Trains.com

smallest curves on your layout

7973 views
26 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 3, 2005 1:01 AM
My newly completed area 3 has almost all 1.1 m rad curves, however i have had to have 2 onlly R 2 aprox i e bigger than R1 but smaller than R3.

Rgds Ian
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 3, 2005 1:01 AM
My newly completed area 3 has almost all 1.1 m rad curves, however i have had to have 2 onlly R 2 aprox i e bigger than R1 but smaller than R3.

Rgds Ian
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 2, 2005 9:16 PM
Mine a r-1 (4 ft dia) . I've been thinking of redoing it using r-2 (5 ft dia), but I'd have to move a few small trees and bushes. We rent, so a larger layout just isn't in the cards for the forseeable future.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 2, 2005 9:16 PM
Mine a r-1 (4 ft dia) . I've been thinking of redoing it using r-2 (5 ft dia), but I'd have to move a few small trees and bushes. We rent, so a larger layout just isn't in the cards for the forseeable future.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 2, 2005 8:22 PM
im 8' 10' thats all nothing smaller.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 2, 2005 8:22 PM
im 8' 10' thats all nothing smaller.
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Redding, California
  • 1,428 posts
Posted by Train 284 on Thursday, June 2, 2005 3:50 PM
Mine are 4ft. I'm operating a narrow guge layout, so it works good.
Matt Cool Espee Forever! Modeling the Modoc Northern Railroad in HO scale Brakeman/Conductor/Fireman on the Yreka Western Railroad Member of Rouge Valley Model RR Club
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Redding, California
  • 1,428 posts
Posted by Train 284 on Thursday, June 2, 2005 3:50 PM
Mine are 4ft. I'm operating a narrow guge layout, so it works good.
Matt Cool Espee Forever! Modeling the Modoc Northern Railroad in HO scale Brakeman/Conductor/Fireman on the Yreka Western Railroad Member of Rouge Valley Model RR Club
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Kingsland Georgia, USA
  • 203 posts
Posted by ghelman on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 8:40 PM
My layout as it is today has 4 ft dia (1.22 meters) because that is the room I was trying to fit it in. But, I am enlarging to another part of the yard. The plan is to have nothing smaller than a 10 ft dia.(3.05 Meters) The new section will be reserved for the larger trains.

George (Rusty G)
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Kingsland Georgia, USA
  • 203 posts
Posted by ghelman on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 8:40 PM
My layout as it is today has 4 ft dia (1.22 meters) because that is the room I was trying to fit it in. But, I am enlarging to another part of the yard. The plan is to have nothing smaller than a 10 ft dia.(3.05 Meters) The new section will be reserved for the larger trains.

George (Rusty G)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 6:35 PM
The smallest curve on my G.R.R. IS 6 FT. ben
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 6:35 PM
The smallest curve on my G.R.R. IS 6 FT. ben
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: New York
  • 214 posts
Posted by Chompers on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:41 PM
my minimum is a lgb R2 curve.
The P.C.&.M.R.R SA#14
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: New York
  • 214 posts
Posted by Chompers on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:41 PM
my minimum is a lgb R2 curve.
The P.C.&.M.R.R SA#14
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Whitmore Lake, Michigan
  • 350 posts
Posted by markperr on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:27 PM
Outdoors 8 ft

Indoors 4 ft

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Whitmore Lake, Michigan
  • 350 posts
Posted by markperr on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:27 PM
Outdoors 8 ft

Indoors 4 ft

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Slower Lower Delaware
  • 1,266 posts
Posted by Capt Bob Johnson on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 12:38 PM
My main line is currently 20', however when I get the mountain division built it will be down to 15'. It has been the plan to maybe use some 10' in yards or on sidings when I get around to building them. My rule was nothing smaller than 10'!
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Slower Lower Delaware
  • 1,266 posts
Posted by Capt Bob Johnson on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 12:38 PM
My main line is currently 20', however when I get the mountain division built it will be down to 15'. It has been the plan to maybe use some 10' in yards or on sidings when I get around to building them. My rule was nothing smaller than 10'!
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: North of Chicago
  • 1,050 posts
Posted by Tom The Brat on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 11:53 AM
The smallest in the shop layout is 11.5 ft diameter. The biggest is 16.5 ft.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: North of Chicago
  • 1,050 posts
Posted by Tom The Brat on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 11:53 AM
The smallest in the shop layout is 11.5 ft diameter. The biggest is 16.5 ft.
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Lorain,Ashland&Southern RR
  • 2 posts
Posted by Shadowbourne Inc on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:11 PM
When I started my layout last year I was using 4ft curves which was working good for my moguls and 0-4-0s but after purchasing my LGB Mike this year I finding it binding up on R1 curves. I am also having problems with keeping it from derailing on manual switches, any suggestions? All my track and switches are LGB. Rolling stock is a mixture of LGB, Bachmann, and Lionel.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Lorain,Ashland&Southern RR
  • 2 posts
Posted by Shadowbourne Inc on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:11 PM
When I started my layout last year I was using 4ft curves which was working good for my moguls and 0-4-0s but after purchasing my LGB Mike this year I finding it binding up on R1 curves. I am also having problems with keeping it from derailing on manual switches, any suggestions? All my track and switches are LGB. Rolling stock is a mixture of LGB, Bachmann, and Lionel.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 1, 2004 9:00 PM
Firstly; I really should not be getting involved in any non metric conversations, however maybe the local authorities won't find out.

I have to agree with Smoggy, I use LGB's tightest curves and I must say my LGB Mallet and its associated carriages (600mm long) look really strange, as does my ICE train on these curves. I have many in my reversing loop but I have no choice as I am determined to make my railway fit my garde and and not the other way around. To put an LGB Mike through my reversing would be an incredible sight. However I do have a few of these tight curves on my main line and I have no trouble with them at all, as I run only LGB rolling stock.

I used some second hand LGB R1 curves but nearly all my track is LGB and Garden Railway Club of Australia club track, which is similar to flextrack only better in my opinion. But I do use LGB curves as minimum templates to compare any curves I do make and it works for me.

Regards

Ian; Kawana Island Tropical Railway.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 1, 2004 9:00 PM
Firstly; I really should not be getting involved in any non metric conversations, however maybe the local authorities won't find out.

I have to agree with Smoggy, I use LGB's tightest curves and I must say my LGB Mallet and its associated carriages (600mm long) look really strange, as does my ICE train on these curves. I have many in my reversing loop but I have no choice as I am determined to make my railway fit my garde and and not the other way around. To put an LGB Mike through my reversing would be an incredible sight. However I do have a few of these tight curves on my main line and I have no trouble with them at all, as I run only LGB rolling stock.

I used some second hand LGB R1 curves but nearly all my track is LGB and Garden Railway Club of Australia club track, which is similar to flextrack only better in my opinion. But I do use LGB curves as minimum templates to compare any curves I do make and it works for me.

Regards

Ian; Kawana Island Tropical Railway.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 1, 2004 10:44 AM
I use LGB R1 curves (4ft) but I stagger them.i.e. 1x curve,1x straight,1xcurve ect until I get the right turn.I find that it looks smoother when running and stops wheelspin on a heavily loaded loco.Troy
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 1, 2004 10:44 AM
I use LGB R1 curves (4ft) but I stagger them.i.e. 1x curve,1x straight,1xcurve ect until I get the right turn.I find that it looks smoother when running and stops wheelspin on a heavily loaded loco.Troy
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 1, 2004 8:29 AM
Hi
My tightest is LGB R1 on the main line a MISTAKE made at the begining of construction.
Now buying live steam locomotives is a pain and the larger Electics other than LGB are out of the question untill I get too stage three if i ever get there
regards John
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 1, 2004 8:29 AM
Hi
My tightest is LGB R1 on the main line a MISTAKE made at the begining of construction.
Now buying live steam locomotives is a pain and the larger Electics other than LGB are out of the question untill I get too stage three if i ever get there
regards John
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Western Oregon
  • 27 posts
Posted by jtrost on Monday, November 24, 2003 5:35 PM
Jumping in the middle, I'll dive into two of the topics. Mininum radius I use is about 4 ft. A few spots may be tighter but most is 4.5 ft or greater. My Bachmann Consolidation handles them nicely and it all looks good enough for me.

Flex vs. hand laid track is the other topic. I hand laid most of my track. Cut ties from Trex decking and used 1/2 inch spikes (stainless). The Trex holds the spikes well enough that the rust/no rust issue becomes irrelevant. The big issue for me was cost. Hand laid is considerably less expensive. That is if you don't mind 2 to 4 hours on your knees to spike a few feet of track. Hand laid is A LOT of work. The interesting thing of this is that I find I like the appearance of hand laid on the Trex ties more than flex. I had to use flex on bridges and trestles where hand spiking would have been difficult but am not thrilled with the look.

There's my two cents worth.
WR&C Railroad

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy