daveklepperAnd I gather the diesel was a flat design under the floor?
There is actually one of those 'how to...' videos from the Fifties on YouTube that tells how to start and run early versions of these railcars; it contains a number of detail views of the powerplants and gearboxes as installed.
Here's the introduction:
Note that on this type (I believe these were Derby lightweights), the engines are 'bus engines' but run flat (as on a number of American buses, and on RDCs). This is different from a 'pancake' or horizontally-opposed 'boxer' engine design. Note the "BUT" on the control gear; this was a joint venture between AEG and Leyland.
Here's the section dealing with faults that shows what to do with some of the 'very expensive' equipment under the car...
Note the 'other type' of railcar at about 34:00 - is this a Metropolitan-Cammell?
I should add, however, that I have never seen an umbrella opened in a train or transit vehicle for use as a sunshade.
I have seen one opened in a bus once and in a railroad coach once. But I have to admit it was not rain through a leaky roof in either case but a leaky air-conditioning system.
I stand corrected. Thank you. Is your photo of the two cars also the one in Father Frank Browne SJ Collection? Or did you obtain it elsewhere and where? And I gather the diesel was a flat design under the floor?
daveklepper And here's a New Diesel railcar with a leaky roof!
And here's a New Diesel railcar with a leaky roof!
I think the driver is indeed beyond a window, a glazed partition between the cab and the first class passenger compartment.
The railcar in question is:
These appear to be the CIE version of the AEC railcars built for the Great Northern Railway of Ireland shortly after WWII. A feature of the GNRI cars was the glazed partition at the cab end, which provided a view ahead at the leading end and an observation saloon at the rear. These were interesting mechanically, with the diesel engines and transmissions mounted on each side, one side driving the forward truck and the other side the rear truck. The final drives were like those on a Shay locomotive but only the two inner axles were driven. Two power cars could haul two trailer cars.
And I favour the sunshade theory of the umbrella.
Peter
In general. I wish to correct Father Frank Browne JG's images only to correct fading due to age or other specific imperfections like tears or holes or dirt. But there is one exception:
The photo from the website:
The modification I would like:
Can you understand why? I think if the good Father were still alive, I could convince him that a black daytine sky is a real forboding of doom, and I would not like to be resonsible for publishing such an image. But the picture is a great one. Does my modification loose any of its greatness? Comments requested.
I like the idea that he was a steam fan and took the picture becauses of a leaky roof. And what you think is the left edge of the a window is clearly a pole within the car body. Look at the fillet ar rhe top of the pole and compare with fillet at the right side of the window, which is indeed the reverse of the real left side of the window.
This was a post-WWII diesel railcar, amd the operatpr would not be outside.
I guessed the lady had the umbrella for shade from the sun coming in on that side. The gentleman in front of her (the operator?) seems to be on the outside of the window.
With that first shot it looks like Father Browne was ahead of his time, most railfan photographers back then didn't bother with 3/4 back end shots. This one looks good!
That lady with the umbrella! "Adapt, improvise, and overcome!"
Here is 409:
And here's a New Doesel railcar with a leaky roof!
daveklepper The Father Frank Browne (SJ) files are even more interesting than the Titanic files! There is no question in my mind that the good Father was a railfan, with a whole section devoted to trains. Here is one picture, not in any way altered by me: The information given is Engine 406, photographed 1944. Brian Solomon should be interested in all these photos and probably can provide further identification.
The Father Frank Browne (SJ) files are even more interesting than the Titanic files! There is no question in my mind that the good Father was a railfan, with a whole section devoted to trains. Here is one picture, not in any way altered by me:
The information given is Engine 406, photographed 1944.
Brian Solomon should be interested in all these photos and probably can provide further identification.
The 400s were built for the Great Southern and Western Railway and were mainly used on the trains on the main line between Dublin and Cork. 400 was built in 1916 and was based on the English Great Western Railway Star class, a superheated four cylinder simple. Four were built by the GSWR workshops at Inchicore and six by Armsrong Whitworth in England, apart from 400, between 1921 and 1923.
They were a disappointment in their original form and 400, 404 and 408 were scrapped by 1930. The others were rebuilt with two cylinders, 401,402 and 406 having 28" stroke but the others retained the 26" stroke from the four cylinder design. 401 and 406 had Caprotti poppet valves, but 401 was rebuilt with piston valves. A number were rebuilt with larger boilers.
The railways in Ireland were amalgamated in November 1924.
Since the GSWR was the largest system in the merger, GSWR locomotives maintained their numbers on the GSR, and later on the CIE.
WOW!
Father Browne's rail pictures probably call for a book of their own!
"Railfanning With Father Browne." There you go!
The Father Frank Browne S. J. files are even more interesting than the Titanic files! There is no question in my mind that the good Father was a railfan, with a whole section devoted to trains. Here is one picture, not in any way altered by me:
Hard Question to answer. The music director chose music that was not well known but extremely high quality, usually including combinations of organ and instruments and chorus.
The following email was received yesterday, and when have a few more moments to spare I will go back and make the corrections:
On 3/31/20, Edwin davison <info@davisonphoto.com> wrote:> Many thanks for the information, much of which we would know. If I could ask> for a couple of further corrections, when you mention Father Browne would> you please append SJ after his name to signify the order. Also the web> information for this images is at www.titanicphotographs.com and> www.fatherbrowne.com>> Edwin Davison
David, those must have been some great concerts for you to travel all the way from New York to Bryn Mawr, even if you got two train rides along with them!
What was more fun, the concerts or the train rides?
I should have noted that Rich Allman's church is approximately across a street from the ex-PRR Bryn Mawr station on SEPTA's ex-PRR Paoli and now Downingtown and hopefully Lancaster or even Harrisburg line, and has an excellent organ and an outstanding music program including evening concerts. I did at times travel from New York and back specifically for concerts.
Flintlock76 it could have been a lot worse.
You said a mouthful brother!
Trains, trains, wonderful trains. The more you get, the more you toot!
Thanks for the figures Becky! 2,208 souls in total. I'll have to reference my figures more carefully next time.
The scary thing is considering the maximum capacity of the ship it could have been a lot worse.
2,208 total. 324 in 1st, 284 in 2nd and 709 in 3rd for a total of 1,317 passerngers and 891 crew. That of course doesn't count those who crossed in utero like John Jacob Astor VI and several others born to women survivors less than 9 months after April 14, 1912.
How lucky Dr. Mutch and his family were! There were eight clergymen on the Titanic, three Catholic, five Protestant, and all lost. Of course they were, they were men of God doing what they could to provide comfort and hope to those left on board. Dr. Mutch, and we could assume Father Browne (had he stayed on board) would have made ten lost.
I'm assuming Dr. Mutch and his family would have been traveling Second Class, neither First Class or Third Class (Steerage) were sold out. Titanic had 2,200 passengers on board, the maximum capacity was around 3,000.
Thanks for passing that on David!
deleted
Here is Father Browne's photo of the Titanic departing from Ireland:
The Book, A Dedicated Life, Father Frank Browne's biography, with photos, is published by Yale Univeristy Press, costs 50 dollars, and is available from Amazon. The authors are the Davison Brothers, who also are responsible for the preservation and cataloging of Father Browne's negatives, and can be reached at info@davisonphoto.com. But for the specific photos on this thread, go to www.titanicphotographs.com and> www.fatherbrowne.com>
That really is a great effort! Thanks David!
daveklepper I've attepted to correct the double-expsure of the Marconi (Wireless) room. First the photo with only contrast and shading processing, as posted ealier, then an attempt to correct the double-exposure. Your comments are welcome.
I've attepted to correct the double-expsure of the Marconi (Wireless) room. First the photo with only contrast and shading processing, as posted ealier, then an attempt to correct the double-exposure. Your comments are welcome.
Great effort! Thanks for that!
Jones 3D Modeling Club https://www.youtube.com/Jones3DModelingClub
David and all-- The Father Browne story has been fixed. I initially missed page 2 and submitted page 3 twice. If you go back you can now read it correctly.
I found an interesting short history of "The Boat Train" in Titanic's time. Have fun, everyone!
http://www.turniprail.blogspot.com/2012/04/titanic-and-london-and-south-western.html
I probably screwed it up...I'll update and fix, just give me a bit of time, swamped here at the moment. Darn!
Nice work on those photos David!
And it does look like some of those documents are incomplete, but not a catastrophe.
That distinguished looking gentleman on the left of the second photo? For years it was thought to be John Jacob Astor, who was lost on the Titanic, however Astor didn't get on the ship until it stopped in Cherbourg.
Turns out to be a "Close, but no cigar!" situation. The man is an Astor, but a cousin to John Jacob named William Waldorf Astor, husband of Nancy Astor, who moved to Britain in 1890. He was there just to see some friends off on the train.
Father Browne almost threw away that photo of the wireless room since it was a double-exposure, (I wonder what he said when when the shot was devloped? Probably something nasty but not blasphemous!) but when he found out it was the only photo of the wireless room he kept it anyway. Titanic's wireless equipment was the most modern and up-to-date of it's time. It had a guaranteed range of 350 during the day, but could acually reach 500 miles, and a 1,000 mile range at night.
Minningman, what happened to the word "camera" at the bottom of the first page of the scanned text? Is it missing from the document?
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter