Trains.com

LGB turning Chinese?

16438 views
47 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 76 posts
Posted by bobgrosh on Monday, May 30, 2005 9:10 PM
Sorry TOC - We posted at the same time and I missed your post entirely.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Curmudgeon

You missed the last line.

BTW, if you are using stock wheels, you have to be out of level in 12" by about 1/4" to have them derail for that reason.

Gauge okay?
TOC

My track is level enough that there is no way it would be out 1/4" in 12". I can push or pull 20 cars at any speed for hours without a derailment. 

UNTIL - I hit an errant pine needle or one of those little worm things that the pines down here drop. Then cars with a three point suspension and equalized trucks will ride over the object without lifting another wheel high enough to allow it to jump the rail on a curve. But, hit something like that with one of the new cars on a curve is asking for trouble. There is no way to avoid these things. Most of the trees belong to my neighbors.

Checked the gauge with calipers. No problem there on new cars.

Oh, I boxed the loco for shipment and discovered I had had packed it without the original box. Now it's sitting in my office in Alabama, 200 miles away. When I go there next week, I'll be sure to get it on it's way. Thanks so much for the loan of it. I really appreciate it. Sorry for the delay.
B0B
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: US
  • 1,386 posts
Posted by Curmudgeon on Monday, May 30, 2005 10:53 PM
Original box is not important.
Just an old one I had laying around.
Any box will do.
TOC
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Bucks County, PA
  • 428 posts
Posted by Bucksco on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 2:16 PM
Which cars are being referred to? LGB 's 4091 series of American style 40 foot boxcars have never been changed.
Jack
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 76 posts
Posted by bobgrosh on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:43 PM
Hi Jack
Thanks for showing an interest in this.

QUOTE: Originally posted by Bucksco

Which cars are being referred to? LGB 's 4091 series of American style 40 foot boxcars have never been changed.


I'm comparing just about any older 4 axle freight. For example the 43682 D&RGW Sheep Sound Car tracks very well.



It seldom derails. It has one truck that rocks side to side and one that does not. The trucks have an elongated mounting hole on one side that keeps the wheels in contact with the railhead when the track is uneven or if there is a foreign object (if not too big) on the track..

Here are three pictures of my 43682 car.

This is an example of an LGB car that runs great.











How Lets compare this to one of the new lower cost LGB cars, I think these cars were made in China, but I'm not sure.

Like the 47916 Southern Boxcar



or the 45913 Santa Fe Super Chief Boxcar, Brown





Here are two pictures of one of my Santa Fe boxcars. The Southern boxcars are the same.

This car is very prone to derailing.

First the truck. It is stiff. If one wheel is lifted by debris, the other wheel will lift too.



Note that all the truck parts have en entirely new design.

Now the underbody.





Notice the humps to the left and right of the center mounting post. They let the trucks rock front to back but not sided to side. On these new cars, both ends are of this design. The cars do not have a three point suspension and will derail, (especially on curves) much more easily than the older design shown above.

Any further information about this problem would be appreciated.

Can we expect this to be resolved in future production runs?
B0B



  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 6:38 AM
My .02 is that the little 2-4-0 Steam engine in the new LGB American sets is one loveable, well-running, chunky adorable toy! And this is one of the LGB premier China products.

Some RhB stock, as well as many "standard gauge" mainline USA freight wagons from LGB are now made in China. I have seen many of these, and even by touch, they seem very well constructed. No, i did not hold the RhB baggage wagon--never hit the store shelves here in CA. The new Rhb freight wagons have a great amount more detail than there previous "German made" counterparts.

There have been some QC issues for sure, but LGB is a company determined to make trains that will be in your family for generations, not for one Christmas and then be forgotten when it breaks--thus I believe that any QC issues with their Asia partners will be smoothly corrected. Note that D. Buffington recently said that 80+% of LGB is still Made in Nurnberg, Germany.

When there is a QC issue, yes, it may mean the demise of quality for a firm, but when you are talking about Lehmann Patenwerk--a company that does not believe in the overnight-get-rich-quick from a shabby product that breaks---a company dedicated to its customer base---you shouldn't worry in the long run!

Regards,

TP Metzger






  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 76 posts
Posted by bobgrosh on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 9:24 AM
TP
I agree about the little American 2-4-0.

I have a Santa Fe 2-4-0 from a starter set. I sometimes use it to check track work and new rolling stock. Sometimes I leave it running with ten or more cars, day and night.

Twice I forgot to shut everything down and returned from a week long business trip to find it still going. I love sitting on the back porch during a heavy rainstorm and watching it run in the rain . It lasted 5 years in heavy use every weekend. I finally wore out a gear in it, but that has finally been replaced and it is as good as new.

I have a Southern 2-4-0 with sound also. Unfortunately, a hole in the weight was drilled a little off center. That caused the circuit board to burn out the first day I got it when I turned on the smoke generator, so the Southern 2-4-0 is currently sidelined. I have no doubt that when I get a new board and weight, it will perform as well as the one from the set. Based on the set version, the little 2-4-0 is a strong contender with the old Stainz as far as reliability goes.

I do have a dozen or so locos with other brand names on them. They are all relegated to the shelves. I have about 17 LGB locos and from now on it will be only LGB locos for me from now on. But, I might try fitting LGB F7 motor blocks in my Southern Crescent Aristo AB set and a mogul block in an Annie.

Now if more people ran the little LGB field locos, maybe we could get LGB to look at the serious engineering boo-boo in that one. I miss the cute little buggers.

B0B
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Coldstream, BC Canada
  • 969 posts
Posted by RhB_HJ on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 9:25 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by LGBFan123

My .02 is that the little 2-4-0 Steam engine in the new LGB American sets is one loveable, well-running, chunky adorable toy! And this is one of the LGB premier China products.

Some RhB stock, as well as many "standard gauge" mainline USA freight wagons from LGB are now made in China. I have seen many of these, and even by touch, they seem very well constructed. No, i did not hold the RhB baggage wagon--never hit the store shelves here in CA. The new Rhb freight wagons have a great amount more detail than there previous "German made" counterparts.

There have been some QC issues for sure, but LGB is a company determined to make trains that will be in your family for generations, not for one Christmas and then be forgotten when it breaks--thus I believe that any QC issues with their Asia partners will be smoothly corrected. Note that D. Buffington recently said that 80+% of LGB is still Made in Nurnberg, Germany.

When there is a QC issue, yes, it may mean the demise of quality for a firm, but when you are talking about Lehmann Patenwerk--a company that does not believe in the overnight-get-rich-quick from a shabby product that breaks---a company dedicated to its customer base---you shouldn't worry in the long run!

Regards,

TP Metzger


Hey Tom, [:o)][;)]

Make sure Dave B gets a copy of your testimonial! [;)][:p][;)]

Bob Grosh may quibble on a point or two, given his experience with the FRR engines.
And yes Sir, there were a few problems with some of the 2-4-0 steamers; one of them being incorrect mesh on the gearing which resulted in stripped gears.

The samples of this problem I saw were typical QC SNAFUs!

Some of those problems I file in the "what were they thinking category?"
Cheers HJ http://www.rhb-grischun.ca/ http://www.easternmountainmodels.com
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 76 posts
Posted by bobgrosh on Friday, June 3, 2005 1:20 AM
I sure hoped that Jack Lynch would explain why the three point suspension was abandoned, or why the trucks are so stiff. Is he going to be like the LGBoA repair center and just let the subject drop.
I never heard why they changed away from stainless steel ball bearing to the ones that rust up solid after the first rain either.
Is there some way to report this stuff direct to the engineers and QC people in Germany?
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Bucks County, PA
  • 428 posts
Posted by Bucksco on Friday, June 3, 2005 7:19 AM
Bob,
I would love to give you the answer you want to hear but I don't think you'll like the answers I was given.
The newer US style boxcars were designed in Nurnberg. The tooling was later sent overseas for production (nothing was changed). The information you supplied has been sent on to the "proper authorities". I can't guarantee that future models will be changed but I've sent the information on. I am the marketing manager not the director of product and technical development- but the info was forwarded to him.
Hopefully you concerns will be addressed in future models.
Jack
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 76 posts
Posted by bobgrosh on Friday, June 3, 2005 7:56 AM
Jack, actually, That was the answer I was looking for.

Great!

Thanks for following up.

It would be nice if someone in the product and technical development could visit this forum too. I suppose the language barrier is the problem.

I really appreciate your passing this type of info along. Even if they don't correct the designs on those cars, at least they won't repeat the same mistakes on the next new product.

B0B GR0SH
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: West Australia
  • 2,217 posts
Posted by John Busby on Sunday, June 5, 2005 9:41 AM
Hi all
If I ever get one carp Made in China LGB wagon or locomotive or track componant LGB can Kiss My Custom Good Bye.
I get charged Rolls Royce Prices I demand a Rolls Royce Quality Product regardles of where the product is made.
So all I can say is the Quality Control had better be to the
Rolls Royce standard.
Unfortunatly I have heard the new motor is not as good as the old one and problems with things wearing out with more to do with design change for cheap manufacture rather than maintaining or improving the quality of the product I hope this is not true.
regards John
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 76 posts
Posted by bobgrosh on Monday, June 6, 2005 3:30 AM
John

LGB has a PDF about their quality, you can read it here;
http://www.lgb.de/pdf/qualitye.pdf

Go to page 15 and you will find this quote:

QUOTE: ...LGB trains are equipped with seven-pole, ball-bearing “Bühler”
motors, the equivalent of a modern, fuel-injected V-8.


Yet, I have nearly a dozen LGB locos that came with cheap FIVE pole core-less can motors that do NOT have ball bearings or even the cast ends shown on that page. The motors in those LGB locos appear to be exactly identical to motors I found in a $19.95 RC car at Radio Shack. In fact I've bought several of the cars to get replacement motors for my LGB locos when they burned out.

Of course, at the bottom of every page in that document you will also find:
QUOTE: Products, specifications and availability dates are subject to change
without notice.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 8, 2005 4:09 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by bobgrosh

TP
I agree about the little American 2-4-0.

I have a Santa Fe 2-4-0 from a starter set. I sometimes use it to check track work and new rolling stock. Sometimes I leave it running with ten or more cars, day and night.

Twice I forgot to shut everything down and returned from a week long business trip to find it still going. I love sitting on the back porch during a heavy rainstorm and watching it run in the rain . It lasted 5 years in heavy use every weekend. I finally wore out a gear in it, but that has finally been replaced and it is as good as new.

I have a Southern 2-4-0 with sound also. Unfortunately, a hole in the weight was drilled a little off center. That caused the circuit board to burn out the first day I got it when I turned on the smoke generator, so the Southern 2-4-0 is currently sidelined. I have no doubt that when I get a new board and weight, it will perform as well as the one from the set. Based on the set version, the little 2-4-0 is a strong contender with the old Stainz as far as reliability goes.

I do have a dozen or so locos with other brand names on them. They are all relegated to the shelves. I have about 17 LGB locos and from now on it will be only LGB locos for me from now on. But, I might try fitting LGB F7 motor blocks in my Southern Crescent Aristo AB set and a mogul block in an Annie.

Now if more people ran the little LGB field locos, maybe we could get LGB to look at the serious engineering boo-boo in that one. I miss the cute little buggers.

B0B



Bob,

Enjoyed your comments. When I give my opinion I bet there are probably some who think that, to me, LGB can do no wrong. That is untrue. LGB has made some big no-no's in the past. Even before the China outsourcing, I had passenger cars with shabby paint jobs--and these were bought brand new from retailers. The dual-paint schemes are much more precise now than in the 1980s, there is no bleeding and the liveries (lettering,etc.) is much more prototypical for both Euro and American stock. For the most part with locos and rolling stock, I think LGB is improving in quality.

LGB really sat twiddling their thumbs with the advent of a timed-station-stop module for analog users. How many years did I hear people say during the holidays " I need a train to slow down and stop while another one goes" ??
And yet, they still do not offer such a unit for analog users (they offered a timer + contact box in the mid-90s but that has been discontinued for years, and even that was a poor design because it did not have momentum and braking built-in).

Also, a dual=reverse loop set that is automated has been sorely missing from the program. LGB shouldn't expect everyone in their 30 year customer base to jump on board the DIGITAL route right away! It is very expensive to convert old locos to digital, much of a hassle too. I think LGB offering pre-installed decoders is great (as long as they are better than the cheesy "Type II" offering!) True, digital offers some hi=tech fun (my most enjoyable feature is the Back-EMF so far) but I don't expect the majority of "veteran LGBers" to go out and convert their extensive loco collection over to the new technology for at least another 10 years. I am one holding out (I have tried the digital route but until I am willing to make a significant (read as :$1200) investment I can pretty much accomplish everything in analog for my modest sized pike).

Hmmm...sorry to get off topic! Where was I..oh yes, I was about to say that many LGBers like the portability of LGB (the dreaded "R1" crowd) and I don't see these people wanting to invest in MTS but still wanting to have realistic slow-motion and station stopping options. I really believe there is still a LGB market for analog devices. The irony is, if you have a new LGB decoder-equipped loco and the old discontinued timer-box, you could have realistic braking and momentum stops. But I like my old LGB locos, I won't part with the ones I currently own, and I don't see that as enough reason to "upgrade" to a new version of the same loco (yet, anyway!)..mainly because I know that my older locos on the market won't make enough $$ to buy the replacement!

Have fun with that 2-4-0, and I hope you get the other one back working!.

Regards,

Tom M.












  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 8, 2005 4:22 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by LGBFan123

[
Enjoyed your comments. When I give my opinion I bet there are probably some who think that, to me, LGB can do no wrong. That is untrue. LGB has made some big no-no's in the past. Even before the China outsourcing, I had passenger cars with shabby paint jobs--and these were bought brand new from retailers. The dual-paint schemes are much more precise now than in the 1980s, there is no bleeding and the liveries (lettering,etc.) is much more prototypical for both Euro and American stock. For the most part with locos and rolling stock, I think LGB is improving in quality.



My above comments may illicit a bunch of flamed responses, so I will add that no, I have not purchased a US Trolley (on a German themed pike, c'mon!??) nor have run any of the new American stock on my tracks (although my brother has a growing US-themed LGB collection and so far we like the stuff he's purchased running on his rails). My comments on the fact that LGB seems to be improving in quality is from my own purchases, namely new European rolling stock. I do have one issue with a newer Euro-style Christmas car, being that the side gates and landing don't mesh well like the older units, and this car did not come with Euro buffers or buffer mounts. I assume they kept the mounts off so that American-users can easily hook knuckle couplers to it for their pleasure.

Unfortunately, I no longer have the box to see if it came from China or from Germany!!






  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Bucks County, PA
  • 428 posts
Posted by Bucksco on Wednesday, June 8, 2005 8:23 AM
"LGB really sat twiddling their thumbs with the advent of a timed-station-stop module for analog users. How many years did I hear people say during the holidays " I need a train to slow down and stop while another one goes" ??"

Tom,
LGB's Jumbo transformer can be used to accompli***his.
Jack
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 8, 2005 3:27 PM
Oh dear.
LGB made in China with a reduced quality control.My Dad is going to go bat***
It's a shame.Usually with LGB you chuck it in the garden and let it cope!
Is this going to change?
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Bucks County, PA
  • 428 posts
Posted by Bucksco on Wednesday, June 8, 2005 4:30 PM
Let's not jump to conclusions now!
Jack
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 8, 2005 4:43 PM
If my father buys two tram models,payingLGB prices.What is he paying for?
Superior plastic maybe.
He is not paying for superior electrical contacts.I had to do that for LGB!
If the models are built in China are the same plastic formulas used?
I think not.It seems like a usual stitch up to me.Cheap labour,cheap materials,same LGB prices.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy