Trains.com

Lionel..Please explain why I want to buy this piece of.............

8554 views
77 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
  • 8,059 posts
Posted by cnw1995 on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:35 AM
Brian is right. Not only did I see it last winter (I liked the packaging which let you see the engine and cars behind cellophane by flipping up the 'lid'), it was able to past the "five-year-old test" - where my youngest easily could re-rail the one they had out of the box. Now he can't easily do that with a smaller-trucked engine or trolley - even Percy.

Doug Murphy 'We few, we happy few, we band of brothers...' Henry V.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: MICH
  • 8,153 posts
Posted by sir james I on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:32 AM
I can think of only one Lionel that looks worse, don't remember the year or # thankfully, but it was a GP they made for J C Penny  christmas catalog. As far as I know Pennys stopped  having a Lionel special edition after that.

"IT's GOOD TO BE THE KING",by Mel Brooks 

  Charter Member- Tardis Train Crew (TTC)   - Detroit3railers-  Detroit Historical society Glancy Modular trains- Charter member BTTS

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Jelloway Creek, OH - Elv. 1100
  • 7,578 posts
Posted by Buckeye Riveter on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 11:18 AM

Dear Lionel,

Please accept my appologies for posting this topic.  I sure didn't know that 670 995 1,447 1,991 people were interested in a HIGH WATER LOCOMOTIVE when I posted this topic.  Now you have a problem due to so many people knowing about this piece of ????????.

In order to make some $$$ on this locomotive, I would suggest you rename it the CRASH and BURN LOCOMOTIVE.  With such a high center of gravity if would be great for the kids to use at full speed heading into a tight curve where it could fly off the track.  If the layout was oreiented correclty, they might be able to launch it through a window pane of their house.  Wow! That would be better than a baseball through the window in my book. 

Incidently, a friend of mine in Colorado asked for some help in buying a train set for the grandson just the other day.  Sorry, but I couldn't put this locmotive on the list, so another sale down the tubes.

Again, my apologies,

Celebrating 18 years on the CTT Forum. Smile, Wink & Grin

Buckeye Riveter......... OTTS Charter Member, a Roseyville Raider and a member of the CTT Forum since 2004..

Jelloway Creek, OH - ELV 1,100 - Home of the Baltimore, Ohio & Wabash RR

TCA 09-64284

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 880 posts
Posted by Last Chance on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 11:39 AM

Occasionally Im astounded by the highs (Or was it the lows?) Companies seek on thier products.

That poor engine ought to be taken back to the shop and rebuilt proper.

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • 2,306 posts
Posted by kpolak on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 2:10 PM

Is Lionel totally to blame for this one?

Was Target involved in the decision making on this design?

Kurt

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Central Ohio
  • 80 posts
Posted by geedub on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 2:57 PM
I am thinking of converting my entire collection of postwar engines to this highwater model.......
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: mt.jewett,pa
  • 78 posts
Posted by warner brook on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 3:22 PM

hi buckeye

there`s actually a prototype sitting in the yard in johnsonburgh pa.

dutchman
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Dublin, Ohio
  • 39 posts
Posted by eness76 on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 3:25 PM
I will say that this engine, while ugly and clearly directed at the toy market, does serve a purpose.  I have a 3yr old son, and we play together with my toy trains almost every day, but he knows those are Daddy's trains.  So last christmas I picked one of these "high-water specials" up on the Bay brand new for next to nothing, wrapped it nicely and put it under the tree for him to unwrap as HIS first engine.  He now wants nothing to do with Daddy's steam turbine, or trainmaster, or even F3 set, it is HIS train he wants to run.  It does a nice job too on short light consists around our layout, navigates 022 switches flawlessly and generally provides lots of hours of fun for him, and in turn, me.  It is fast enough that he can accidently dump it too, and the rest of you that started at this when you were a kid know, the lure of dumping it is half the fun.  So I'm going to cut against the grain here and say mission accomplished Lionel, you've made one heck of a toy for my son.  Offering something for everyone seems to be a good business plan in my opinion.  It is good to not always take ourselves so seriously when playing with toy trains. :)
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Sunny So. Cal.
  • 3,784 posts
Posted by dbaker48 on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:02 PM

Eness,

Thanks for sharing, I was hoping that there was someone out there that would relate your exact situation.  That is tremendous, both you and your son win!  Your not concerned regarding the value, and if something is destroyed.  He has something that is HIS, and will have more lattitude with, and fun with.    Good job.

(I don't think I will buy one to have on my layout for kids use, however.)

Don

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Western Pennsylvania
  • 687 posts
Posted by prewardude on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 6:08 PM
 Buckeye Riveter wrote:

Dear Lionel,

... In order to make some $$$ on this locomotive, I would suggest you rename it the CRASH and BURN LOCOMOTIVE.  With such a high center of gravity if would be great for the kids to use at full speed heading into a tight curve where it could fly off the track.  If the layout was oreiented correclty, they might be able to launch it through a window pane of their house.  Wow! That would be better than a baseball through the window in my book...

Laugh [(-D]

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 6:46 PM
Those are not just trucks that are way too high, they are EMD trucks that are way too high!

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Hobart, In
  • 568 posts
Posted by jwse30 on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 6:53 PM

 eness76 wrote:
It is good to not always take ourselves so seriously when playing with toy trains. :)

Not quite as catchy as "Model Railroading is fun!", but every bit as true.

Thanks for some wisdom,

 

J White

 

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 7 posts
Posted by sparks32 on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:05 PM

This "High Water Train" was not made by Lionel for sale at Target, this train was made for Disney by Lionel for sale at Target!  Disney plans to remake the Ugly Daushound movie into a kids movie and this "Great Dane" will be the starring role as a Big Train trying to fit in with his smaller brothers and sisters trains, just imagine what happens when he tries to fit where he can't go just because his brothers and sisters trains could!  It could be the funniest train movie you ever saw and maybe Will Ferrell will be the voice of Brutus. " I think I can fit, I think I can fit, Whoops, Oh No, I Couldn't Fit"!    BAD TRAIN!  Laugh [(-D]

                                                                      Sincerely,

                                                                      sparks32gphillips@msn.com

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Bawlmer Hon
  • 314 posts
Posted by choochin3 on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:01 PM

Methinks that the reason that Alco looks like a monster truck is that Lionel changed the frame from metal to plastic.

The metal frame hung down over the top of the truck and closed some of that gap.

 

Carl T.

I'm out Choochin!
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: The ROMAN Empire State
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by brianel027 on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:48 PM

Carl, as I mentioned earlier, Lionel made the plastic frame and body modification in 1996. The first Alco's made with this mod were the separate sale Reading ones. That loco did not look like this one. I'd be inclinded to wonder if  a production error was made: that the former Alco shell made to go on the sheet metal frame was used on the plastic frame rather than using the newer modified Alco shell that also was used for a Amtrak and Santa Fe Alco as someone else mentioned.

I also like the story told by enss. But he also mentioned getting the loco very cheap. It's an open question as to whether he would have paid more for the same loco? For normal retail or normal discount pricing, there are far better loco choices.

And as for myself, I don't take myself too seriously. I don't count rivets nor compare models to actual builders drawings, or measure them with scale rulers and then write complaints about it on other forums. And I love modern roads on toy trains like the Alco FA and the S-2 even though those locos were long retired before.

This is just the product area loco I normally buy. the K-Lionel S-2 loco is a far better value than this one though. And I think that S-2 is the best loco made in the past few decades... I'd take the K-Line S-2 over any other scale/electronically loaded loco, both for price and superb reliability. And if Lionel made one of these in Norfolk Southern, I'd buy one and I wouldn't complain that the Norfolk Southern doesn't have any S-2 switchers either.

brianel, Agent 027

"Praise the Lord. I may not have everything I desire, but the Lord has come through for what I need."

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: MICH
  • 8,153 posts
Posted by sir james I on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 7:30 AM
Maybe we missed the point, we know it's made wrong and too high, but there is a little boy out there(eness76)who loves his engine. And I'm sure he is not the only one. But Lionel sure could have given this little boy a much better effort.

"IT's GOOD TO BE THE KING",by Mel Brooks 

  Charter Member- Tardis Train Crew (TTC)   - Detroit3railers-  Detroit Historical society Glancy Modular trains- Charter member BTTS

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upstate New York
  • 899 posts
Posted by nblum on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 8:13 AM

Maybe it's just a cute toy, not a model train?

 

Or Lionel's attempt to provide satisfaction for those who enjoy expressing indignation over other people's toys? 

Neil (not Besougloff or Young) :)
  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Highland, Mi
  • 582 posts
Posted by J. Daddy on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:50 AM
 nblum wrote:

Maybe it's just a cute toy, not a model train?

Or Lionel's attempt to provide satisfaction for those who enjoy expressing indignation over other people's toys? 

yeah but cute trains don't cost 89.00!!! Ouch!

When the men get together its always done right! J. Daddy
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upstate New York
  • 899 posts
Posted by nblum on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 12:25 PM
I don't know that the cost is much different than other similar toys.  RMT Beeps are in that ball park cost, and they have virtually no tooling or marketing costs, and very low overhead compared with a larger company like Lionel.  Have you priced any Brio trains recently?  So I'd say this little  specimen is right in the ball park cost-wise.  There aren't any Weaver, Atlas or MTH locos in that price range, for example, so it clearly is the economy version not being provided by others, filling a market niche, however ugly it seems to more sophisticated folks here.
Neil (not Besougloff or Young) :)
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • 1,512 posts
Posted by philo426 on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 3:38 PM
The Edsel wasn't so bad it just had teething problems(like most new models)and an unfortunate front "Horse-collar "grill.Now they are collectors items. 
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Western Pennsylvania
  • 687 posts
Posted by prewardude on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 6:32 PM

Sure, it's a cute toy, but the point here is that Lionel has made this same exact engine in the past (in a cheapened version) and it looked much better than this. They should have left well enough alone.

 - Clint 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Thursday, August 21, 2008 10:27 AM

 philo426 wrote:
The Edsel wasn't so bad it just had teething problems(like most new models)and an unfortunate front "Horse-collar "grill.Now they are collectors items. 

Yeah but I still rather have a Tucker TorpedoWink [;)]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Highland, Mi
  • 582 posts
Posted by J. Daddy on Friday, August 22, 2008 8:59 AM

 nblum wrote:
I don't know that the cost is much different than other similar toys.  RMT Beeps are in that ball park cost, and they have virtually no tooling or marketing costs, and very low overhead compared with a larger company like Lionel.  Have you priced any Brio trains recently?  So I'd say this little  specimen is right in the ball park cost-wise.  There aren't any Weaver, Atlas or MTH locos in that price range, for example, so it clearly is the economy version not being provided by others, filling a market niche, however ugly it seems to more sophisticated folks here.

yeah but its 89.00 just for the engine! At least with the above don't you get a starter set for this price?!

When the men get together its always done right! J. Daddy
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upstate New York
  • 899 posts
Posted by nblum on Friday, August 22, 2008 9:16 AM

RMT doesn't make starter sets, just rolling stock and locomotives. Their locomotives are about $70.00, not usually available discounted, which is about what the equally goofy looking Lionel will cost at a typical 20% discount.  Anyhow, we don't know that the final product will look as goofy ;).  RMT makes goofy looking stuff and everyone's drooling, and Lionel does it, and everyone's fuming.

MTH, Atlas, Williams and Weaver have no comparables to speak of.  Williams probably comes closest.

 

A typical nice Brio set retails for about $130 or so. 

Neil (not Besougloff or Young) :)
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Massachusetts
  • 16 posts
Posted by Night Train on Friday, August 22, 2008 9:25 AM

Actually, I think geedub has the right idea...

"I am thinking of converting my entire collection of postwar engines to this highwater model......."

Go ahead and make fun of it, you guys.  Nobody liked the "girls" pastel-colored Lionel set when it came out, either.

Personally, I'm going to run right out and buy as many of these monster truck Alcos as I can find!  Some day they'll be "unique", "rare", "hard-to-find-in-this-condition", "highly collectible", (insert your own favorite eBay exaggeration here), auction items!  I'll make a fortune on them and have the last laugh!

Note: All above statements made with tongue implanted firmly in cheek! Wink [;)] 

-Cooper

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Highland, Mi
  • 582 posts
Posted by J. Daddy on Friday, August 22, 2008 11:58 AM

 philo426 wrote:
The Edsel wasn't so bad it just had teething problems(like most new models)and an unfortunate front "Horse-collar "grill.Now they are collectors items. 

At first I thought this was the real car... LOL... then I saw the washing machine dials behind it... My nieghbor bought an Edsel, found it sitting in a barn.... man they are ugly... I don't know, just because something is ugly looking does not mean it will be rare and collectable... I think I will stick with the good looking scale stuff...

When the men get together its always done right! J. Daddy
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • 1,512 posts
Posted by philo426 on Saturday, August 23, 2008 9:33 AM
One Tucker Torpedo coming up!  
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
Posted by Brutus on Saturday, August 23, 2008 9:41 AM
My first thought on this was, Oh look, a Lionel Beep.  Cool car pics!

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: S.E. Ohio
  • 5,434 posts
Posted by Blueberryhill RR on Saturday, August 23, 2008 7:00 PM

Didn't they say the same thing about Marx trains. Ugly.

50 years from now, people will be trying to collect the Lionel engine.

Chuck # 3 I found my thrill on Blueberryhill !!
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Rolesville, NC
  • 15,416 posts
Posted by ChiefEagles on Saturday, August 23, 2008 8:26 PM
 Blueberryhill RR wrote:

Didn't they say the same thing about Marx trains. Ugly.

50 years from now, people will be trying to collect the Lionel engine.

Will not be able to find them as Neil will have bought all of them. Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D] 

 God bless TCA 05-58541   Benefactor Member of the NRA,  Member of the American Legion,   Retired Boss Hog of Roseyville Laugh,   KC&D QualifiedCowboy       

              

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month