1)
2) New Home of Facebook
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/03/nyregion/facebook-nyc-office-farley-building.html
All those thousands of people involved, and the secret was kept right up to the end.
Yes, they only knew about the particular piece of the puzzle they were working on, but they still kept their mouths shut about the piece. Says a lot.
Except for a few who didn't, but their story doesn't belong here.
Speakig of "The Gadgets," did you know if things had gone a little differently they might have been dropped by RAF "Lancasters?" Here's the story.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XX9ptCNpik
Flintlock76Speakig of "The Gadgets," did you know if things had gone a little differently they might have been dropped by RAF "Lancasters?"
Overmod In a world where parachute retarding was not advisable, I tremble to think of the survivability of those Lancasters...
Well, the concept of parachute bomb fall retarding was known by that time, the Air Force making use of it during very low level bombing missions, they called them "parafrags," so parachutes could have been applied to the A-bombs if needed, it wouldn't have been difficult.
The only other airplane capable of carrying A-bombs would have been the Convair B-32 "Dominator," originally contracted as a back-up for Boeing's B-29, "just in case," but development was agonizingly slow, the B-32's not making it to the Pacific until mid-summer of 1945. I won't tell the whole story of the B-32, anyone curious can look it up easily. Suffice to say all B-32's produced (there weren't many) were dropped from Air Force inventory by the end of 1945. Obviously the Air Force didn't think much of it.
The Lancs probably could have pulled off the atomic missions, losing that five tons of dead weight would have certainly given them an immediate gain in airspeed, and the bombs would have still had that 45 second interval from drop to detonation, maybe much longer if they put drag chutes on them.
But it's all speculation anyway, since the scenario never happened.
The soviets did drop them by parachute. Or at least, they did with this one:
75 years ago the term "Hibakusha" was invented.
Same me, different spelling!
Flintlock76... parachutes could have been applied to the A-bombs if needed, it wouldn't have been difficult.
As I recall, the stated military reasoning was that a retarded drop would provide more time for them enemy' to shoot at the device to disable it (or fire any salvage fuzing early) if they recognized it, but (in my opinion much more importantly) in the event of nondetonation the drop would lovingly convey to the Japanese a near-intact copy of $4B of applied secret research. They certainly had physicists who would know more or less exactly what it was, and how to reverse-engineer most of its details.
It has been my opinion since reading about the Lancasters in the Groves book that parachute retardation would have been needed for that aircraft's survival, and that rejection of that aircraft type would have functionally followed regardless of any 'American carrier for American bomb' chauvinism actually involved.
Well, it's all speculation anyway. It certainly makes a lot more sense as far as a "what if?" scenario than say, "USS Constitution vs. HMS Victory, who would win?" or "What if General Lee had an atomic bomb at Gettysburg?"
And considering the B-29 had its development problems the Air Force was going to have to use something. As it was the the B-29's "bugs" were sufficiently worked out, although if Air Force historian Col. Walter Boyne is to be believed, and I don't see why not, when all was said and done the Air Force never loved the B-29 the way they loved the B-17.
A few more things...
The "Tsar Bomba." I wonder how many shots of Stoly those Soviet bomber crewmen needed to settle down after THAT mission?
And Hiroshima's "Shadow People." In a way, they were the lucky ones. They never knew what hit them.
With the end a few years away, the Rock Island, always struggling, gave it a good go with a new look. A household name and a sprawling system it was always the underdog and a railfan favourite.
This certainly gave a good impression and at least pointed to a new and hopeful future.
Never really cared too much for this scheme, always found it a bit garish but it was the times and perhaps in scenes such as this it gave a good impression.
I liked it and still do.
But then I also liked the McGinnis New Haven scheme and still do.
But thls variation even better:
I saw one of those sky blue "Rock" boxcars pass through Richmond about two years ago, it looked like it had a skin disease but was still recognizable. Quite a shock to see it though!
And it seemed the New Haven just couldn't settle on a paint scheme once diesels and modern electrics came along, but the thing is they ALL looked good!
Flintlock76but the thing is they ALL looked good!
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4d/New_Haven_Railroad_Daniel_Webster.JPG/800px-New_Haven_Railroad_Daniel_Webster.JPG
Well...that one is certainly questionable.
Yeah it even toured here through Southern Ontario on the CASO but we showed it the door pronto.
I quite like the McGinnis colours, even though I despise the man.
We still have lots of these in revenue service, Illinois Central and/or Grand Trunk Western must have bought a big portion of Rock Island's grain car fleet after the final bankruptcy. The (very faded) logos and lettering are still readable on many of them.
Greetings from Alberta
-an Articulate Malcontent
OvermodAre you sure you want to say ALL?
Uh, yeah, I see what you mean. I wasn't aware the "Daniel Webster" even existed. Well, it's a wasted day if you don't learn something new. Man, that thing's really ugly!
Oh well, even Babe Ruth didn't hit a home run every time at bat.
SD70DudeI quite like the McGinnis colors, even though I despise the man.
As I have noted before, he went through an AWFUL lot of duds before arriving at the rather delightful elements in the final designs (which play around with the colors depending on locomotive type). See the YouTube video, but keep aspirin and Dramamine near.
https://vimeo.com/57203024
I am not as certain that I like his version for B&M nearly as much...
SD70Dude I quite like the McGinnis colours, even though I despise the man. We still have lots of these in revenue service, Illinois Central and/or Grand Trunk Western must have bought a big portion of Rock Island's grain car fleet after the final bankruptcy. The (very faded) logos and lettering are still readable on many of them.
Many of them went to the CNW and to the SSW. Of those, most now have been sold off to other owners. The last ones arrived on the RI in '78/79. Time is ticking away for them.
Jeff
jeffhergert Time is ticking away for them. Jeff
Time is ticking away for them.
Yes indeed, besides the 40 and 50 year age limitations CN now has a total of 2500 new high-capacity grain cars either in service or on order (all from National Steel Car in Hamilton, ON). A number of prominent grain shippers out here have also acquired their own fleets over the past few years.
The ex-Rock Island cars are only a small minority of the soon to be retired fleet, there are still hundreds if not thousands of cylindrical four bay hoppers still in service out here, these being the former Canadian Wheat Board and Provincial government fleets, nicknamed 'Trudeau Hoppers' after the Prime Minister who bought them. They have been a everyday sight across the Canadian prairies for decades, having replaced the previously ubiquitous 40' boxcar in grain service.
And yes, despite being modern compared to F-units or steam this iconic Canadian car design is very worthy of preservation. That's all I can say for now.
Alberta.... boring!
I was hoping you would find that one, I'd probably get banned again for posting it.
If anyone asks, they are all painted like that (we're very open-minded up here)
Without the winter. Still quite nice.
Miningman Alberta.... boring!
Now, this is really boring:
Jones 3D Modeling Club https://www.youtube.com/Jones3DModelingClub
Indeed! Good one.
I regret to say it took me a while to figure it out.
Over on Trains some folks were discussing the blandness of Amtrak decor versus the fabulous themes in passenger cars post WWII.
For a while though Amtrak gave it a go, perhaps influenced by all the equipment they inherited and tradition.
And also in other ways.
One of the things I did was a proposal for Amtrak dining cars in the great age of purple in Amtrak and AutoTrain decor. This had tables with the appearance of inlaid marquetry and 'bar finish' clear epoxy for durability, and 'nonwoven' tablecloths and napkins that could be washed but just as easily 'recycled' if badly stained ... or stolen for souvenirs. After eating hours the tables folded down against the walls and the car became a disco with a full light show and sound system built into the channels in the overhead.
Hokey perhaps but it would have been fun, especially with the car attendants in hot pants...
Certainly far better and classier than WAP!
Mamma mia!
As a rule I have no use for "tagging" but after seeing that I'll have to rethink things a bit.
It couldn't have come out of the car shop like that, could it?
Wish to second the throughts expressed by others about the Danial Webster paint scheme being an exception ot oterwise good designs.
My son and I were just out Thursday afternoon train watching along NS north of Duncannon PA @ about MP 125. Did not even turn into our spot when a train comes along of covered hoppers. Gray hopper after gray hopper goes by but near the end another strange color is seen. On this poor faded car it said ROUTE ROCK. I was so shocked to see it I did not get the new owners markings! But, they are still out there!
GEOFF
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter