Trains.com

Got my CTT today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

7888 views
74 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 122 posts
Posted by DCmontana on Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:21 PM
I thought it was a great issue. The attic layout was a real hit. Being a true nostalgia buff, the 1945 layout was equally impressive. If there were only one manufacturer of three rail O gauge, I would still be buying from them. I have a variety of rolling stock, but my old Lionel 2056 is still my favorite. It is decked out in Milwaukee dress and pulls a nice string of 9500 Milwaukee passenger cars. I can't imagine people taking the legal actions between the produces in a personal way. I don't know those people and their fights, justified or not, are not mine. I don't care who makes a great product, I buy from any manufacturer. As to exposing the hobby, my layout is portible. I am a school administrator and take it to my office just before Christmas. We bring the elementary students to the district office and I let the school district pay me to run the trains for a couple of days. The only compaints I get are from parents that don't know where to by a train set in the remaining few days until Christmas. CTT got me back into the hobby several years ago and I look forward to every issue. As a matter of fact, I cannot recall a bad issue.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:36 PM
I agree with BillFromWayne. The content is really good, and the upbeat lead off from the editor is appreciated. I let my subscription to another magazine lapse due to what I consider to be less than interesting material that they present and the plethora of ads that they run with the outdated prices and lack of availability. CTT has interesting features and it is written in a real friendly tone.

It was a little on the thin side -- I stand by that comment, but I am happily subscribed through 2007.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • 76 posts
Posted by winrose46 on Friday, October 28, 2005 7:26 AM
I normally do not get excited about reviews but ctt's MTH alcoS-2 was right on. I just picked up the Chessie version and everything in the article is correct. The sound is great and the detail is unbelieveable. One difference on the Chessie from the reviewed model is that it does not have the watch your step decals on the steps. Additionally, MTH has its mininum curve as O-31; however, my unit did not have any problem with my O-27 loop on my level. It did hickup going over a gargraves switch (It did not have any problem with K-Line 42 switches) at speeds less than 15 smph and I will see if I can reposition the pick up roller.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Eastern Montana
  • 63 posts
Posted by MTsteamfan on Friday, October 28, 2005 5:51 PM
I had been wondering why there have been no Lionel reviews lately. Thanks Bob for providing the reason.

I don't understand why Lionel is not sending products to CTT for review. They must be aware that advertising is not required. Why wouldn't they jump at the chance at what is essentially a free ad for one of their great new products? It just doesn't make sense.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 28, 2005 10:05 PM
I have no idea what Lionel might be thinking, but I have to wonder about something:

If all the manufacturers move toward a "build to order" model for their products (which seems to be the case, especially for the higher-end stuff), then what would be the point of submitting a product for review? A review or an ad might help the dealers move the few items they bought for shelf stock, but that's it.

Those guys spend a ton of money on catalogs every year. Maybe that's all the publicity they think they need.

I'm not saying they are right or wrong, it's just something to think about.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 29, 2005 6:09 AM
"If all the manufacturers move toward a "build to order" model for their products (which seems to be the case, especially for the higher-end stuff), then what would be the point of submitting a product for review? A review or an ad might help the dealers move the few items they bought for shelf stock, but that's it."
----------------------------------

That's actually a very good point. As it is already, product reviews often enough are of little real value to a perspective consumer because the products are, just as often, long gone from the dealers' shelves even before the review appears. And this situation, especially as it exists for high-end products, is bound to get worse in the future. Furthermore, pre-ordering--the trend of the times--pretty much negates the value of reviews for those products that must be preordered.

I know that folks like to read product reviews, if for no other reason than to validate their choices, but changes in the hobby industry in recent years have rendered many of these reviews somewhat meaningless. It may be time for the various publications to re-evaluate the allocation of at least part of their editorial lineage.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • 76 posts
Posted by winrose46 on Sunday, October 30, 2005 9:01 PM
I disagree on the reviews being too late. I bought the Chessie Alco S-2 based upon the review and seeing that it was in stock in Laurel.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 31, 2005 8:48 AM
It sounds like a great issue! I'm especially looking forward to the article on the 1945 showroom layout! It has arrived at my house in Langenburg, but since I'm here in Regina right now, I'm not going to be able to look at it until the Nov. 11 long weekend when I'm heading back home. Oh well, I'm quite busy right now anyway.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 31, 2005 10:09 AM
It seems ironic that model train magazines are thinnest when interest in them is at it's peak.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, November 24, 2005 10:01 PM
Issues continue to get thinner. Subscription rates are down something like 18% over the past 5 years. The collector market is shrinking and the magazine should really take a look at trends inthe hobby and go with the flow. You are also seeing that magazines that cater tro the operator are growing in popularity. This magazine won't be top of the heap for much longer if they don't change.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 2,877 posts
Posted by Bob Keller on Friday, November 25, 2005 7:55 AM
Hi Ru,
As a matter of fact we changed directions several years back - you see virtually no "wall of trains" collection stories or "count the rivets in the 6464 car" commentaries any longer. We feature far more operator-oriented features, track plans, and how-tos than ever before. I guess it all comes down to what your perception of the magazine is.

If we run a story on how to tune up a postwar Flyer engine or a Lionel transfer table, I'd say that is an operator story (since it is to get the engine or the accessory to run) while others would say it is a collector story because it is about "old" stuff.

Similarly, if we run a feature on a collector's layout (not the collection), I'd say operator feature, but if the trains are prewar, some are going to lable it 'prewar collector' and page on past it.

Thanks for the comments.

Bob Keller

  • Member since
    January 2013
  • 60 posts
Posted by M1Tanker on Friday, November 25, 2005 8:47 AM
CTT and the Army Times always get read through cover to cover in our house!
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Holland
  • 1,404 posts
Posted by daan on Friday, November 25, 2005 5:31 PM
Got it yesterday. A very nice magazine, and still the best in classic toy trains. I loved the article on the standard gauge from lionel. Beautifull machines!
Daan. I'm Dutch, but only by country...
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: North of Philadelphia
  • 2,372 posts
Posted by tmcc man on Friday, November 25, 2005 10:12 PM
Daan, how did you get yours so quickly. I was starting this on the december issue.
Colin from prr.railfan.net
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, November 26, 2005 4:54 PM
Got my Jan. issue today in PA. Thought the "Building the PERFECT Christmas layout" article was very funny..."Rule #1: Go with something small, less than 200 square feet". Holy Christmas, this 8x12 layout is bigger than my year-'round 5x8!!!
"went together fairly quickly...over a couple of months" Duh?
Look, the layout looks great, but are you sure this wasn't a early "April Fool's" joke?
In any event, the story has a happy ending...it's now a permanent layout...which makes me wonder why it was billed as a "perfect Christmas layout" in the first place.
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • 1,774 posts
Posted by Dr. John on Saturday, November 26, 2005 5:03 PM
Jan. issue arrived today. Been busy working on the Christmas layout today.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Rolesville, NC
  • 15,416 posts
Posted by ChiefEagles on Saturday, November 26, 2005 6:27 PM
Been putting up Christmas decorations all afternoon [after returning from Todd's Train Depot]. Just went to mailbox as drove in from going to dinner [Combo fried chicken and pork ba-be-que [:D]], My January issue was in there. [:D] Now sit back and enjoy. OH, have lighted Christmas train on my back roof.

 God bless TCA 05-58541   Benefactor Member of the NRA,  Member of the American Legion,   Retired Boss Hog of Roseyville Laugh,   KC&D QualifiedCowboy       

              

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • 28 posts
Posted by tintrax on Saturday, November 26, 2005 8:15 PM
Here in New Zealand my CTT used to arrive quite quickly in spite of coming via Germany! (Germany!!!!!!!!). Now I am not sure where it comes from, outer space maybe, as it takes a week longer. than it used to I don`t expect the January issue here for another week or so. Time will tell.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Roanoke Virginia
  • 34 posts
Posted by watinva on Saturday, November 26, 2005 9:21 PM
My copy arrived today in Roanoke Va. Williams ad on backcover got my attention. Penn GG1 @149.95 for Platinum Club Members seems like a pretty good deal. Am I correct in believing that this is the same size as the orginal postwar lionel GG1s? Does anyone have one of this and if so how do you like it.
Thanks
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: North of Philadelphia
  • 2,372 posts
Posted by tmcc man on Saturday, November 26, 2005 9:57 PM
I just got mine. Not reading it just yet. Looking at the adds
Colin from prr.railfan.net
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Western Pennsylvania
  • 687 posts
Posted by prewardude on Sunday, November 27, 2005 9:25 PM
Got mine yesterday. It sure is nice to see some Standard gauge in the mag again! [:)]
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 31 posts
Posted by PaulEFudd on Monday, November 28, 2005 9:44 AM
I received mine on Saturday, a nice treat for the holiday weekend.

When I first picked it up I thought it was a bit thin, however, it had excellent featured layouts and Christmas putz' to boot and it was not overwhelmed by ads. The reviews of yet more diesels is either a sign most are going diesel or CTT needs to go out and buy/burrow some modern Lionel steam to review. Personally, diesel reviews are a waste of space.

I have to say that over the past year CTT has been getting better and better, especially with coverage of well-done layouts (these are the ones that inspire to build). Please keep this aspect up.

Paul
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 2,877 posts
Posted by Bob Keller on Monday, November 28, 2005 10:56 AM
Lionel hasn't shipped us anything in more than a year. I did go out a few weeks back and bought a Lionel 0-4-0, which will be reviewed in the near future.

Bob Keller

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: North Texas
  • 5,707 posts
Posted by wrmcclellan on Monday, November 28, 2005 11:06 AM
Have yet to see the Jan issue in N Texas. [:(]

Regards, Roy

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: New England
  • 6,241 posts
Posted by Jumijo on Monday, November 28, 2005 11:09 AM
Bob,

I'd be very interested in seeing a long-term review on the Polar Express Berk or a similar Lionel "small" berk of the same ilk.

Jim

Modeling the Baltimore waterfront in HO scale

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, November 28, 2005 11:18 AM
I haven't recevied mine to date. I wish CTT would start shipping them in the plastic wrappers like they used to. My issues have been coming late and sometimes a little damaged. As if someone at the post office is looking thru it first. My local hobby shop has them before do.

I have two more years on my subscription. I may not renew my subscription in order to get a copy quicker and in better condition. I look forward to receiving each issue of CTT. I have every copy.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 2,877 posts
Posted by Bob Keller on Monday, November 28, 2005 11:35 AM
The Polar Express Berkshire has been on our display layout (you may recall the two-level desert and Christmas project layout we ran in the magazine in 1999 or so) in our offices, and has been regularly for visitors. It has run fine and the only problem we thought we had - was actually a transformer wire issue. It has been a real crowd pleaser running through the Christmas village.

Note to dtpowell, if you receive damaged copies, call our customer service number and they'll send you a new copy.

Bob Keller

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: S.E. Ohio
  • 5,434 posts
Posted by Blueberryhill RR on Monday, November 28, 2005 12:56 PM
I got my Jan. 2006 issue today.

HOOOO RAAAAH


See the Williams sale on the back cover???

Chuck
Chuck # 3 I found my thrill on Blueberryhill !!
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Jelloway Creek, OH - Elv. 1100
  • 7,578 posts
Posted by Buckeye Riveter on Monday, November 28, 2005 1:44 PM
The Roger's Corners post office delivered mine today.

and I want you to note what is being advertised on the inside of the back cover.

Now I have more than enough reason to post my G Scale photos on CTT. [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]

And make sure you see Page 74.....What has the old Buckeye been telling you about foam? [:0][swg]

Celebrating 18 years on the CTT Forum. Smile, Wink & Grin

Buckeye Riveter......... OTTS Charter Member, a Roseyville Raider and a member of the CTT Forum since 2004..

Jelloway Creek, OH - ELV 1,100 - Home of the Baltimore, Ohio & Wabash RR

TCA 09-64284

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: North Texas
  • 5,707 posts
Posted by wrmcclellan on Monday, November 28, 2005 3:53 PM
Got it today finally!

Regards, Roy

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month