I'm glad you booted up the thread David, it's a blast from the past and I'd forgotten how much fun it was!
With a new thread devoted to Irish Railways, I'm booting up this thread to make some fine photos easily available and a liמk to more.
daveklepper Haven't we established that it is Dublin-Heuston and not Crewe? Or did I miss somthingt
Haven't we established that it is Dublin-Heuston and not Crewe? Or did I miss somthingt
Firstly, I should apologise for taking so long to answer this. I am having an apartment renovated, and I have been tied up with contractors for much of my time.
I have been as confused as anybody.
However, when I looked at an enlargement of the photo in question, there was an overhead bridge over the station just at the (North) end of the overall roof. Having checked as much as I could, I haven't found any evidence of an overhead bridge at Dublin Heuston station at any time.
Also, in the enlargement it became clear that there was no road behind the retaining wall to the right of the photo.
So, on reflection, despite the view looking nothing like Crewe today, it seems likely that the photo was indeed Crewe. There are other relevant comments in my earlier post.
Peter
OK Will do. May have to wait a while.
Why ever not? There's certainly historic precedent for it!
The Leica M3 shown in the selfie and regularly used by Father Frank Browne, SJ, was introduced by Leitz in 1954, and is the camera I regularly use.
Father Frank Browne, SJ, past on in 1960 at age 80.
I've been cutting my own hair. When the Coronavirus threat is ended, and I pay to have a haircut, should I take a selfie with my Leice M3 and have it posted?
CSSHEGEWISCHAre you sure that it wasn't Mexican holy water from Jalisco state?
They do that differently now.
https://www.cbs17.com/news/check-this-out/priest-goes-viral-after-picture-shows-him-using-squirt-gun-filled-with-holy-water/
We are starting to confuse 'holy water' with 'water of life' with 'divine elixir'. That's gonna get us in trouble.
CSSHEGEWISCH Are you sure that it wasn't Mexican holy water from Jalisco state?
Are you sure that it wasn't Mexican holy water from Jalisco state?
I'm sure. Definately from Hot-Lanta!
And if it's around Fat Tuesday, you can be a member of a 'Krewe'.
York1 John
MiningmanI just knew this would start a riot.
Deggesty Flintlock76 Crewe in England. Interesting. There's a Crewe here in Virginia, and it's a crew change point on the Norfolk-Southern line to Danville. Crewe must be a good name for railroad towns! Wayne, Crewe is on what was the N&W's main line; you go west from there, and you go through Farmville; you go east, and you go by Petersburg. what have you been drinking?.
Flintlock76 Crewe in England. Interesting. There's a Crewe here in Virginia, and it's a crew change point on the Norfolk-Southern line to Danville. Crewe must be a good name for railroad towns!
Crewe in England. Interesting. There's a Crewe here in Virginia, and it's a crew change point on the Norfolk-Southern line to Danville.
Crewe must be a good name for railroad towns!
Wayne, Crewe is on what was the N&W's main line; you go west from there, and you go through Farmville; you go east, and you go by Petersburg. what have you been drinking?.
Well last night only Coca-Cola, you know, "Southern Holy Water?"
I just dug out my ancient old (1991) Virginia railfan book and you're absolutely right Johnny, Crewe is on the old N&W (now NS) mainline from Norfolk to Roanoke. However the book does call it a "crewe" change point.
If you work for NS and you're part of the crewe I guess that's what you dew.
Wayne
Johnny
Glad to use the Dublin-Heuston caotion, and thank you!
I just knew this would start a riot.
But is that gantry in the part of Crewe that is not Crewe, or is in in the not-Crewe that is Crewe?
It's been found!
Seem to have lost the caption. Where is this signal bridge?
Crewe Gantry, 1930 http://www.fatherbrowne.com/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crewe
Overmod I was waiting for people more familiar with UK practice to flag the location -- I'd lay money on Peter Clark knowing not only the railroad and place but the era down to a few years' spread, the type of equipment, etc. For some reason this makes me think of Reading. (the one in England).
I was waiting for people more familiar with UK practice to flag the location -- I'd lay money on Peter Clark knowing not only the railroad and place but the era down to a few years' spread, the type of equipment, etc.
For some reason this makes me think of Reading. (the one in England).
I think that view is approaching Dublin Heuston (orignally called Kingsbridge).
The elevated roadway on the right and the general track layout looks right.
The carriage doesn't look like one of any of the major British railways. In fact, it looks like a vehicle belonging to the Great Northern Railway of Ireland. A number of vehicles with that style of panelling and flat or nearly flat sides were built during the very early years of the 20th Century. These had small raised class indicator plates just above the windows in the doors and these appear in the photo.
Against this is the fact that GNR(I) trains normally terminated at Dublin Connolly north of the river but there were connecting lines and through trains were run as far as Cork.
But that's the best I can do.
Aye chihuahua! I pity the operator!
Trains, trains, wonderful trains. The more you get, the more you toot!
I don't know myself, but wow, it looks like a signal bridge on steroids!
daveklepperWho would like to discuss differences and similarities between classic Irish and North American interlocking installations?
I think a better place to start might be between British and American practice, followed by detail differences between contemporary British and American plants of this era. This is not an area where I have more than 'reading' expertise, so will leave it to others with 'the Knowledge' and the proper enthusiasm.
It had not occurred to me that those little patent plates were actually pedals to assist returning the levers to locking position.
The term 'interlocking' itself refers to Saxby and Farmer-type arrangements, where only full combinations of route could be selected with the switch levers and others were 'locked out'. This was invented just after the American Civil War, and (as usual, I supposed, where these things are concerned) there is some question about whether very early American interlocking practice was cribbed from the English or parallel-developed. These things remain one of the great innovations of the Victorian era, really as technologically advanced in anything in security lock practice or even horology of that period; I have the same trouble trying to figure out how complex plants are 'programmed' as I do trying to reverse-engineer something like an IBM Composer to fix and adjust it without a manual. In other words: lots.
Note the typically British electric line-occupancy indicator, about which there are many discussions online -- both in its principles and in its practical use. I believe the inimitable Robinson developed devices like this in America, by the 1870s, but they had comparatively little early use (you would not believe some of the relevant battery chemistries!) I think in part due to the relatively late invention of the dynamo as a practical source of DC power at the required combination of voltage and amperage to make electrical signaling fully 'practical'.
Who would like to discuss differences and similarities between classic Irish and North American interlodking installations?
Thanks, Peter!
daveklepper Here is another of my favorite Father Frank Browne S. J. pictures. Probably Peter can supply details:
Here is another of my favorite Father Frank Browne S. J. pictures. Probably Peter can supply details:
I've been a bit slow getting to this....
The locomotive on the left is GSR 461, an inside cylinder 2-6-0 built for the Dublin and South Eastern Railway by Beyer Peacock in 1922. This locomotive is now preserved by the Railway Preservation Society of Ireland. A summary of locomotive classes in 1948 described the two locomotives in the class as "One of the best Goods on the System". Inside cylinder 2-6-0s are unusual but are represented by "James" in the "Thomas the Tank Engine" books.
The locomotive on the right is a former Great Southern and Western Class 101 0-6-0 which dates back to 1867, and some of these were built by Beyer Peacock also. It appears to have been rebuilt with a 4'4" diameter boiler, but retains the original design of smokebox with a backward sloping front and two smokebox doors. The 1948 summary said: "The general purpose small Goods engine can work over most lines."
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter