolling stock.
I used some second hand LGB R1 curves but nearly all my track is LGB and Garden Railway Club of Australia club track, which is similar to flextrack only better in my opinion. But I do use LGB curves as minimum templates to compare any curves I do make and it works for me.
Regards
Ian; Kawana Island Tropical Railway.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Saturday, May 1, 2004 10:44 AM
I use LGB R1 curves (4ft) but I stagger them.i.e. 1x curve,1x straight,1xcurve ect until I get the right turn.I find that it looks smoother when running and stops wheelspin on a heavily loaded loco.Troy
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Saturday, May 1, 2004 10:44 AM
I use LGB R1 curves (4ft) but I stagger them.i.e. 1x curve,1x straight,1xcurve ect until I get the right turn.I find that it looks smoother when running and stops wheelspin on a heavily loaded loco.Troy
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Saturday, May 1, 2004 8:29 AM
Hi
My tightest is LGB R1 on the main line a MISTAKE made at the begining of construction.
Now buying live steam locomotives is a pain and the larger Electics other than LGB are out of the question untill I get too stage three if i ever get there
regards John
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Saturday, May 1, 2004 8:29 AM
Hi
My tightest is LGB R1 on the main line a MISTAKE made at the begining of construction.
Now buying live steam locomotives is a pain and the larger Electics other than LGB are out of the question untill I get too stage three if i ever get there
regards John
Reply
Edit
jtrost
Member since
September 2002
From: Western Oregon
27 posts
Posted by
jtrost
on Monday, November 24, 2003 5:35 PM
Jumping in the middle, I'll dive into two of the topics. Mininum radius I use is about 4 ft. A few spots may be tighter but most is 4.5 ft or greater. My Bachmann Consolidation handles them nicely and it all looks good enough for me.
Flex vs. hand laid track is the other topic. I hand laid most of my track. Cut ties from Trex decking and used 1/2 inch spikes (stainless). The Trex holds the spikes well enough that the rust/no rust issue becomes irrelevant. The big issue for me was cost. Hand laid is considerably less expensive. That is if you don't mind 2 to 4 hours on your knees to spike a few feet of track. Hand laid is A LOT of work. The interesting thing of this is that I find I like the appearance of hand laid on the Trex ties more than flex. I had to use flex on bridges and trestles where hand spiking would have been difficult but am not thrilled with the look.
There's my two cents worth.
WR&C Railroad
Reply
1
2
Search the Community
FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER
Get the
Garden Railways
newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month
Sign up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from
Garden Railways
magazine. Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy